Batstone, R
(2012) Language form, task-based language teaching, and the classroom context. ELT Journal Volume, 66, 459–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batstone, R., & Philp, J
(2013) Classroom interaction and learning across time and space. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 109–125). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breen, M
(1985) The social context for language learning—a neglected situation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 135–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987) Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks ( Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education , Vol. 7) (pp. 23–46). London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Brooks, L., & Swain, M
(2009) Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on inter- action: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58–89). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burrows, C
(2008) An evaluation of task-based learning in the Japanese classroom. English Today, 24(4), 11–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y
(2004) What level English proficiency do elementary school teachers need to attain to teach EFL? Case studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 245–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y., & Lee, J
(2009) On-task versus off-task self-assessments among Korean elementary school students studying English. Modern Language Journal, 90, 506–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carless, D
(2002) Implementing task-based learning with young learners. English Language Teaching Journal, 56, 389–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31, 485–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Student use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom. ELT Journal, 62, 331–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, L
(2010) Group processes and EFL learners’ motivation: A study of group dynamics in EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 129–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., & Goh, C
(2011) Teaching oral English in higher education: Challenges to EFL teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 333–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colby-Kelly, C., & Turner, C
(2007) AFL research in the L2 classroom and evidence of usefulness: Taking formative assessment to the next level. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 9–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saint Léger, D
(2009) Self-assessment of speaking skills and participation in a foreign language class. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 158–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
East, M
(2012) Addressing the intercultural via task-based language teaching: Possibility or problem? Language and Intercultural Communication, 12(1), 56–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eguchi, M., & Eguchi, K
(2006) The limited effect of PBL on EFL Learners: A case study of English magazine projects. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 207–225.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(2003) Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2005) Planning in task-based performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, A., & Mackey, A
(2009) Interactional feedback in learner-learner interactions in a task-based EFL classroom. IRAL, 47, 267–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, A., Ziegler, N., & Mackey, A
in press). Peer interaction and metacognitive instruction in the EFL classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.) Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda Amsterdam John Benjamins
Fushino, K
(2010) Causal relationships between communication confidence, beliefs about group work, and willingness to communicate in foreign language group work. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 700–724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R., & Barón, J
(2013) The impact of increasing task complexity on L2 pragmatic moves. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 45–69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guk, I., & Kellogg, D
(2007) The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11, 281–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hui, L
(1997) New bottles, old wine: Communicative language teaching in China. Forum, 35(4), 38–44.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J., Young, R., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N., Lantolf, J., Mackey, A., & Talmy, S
(2014) Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Published online first 12 March 2014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeon, I.J
(2006) EFL teachers’ perception of task-based language teaching: With a focus on Korean secondary classroom practice. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 192–206.Google Scholar
Kawauchi, C
(2005) The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y
(2008) The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92, 114–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Task complexity, learning opportunities, and Korean EFL learners’ question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 627–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Effects of pretask modeling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 8–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K
(2008) The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Using pre-task modeling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15,183–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N
(2011) Task complexity, language anxiety and the development of past tense. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 287–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, C., Zhao, Y., & Wang, J
(2011) Task-based language teaching in online ab initio foreign language classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 95, 81–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasito, & Storch, N
(2013) Comparing pair and small group interactions on oral tasks. RELC Journal, 44, 361–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, I
(2007) Assessment for learning: Integrating assessment, teaching, and learning in the ESL/EFL writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 199–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M.J
(2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, D
(1998) It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 677–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Z
(2013) Capitalising on learner agency and group work in learning writing in English as a Foreign Language. TESOL Journal, 44, 633–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, D
(2007) Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M
(2000) Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M., & Robinson, P
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research, practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Fujii, A., Biesenbach-Lucas, S., Weger, H., Dolgova Jacobsen, N., Fogle, L., Lake, J., Sondermann, K., Tagarelli, K., Tsujita, M., Watanabe, A., Abbuhl, R., & Kim, K
(2013) Tasks and traditional practice activities in a foreign language classroom context. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 71–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., McDonough, K., Fujii, A. & Tatsumi, T
(2001) Learners’ reports about the L2 classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 285–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K
(2004) Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W
(2007) Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 107–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Collaborative syntactic priming activities and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 817–841. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., Crawford, W., & De Vleeschauwer, J
in press). Thai EFL learners’ interaction during collaborative writing tasks and its relationship to text quality. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.) Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda Amsterdam John Benjamins
McDonough, K., Crawford, W., & Mackey, A
(2015) Creativity and EFL learners’ language use during a group decision-making task. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 188–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Sunitham, W
(2009) Collaborative dialogue between Thai EFL learners during self-access computer activities. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 231–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L
