Article published in:
Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 8] 2015
► pp. 271–302

Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces

| Freelance
This chapter focuses on teachers’ uses of pedagogical tasks in the classroom. It has long been recognised that the task-as-workplan inevitably changes once in process in the classroom (Breen, 1987). However, since relatively little empirical attention has been given to tasks in action in the classroom, we know remarkably little about how far workplans actually do change, and in what ways. This chapter highlights the role played by the teacher, intentionally and unintentionally, in making adjustments to the workplan prospectively in pre-lesson planning and dynamically while implementing the task in the classroom. To this end, I propose conceptualising the task as a succession of workplans, open to change at different phases of classroom use, and outline a framework for tracing those changes as the task unfolds in process. In the second part of the chapter, I apply this framework to the analysis of two teachers working with the same task. Drawing on teacher interviews, classroom transcripts and stimulated recalls, I show how one teacher appears to successively ‘re-task’ the original workplan, while the other appears to unintentionally de-task it, and track the cumulative impacts of each change on the opportunities for language use created. I conclude the chapter with a brief consideration of how insights from a multidimensional approach to the workplan, such as the one proposed here, could be drawn on to support beginning teachers or those transitioning to TBLT.
Published online: 05 November 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.10sam
References
Andon, N
to appear). Exploring TBLT in optimal conditions. In M. Bygate, V. Samuda & K. Van den Branden (Eds.) TBLT as a researched pedagogy Amsterdam John Benjamins
Andon, N., & Eckerth, J
(2009) Chacun à son gout? Task-based pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 286–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berben, M., Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K
(2007) ‘We’ll see what happens’: Tasks on paper and tasks in a multilingual classroom. In K. Van den Branden & M. Verhelst (Eds), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 32–67). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M
(1993) Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publications.Google Scholar
Breen, M.P
(1987) Learner contributions to task design. In C.N. Candlin & D.F. Murphy (Eds.). Language learning tasks ( Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education , Vol.7) (pp.23–46). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Breen, M.P., & Candlin, C.N
(1980) The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 89–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M
(2000) Introduction to special issue: ‘Tasks in language pedagogy’. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 185−192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Patterning and unpredictability in the task-in-process: A dynamic systems theory approach. In M. Derivry-Plard, C. Brudermann, & P. Faure (Eds). Apprendre les langues dans l'enseignement supérieur au 21ème siècle (pp.135–163). Paris: Riveneuve.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H
(2015) Linking ‘task’ and curricular thinking: An affirmation of the TBLT educational agenda. In M. Bygate. (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carless, D
(2003) Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31(4), 485–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Issues in teachers’ re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639−662. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G
(2000) Language play and language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P
(1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulson, D
(2005) Collaborative tasks for cross-cultural communication. In C. Edwards & J. Willis. (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks. (pp. 127–138). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dam, L., & Gabrielsen, G
(1988) Developing learner autonomy in a school context: A six-year experiment beginning in the learners’ first year of English. In H. Holec, (Ed.), Autonomy and self-directed learning: Fields of application (pp. 19−30). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Donato, R
(2000) Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27−50). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Duff, P
(1986) Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R.R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 147–181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1993) Tasks and interlanguage performance: An SLA research perspective. In G. Crookes & S.M. Gass. (Eds), Tasks and language learning (pp. 57−95). Clevedon: Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
East, M
(2012) Task-based learning from the teachers’ perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C., & Willis, J
Teachers exploring tasks. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan
Ellis, R
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Teachers evaluating tasks. In M. Bygate. (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R
(2015) ‘I’m still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language tasks. Language Teaching Research. Published online before print January 20, 2015, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299−323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S
(1997) Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Johnson, K
(1996) Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2003) Designing language teaching tasks. Houndmills: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Kohonen, V
(2001) Towards experiential foreign language education. In V. Kohonen, R. Jaatinen, P. Kaikkonen, & J. Lehtovaara (Eds.), Experiential learning in foreign language education (pp. 8−60). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C
(2005) Post 9/11: Foreign languages between knowledge and power. Applied Linguistics, 26, 545–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J.P
(2000) Introducing sociocultural theory. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp.1−26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W
(2007) Communicative and task-based learning in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H
(1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp.77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Long, M.H., & Crookes, G
(1993) Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context (pp. 9−54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Legutke, M., & Thomas, H
(1991) Process and experience in the language classroom. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackey, A
(1999) Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557−589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mcdonough, K
(2015) Perceived benefits and challenges with the use of collaborative tasks in EFL contexts. In M. Bygate. (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mohan. B
(1986) Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Mori, J
(2002) Task design, plan and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23, 323–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muller, T
(2005) Adding tasks to textbooks for beginner learners. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds), Teachers exploring tasks (pp. 69−77). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A., & Schocker-von-Dittfurth, M
(2011) Teaching English: Task-supported language learning. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Newton, J., Crabbe, D., & Trang Thi Nguyen, B
to appear). Teacher transformation of oral textbook tasks in Vietnamese EFL high school classrooms. In M. Bygate, V. Samuda, & K. Van den Branden (Eds.) TBLT as a researched pedagogy Amsterdam John Benjamins
Norris, J
(2009) Task-based teaching and testing. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds), Handbook of second and foreign language teaching (pp. 578- 594). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ormerod, T.C., & Ridgway, J
(1999) Developing task design guides through cognitive studies of expertise. In S. Bagnara (Ed.), European Conference on Cognitive Science (ECCS99) (pp. 401–410). Sienna, Italy.Google Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J
(1993) Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pullin Stark, P
(2005) Integrating task-based instruction into a business English programme. In C. Edwards & J. Willis, Teachers exploring tasks (pp. 40−49). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Richards, J.C
(2005) Communicative language teaching today (RELC Portfolio Series 13). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.Google Scholar
Riggenbach, H
(1999) Discourse analysis in the language classroom: The spoken language. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task productions: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M.P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7–26). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2015) The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Samuda, V
(2001) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: the role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–140). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
(2005) Expertise in second language pedagogic task design. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in language teaching (pp. 230–254). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M
(2008) Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P
(2005) ‘Task’ as research construct. Language Learning, 55(3), 533−570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, A.H
(1985) Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A
(2003) Learner output, hypothesis testing, and internalizing linguistic knowledge. System, 31(2), 155–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Task-based language learning and teaching: Theories and applications. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks (pp.13−30). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A., & Coombe, C.A
(Eds.) (2012) Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2015) Limited attention capacity and cognition: Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on tasks. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language teaching research 1(3): 185−211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning 49(1): 93−120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193−216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slimani-Rolls, A
(2005) Practitioner research: Rethinking task-based language learning: What we can learn from the learners. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 195−218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R.J., Forsythe, G.B, Hedlund, J., Horvath, J., Wagner, R., Williams, W., Snook, S., & Grigorenko, E
(2000) Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swan, M
(2005) Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26, 376−401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Van Avermaet, P., Colpin, M., Van Gorp, K., Bogaert, N., & Van den Branden, K
(2006) The role of the teacher in TBLT. In K. Van den Branden (ed.), Task-based language teaching: From theory to practice (pp. 175–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K
(Ed.) 2006 Task-based language teaching: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Mediating between predetermined order and complete chaos: The role of the teacher in task-based language education. IJAL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 264–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Task-based language education: From theory to practice… and back again. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Lier, L
(1996) Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Willis, J
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Willis, D. & Willis, J
(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 24 other publications

