Article published in:
Translation, Cognition & Behavior
Vol. 2:2 (2019) ► pp. 233–239
Thematic section

Introduction

Cognitive processes in dialogue interpreting

| Stockholm University | Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
| Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)
Article outline
  • 1.Cognitive approaches
  • 2.Dialogue interpreting
  • 3.Topics in the thematic section
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 06 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00027.tis
References

References

Albl-Mikasa, Michaela
2016 “Notation Language and Notation Text: A Cognitive-linguistic model of consecutive interpreting.” In Consecutive Notetaking and Interpreter Training. Edited by Y. Someya, 71–117. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2019 “Interpreters’ Roles and Responsibilities.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Language Industry Studies. Edited by E. Angelone, M. Ehrensberger-Dow and G. Massey, (forthcoming). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Albl-Mikasa, Michaela, and Christiane Hohenstein
2017 “Cognition in Community Interpreting: The influence of interpreter’s knowledge of doctor-patient interaction.” In Doing Applied Linguistics—Enabling Transdisciplinary Communication. Edited by D. Perrin and U. Kleinberger, 130–138. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexieva, Bistra
1988 “Analysis of the Simultaneous Interpreter’s Output”. In Translation, our Future: Proceedings of the XIth World Congress of FIT. Edited by P. Nekeman, 484–488. Maastricht: Euroterm.Google Scholar
Arumí Ribas, Marta, and Mireia Vargas Urpi
2017 “Strategies in Public Service Interpreting.” Interpreting 19 (1): 118–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakti, Maria
2009 “Speech Disfluencies in Simultaneous Interpretation”. In Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2008. Edited by D. De Crom. http://​www​.kuleuven​.be​/cetra​/papers​/papers​.html Accessed 15 May 2019.
Barik, Henri
1973 “Simultaneous Interpretation: Temporal and Quantitative Data”. Language and Speech 161: 237–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cecot, Michela
2001 “Pauses in Simultaneous Interpretation: A contrastive analysis of professional interpreters’ performance”. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 111: 63–85.Google Scholar
Christoffels, Ingrid K., Annette M. B. de Groot, and Judith F. Kroll
2006 “Memory and Language Skills in Simultaneous Interpreters: The role of expertise and language proficiency”. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (3): 324–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cokely, Dennis
1992 Interpretation: A Sociolinguistic Model. Burtonsville, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Conseil de l’Europe
n.d. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Accessed 2 November 2018. https://​www​.coe​.int​/en​/web​/portfolio​/the​-common​-european​-framework​-of​-reference​-for​-languages​-learning​-teaching​-assessment​-cefr-
Englund Dimitrova, Birgitta, and Elisabet Tiselius
2016 “Cognitive Aspects of Community Interpreting: Toward a Process Model”. In Reembedding Translation Process Research. Edited by R. Muñoz, 195–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gile, Daniel
2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda
1972 “Segmentation of Input in Simultaneous Interpretation.” Psycholinguistic Research 11: 127–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, Adelina
1999 Discourse processing during simultaneous interpreting: An expertise approach. PhD diss., Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Liu, Minhua
2001 Expertise in Simultaneous Interpreting: A working memory analysis. PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
1995 “Slips and Shifts in Simultaneous Interpreting”. In Topics in Interpreting Research. Edited by J. Tommola, 73–90. Turku: The University of Turku, Centre for Translation and Interpreting.Google Scholar
Padilla Benítez, Presentación, M.ª Teresa Bajo Molina, José J. Cañas, Delgado, and Francisca Padilla Adamuz
1995 “Cognitive processes of memory in simultaneous interpretation.” In Topics in Interpreting Research. Edited by J. Tommola, 61–71. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Pradas Macías, Esperanza M.
2006 “Probing Quality Criteria in Simultaneous Interpreting: The role of silent pauses in fluency”. Interpreting 8 (1): 25–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riccardi, Alessandra
1996 “Language-specific Strategies in Simultaneous Interpreting”. In Teaching Translation and Interpreting 3 New Horizons. Edited by C. Dollerup and V. Appel, 213–222. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Setton, Robin
1999 Simultaneous Interpretation: A Cognitive-pragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stachowiak-Szymczak, Katarzyna
2019 Eye Movements and Gestures in Simultaneous and Consecutive Interpreting. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tiselius, Elisabet
2013 Experience and Expertise in Conference Interpreting: An investigation of Swedish conference interpreters. PhD Diss., the University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Tissi, Benedetta
2000 “Silent Pauses and Disfluencies in Simultaneous Interpretation: A descriptive analysis”. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 101: 103–127.Google Scholar
Vranjes, Jelena, Gert Brône and Kurt Feyaerts
2018 “On the Role of Gaze in the Organization of Turn-taking and Sequence Organization in Interpreter-mediated Dialogue”. Language and Dialogue 8 (3): 439–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Sarah
1995 “Observations on Anomalous Stress in Interpreting”. The Translator 1 (1): 47–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tiselius, Elisabet & Birgitta Englund Dimitrova
2021. Turn-taking in dialogue interpreting. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8:2 ► pp. 328 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 february 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.