Cover not available
Article published In:
Food and terminology: Expressing sensory experience in several languages
Edited by Rita Temmerman and Danièle Dubois
[Terminology 23:1] 2017
► pp. 89–112

Babel of the senses

On the roles of metaphor and synesthesia in wine reviews

| University of Castilla-La Mancha |

Of all the varieties of sensory experience, wine appreciation seems to be one of the most rewarding yet also one of the most challenging to verbalize. This is largely due to a lack of scientific terminology capable of describing sensory impressions (in turn related to how little is known about human perception). Wine language is highly unspecific and figurative, depending on a weakly standardized community practice rather than a solid and comprehensive range of descriptors. In this paper I study figurative language and verbal creativity in a corpus of 12,000 English and Spanish wine reviews by focusing specifically on metaphor and synesthesia as the resources that best exemplify (and often manage to overcome) many of the genre’s shortcomings. In addition to the discussion of quantitative results, a case study in synesthesia is offered as illustration of the genre’s complexities, complemented by a contrastive discussion of how similar difficulties are handled in different ways in English and Spanish.

Keywords: specialized genre, sensory perception, wine tasting notes, wine reviews, descriptors, metaphor, synesthesia
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Corpus
  • 4.The challenges of wine description and evaluation
    • 4.1Wine reviews as promotional genre
    • 4.2Stylistic and terminological inconsistencies
  • 5.A synesthesia case study: Acidity
    • 5.1Babel of the senses
    • 5.2Mixing more senses
    • 5.3A contrastive note on the Spanish corpus
  • 6.Conclusions
  • A note on the corpus
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/term.23.1.04sua
References
Amoraritei, Loredana
2002 “La métaphore en œnologie.” Metaphorik 31: 4–16.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence
2008 “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 591: 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brochet, Frédéric, and Denis Dubourdieu
2001 “Wine Descriptive Language Supports Cognitive Specificity of Chemical Senses.” Brain and Language 771:187–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Rosario
2007 “Manner-of-motion Verbs in Wine Description.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (12): 2095–2114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Rosario, and Ernesto Suárez-Toste
2008 “Translating the Senses: Teaching the Metaphors in Winespeak.” In Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, ed. by Frank Boers and Seth Lindstromberg, 241–260. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 “A Genre Approach to Imagery in Winespeak.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, ed. by Graham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan, and Lynne Cameron, 265–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Rosario, and Javier Díaz-Vera
(eds) 2013 Sensuous Cognition. Explorations into Human Sentience: Imagination, (E)motion, and Perception. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charters, Steve
2006 Wine and Society. The Social and Cultural Context of a Drink. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance
1993 Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coutier, Martine
2007 Dictionnaire de la langue du vin. CNRS Editions: Paris.Google Scholar
Day, Sean
1996 “Synaesthesia and Synaesthetic Metaphors.” Psyche 2 (32). [URL]. Accessed 4 May 2017.Google Scholar
Dubois, Danièle
2007 “From Psychophysics to Semiophysics: Categories as Acts of Meaning. A Case Study from Olfaction and Audition back to Colors.” In Speaking of Colors and Odors, ed. by Martina Plümacher and Peter Holz, 167–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawel, Richard, Anita Oberholster, and Leigh Francis
2000 “A Mouth-feel Wheel: Terminology for Communicating the Mouth-feel Characteristics of Red Wine.” Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 61: 203–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
(ed.) 2016 Mixing Metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, Andrew
1997 The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goode, Jamie
2016 I Taste Red. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hommerberg, Charlotte
2011 Persuasiveness in the Discourse of Wine: The Rhetoric of Robert Parker. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Google Scholar
Howes, David
2003 Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory.  Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefford, Andrew
2013 “TN of Amontillado Coliseo VORS.” In Jesús Barquín, Andrew Jefford, and Richard Mayson. “Amontillado: A Draught from Paradise.” The World of Fine Wine 421. [URL]. Accessed 3 September 2016.Google Scholar
2016 “Andrew Jefford’s Column.” Decanter 141.Google Scholar
Johnson, Hugh, and Jancis Robinson
2007 The World Atlas of Wine, 5th ed. London: Mitchell Beazley.Google Scholar
2013 The World Atlas of Wine, 7th ed. London: Mitchell Beazley.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987 The Body in the Mind. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, Georges
2012 “Carte d’identité linguistique des odeurs.” Revue IRIS 331: 91–103.Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges, and Marcel Vuillaume
2016 “Odours and Denominations: Issues in their Identification.” In Words for Odours: Language Skills and Cultural Insights, ed. by Melissa Barkat-Defradas and Elisabeth Motte-Florac, 209–228, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Kramer, Matt
2015 True Taste. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner
1989 More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langewiesche, William
2000 “The Million-Dollar Nose.” The Atlantic Monthly 2861: 42–70.Google Scholar
