Article published in:
Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing
Edited by Heidi Byrnes and Rosa M. Manchón
[Task-Based Language Teaching 7] 2014
► pp. 193216
References
Adams R
(2006) L2 tasks and orientation to form: A role for modality? ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15, 7–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L
(2008) Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral–literate connection (pp. 243–266). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Andringa S.J., de Glopper C.M, & Hacquebord, H.I
(2011) The effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance. Language Learning, 61, 868–903. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Albert, A
(2007) Creativity and task performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
Bachman, L
(1990)  Fundamental considerations in language testing . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A
(1996)  Language testing in practice . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D
(1988)  Variation across speech and writing . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S
(2009)  Register, genre, and style . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V (
2005) Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed). Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H.H., & Norris, J.M
(2010) Realizing advanced FL writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94 (Supplement s-1).Google Scholar
Cameron, C., Lee, K., Webster, S., Munro, K., Hunt, A., & Linton, M
(1995) Text cohesion in children’s narrative writing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 257–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M
(1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S
(1997) Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in communicative language teaching? TESOL Quarterly, 31, 141–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.L
(1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B
(2008)  School discourse. Learning to write across the years of schooling . London: Continuum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J
(1988)  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coxhead, A
(1998)  An academic word list (ELI Occasional Publications, Vol. 18). Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
(2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dasinger, L., & Toupin, C
(1994) The development of relative clause functions in narrative. In R. Berman & D.I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in a narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 452–514). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
de Bot, K
(1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt's 'speaking' model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deerwester, S.S., Dumais, T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., & Harshman, R
(1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R
(1987) Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003)  Task-based language learning and teaching . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F
(2004) The effects of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 59–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P
(1998) A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R.B
(1996)  Theory and practice of writing . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Granfeldt, J
(2008) Speaking and writing in L2 French: Exploring effects on fluency, accuracy and complexity. In A. Housen, S. van Daele, & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching . Brussels, March 29–30, 2007.
Halliday, M.A.K
(2002) On spoken and written modes of meaning. In J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar (pp. 323–351). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R
(1976)  Cohesion in English . London: Longman. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heatley, A., Nation, I.S.P., & Coxhead, A
Ishikawa, T
(2006) The effect of manipulating task complexity along the ( ± Here-and-Now) dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136–156). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S
(2002) Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 57–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.T
(1996) A model of working memory in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W
(1998)  Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A
(1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J
(2011) Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 148–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A
(2012) The role of task complexity, modality and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62, 439–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I
(2008) Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 48–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Task performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T
(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T
(2008)  A synthesis of research on second language writing . London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W
(1989)  Speaking: From intention to articulation . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M.M
(2002) An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 15–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malvern, D.D., & Richards, B.J
(1997) A new measure of lexical diversity. In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving models of language . Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Manchón, R.M, & Roca de Larios, J
(2007) Writing-to-learn in instructed language contexts. In E. Alcón & P. Safont (Eds.), The intercultural speaker. Using and acquiring English in instructed language contexts (pp. 101–121). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R.M., & Roca de Larios, J
(2011) Writing to learn FL contexts: Exploring learners’ perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 181–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R.M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L
(2009) The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes: Implications for theory. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102–129). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McCarthy, P.M., & Jarvis, S
(2007) A theoretical and empirical evaluation of vocd . Language Testing. 24, 459–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P.M., & Jarvis, S.A
(2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behaviour Research Methods, 42, 381–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., & Graesser, A.C
(2002)  Coh-Metrix: Automated Cohesion and Coherence Scores to Predict Text Readability and Facilitate Comprehension . Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
Niu, R
(2009) Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18, 384–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ong, J., & Zhang, L.J
(2010) Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 219–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(2012) Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing–SLA interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 404–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, G
(2009) CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30, 590–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T
(1984) Methods of morpheme quantification: their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 69–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M
(1998) Developmental dynamics in L1 and L2 acquisition. Processability theory and generative entrenchment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D., & Tolchinsky, L
(2002)  Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model . Journal of Child Language, 29, 419–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The Cognition Hypothesis of adult, task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45–107.Google Scholar
(2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M
(2008)  Tasks in second language learning . Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T.J.M., Spooren, W.P.M., & Noordman, L.G.M
(1992) Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & van Gelderen, A
(2009) Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts. Learning, teaching and research (pp. 77–101). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Skehan, P
(2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.I
(1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking to speaking”. In J.J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Languaging, agency, and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tannen, D
(1982)  Spoken and written language. Exploring orality and literacy . Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W
(1983)  Strategies of discourse comprehension . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
West, M
(1953)  A general service list of English words . London: Longman.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R
(2003) Processes of conceptualization in language production. Linguistics, 41, 851–881. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J
(2012) The potential role (s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.A., & Radvansky, G.A
(1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Abrams, Zsuzsanna
2016. Exploring collaboratively written L2 texts among first-year learners of German in Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29:8  pp. 1259 ff. Crossref logo
Allaw, Elissa
2021. A learner corpus analysis: Effects of task complexity, task type, and L1 & L2 similarity on propositional and linguistic complexity . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4  pp. 569 ff. Crossref logo
Amiryousefi, Mohammad
2016. The differential effects of two types of task repetition on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency in computer-mediated L2 written production: a focus on computer anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29:5  pp. 1052 ff. Crossref logo
HWANG, HAERIM, HYEYOUNG JUNG & HYUNWOO KIM
2020. Effects of Written Versus Spoken Production Modalities on Syntactic Complexity Measures in Beginning‐Level Child EFL Learners. The Modern Language Journal 104:1  pp. 267 ff. Crossref logo
Kang, Dae-Min
2020. A native-like adult L2 Korean learner’s agentive acquisition of Korean relative clauses. International Journal of Bilingualism 24:5-6  pp. 1017 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Hyunwoo & Haerim Hwang
2022. Assessing Verb‐Construction Integration in Young Learners of English as a Foreign Language: Analyses of Written and Spoken Production. Language Learning 72:2  pp. 497 ff. Crossref logo
Lázaro-Ibarrola, Amparo & María Ángeles Hidalgo
2021. Give me a second chance. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2  pp. 275 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz-Funes, Marcela
2015. Exploring the potential of second/foreign language writing for language learning: The effects of task factors and learner variables. Journal of Second Language Writing 28  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Ju, Qiyu Sun & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2021. Effects of manipulating writing task complexity on learners’ performance in completing vocabulary and syntactic tasks. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882110243 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Xiaopeng, Baoshan Zhao & Wenwen Li
2021.  N-gram use in EFL learners’ retelling and monologic tasks. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 june 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.