Cover not available
Article published In:
Terminology
Vol. 22:1 (2016) ► pp.30–51

Opposite relationships in terminology

This article studies a family of semantic relationships that is often ignored in terminological descriptions, i.e. opposite relationships that include, but are not limited to, antonymy. We analyze English and French terms classified in an environmental database as opposites (Eng. polluting; green, afforestation; deforestation; Fr. réchauffer; refroidir, atténuation; intensification) and revise this first classification based on typologies and criteria supplied by literature on lexical semantics, psycholinguistics and corpus linguistics. Our revised classification shows that diversified opposite relationships can be observed between terms. They also appear to display the same complexity as in general language. Finally, in some cases, the nature of concepts in the specific subject field must be taken into consideration.
Keywords: antonymy, opposite, environment, term, semantic relationship, terminological database
Published online: 19 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/term.22.1.02gag
References (22)
Amsili, Pascal. 2003. “L’antonymie en terminologie: quelques remarques.” In Terminologie et Intelligence Artificielle (TIA), 31–40, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
Atkins, BT Sue, and Michael Rundell. 2008. The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, D Alan. 2001. “Paradigmatic Relations of Exclusion and Opposition II: Reversivity.” In Lexicology: An International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies ed. by Alan D. Cruse, Franz Hundsnurscher, Michael Job and Peter Rolf Lutzeier. 507–510. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan. 2011. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DiCoEnviro. Dictionnaire fondamental de l’environnement ([URL]). Accessed 5 January 2015.
Fellbaum, Christiane. 1995. “Co-occurrence and Antonymy.” International Journal of Lexicography 8 (4): 281–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Steven. 2002. Antonymy: A Corpus-based Perspective. London; New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kocourek. R. 1991. La langue française de la technique et de la science. Vers une linguistique de la langue savante. Wiesbaden: Oscar Brandstetter.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne, and Keith Lehrer. 1982. “Antonymy.” Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (4): 483–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
León Araúz, Pilar, Ariane Reimerink, and Pamela Faber. 2009. “Knowledge Extraction on Multidimensional Concepts: Corpus Pattern Analysis (CPA) and Concordances.” In 8ème conférence internationale Terminologie et Intelligence Artificielle . Toulouse.
L’Homme, Marie-Claude. 2004. La terminologie: principes et techniques. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshman, Elizabeth, Marie-Claude L’Homme, and Victoria Surtees. 2008. “Portability of Cause-Effect Relation Markers across Specialized Domains and Text Genres: A Comparative Evaluation.” Corpora 3(2): 141–172 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor, André Clas, and Alain Polguère. 1995. Introduction à la lexicologie explicative et combinatoire. Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgique): Duculot / Aupelf - UREF.Google Scholar
Muehleisen, Victoria Lynn. 1997. Antonymy and Semantic Range in English. Dissertation. Northwestern University. ([URL]). Accessed 15 December 2014.
Murphy, M Lynne. 2003. Semantic Relations and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polguère, Alain. 2003. Lexicologie et sémantique lexicale: notions fondamentales. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
SAAQ. 2014. “Définition de véhicule lourd.” In Véhicule lourd. ([URL]) Accessed 4 January 2014.Google Scholar
Sager, Juan C. 1990. A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sager, Juan C., and Kyo Kageura. 1994. “Concept Classes and Conceptual Structures: Their Role and Necessity in Terminology.” ALFA: Terminology and Special Linguistics 7(8): 191–216.Google Scholar
WordNet. A Lexical Database for English ([URL]). Accessed 1st June 2015.
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

[no author supplied]
2020. Lexical Semantics for Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 20], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Morphologized concept ECO- in the processes of conceptual derivation of the English ecological linguo-mental units. Mìžnarodnij fìlologìčnij časopis 13:2 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.