Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation, Cognition & Behavior
Vol. 5:1 (2022) ► pp.50–83

Working memory tasks in interpreting studies

A meta-analysis

ORCID logo | University of Bologna
Studies about working memory (WM) and interpreting have used a variety of methods and results are often conflicting. There is therefore the need to analyse the cognitive tasks which have been used so far to assess their effectiveness in detecting WM performance differences. This paper presents the findings of a meta-analysis that compares the results of interpreters and interpreting students (study group) to the results of non-interpreters (control group) in four cognitive tasks (reading span, n-back task, listening span and dual tasks). Interpreters show a significant WM advantage of medium size over non-interpreters in tasks based on verbal stimuli, but not in tasks based on non-verbal stimuli. In addition, differences are larger when there is a wider gap in interpreting expertise between the two groups.
Keywords: working memory, interpreting, cognitive tasks, methodology, literature review, meta-analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background and motivation
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Literature search and selection criteria
    • 3.2Task classification
    • 3.3Groups: Interpreters, interpreting students and non-interpreters
    • 3.4Variables
    • 3.5Statistical methods
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Reading span task
      • 4.1.1Reading span accuracy: Comparison between interpreters and non-interpreters
      • 4.1.2Reading span accuracy: Comparison between interpreting students and non-interpreters
      • 4.1.3Reading span accuracy: Comparison between interpreters and interpreting students
    • 4.2N-back task
      • 4.2.1N-back task accuracy: Comparison between interpreting students and non-interpreters
      • 4.2.2N-back task RT: Comparison between interpreting students and non-interpreters
    • 4.3Listening span task
      • 4.3.1Listening span accuracy: Comparison between interpreters and non-interpreters
      • 4.3.2Listening span accuracy: Comparison between interpreting students and non-interpreters
    • 4.4Dual tasks
      • 4.4.1Dual tasks accuracy: Comparison between interpreters and non-interpreters
      • 4.4.2Dual tasks accuracy: Comparison between interpreting students and non-interpreters
    • 4.5Analyses on all WM tasks
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 1 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00063.ghi
References
Assink, Mark, Claudia E. van der Put, Machteld Hoeve, Sanne L. A. de Vries, Geert Jan J. M. Stams, and Frans J. Oort
2015 ‘Risk Factors for Persistent Delinquent Behavior among Juveniles: A Meta-Analytic Review’. Clinical Psychology Review 42 1 (December): 47–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Assink, Mark, and Carlijn J. M. Wibbelink
2016 ‘Fitting Three-Level Meta-Analytic Models in R: A Step-by-Step Tutorial’. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology 12 ( 3 ): 154–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babcock, Laura, Mariagrazia Capizzi, Sandra Arbula, and Antonino Vallesi
2017 ‘Short-Term Memory Improvement After Simultaneous Interpretation Training’. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 1 ( 3 ): 254–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babcock, Laura, and Antonino Vallesi
2017 ‘Are Simultaneous Interpreters Expert Bilinguals, Unique Bilinguals, or Both?’ Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20 ( 2 ): 403–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cai, Rendong, Yanping Dong, Nan Zhao, and Jiexuan Lin
2015 ‘Factors Contributing to Individual Differences in the Development of Consecutive Interpreting Competence for Beginner Student Interpreters’. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 9 (1): 104–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Mike W.-L.
