Article published In:
Translation, Cognition & BehaviorVol. 5:2 (2022) ► pp.165–186
When and how to revise?
Building a cognitive dyad of translator and reviser through workflow adjustment
The translation production team that consists of a translator and a reviser can be investigated as a specific kind of (sub)system of socially distributed cognition, a cognitive dyad; this system is defined as only including the translation professionals who are directly involved in the drafting of the translation. Based on interviews with translation professionals, I argue that this fine-tuned cognitive dyad gets its form not only as a result of its participants’ characteristics, but also under the influence of other factors, some of which vary from one project to the next, leading to the flexible formation of the reviser’s task in particular. The three most important project-specific influencing factors are the text genre, the translator’s experience and competence, and the client’s needs and requirements. While genre and the client’s needs and requirements seem to have a markedly similar impact, mainly influencing the internal task configuration of the cognitive dyad, the translator’s experience and competence often leads to non-revision. Trust is an important element in this process.
Keywords: socially distributed cognition, cognitive dyad, translation revision, translation workflow
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Revision practices and procedures of LSPs
- 1.2Distributed cognition
- 1.2.1Extended and distributed cognition in cognitive science
- 1.2.2Distributed cognition in translation studies
- 2.Data and methods
- 3.Results: Forming a cognitive dyad under the influence of project-specific factors
- 3.1Text genre
- 3.2Experience and competence of the selected translator
- 3.3Client’s needs and requirements
- 4.Discussion: A complex network of factors requires flexibility
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References
Abdallah, Kristiina
2012 Translators in Production Networks: Reflections on agency, quality and ethics. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland. [URL]
Abdallah, Kristiina, and Kaisa Koskinen
2007 “Managing Trust: Translating and the network economy”. Meta, 52 (4): 673–687. 
Alfer, Alexa
2017 “Entering the Translab: Translation as collaboration, collaboration as translation, and the third space of ‘translaboration’”. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 3 (3): 275–290.
Brunette, Louise, Chantal Gagnon & Jonathan Hine
2005 “The GREVIS Project: Revise or court calamity”. Across Languages and Cultures 6 (1): 29–45.
Chesterman, Andrew
Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers
1998 “The Extended Mind”. Analysis 581: 7–19.
Dawson, Michael R. W.
2013 Mind, Body, World: Foundations of cognitive science. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
Gallotti, Mattia, and Chris D. Frith
2017 “Social Cognition in the We-Mode”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (4): 160–165.
Hernández Morin, Katell
2009a La révision comme clé de la gestion de la qualité des traductions en contexte professionnel [Revision as a key to managing translation quality in a professional context]. Doctoral thesis, Université Rennes 2. [URL]
2009b “Pratiques et perceptions de la révision en France [Practices and perceptions of revision in France]”. Traduire (Paris) 2111: 58–78.
Hutchins, Edwin
1995a Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
1995b “How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds”. Cognitive Science 19 (3): 265–288.
Korhonen, Annamari
2021 “From Language Check to Creative Editing: Exploring variation in the revision stage of the LSP workflow”. In Translation Revision and Post-Editing: Industry Practices and Cognitive Processes. Edited by Maarit Koponen, Brian Mossop, Isabelle S. Robert & Giovanna Scocchera, 131–147. Abingdon: Routledge.
Korhonen, Annamari & Maija Hirvonen
2021 “Joint Creative Process in Translation: Socially distributed cognition in two production contexts”. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8 (2): 251–276.
Krüger, Ralph
2016 “Situated LSP Translation from a Cognitive Translational Perspective”. Lebende Sprachen 61 (2): 297–332.
Mossop, Brian
2014 Revising and Editing for Translators. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2016 “Reembedding Translation Process Research: An Introduction”. In Reembedding Translation Process Research. Edited by Ricardo Muñoz Martín, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2017 “Looking toward the Future of Cognitive Translation Studies”. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by John W. Schwieter & Aline Ferreira, 555–572. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
2021 Situated cognition. In Handbook of Translation Studies, vol 51. Edited by Yves Gambier & Luc van Doorslaer, 207–212. John Benjamins.
Nurminen, Mary
2020 “Raw Machine Translation Use by Patent Professionals: A case of distributed cognition”. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 3 (1): 100–121.
Perry, Mark
1999 “The Application of Individually and Socially Distributed Cognition in Workplace Studies: Two peas in a pod?” Proceedings of European Conference on Cognitive Science, Siena, Italy: 87–92.
Pleijel, Richard
2021 “Translation Teams as Cognitive Systems: Archival Material, Cognitive Artifacts, and Group-Level Cognitive Processes”. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8 (2): 307–327.
Pym, Anthony
Rasmussen, Kirsten Wolch & Anne Schjoldager
2011 “Revising Translations: A Survey of Revision Policies in Danish Translation Companies”. The Journal of Specialised Translation 151: 87–120. [URL]
Risku, Hanna
2009 Translationsmanagement: Interkulturelle Fachkommunikation im Informationszeitalter [Translation management: Intercultural specialized communication in the information era]. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
2014 “Translation Process Research as Interaction Research: From mental to socio-cognitive processes”. In Minding Translation, ed. by Ricardo Muñoz Martín, special issue of MonTI. Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación: 331–353.
Risku, Hanna, and Regina Rogl
2021 “Translation and Situated, Embodied, Distributed, Embedded and Extended Cognition”. In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by Fábio Alves, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 478–499. Abingdon: Routledge.
Risku, Hanna & Regina Rogl
2022 “Praxis and Process Meet Halfway: The convergence of sociological and cognitive approaches in Translation Studies”. The International Journal for Translation and Interpreting Research 14 (2): 32–49.
Sannholm, Raphael
2021 Translation, Teamwork, and Technology: The Use of Social and Material Scaffolds in the Translation Process. Stockholm: Stockholm University. [URL]
Schnierer, Madeleine
2019 Qualitätssicherung. Die Praxis der Übersetzungsrevision im Zusammenhang mit EN 15038 und ISO 17100 [Quality assurance. The practice of translation revision in connection with EN 15038 and ISO 17100]. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Uotila, Anna
2017 Revision and Quality Assurance in Professional Translation: A Study of Revision Policies in Finnish Translation Companies. Master’s Thesis, University of Tampere. [URL]
Zwischenberger, Cornelia
2020 “Translaboration: Exploring Collaboration in Translation and Translation in Collaboration”. Target 32 (2): 173–190.