Lawless, Harry T.
1999 “Descriptive Analysis of Complex Odors: Reality, Model or Illusion?” Food Quality and Preference 101: 325–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne
1978 “Structures of the Lexicon and Transfers of Meaning.” Lingua 451: 95–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Wine & Conversation. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen, and Asifa Majid
2014 “Differential Ineffability and the Senses.” Mind & Language 29 (4): 407–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, and Niclas Burenhult
2014 “Odors Are Expressible in Language, as long as You Speak the Right Language.” Cognition 130 (2): 266–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, Ann, Richard Arnold, Brian Masuda, Suzanne Pecore, Janice Schmidt, and Peter Stern
1984 “Progress Towards a Standardized System of Wine Aroma Terminology.” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 351:107–109.Google Scholar
Noble, Ann, Richard Arnold, John Buechsenstein, Jane Leach, Janice Schmidt, and Peter Stern
1987 “Modification of a Standardized System of Wine Aroma Terminology.” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 38 (2):143–146.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2010 “Touchdowns in Winespeak: Ontologies and Construals in Use and Meaningmaking.” In Proceedings for the 1st Congress on Linguistic Approaches to Food and Wine Descriptions, ed. by Margarita Goded Rambaud and Alfredo Poves Luelmo, 57–72. Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita, and Mats Eeg-Olofsson
2013 “Describing Sensory Experience. The Genre of Wine Reviews.” Metaphor & Symbol 28 (1):1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita, and Charlotte Hommerberg
2016 “We Drink with Our Eyes First. The Web of Sensory Perceptions, Aesthetic Experiences and Mixed Imagery in Wine Reviews.” In Mixing Metaphor, ed. by Raymond Gibbs, 177–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popova, Yanna
2005 “Image Schemas and Verbal Synaesthesia.” In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Beate Hampe, 395–419. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakova, Marina
2003 The Extent of the Literal: Metaphor, Polysemy and Theories of Concepts. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Yeshayahu
1997 “Cognitive Constraints on Poetic Figures.” Cognitive Linguistics 8 (1): 33–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Yeshayahu, and Michal Cohen
1998 “How Come Silence Is Sweet but Sweetness Is Not Silent: A Cognitive Account of Directionality in Poetic Synaesthesia.” Language and Literature 7 (2): 123–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Yeshayahu, and Ravid Eisenman
2008 “ ‘Heard Melodies are Sweet, but Those Unheard Are Sweeter’: Synaesthesia and Cognition.” Language and Literature 17 (2): 101–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
2003 “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistics Life.” Language and Communication 231: 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “ ‘Cultural’ Concepts and the Language Culture Nexus.” Current Anthropology 45 (5): 621–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Old Wine, New Ethnographic Lexicography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 351:481–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca
2015 “Synaesthesia: A Corpus-based Study of Cross-modal Directionality.” Functions of Language 271: 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suárez-Toste, Ernesto
2007 “Metaphor inside the Wine Cellar: On the Ubiquity of Personification Schemas in Winespeak.” Metaphorik.de 121: 53–64.Google Scholar
2013 “One Man’s Cheese is another Man’s Music: Synaesthesia and the Bridging of Cultural Differences in the Language of Sensory Perception.” In Sensuous Cognition, ed. by Rosario Caballero and Javier Díaz-Vera, 169–191. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, Rita
2000 Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorngate, John H.
1997 “The Physiology of Human Sensory Response to Wine: A Review.” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 481: 271–279.Google Scholar
Tsur, Reuven
1992 Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ullman, Stephen
1945 “Romanticism and Synaesthesia: A Comparative Study of Sense Transfer in Keats and Byron.” PMLA 60 (3): 811–827. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1957 The Principles of Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke
1984 “The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study.” Linguistics 21 (1): 123–162.Google Scholar
Williams, Joseph
1976 “Synaesthetic Adjectives: A Possible Law of Semantic Change.” Language 521: 461–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Ning
2003 “Synesthetic Metaphor: A Cognitive Perspective.” Journal of Literary Semantics 321: 19–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Caballero, Rosario
2019. Chapter 7. Sensory experiences, meaning and metaphor. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Iju
2023. Winespeak in wine’s pics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Klein Hazebroek, Bente & Ilja Croijmans
2023. Let’s talk over coffee: Exploring the effect of coffee flavour descriptions on consumer imagery and behaviour. Food Quality and Preference 105 ► pp. 104757 ff. DOI logo
López Arroyo, Belén & Roda P. Roberts
2020. What wine descriptors really mean A comparison between dictionary definitions and real use. Journal of Wine Research 31:4 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
López Arroyo, Belén & Lucía Sanz Valdivieso
2022. The phraseology of wine and olive oil tasting notes. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 28:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Representing Wine – Sensory Perceptions, Communication and Cultures [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 21], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.