2014 ‘Modeling Dependent Effect Sizes with Three-Level Meta-Analyses: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach’. Psychological Methods 19 (2): 211–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chincotta, Dino, and Geoffrey Underwood
1998 ‘Simultaneous Interpreters and the Effect of Concurrent Articulation on Immediate Memory: A Bilingual Digit Span Study’. Interpreting 3 ( 1 ): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chmiel, Agnieszka
2018 ‘In Search of the Working Memory Advantage in Conference Interpreting – Training, Experience and Task Effects’. The International Journal of Bilingualism; London 22 ( 3 ): 371–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christoffels, Ingrid K., Annette M. B. de Groot, and Judith F. Kroll
2006 ‘Memory and Language Skills in Simultaneous Interpreters: The Role of Expertise and Language Proficiency’. Journal of Memory and Language 54 ( 3 ): 324–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Version 6.2
2021 6.2. [URL]
Cohen, Jacob
1977 Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Google Scholar
Cooper, Harris, Larry V. Hedges, and Jeffrey C. Valentine
2009 The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Desmet, Bart, Mieke Vandierendonck, and Bart Defrancq
2018 ‘Simultaneous Interpretation of Numbers and the Impact of Technological Support’. In Interpreting and Technology, edited by Claudio Fantinuoli, 13–27. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, and Judy A. Siguaw
2000 ‘Assessment of Model Fit’. In Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated, 82–100. London, UNITED KINGDOM: SAGE Publications. [URL]. DOI logo
Dong, Yanping, and Rendong Cai
2015 ‘Working Memory in Interpreting: A Commentary on Theoretical Models’. In Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing, edited by Zhisheng (Edward) Wen, Borges Mailce Mota, and Arthur McNeill, 63–84. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Yanping, and Yuhua Liu
2016 ‘Classes in Translating and Interpreting Produce Differential Gains in Switching and Updating’. Frontiers in Psychology 71 (August). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Yanping, Yuhua Liu, and Rendong Cai
2018 ‘How Does Consecutive Interpreting Training Influence Working Memory: A Longitudinal Study of Potential Links Between the Two’. Frontiers in Psychology 9 1: 875. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duval, Sue, and Richard Tweedie
2000 ‘Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot-Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis’. Biometrics 56 (2): 455–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco Aixelá, Javier
2001 ‘BITRA (Bibliography of Interpreting and Translation). Open-Access Database.’ [URL]
García, Adolfo M.
2014 ‘The Interpreter Advantage Hypothesis: Preliminary Data Patterns and Empirically Motivated Questions’. Translation and Interpreting Studies. The Journal of the American Translation and Interpreting Studies Association 9 ( 2 ): 219–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gile, Daniel
2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 ‘CIRIN Bulletin’ 2021 [URL]
Grundy, John G., and Kalinka Timmer
2017 ‘Bilingualism and Working Memory Capacity: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis’. Second Language Research 33 ( 3 ): 325–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrer, Mathias, Pim Cuijpers, Toshi A. Furukawa, and David D. Ebert
2021 Doing Meta-Analysis with R: A Hands-On Guide. CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedges, Larry V.
1981 ‘Distribution Theory for Glass’s Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators’. Journal of Educational Statistics 6 ( 2 ): 107–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunter, John E., and Frank L. Schmidt
1990 Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
2000 ‘Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta-Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge’. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 8 ( 4 ): 275–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Injoque-Ricle, Irene, Juan Pablo Barreyro, Jesica Formoso, and Virginia I. Jaichenco
2015 ‘Expertise, Working Memory and Articulatory Suppression Effect: Their Relation with Simultaneous Interpreting Performance’. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 11 ( 2 ): 56–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jin, Ya-shyuan
2010 ‘Is Working Memory Working in Consecutive Interpreting?’ The University of Edinburgh. [URL]
Kelley, Ken, and Kristopher J. Preacher
2012 ‘On Effect Size’. Psychological Methods 17 ( 2 ): 137–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpke, Barbara, and Jean-Luc Nespoulous
2006 ‘Working Memory Performance in Expert and Novice Interpreters’. Interpreting 8 ( 1 ): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Sylvie
2004 ‘Shared Attention during Sight Translation, Sight Interpretation and Simultaneous Interpretation’. Meta : Journal Des Traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal 49 (2): 294–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Minhua, Diane L. Schallert, and Patrick J. Carroll
2004 ‘Working Memory and Expertise in Simultaneous Interpreting’. Interpreting 6 ( 1 ): 19–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Logie, Robert, Valérie Camos, and Nelson Cowan
eds. 2021 Working Memory – State of the Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Joanne E., and Sue E. Brennan
2019 ‘Synthesizing and Presenting Findings Using Other Methods’. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 321–47. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher D., and Thomas A. Hanson
2019 ‘Meta-Analyses of Simultaneous Interpreting and Working Memory’. Interpreting 21 ( 2 ): 165–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 ‘Meta-Analysis and Replication in Interpreting Studies’. Interpreting 22 ( 1 ): 140–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morales, Julia, Francisca Padilla, Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza, and M. Teresa Bajo
2015 ‘Simultaneous Interpretation Selectively Influences Working Memory and Attentional Networks’. Acta Psychologica 155 1 (February): 82–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara
2000 ‘Simultaneous Interpreting: Cognitive Potential and Limitations’. Interpreting 5 ( 2 ): 83–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nour, Soudabeh, Esli Struys, and Helene Stengers
2020a ‘Adaptive Control in Interpreters: Assessing the Impact of Training and Experience on Working Memory’. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23 ( 4 ): 772–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nour, Soudabeh, Esli Struys, Evy Woumans, Ily Hollebeke, and Hélène Stengers
2020b ‘An Interpreter Advantage in Executive Functions?: A Systematic Review’. Interpreting 22 ( 2 ): 163–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olalla-Soler, Christian
2020 ‘Practices and Attitudes toward Replication in Empirical Translation and Interpreting Studies’. Target: International Journal of Translation Studies 32 ( 1 ): 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Matthew J., Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, et al.
