Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation, Cognition & Behavior
Vol. 3:2 (2020) ► pp.241–262

The early presence and developmental trend of interpreter advantages in cognitive flexibility

Effects from task differences and L2 proficiency

ORCID logo | Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
ORCID logo | Zhejiang University
Findings about interpreter advantages in cognitive flexibility have been discrepant. To examine whether task differences and interpreters’ L2 proficiency contributed to the discrepancy, we tested two groups of university students (interpreting trainees vs. control participants) with two color-shape switching tasks differing in stimulus valence (univalent vs. bivalent). The results showed that: (1) only the univalent task detected a switch cost advantage for the interpreter group, indicating the task condition for observing interpreting trainees’ early advantage in local switching ability (as indexed by switch cost); (2) only the interpreter group with an advanced L2 proficiency showed a marginally significant mixing cost advantage over the control group, indicating a tendency toward an advantage in more global and sustained control. These findings suggest tentative explanations for the discrepant results in the literature and conditions for the presence and development of interpreter advantages in cognitive flexibility.
Keywords: cognitive flexibility, interpreter advantage, switch cost, mixing cost, stimulus valence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Switch cost or mixing cost advantages
      • Factor 1: Task differences
      • Factor 2: L2 proficiency
    • 1.2The present study
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials and tasks
    • 2.3Procedure
  • 3.Results testing Hypothesis 1
    • 3.1Data trimming
    • 3.2Group matching
    • 3.3Statistical analyses
    • 3.4The univalent task
      • Switch cost
      • Mixing cost
    • 3.5The bivalent task
      • Switch cost
      • Mixing cost
  • 4.Results testing Hypothesis 2
    • Switch cost
    • Mixing cost
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00043.zha
References (44)
References
Abutalebi, J. and D. W. Green. 2016. “Neuroimaging of Language Control in Bilinguals: Neural Adaptation and Reserve.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19 (4): 689–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L. and A. Vallesi. 2017. “Are Simultaneous Interpreters Expert Bilinguals, Unique Bilinguals, or Both?” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20 (2): 403–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L., M. Capizzi, S. Arbula and A. Vallesi. 2017. “Short-Term Memory Improvement After Simultaneous Interpretation Training.” Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 1 (3): 254–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, M., T. Schubert, T. Strobach, J. Gallinat and S. Kuhn. 2016. “Simultaneous Interpreters vs. Professional Multilingual Controls: Group Differences in Cognitive Control as well as Brain Structure and Function.” Neuroimage 1341: 250–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braver, T. S., J. R. Reynolds and D. I. Donaldson. 2003. “Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching.” Neuron 39 (4): 713–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cai, Rendong, Yanping Dong, Nan Zhao, and Jiexuan Lin. 2015. “Factors Contributing to Individual Differences in the Development of Consecutive Interpreting Competence for Beginner Student Interpreters.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 9 (1): 104–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Baene, W., W. Duyck, M. Brass and M. Carreiras. 2015. “Brain Circuit for Cognitive Control is Shared by Task and Language Switching.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27 (9): 1752–1765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A. 2013. “Executive functions.” Annual Review of Psychology 641: 135–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y. and Z. Xie. 2014. “Contributions of Second Language Proficiency and Interpreting Experience to Cognitive Control Differences among Young Adult Bilinguals.” Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26(5): 506–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y. and F. Zhong. 2019. “The Intense Bilingual Experience of Interpreting and Its Neurocognitive Consequences.” In The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism. Edited by J. W. Schwieter, 685–700. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y. and P. Li. 2015. “The Cognitive Science of Bilingualism.” Language and Linguistics Compass 9 (1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Attentional Control in Interpreting: A Model of Language Control and Processing Control.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y. and Y. Liu. 2016. “Classes in Translating and Interpreting Produce Differential Gains in Switching and Updating.” Frontiers in Psychology 71: 1297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, A. M. 2014. “The Interpreter Advantage Hypothesis: Preliminary Data Patterns and Empirically Motivated Questions.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 9 (2): 219–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, A. M., E. Muñoz and B. Kogan. 2019. “Taxing the Bilingual Mind: Effects of Simultaneous Interpreting Experience on Verbal and Executive Mechanisms.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition: 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geranpayeh, A. 2003. “A Quick Review of the English Quick Placement Test.” Research Notes 121: 8–10.Google Scholar
Gold, B. T., C. Kim, N. F. Johnson, R. J. Kryscio and C. D. Smith. 2013. “Lifelong Bilingualism Maintains Neural Efficiency for Cognitive Control in Aging.” Journal of Neuroscience 33 (2): 387–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilchey, Matthew O., Jean Saint-Aubin, and Raymond M. Klein. 2015. “Does Bilingual Exerciseenhance Cognitive Fitnessin Traditional Non-Linguistic Executive Processing Tasks?” In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Edited by J. W. Schwieter, 586–613. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesel, A., M. Steinhauser, M. Wendt, M. Falkenstein, K. Jost, A. M. Philipp and I. Koch. 2010. “Control and Interference in Task Switching—A Review.” Psychological Bulletin 136 (5): 849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, I., W. Prinz and A. Allport. 2005. “Involuntary Retrieval in Alphabet-arithmetic Tasks: Task-mixing and Task-switching Costs.” Psychological Research 69 (4): 252–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, P., F. A. N. Zhang, E. Tsai and B. Puls. 2013. “Language History Questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A New Dynamic Web-based Research Tool.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17 (3): 673–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D. and C. Bundesen. 2003. “Clever Homunculus: Is There an Endogenous Act of Control in the Explicit Task-cuing Procedure?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (3): 575–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, C. D. and T. A. Hanson. 2019. “Meta-analyses of simultaneous interpreting and working memory.” Interpreting 21 (2): 165–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A. and N. P. Friedman. 2012. “The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (1): 8–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monsell, S., T. J. Taylor and K. Murphy. 2001. “Naming the Color of a Word: Is It Responses or Task Sets that Compete?” Memory & Cognition 29 (1): 137–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paap, K. R. and O. Sawi. 2014. “Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs.” Frontiers in Psychology 51: 962. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paap, K. R. and Z. I. Greenberg. 2013. “There is No Coherent Evidence for a Bilingual Advantage in Executive Processing.” Cognitive Psychology 66 (2): 232–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pliatsikas, C. and G. Luk. 2016. “Executive Control in Bilinguals: A Concise Review on fMRI Studies.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19 (4): 699–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, A. and B. Macwhinney. 2010. “A Bilingual Advantage in Task Switching.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13 (2): 253–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, A. and T. H. Gollan. 2011. “Good Language-switchers are Good Task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish-English and Mandarin-English Bilinguals.” Journal of International Neuropsychological Society 17 (4): 682–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qu, L. I., J. J. W. Low, T. Zhang, H. Li and P. D. Zelazo. 2015. “Bilingual Advantage in Executive Control when Task Demands are Considered.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19 (2): 277–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H. and Raven, J. 1977. Manual for Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices: Sets I and II. London: H.K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Rubin, O. and I. Koch. 2006. “Exogenous Influences on Task Set Activation in Task Switching.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (6): 1033–1046. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, O. and N. Meiran. 2005. “On the Origins of the Task Mixing Cost in the Cuing Task-switching Paradigm.” Journal of Experimental Psycholgy: Learning, Memmry and Cognition 31 (6): 1477–1491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santilli, M., M. G. Vilas, E. Mikulan, M. Martorell Caro, E. Muñoz, L. Sedeño, A. Ibáñez and A. M. García. 2018. “Bilingual Memory, to the Extreme: Lexical Processing in Simultaneous Interpreters.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22 (2): 331–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soveri, A., A. Rodriguez-Fornells and M. Laine. 2011. “Is There a Relationship between Language Switching and Executive Functions in Bilingualism? Introducing a Within-group Analysis Approach.” Frontiers in Psychology 21: 183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobach, T., M. Becker, T. Schubert and S. Kuhn. 2015. “Better Dual-task Processing in Simultaneous Interpreters.” Frontiers in Psychology 61: 1590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Syndicate, U. C. L. E. 2001. Quick Placement Test, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseheart, M., M. Viswanathan and E. Bialystok. 2016. “Flexibility in Task Switching by Monolinguals and Bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19 (1): 141–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Putte, E., W. De Baene, L. García-Pentón, E. Woumans, A. Dijkgraaf and W. Duyck. 2018. “Anatomical and Functional Changes in the Brain after Simultaneous Interpreting Training: A Longitudinal Study.” Cortex 991: 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandierendonck, A., B. Liefooghe and F. Verbruggen. 2010. “Task Switching: Interplay of Reconfiguration and Interference Control.” Psychological Bulletin 136(4): 601–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, H. and Y. Dong. 2019. “How does Interpreting Experience Enhance Working Memory and Short-term Memory: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Cognitive Psychology 31 (8): 769–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, H., A. Hartanto and S. Yang. 2016. “The Complex Nature of Bilinguals’ Language Usage Modulates Task-switching Outcomes.” Fronties in Psychology 71: 560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yudes Gómez, C., Macizo Soria, P., & Bajo Molina, M. T. 2011. “The Influence of Expertise in Simultaneous Interpreting on Non-verbal Executive Processes.” Frontiers in Psychology 21, 309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Zhao, Hongming, Xiaocong Chen & Yanping Dong
2024. Young interpreting trainees’ better adaptation to the flanker conflicting environment: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics 70 ► pp. 101181 ff. DOI logo
Song, Qichao, Ting Song & Xiaodong Fei
2023. Effects of executive functions on consecutive interpreting for Chinese-Japanese unbalanced bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Zhong, Fei & Yanping Dong
2023. On the way to an interpreter advantage in coordination: evidence from interpreting students across different training stages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:3 ► pp. 610 ff. DOI logo
Zhong, Fei, Yanping Dong & Yaqiong Liu
2022. Neural correlates of contributions of interpreting training to second language semantic integration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 75:1 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
胡, 敏霞
2021. Review and Commentary on the Interactive Effects of Interpreting Experience and Executive Control. Modern Linguistics 09:02 ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.