(2008) Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakatani, Y
(2010) Identifying strategies that facilitate EFL learners’ oral communication: A classroom study using multiple data collection procedures. Modern Language Journal, 94, 116–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neumann, H., & McDonough, K
(2014) Exploring the relationships among student preferences, prewriting tasks, and text quality in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 14–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing,27, 84–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishino, T
(2008) Japanese secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding communicative language teaching: An exploratory survey. JALT Journal, 30, 27–51.Google Scholar
Park, S
(2010) The influence of pretask instructions and pretask planning on focus on form during Korean EFL task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 14, 9–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patanasorn, C
(2010) Effects of procedural, content and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context. PhD dissertation. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Peng, J
(2012) Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40, 2013–2013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peng, J., & Woodrow, L
(2010) Willingness to communicate in English: A Model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60, 834–876. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., & A. Mackey
(2010) Interaction research: what can socially informed approaches offer to cognitivists (and vice versa)? In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp.210–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plakans, L
(2009) The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 252–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plakans, L., & Gebril, A
(2012) A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 17, 18–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rao, Z
(2002) Chinese students’ perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. System, 30, 85–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, S
(2005) The impact of assessment method on foreign language proficiency growth. Applied Linguistics, 26, 317–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sakui, K
(2004) Wearing two pairs of shoes: Language teaching in Japan. ELT Journal, 58 (2), 155–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V
(2001) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 119–140). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Sanguran, J
(2005) The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 111–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M
(2013) Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 611–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S
(2012) Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-method examination. Language Awareness, 21, 157–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Lyster, R
(2012) Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 591–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P
(1999) Task-based interaction. ELT Journal, 53, 149–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shehadeh, A
(2011) Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 286–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, L
(1998) Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students' compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 319–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(1996) A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P
(1993) Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N
(2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pairwork. Language Learning, 52, 119–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M
(1993) The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158–164.Google Scholar
(1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 99–118). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Takimoto, M
(2012) Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1240–1253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y
in review). Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatic- related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics.
Tsui, A
(1996) Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 145–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J
(Eds.) (2009) Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M
(2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson-Todd, R
(2006) Continuing change after the innovation. System, 34, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, J
(2004) Perspectives on task-based instruction: Understanding our practices, acknowledging different practitioners. In B. Leaver & J. Willis (Eds.), Task-based instruction in foreign language education (pp. 3–44). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wiriyakarun, P
(2001) Student-centered evaluation of the curriculum. In R. Watson-Todd (Ed.), Task-based learning and curriculum innovation seminar proceedings (pp. 58–62). Bangkok: King Mongkut’s University of Technology.Google Scholar
Yashima, T
(2002) Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 54–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R
(2003) The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yule, G., & Macdonald, D
(1990) Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interaction role. Language Learning, 40, 539–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, E.Y
(2007) TBLT innovation in primary school English language teaching in mainland China. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 68–91). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Ziegler, N., & Moeller, A
(2012) Increasing self-regulated learning through the LinguaFolio. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 330–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Ahmadian, Mohammad J. & Michael H. Long
2021. Conclusion. In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching,  pp. 671 ff. DOI logo
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Chen, Tzu-Hua
2023. Dynamic fluctuations in foreign language enjoyment during cognitively simple and complex interactive speaking tasks. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13:3  pp. 627 ff. DOI logo
Chu, Xixi
2022. The Practice of TBLT in Teaching Oral Language in Asian Primary Schools. In Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2022) [Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 687],  pp. 1802 ff. DOI logo
Dunn, William, Xavier Gutiérrez & Leila Ranta
2023. Teacher Leadership as the Missing Link Between TBLT Research and Pedagogical Practice. In Language Teacher Leadership [New Language Learning and Teaching Environments, ],  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
East, Martin
2024. Taking communication to task once more – a further decade on. The Language Learning Journal  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Han, ZhaoHong
2018. Task-Based Learning in Task-Based Teaching: Training Teachers of Chinese as a Foreign Language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 38  pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Jackson, Daniel O.
2022. Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Kim, Youjin, Yeonjoo Jung & Nicole Tracy‐Ventura
2017. Implementation of a Localized Task‐Based Course in an EFL Context: A Study of Students’ Evolving Perceptions. TESOL Quarterly 51:3  pp. 632 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Isidora Angulo
2020. Chapter 2. The role of L1 use by high-proficiency learners in L2 vocabulary development. In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55],  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2019. Do teachers care about research? The research–pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal 73:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2019. Chapter 3. Methodological strengths, challenges, and joys of classroom-based quasi-experimental research. In Doing SLA Research with Implications for the Classroom [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 52],  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2022. The Research–Practice Dialogue in Second Language Learning and Teaching: Past, Present, and Future. The Modern Language Journal 106:3  pp. 509 ff. DOI logo
Storch, Neomy & Masatoshi Sato
2020. Comparing the Same Task in ESL vs. EFL Learning Contexts: An Activity Theory Perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Van den Branden, Kris
2016. The Role of Teachers in Task-Based Language Education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36  pp. 164 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.