Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation, Cognition & Behavior
Vol. 4:2 (2021) ► pp.281–304
thematic section

A systematic review of experimental research in audiovisual translation 1992–2020

ORCID logo | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
ORCID logo | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
This study systematically reviewed 61 experimental studies on audiovisual translation (AVT), published in academic journals between 1992 and 2020. The review examined five aspects of these studies: publication trends, research scopes, research designs, statistical procedures, and reporting practices. Major findings include: (a) there has been a slight concentration of publication outlets for experimental AVT research; (b) the focal studies could be categorized into three themes (product, process, and pedagogy), with the product theme being the most popular and subtitling the dominant AVT modality; (c) the inclusion of a comparison group was the most common design feature, and questionnaires and tests were the most popular research instruments; (d) inferential statistical analysis was favored over descriptive statistical analysis; (e) data normality information and effect sizes were not regularly reported. Based on the systematic review, suggestions are made for the future development of experimental AVT research.
Keywords: systematic review, audiovisual translation, experiment, research synthesis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Making a case for a systematic review
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Selection criteria
    • 3.2Coding protocol
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1What have been the publication trends of experimental AVT research?
    • 4.2What have been the research scopes of experimental AVT research?
    • 4.3How have AVT experiments been designed?
      • 4.3.1Participant characteristics
      • 4.3.2Sample size
      • 4.3.3Design features
      • 4.3.4Research instruments
    • 4.4What statistical procedures were used in experimental AVT studies?
    • 4.5What reporting practices were employed in experimental AVT studies?
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Publication trends
    • 5.2Research scopes
    • 5.3Research designs
    • 5.4Statistical procedures and reporting practices
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 8 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00056.wu
References (44)
References
Avgousti, Maria Iosifina. 2018. “Intercultural Communicative Competence and Online Exchanges: A Systematic Review.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 31 (8): 819–853. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaume Varela, Frederic. 2018. “An Overview of Audiovisual Translation: Four Methodological Turns in a Mature Discipline.” Journal of Audiovisual Translation 1 (1): 40–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danan, Martine. 1992. “Reversed Subtitling and Dual Coding Theory: New Directions for Foreign Language Instruction.” Language Learning 42 (4): 497–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Giovanni, Elena. 2018. “Dubbing, Perception and Reception.” In Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation. Edited by Elena Di Giovanni and Yves Gambier, 159–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility. Edited by Łukasz Bogucki and Mikołaj Deckert, 397–413. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Giovanni, Elena, and Yves Gambier. 2018. “Introduction.” In Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation. Edited by Elena Di Giovanni and Yves Gambier, vii–xii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz Cintas, Jorge, and Agnieszka Szarkowska. 2020. “Introduction: Experimental Research in Audiovisual Translation–Cognition, Reception, Production.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 331: 3–16.Google Scholar
Doherty, Stephen. 2018. “Analysing variable relationships and time-course data in eye tracking studies of translation processes and products”. In Eye Tracking and Multidisciplinary Studies on Translation. Edited by Callum Walker and Federico Federici, 71–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flis, Gabriela, Adam Sikorski, and Agnieszka Szarkowska. 2020. “Does the Dubbing Effect Apply to Voice-over: A Conceptual Replication Study on Visual Attention and Immersion.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 331: 41–69.Google Scholar
Franco Aixelá, Javier. 2001–2019. BITRA (Bibliography of Interpreting and Translation). Accessed October 15, 2020. [URL]
Gambier, Yves, and Luc van Doorslaer. (n.d). Translation studies bibliography. Accessed October 15, 2020. [URL]
Gambier, Yves. 2013. “The Position of Audiovisual Translation Studies.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies. Edited by Carmen Millan Varela and Francesca Bartrina Martí, 45–59. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gile, Daniel. 2016. “Experimental Research.” In Researching Translation and Interpreting. Edited by Claudia V. Angelelli and Brian James Baer, 220–228. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grbić, Nadja, and Sonja Pöllabauer. 2008. “Counting What Counts: Research on Community Interpreting in German-Speaking Countries—A Scientometric Study.” Target 20 (2): 297–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, Jenifer. 2016. A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS and R. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Jan-Louis, and Stephen Doherty. 