Cover not available
Part of
Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 8] 2015
► pp. 27–58

Thinking and acting programmatically in taskbased language teaching

Essential roles for program evaluation

| Georgetown University

Inquiry may play distinct roles in proposals for and practices of task-based language teaching (TBLT), from theorizing learning and developing taskbased pedagogy, to observing and judging the effectiveness of task-based ideas in practice, to ultimately understanding the value of TBLT as an approach to educational reform. In this paper, considering these diverse possibilities for inquiry in TBLT, I first reflect on the origins and practical impact of task-based ideas, highlighting their programmatic and educational scope. I then point to the lack of alignment between this programmatic orientation and prevailing emphases in much of the existing TBLT research. In response, I suggest that pragmatic traditions of program evaluation enable the critical articulation of inquiry with real needs of real educators to do real educational good in real program contexts. By examining published cases of TBLT program evaluation, I identify the ways in which they have contributed to both practical decision making in situ and to the accumulation of improved understandings about taskbased language education in general. I conclude with recommendations for the integration of program evaluation as a key development in advancing the value of TBLT endeavors.

Published online: 5 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.02nor
References
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL)
(2002) ACTFL/NCATE program standards for the preparation of foreign language teachers. Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Al-Dabbagh, S.A., & Al-Taee, W.G
(2005) Evaluation of a task-based community oriented teaching model in family medicine for undergraduate medical students in Iraq. BMC Medical Education, 5(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beretta, A
(1986b) Program-fair language teaching evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 431–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990a) Implementation of the Bangalore Project. Applied Linguistics, 11, 321–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) What can be learned from the Bangalore evaluation? In J.C. Alderson & A. Beretta (Eds.), Evaluating second language education (pp. 250–273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beretta, A., & Davies, A
(1985) Evaluation of the Bangalore project. ELT journal, 39(2), 121–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J.S
(1961) The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.Google Scholar
Candlin, C
(1987) Towards task-based language learning. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 5–22). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Carless, D
(1998) A case study of curriculum implementation in Hong Kong. System, 26(3), 353–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31, 485–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Center for Canadian Language Benchmarks
(2012) Canadian language benchmarks: English as a second language for adults. Ottawa: Author.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L.J., & Associates
(1980) Toward reform of program evaluation. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L.J., & Suppes, P
(Eds.) (1969) Research for tomorrow's schools: Disciplined inquiry for education. London, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dewey, J
(1933) How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
(1938) Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Educational Testing Service
(2009) Scores you can trust. Accessed May 10, 2015 from [URL]
Ellis, R
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(1999) The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 215–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R
(2007) The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and [+/-Here-and-Now]: Effects on L2 oral production. In M. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 44–68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K.B
(2014) Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Y.Z., & Tschudi, S
(2008) A utilization-focused approach to the evaluation of a web-based hybrid conversational Mandarin program in a North American university. Teaching English in China: CELEA Journal, 31(5), 37–54.Google Scholar
James, W
(1899/1958) Talks to teachers. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
José de la Fuente, M., Martín Peris, E., & Sans Baulenas, N
(2011) Gente (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Kolb, D
(1984) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lai, C., Zhao, Y., & Wong, J
(2011) Task-based language teaching in online ab initio foreign language classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 95(s), 81–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M.H., & Crookes, G
(1993) Units of analysis in syllabus design—The case for task. In G. Crookes & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Long, M.H., & Norris, J.M
(2000) Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597–603). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Markee, N
(1996) Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W
(2007) Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mori, J
(2002) Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied linguistics, 23(3), 323–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M
(2006) The why (and how) of assessing student foreign language programs. Modern Language Journal, 90, 590–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Task-based teaching and testing. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Cambridge: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Language program evaluation. Modern Language Journal, 100(s).Google Scholar
Norris, J.M., Brown, J.D., Hudson, T.D., & Bonk, W
(2002) Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based L2 performance assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 395–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patton, M.Q
(2008) Utilization-focused evaluation, (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S
(1878/1992) How to make our ideas clear. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce, Vol.1 (pp. 124–141). Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N.S
(1987) Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, W.J
(1997) Research on task-centered practice. Social Work Research, 21(3), 132–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, W.J., & Fortune, A.E
(2004) Task-centered practice: An exemplar of evidence-based practice. In A. Roberts & K. Yeager (Eds.), Evidence-based practice manual: Research and outcome measures in health and human services (pp. 226–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M
(2008) Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Sasayama, S., Malicka, A., & Norris, J.M
(2014) Cognitive task complexity in TBLT research and beyond: A research synthesis. Presentation at the 50th International Association of Applied Linguistics (AILA) conference, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P
(2005) “Task” as research construct. Language Learning, 55(3), 533–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N
(2011) A comparative study of the effects of input-based and production-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition by young EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 15, 137–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) The effect of focus on form and focus on forms instruction on the acquisition of productive knowledge of L2 vocabulary by young beginner learners. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 36–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(Ed.) (2014) Investigating a processing perspective on task performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slimani-Rolls, A
(2005) Rethinking task-based language learning: What we can learn from the learners. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 195–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steffe, L.P., & Gale, J.E
(Eds.) (1995) Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R.J
(2003) What is an ‘expert student?’. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 5–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R.J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E
(1998a) Teaching for successful intelligence raises school achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 667–669.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R.J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E.L
(1998b) Teaching triarchically improves school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swan, M
(2005) Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towell, R., & Tomlinson, P
(1999) Language curriculum development research at university level. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, R.W
(1949) Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K
(Ed.) (2006a) Task-based language teaching in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Training teachers: Task-based as well? In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language teaching in practice (pp. 217–273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J.V
(1995) Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 159–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A.N
(1916) The aims of education. Presidential address to the Mathematical Association of England, London, UK.Google Scholar
(1929) The aims of education and other essays. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G
(1998) Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G.P., & McTighe, J
(1998) Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Zhang, E
(2007) TBLT innovation in primary school English language teaching in mainland China. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 68–91). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 20 other publications

Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Bryfonski, Lara & Todd H. McKay
2019. TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research 23:5 ► pp. 603 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2019. Affirming the context of instructed SLA: The potential of curricular thinking. Language Teaching Research 23:4 ► pp. 514 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2020. Chapter 10. Envisioning L2 writing development in CDST under a curricular optic. In Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 54], ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2022. Heidi Byrnes's essential bookshelf: Curriculum. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dunn, William, Xavier Gutiérrez & Leila Ranta
2023. Teacher Leadership as the Missing Link Between TBLT Research and Pedagogical Practice. In Language Teacher Leadership [New Language Learning and Teaching Environments, ], ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
East, Martin
2022. Mediating Innovation through Language Teacher Education, DOI logo
Ellis, Rod, Peter Skehan, Shaofeng Li, Natsuko Shintani & Craig Lambert
2019. Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Fu, Ying
2022. EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Regarding Task-based Language Teaching in the Asian Context. International Journal of Education and Humanities 5:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hasnain, Shazia & Santoshi Halder
2023. Exploring the impediments for successful implementation of the task-based language teaching approach: a review of studies on teachers’ perceptions. The Language Learning Journal 51:2 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Jackson, Daniel O.
2022. Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Kim, Youjin, Yeonjoo Jung & Nicole Tracy‐Ventura
2017. Implementation of a Localized Task‐Based Course in an EFL Context: A Study of Students’ Evolving Perceptions. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 632 ff. DOI logo
M. Norris, John & John McE. Davis
2021. Evaluating Task-Based Language Programs. In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 529 ff. DOI logo
Mochizuki, Naoko
2017. Contingent Needs Analysis for Task Implementation: An Activity Systems Analysis of Group Writing Conferences. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 607 ff. DOI logo
Norris, John M.
2021. The Long road to TBLT. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:2 ► pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Samuda, Virginia & Martin Bygate
2021. Exploring the Nuts and Bolts of Task Design. In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Samuda, Virginia, Martin Bygate & Kris Van den Branden
2018. Introduction. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Sasayama, Shoko
2021. Why Task? Task as a Unit of Analysis for Language Education. In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko & YouJin Kim
2018. Chapter 1. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. In Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics [Task-Based Language Teaching, 10], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Van den Branden, Kris
2016. The Role of Teachers in Task-Based Language Education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.