2021 ‘The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews’. BMJ 3721 (March): n71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Denise C., Gary Lautenschlager, Trey Hedden, Natalie S. Davidson, Anderson D. Smith, and Pamela K. Smith
2002 ‘Models of Visuospatial and Verbal Memory across the Adult Life Span’. Psychology and Aging 17 ( 2 ): 299–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollet, Thomas
2021 ‘Meta-Analysis Course (in R)’ 2021 [URL]
Raftery, Adrian E.
1995 ‘Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research’. Sociological Methodology 251 (January): 111–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosiers, Alexandra, Evy Woumans, Wouter Duyck, and June Eyckmans
2019 ‘Investigating the Presumed Cognitive Advantage of Aspiring Interpreters’. Interpreting 21 ( 1 ). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Hannah R., Alexander J. Sutton, and Michael Borenstein
2005 Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis : Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. john Wiley & Sons. [URL]. DOI logo
RStudio, Team
2021 RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston: PBC. https://rstudio.com/.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Frank L., In-Sue Oh, and Theodore L. Hayes
2009 ‘Fixed- versus Random-Effects Models in Meta-Analysis: Model Properties and an Empirical Comparison of Differences in Results’. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology 62 (1): 97–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Signorelli, Teresa M., Henk J. Haarmann, and Loraine K. Obler
2011 ‘Working Memory in Simultaneous Interpreters: Effects of Task and Age’. International Journal of Bilingualism 16 ( 2 ): 198–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, Stavroula, Kalliopi Megari, Mary H. Kosmidis, Maria Apostolidou, and Eleni Takou
2012 ‘Working Memory and Verbal Fluency in Simultaneous Interpreters’. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 34 ( 6 ): 624–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timarová, Šárka, Ivana Čeňková, Reine Meylaerts, Erik Hertog, Arnaud Szmalec, and Wouter Duyck
2014 ‘Simultaneous Interpreting and Working Memory Executive Control’. Interpreting 16 ( 2 ): 139–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 ‘Simultaneous Interpreting and Working Memory Capacity’. In Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting, edited by Aline Ferreira and John W. Schwieter, 1151:101–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tzou, Yeh-Zu, Zohreh R. Eslami, Hsin-Chin Chen, and Jyotsna Vaid
2012 ‘Effect of Language Proficiency and Degree of Formal Training in Simultaneous Interpreting on Working Memory and Interpreting Performance: Evidence from Mandarin–English Speakers’. International Journal of Bilingualism 16 ( 2 ): 213–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ünlü, Elena Antonova, and Çiğdem Sağın Şimşek
2018 ‘Testing the Impact of Formal Interpreting Training on Working Memory Capacity: Evidence from Turkish–English Students–Interpreters’. Lingua 2091 (July): 78–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Linden, Lize, Eowyn Van de Putte, Evy Woumans, Wouter Duyck, and Arnaud Szmalec
2018 ‘Does Extreme Language Control Training Improve Cognitive Control? A Comparison of Professional Interpreters, L2 Teachers and Monolinguals’. Frontiers in Psychology 91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
2005 ‘Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model’. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 30 (3): 261–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 ‘Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the Metafor Package’. Journal of Statistical Software 361 (August): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, Hao, and Yanping Dong
2019 ‘How Does Interpreting Experience Enhance Working Memory and Short-Term Memory: A Meta-Analysis’. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 31 ( 8 ): 769–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yudes, Carolina, Pedro Macizo, and Teresa Bajo
2011 ‘The Influence of Expertise in Simultaneous Interpreting on Non-Verbal Executive Processes’. Frontiers in Psychology 21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yudes, Carolina, Pedro Macizo, Luis Morales, and M. Teresa Bajo
2013 ‘Comprehension and Error Monitoring in Simultaneous Interpreters’. Applied Psycholinguistics 34 (5): 1039–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar