Article In:
Terminology: Online-First Articles

ONTODIC

A model of linguistic knowledge representation based on description logic

ORCID logo | Universitat Jaume I,
After analyzing other linguistic ontologies and lexical models with a variety of perspectives, objectives and results, it was found that they were unsuitable for building dictionaries. To help overcome these issues, a model of linguistic knowledge representation was designed. The ONTODIC model presents two major differences with respect to other ontologies. On the one hand, the aim of ONTODIC has been to model language from the premises of linguistics. This means studying the linguistic elements in their natural contexts, that is, the texts. On the other hand, the design of ONTODIC is based on the principles of description logic.
Keywords: dictionary, language resources, knowledge base, ontology, lexical model, terminology modelling, terminology representation, ONTODIC
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The shortcomings of linguistic ontologies and lexical models
  • 3.Logic-based knowledge models
    • 3.1Ontological knowledge representation based on description logic
  • 4.Systematic analysis of the concepts of industrial ceramics
    • 4.1Implementation in the protégé ontology editor
    • 4.2Reasoning and inferences in ontology
      • Case A. Inheritance of characteristics
      • Case B. Automatic classification of concepts
  • 5.A linguistic model based on logic
    • 5.1Logic components of the ONTODIC model
      • 5.1.1The assertional component: Linguistic elements and their relationships
      • 5.1.2Terminological component: Linguistic conceptualization
      • 5.1.3Linguistic elements as instances of linguistic concepts
    • 5.2Implementation of ceramic terms in the ONTODIC linguistic model
      • 5.2.1Implementation of linguistic concepts
      • 5.2.2Implementation of terms
    • 5.3Principal characteristics and advantages of the ONTODIC model
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (55)
References
Alcina, Amparo. 2009. “Metodología y técnicas para la elaboración de diccionarios onomasiológicos.” In Terminología y sociedad del donocimiento, ed. by Amparo Alcina, Esperanza Valero and Elena Rambla, 33–58. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2020. “La representación de relaciones conceptuales en una ontología.” In Enotradulengua. Vino, lengua y traducción, ed. by Miguel Ibáñez Rodríguez. Berlín: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Alcina, Amparo, and Nava Maroto. 2007. “Formalization of Conceptual Relationships with a View to Implementing Them in the Ontology Editor Protégé: Processing the Terminology of Finished Ceramic Products.” Colloque “Terminologie : approches transdisciplinaires”, Gatineau, Quebec, 2 — 4 de May 2007.Google Scholar
Alcina, Amparo, and Esperanza Valero Doménech. 2018. “Description of the Terminological Concept in an Ontology.” TOTH 2017: Terminologie & Ontologie : Théories et Applications. Chambéry, 8 y 9 de Junio de 2017.Google Scholar
Allemang, Dean, and Jim Hendler. 2011. Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist. Effective Modeling in Rdfs and Owl. Waltham: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Baader, Franz, DresdenIan Horrocks, Carsten Lutz, and Uli Sattler. 2017. An Introduction to Description Logic: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baer, Peter De, Robert Meersman, and Rita Temmerman. 2009. “Termontography and Dogma for Knowledge Engineering within Prolix.”Google Scholar
Bosque-Gil, Julia, Jorge Gracia, John McCrae, Philipp Cimiano, Sander Stolk, Fahad Khan, Katrien Depuydt, Jesse de Does, Francesca Frontini, and Ilan Kernerman. 2019. The Ontolex Lemon Lexicography Module. Final Community Group Report 17 September 2019.Google Scholar
Bowker, Lynne. 1997. “Multidimensional Classification of Concepts and Terms.” In Handbook of Terminology Management, ed. by Sue Ellen Wright and Gerhard Budin, 133–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Briscoe, Ted, Ann Copestake, and Valeria de Paiva. 1994. Inheritance, Defaults and the Lexicon, Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buitelaar, Paul, Philipp Cimiano, Peter Haase, and Michael Sintek. 2009. “Towards Linguistically Grounded Ontologies.” In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, ed. by Lora Aroyo, Paolo Traverso, Fabio Ciravegna, Philipp Cimiano, Tom Heath, Eero Hyvönen, Riichiro Mizoguchi, Eyal Oren, Marta Sabou and Elena Simperl, 111–125. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Chavula, Catherine, and C. Maria Keet. 2014. “Is Lemon Sufficient for Building Multilingual Ontologies for Bantu Languages?” OWLED.Google Scholar
Cimiano, Philipp, Christian Chiarcos, John P. McCrae, and Jorge Gracia. 2020. Linguistic Linked Data. Representation, Generation and Applications.Google Scholar
Cimiano, Philipp, John McCrae, and Paul Buitelaar. 2016. Lexicon Model for Ontologies: Final Community Group Report 10 May 2016. W3C Ontology Lexicon (Ontolex) Community Group.Google Scholar
Cimiano, Philipp, Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Paul Buitelaar, Mauricio Espinoza, and Asunción Gómez-Pérez. 2010. “A Note on Ontology Localization.” Applied Ontology 5 (2):127–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Civera García, Pilar. 2002. “Traducción científico-técnica y terminología en el sector de la industria cerámica.” In La traducción científico-técnica y la terminología en la sociedad de la información, ed. by Amparo Alcina and Silvia Gamero Pérez, 167–176. Castelló: Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Daelemans, Walter, Gerald Gazdar, and Koenraad De Smedt. 1992. “Inheritance in Natural Language Processing.” Computational Linguistics 18 (2):205–218.Google Scholar
DeBellis, Michael. 2021. “A Practical Guide to Building Owl Ontologies Using Protégé 5.5 and Plugins. Edition 3.2.” In.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Philip, and Graeme Hirst. 2002. “Near-Synonymy and Lexical Choice.” Computational Linguistics 28 (2):105–144.Google Scholar
Estellés, Anna, and Amparo Alcina. 2017. Prospects for Building an Ontology on Ceramic Tiles Based on Iso Standards Information. In TOTh 2012 Terminologie & Ontologie : Théories et Applications, ed. by Christophe Roche. Savoie: Éditions de l’université de Savoie.Google Scholar
Estellés Palanca, Anna. 2014. “Ontología de características de la baldosa cerámica desde la terminología.” Doctoral Thesis, Depto. Traducción y comunicación, Universitat Jaume I ([URL]).
Faber, Pamela. 2002. “Oncoterm: Sistema bilingüe de información y recursos oncológicos.” In La traducción científico-técnica y la terminología en la sociedad de la información, ed. by Amparo Alcina and Silvia Gamero Pérez, 177–188. Castelló: Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela, and Catalina Jiménez, eds.) 2002. Investigar En Terminología. Granada: Comares.Google Scholar
Francopoulo, Gil, (ed.) 2013. Lmf Lexical Markup Framework. London: ISTE.Google Scholar
Gaševic, Dragan, Dragan Djuric, Vladan Devedzic, and Bran Selic. 2006. Model Driven Architecture and Ontology Development. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Gómez-Pérez, Asunción, Mariano Fernández López, and Oscar Corcho. 2004. Ontological Engineering. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Guarino, Nicola, and Christopher A. Welty. 2004. “An Overview of Ontoclean.” In Handbook on Ontologies, ed. by Steffen Staab and Rudi Studer. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hirst, Graeme. 2004. “Ontology and the Lexicon.” In Handbook on Ontologies, ed. by Steffen Staab and Rudi Studer, 209–229. Berlin: Springer. Original edition, 2004.Google Scholar
Horridge, Matthew. 2011. A Practical Guide to Building Owl Ontologies Using Protégé 4 and Co-Ode Tools. 1.3. ed. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-ren, Nicoletta Calzolari, Aldo Gangemi, Alessandro Lenci, Alessandro Oltramari, and Laurent Prévot, (eds.) 2010. Ontology and the Lexicon. A Natural Language Processing Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Books Online.Google Scholar
Jouis, Christophe. 2002. “Logic of Relationships.” In The Semantics of Relationships. An Interdisciplinary Perspective ed. by Rebecca Green, Carol A. Bean and Sung Hyon Myaeng, 127–140. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
L’Homme, Marie Claude, and Gabriel Bernier-Colborne. 2012. “Terms as Labels for Concepts, Terms as Lexical Units: A Comparative Analysis in Ontologies and Specialized Dictionaries.” Applied Ontology 7 (4):387–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Bodil Nistrup, and Hanne Erdman Thomsen. 2009a. “Caos — a Tool for the Construction of Terminological Ontologies” In The 17th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics. Nodalida 2009 Proceedings, ed. by Kristiina Jokinen and Eckhard Bick, 279–282. Odense, Denmark: University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Terminological Concept Modelling and Conceptual Data Modelling.” Int. J. Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 4 (4):239–249.Google Scholar
Madsen, Bodil Nistrup, Hanne Erdman Thomsen, and Carl Vikner. 2004. “Principles of a System for Terminological Concept Modelling.” Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’04), Lisbon, Portugal.
Maroto, Nava. 2007. “Las relaciones conceptuales en la terminología de los productos cerámicos y su formalización mediante un editor de ontologías.” Doctoral Thesis, Depto. Traducción y Comunicación, Universitat Jaume I ([URL]).
Maroto, Nava, and Amparo Alcina. 2009. “Formal Description of Conceptual Relationships with a View to Implementing them in the Ontology Editor Protégé.” Terminology 15 (2):232–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCrae, John, Julia Bosque-Gil, Jorge Gracia, Paul Buitelaar, and Philipp Cimiano. 2017. “The Ontolex-Lemon Model: Development and Applications.” In Elex 2017. Electronic Lexicography in the 21st Century. Proceedings of Elex 2017 Conference, ed. by Iztok Kosem, Carole Tiberius, Milos Jakubícek, Jelena Kallas, Simon Krek and Vít Baisa, 587–597. Leiden: Lexical Computing CZ.Google Scholar
Meyer, Ingrid, Karen Eck, and Douglas Skuce. 1997. “Systematic Concept Analysis within a Knowledge-Based Approach to Terminology.” In Handbook of Terminology Management, ed. by Sue Ellen Wright and Gerhard Budin, 98–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montiel-Ponsoda, Elena. 2011. “Multilingualism in Ontologies. Multilingual Lexico-Syntactic Patterns for Ontology Modeling and Linguistic Information Repository for Ontology Localization.” Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.Google Scholar
Musen, M. A. 2015. “The Protégé Project: A Look Back and a Look Forward.” AI Matters. Association of Computing Machinery Specific Interest Group in Artificial Intelligence 1 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvizi, Artemis, Matt Kohl, Meritxell Gonzàlez, and Roser Saurí. 2016. “Towards a Linguistic Ontology with an Emphasis on Reasoning and Knowledge Reuse.” Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC16), Portoro\vz, Slovenia, may.
Pastor, Verónica, and Amparo Alcina. 2010. “Search Techniques in Electronic Dictionaries: A Classification for Translators.” International Journal of Lexicography 23 (3):307–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rambla, Elena. 2023. “La relación conceptual genérico-específico. Su formalización e implementación en una base de conocimiento terminológica.” Programa de Doctorat en Llengües Aplicades, Literatura i Traducció Doctoral Thesis, Depto. Traducción y Comunicación, Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Saint-Dizier, Patrick, and Evelyn Viegas, (eds.) 1995. Computational Lexical Semantics, Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Geneve.Google Scholar
Schalley, Andrea C. 2019. “Ontologies and Ontological Methods in Linguistics.” Language and Linguistics Compass 13 (11). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soler, Victoria, and Amparo Alcina. 2008. “Lexical Patterns for Extracting Concepts Linked by Part-Whole Relation in Spanish.” Terminology 14 (1):99–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sowa, John F. 1992. “Conceptual Analysis as a Basis for Knowledge Acquisition.” In The Psychology of Expertise. Cognitive Research and Empirical Ai, ed. by R. R. Hoffman, 80–96. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Temmerman, Rita, and Koen Kerremans. 2003. “Termontography: Ontology Building and the Sociocognitive Approach to Terminology Description.” In Proceedings of the International Congress of Linguists (Cil17) (Cd-Rom), ed. by Eva Hajicová, Anna Kotesovcová and Jiri Mírovsky. Prague: Matfyzpress.Google Scholar
Valero Doménech, Esperanza. 2014. “Patrones de la definición terminológica en el ámbito de la cerámica. Una contribución a la automatización de las definiciones.” Doctoral Thesis, Depto. Traducción y Comunicación, Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Valero Doménech, Esperanza, and Amparo Alcina. 2015. Aspectos críticos de la formalización de características conceptuales en la definición terminográfica. Terminalia 111: 30–44. Accessed 2023/03/02. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valero, Esperanza, and Amparo Alcina. 2010. “Exploración de características conceptuales en contextos ricos en conocimiento mediante un programa de análisis cualitativo.” Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 51:241–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westerinen, Andrea, and Rebecca Tauber. 2017. “Ontology Development by Domain Experts (without Using the “O” Word).” Applied Ontology 121:299–311.Google Scholar
Wilks, Yorick, and Christopher Brewster. 2009. “Natural Language Processing as a Foundation of the Semantic Web.” Foundations and Trends® in Web Science 1 (3–4):199–327.Google Scholar