Article published In:
Translation, Cognition & BehaviorVol. 5:1 (2022) ► pp.144–164
How useful? How important? How difficult?
Triangulating factors to determine expertise in English-to-French questionnaire translation difficulty
English ‘gradation’ expressions—the interrogative adverb how followed by an adjective or an adverb—are frequent in questionnaires and they are not straightforward to translate into French. A good translation approach is needed, and there are mainly two options: The recommended approach involves the French adverbs à quel point or dans quelle mesure. The second approach uses a direct question, and the gradation occurs by choosing one of several options in the pre-established answer scale. Could there be a link between questionnaire translators’ expertise and the way they handle these translations, both the product and the process? This exploratory project studied six professional questionnaire translators, whose performance was recorded with concurrent think-aloud and keylogging techniques, and then triangulated. Correlations were analysed qualitatively. The results revealed a link between the questionnaire translators’ expertise and their translations. This confirms the importance of relying on expert translators and further briefing and training them to become good questionnaire translators.
Keywords: gradation, surveys, think-aloud, keylogging, triangulation, expertise in questionnaire translation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Expertise in questionnaire translation
- 2.Data and methods
- 2.1Independent variables
- 2.2Dependent variables
- 2.2.1Were expressions translated with the gradation or the direct approach? (TAPs and keystroke logs)
- 2.2.2Was gradation mentioned as problem?
- 2.2.3Did translators mention having learned to translate this type of question with the gradation approach?
- 2.2.4Pauses while translating these expressions
- 2.2.5Did translators search on the Internet how to translate this type of expression?
- 2.2.6Number of attempts, intermediate versions, and corrections
- 2.2.7Number of non-letter keystrokes and mouse movements
- 2.3Data analysis
- 3.Results
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusions and further research
- Notes
-
References
References
Alves, Fabio & José Luiz Gonçalves
2003 “A relevance theory approach to the investigation of inferential processes in translation” In Triangulating Translation. Edited by Fabio Alves, 3–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL]. 
Behr, Dorothée
2018 “Translating questionnaires for cross-national surveys: A description of a genre and its particularities based on the ISO 17100 categorization of translator competences”. Translation & Interpreting 10 (2): 5–20. 
Behr, Dorothée & Kuniaki Shishido
2016 “The Translation of Measurement Instruments for CrossCultural Surveys”. In The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology. Edited by Christof Wolf, Dominique Joye, Tom W. Smith & Yang-chih Fu, 268–286. London: SAGE.
Chmiel, Agnieszka
2020 “Translation, psycholinguistics and cognition” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by Fabio Alves and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 219–238. London: Routledge.
Creswell, John W. & J. David Creswell
2018 Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Dorer, Brita
2020 Advance Translation as a Means of Improving Source Questionnaire Translatability? Findings from a think-aloud study for French and German. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
2022 “Advance Translation—The remedy to improve translatability of source questionnaires? Results of a think-aloud study”. Field Methods online first. (retrieved 26 June 2022)
(retrieved 26 June 2022)European Social Survey
Fonseca, Norma Barbosa de Lima
2019 “Analysing the impact of TAPs on temporal, technical and cognitive effort in monolingual post-editing”. Perspectives 27 (4): 552–588.
García García, José María, Victor M. R. Penichet & María Dolores Lozano Pérez
2018 “Multimodal affective computing to enhance the user experience of educational software applications”. Mobile Information Systems.
Göpferich, Susanne
2006 “How Successful is the Mediation of Specialized Knowledge?-The use of thinking-aloud protocols and log files of reverbalization processes as a method in comprehensibility research”. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business (37): 67–93.
2015 “Translation competence: Explaining development and stagnation from a dynamic system perspective”. In Interdisciplinarity in translation and interpreting process research. Edited by Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich & Sharon O’Brien, 63–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Griebel, Cornelia
2020 “ ‘Article 1103: oh pff… yes—then concerns… the… um… unilateral contract…’: What do hesitation and repair markers tell us about text reception patterns of translators and lawyers?” Translation, Cognition & Behavior 3 (1): 51–75.
Hansen-Schirra, Silvia & Jean Nitzke
2020 “Translation, the process–product interface and cognition”. In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by Fabio Alves & Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 415–432. London: Routledge.
International Test Commission
Jääskeläinen, Rita
2017 “Verbal Reports”. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by John W. Schwieter & Aline Ferreira, 213–231. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Levshina, Natalia
2015 How to do linguistics with R – Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mellinger, Christopher & Thomas Hanson
2017 Quantitative research methods in translation and interpreting studies. Milton Park: Routledge.
PACTE Research Group
2014 “First results of PACTE group’s experimental research on translation competence acquisition: the acquisition of declarative knowledge of translation”. MonTI. Special Issue Minding Translation, 85–115.
Reiss, Katharina
1981 “Type, kind and individuality of text: Decision making in translation”. Poetics Today, 2 (4): 121–131.
Rey, Jean
1984 Dictionnaire sélectif et commenté des difficultés de la version anglaise [Selective and commented dictionary of difficulties in English-to-French translation]. Gap: Editions Ophrys.
Saris, Willem E. & Irmtraud N. Gallhofer
2014 Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Scribani, Melissa., Jessica Shelton, David Chapel, Nicole Krupa, Lynae Wyckoff & Paul Jenkins
2014 “Comparison of bias resulting from two methods of self-reporting height and weight: a validation study”. JRSM open,
5
(6): 1–7.
Smyth, Jolene D. & Kristen Olson
2019 “The effects of mismatches between survey question stems and response options on data quality and responses”. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology,
7
(1): 34–65.
Tiselius, Elisabet & Adelina Hild
2017 “Expertise and competence in translation and interpreting”. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by John W. Schwieter and Aline Ferreira, 1st edition, 425–444. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.