2018. “Triangulation of Online and Offline Measures of Processing and Reception in AVT.” In Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation. Edited by Elena Di Giovanni and Yves Gambier, 91–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laks, Simon. 1957. Le sous-titrage des films. Sa technique. Son esthétique [Subtitling films. Technique. Aesthetics] (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Leijten, Mariëlle, and Luuk Van Waes. 2013. “Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze and Visualize Writing Processes.” Written Communication 30 (3): 358–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Dang. 2019. “Ethnographic Research in Audiovisual Translation.” In The Routledge Handbook of Audiovisual Translation. Edited by Luis Pérez González, 383–398. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsden, Emma, Kara Morgan-Short, Sophie Thompson, and David Abugaber. 2018. “Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field.” Language Learning, 68(2): 321–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher D., and Thomas A. Hanson. 2017. Quantitative Research Methods in Translation and Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy. 2016. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 4th ed. London: UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, John M. and Lourdes Ortega. 2000. “Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-Analysis.” Language Learning, 501: 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “The Future of Research Synthesis in Applied Linguistics: Beyond Art or Science.” TESOL Quarterly 41 (4): 805–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olalla Soler, Christian. 2020. “Practices and Attitudes toward Replication in Empirical Translation and Interpreting Studies.” Target 32 (1): 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orero Clavero, Pilar, Stephen Doherty, Jan-Louis Kruger, Anna Matamala Ripoll, Jan Pedersen, Elisa Perego, Pablo Romero Fresco, Sara Rovira Esteva, Olga Soler Vilageliu, and Agnieszka Szarkowska. 2018. “Conducting Experimental Research in Audiovisual Translation (AVT): A Position Paper.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 301: 105–126.Google Scholar
Orrego Carmona, David. 2019. “Audiovisual translation and audience reception.” In The Routledge Handbook of Audiovisual Translation. Edited by Luis Pérez-González, 367–382. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Orrego Carmona, David, Łukasz Dutka, and Agnieszka Szarkowska. 2018. “Using Translation Process Research to Explore the Creation of Subtitles: An Eye-Tracking Study Comparing Professional and Trainee Subtitlers.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 301: 150–180.Google Scholar
Ortiz Boix, Carla, and Anna Matamala Ripoll. 2016. “Post-Editing Wildlife Documentary Films: A New Possible Scenario.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 261: 187–210.Google Scholar
Pérez González, Luis. 2019. “Rewiring the Circuitry of Audiovisual Translation: Introduction.” In The Routledge Handbook of Audiovisual Translation. Edited by Luis Pérez González, 1–12. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plonsky, Luke. 2013. “Study Quality in SLA: An Assessment of Designs, Analyses, and Reporting Practices in Quantitative L2 Research.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35(4): 655–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Study Quality in Quantitative L2 Research (1990–2010): A Methodological Synthesis and Call for Reform.” The Modern Language Journal 98(1): 450–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Margaret. 2018. “Specialised Translation Today: A View from the JoSTrans Bridge.” The Journal of Specialised Translation (30): 3–22.Google Scholar
Saldanha, Gabriela, and Sharon O’Brien. 2014. Research Methodologies in Translation Studies. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary. 2006. The Turns of Translation Studies: New Paradigms or Shifting Viewpoints? Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szarkowska, Agnieszka. 2011. “Text-To-Speech Audio Description: Towards Wider Availability of AD.” The Journal of Specialised Translation (15): 142–162.Google Scholar
Szarkowska, Agnieszka, Krzysztof Krejtz, Łukasz Dutka, and Olga Pilipczuk. 2016. “Cognitive Load in Intralingual and Interlingual Respeaking – A Preliminary Study.” Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52 (2): 209–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szarkowska, Agnieszka, and Lidia Bogucka. 2019. “Six-Second Rule Revisited: An Eye-Tracking Study on the Impact of Speech Rate and Language Proficiency on Subtitle Reading.” Translation, Cognition & Behavior 2 (1): 101–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talaván Zanón, Noa, and Pilar Rodríguez Arancón. 2014. “The Use of Reverse Subtitling as an Online Collaborative Language Learning Tool.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8 (1): 84–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walczak, Agnieszka, and Louise Fryer. 2018. “Vocal Delivery of Audio Description by Genre: Measuring Users’ Presence.” Perspectives 26 (1): 69–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yan, Jackie Xiu, Jun Pan, and Honghua Wang. 2018. Research on Translator and Interpreter Training: A Collective Volume of Bibliometric Reviews and Empirical Studies on Learners. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wang, Yu & Ali Jalalian Daghigh
2024. Two Decades of Audiovisual Translation Studies: A Bibliometric Literature Review. Sage Open 14:3 DOI logo
Greco, Gian Maria, Anna Jankowska & Agnieszka Szarkowska
2022. Addressing methodological issues in experimental research in audiovisual translation. Translation Spaces 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.