No author info given
2022.  In How to Teach an Additional Language [Task-Based Language Teaching, 15], Crossref logo
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, Crossref logo
Andon, Nick
2018.  In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 132 ff. Crossref logo
Andon, Nick, Martin Dewey & Constant Leung
2018.  In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 236 ff. Crossref logo
Baralt, Melissa
2018.  In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 266 ff. Crossref logo
Baralt, Melissa, Wang Fei, Zhanting Bu, Hao Chen, José Morcillo Gómez & Xunye Luan
2021.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo
Bygate, Martin
2016. TBLT through the lens of applied linguistics. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 167:1 ► pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Ekin, Semih, Ufuk Balaman & Fatma Badem-Korkmaz
2021. Tracking telecollaborative tasks through design, feedback, implementation, and reflection processes in pre-service language teacher education. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0 Crossref logo
Ellis, Rod, Peter Skehan, Shaofeng Li, Natsuko Shintani & Craig Lambert
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, Crossref logo
Han, ZhaoHong
2018. Task-Based Learning in Task-Based Teaching: Training Teachers of Chinese as a Foreign Language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 38 ► pp. 162 ff. Crossref logo
Jackson, Daniel O. & Alfred Rue Burch
2017. Complementary Theoretical Perspectives on Task-Based Classroom Realities. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 493 ff. Crossref logo
Kozlova, Iryna
2021.  In Implementing Augmented Reality Into Immersive Virtual Learning Environments [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Josephine & Alfred Rue Burch
2017. Collaborative Planning in Process: An Ethnomethodological Perspective. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 536 ff. Crossref logo
Long, Michael H.
2016. In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Lynch, Tony
2018.  In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11], ► pp. 193 ff. Crossref logo
Park, Yujong
2021. Task type completion in lower level EFL classes: A conversation analytic study. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882098795 ff. Crossref logo
RO, EUNSEOK
2018. Facilitating an L2 Book Club: A Conversation-Analytic Study of Task Management. The Modern Language Journal 102:1 ► pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Samuda, Virginia & Martin Bygate
2021.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 262 ff. Crossref logo
Samuda, Virginia, Martin Bygate & Kris Van den Branden
2018.  In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Sun, Susan Y. H.
2017. Design for CALL – possible synergies between CALL and design for learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 30:6 ► pp. 575 ff. Crossref logo
Sun, Susan Y. H.
2018. Student configuration and place-making in fully online language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 31:8 ► pp. 932 ff. Crossref logo
Taguchi, Naoko & YouJin Kim
2018.  In Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics [Task-Based Language Teaching, 10], ► pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Van den Branden, Kris
2016. The Role of Teachers in Task-Based Language Education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo
Van den Branden, Kris
2021.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 628 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.