Article published in:
Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing
Edited by Heidi Byrnes and Rosa M. Manchón
[Task-Based Language Teaching 7] 2014
► pp. 217236
References
Allan, D
(1992) Oxford Placement Test 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P
(1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Donato, R
(2000) Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(1987) Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003)  Task-based language learning and teaching . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F
(2005) The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flower, L.S., & Hayes, J.R
(1980) The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L.W. Gregg & E.R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Foster, P
(2001) Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 75–95). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performances. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P
(2009) Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency and lexical diversity. Language Learning, 59, 866–896. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R
(2007) Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 production. IRAL, 45, 215–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T
(2006) The effects of manipulating task complexity along the ( ± Here-and-Now) dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In C.M. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136–156). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.T
(1996) A model of working memory in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Randsell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kormos, J
(2005)  Speech production and second language acquisition . London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 215–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A
(2012) The role of task complexity, modality and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62, 439–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I
(2007) Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. IRAL, 45, 261–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W
(1989)  Speaking: From intention to articulation . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, B.A
(1986) Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, D
(1989)  Designing communicative tasks for language classrooms . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, J., & Zhang, L
(2010) Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students' argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 218–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F
(1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: native-like selection and native-like fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). London, Longman.Google Scholar
Platt, E., & Brooks, F
(1994) The “acquisition-rich environment” revisited. Modern Language Journal, 78, 497–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rahimpour, M
(1997) Task condition, task complexity and variation in oral L2 discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Robinson, P
(1995) Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects of L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task complexity. IRAL, 45, 193–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011)  Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R., Murphy, L., & Marín, J
(2008) The foreign language writer's strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 30–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(1998)  A cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P
(2009a) Assessing L2 task performance: Understanding the effects of task design. System, 37, 482–495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Learner and teacher perceptions of task complexity. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P
(2008) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58, 439–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P
(2005) Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–277). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud
2020. Differential Effects of Strategic Planning and Task Structure on L2 Writing Outcomes. Reading & Writing Quarterly 36:4  pp. 320 ff. Crossref logo
Allaw, Elissa
2021. A learner corpus analysis: Effects of task complexity, task type, and L1 & L2 similarity on propositional and linguistic complexity . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4  pp. 569 ff. Crossref logo
Amiryousefi, Mohammad
2016. The differential effects of two types of task repetition on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency in computer-mediated L2 written production: a focus on computer anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29:5  pp. 1052 ff. Crossref logo
Gomez Laich, Maria Pia & Naoko Taguchi
2021. Effects of task complexity on the learning of genre specific rhetorical moves and linguistic forms: the case of contrast and argumentative essays. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Rahimi, Muhammad
2019. Effects of increasing the degree of reasoning and the number of elements on L2 argumentative writing. Language Teaching Research 23:5  pp. 633 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 june 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.