Cover not available
Part of
The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters
Edited by Villy Tsakona and Jan Chovanec
[Topics in Humor Research 7] 2018
► pp. 127–152

Chapter 6
Teasing as audience engagement

Setting up the unexpected during television comedy monologues

| Rice University, Houston

This paper explores teasing – a type of humorous play associated with intimate, everyday conversation – during televised comedy monologue performances. Thirteen teasing instances, which occurred during joke setup sequences and targeted studio audiences, were transcribed/analyzed alongside videos for: (1) what occasioned the teasing, (2) teasing sequence characteristics, and (3) their social functions. Results indicate that teasing in this genre is occasioned by discursive context (audience responses) rather than interpersonal knowledge; exploits miming/transposition, placing audiences’ words/actions on-stage; and serves to break down rather than reinforce discursive hierarchical differences (i.e. rights to performance floor), engaging studio audiences more fully into the show. Finally, audience teasing during joke setups contributes to expectations of “expecting the unexpected” (Lockyer & Myers, 2011) for media and studio comedy audiences.

Keywords: teasing, stand-up comedy, comedy audiences, functions of teasing, audience engagement, transposition, miming
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Humor and comedian – audience interaction in stand-up comedy
  • 3.What is teasing
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Data analysis
    • 5.1Teasing occasioned by silence/delayed responses
    • 5.2Teasing occasioned by applause/cheers
    • 5.3Teasing occasioned by mixed response
  • 6.Discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 5 January 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.06see
References
Adetunji, Akin
(2013) The interactional context of humor in Nigerian stand-up comedy. Pragmatics, 23(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alberts, Janet Kaye
(1992) An inferential/strategic explanation for the social organisation of teases. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11(3), 153–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apte, Mahadev L.
(1985) Humor and laughter: An anthropological approach. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Max
(1984) Our masters’ voices: The language and body-language of politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
(1977) A theory of play and fantasy. In Steps to an ecology of mind (pp. 183–198). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, Inc.Google Scholar
Baxter, Leslie A.
(1992) Forms and functions of intimate play in personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 18(3), 336–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Betcher, R. William
(1981) Intimate play and marital adaptation. Psychiatry, 44, 13–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987) Intimate play: Creating romance in everyday life. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Boxer, Diana & Cortés-Conde, Florencia
(1997) From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(3), 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
(1934) Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven
(1993) Booing: The anatomy of a disaffiliative response. American Sociological Review, 58(1), 110–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
(2012) Identifying action: Laughter in non-humorous reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1303–1312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortés-Conde, Florencia
(2014) Teasing. In Salvatore Attardo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of humor studies (pp. 758–760). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Cortés-Conde, Florencia & Boxer, Diana
(2010) Humorous self disclosures as resistance to socially imposed gender roles. Gender and Language, 4(1), 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coser, Rose Laub
(1960) Laughter among colleagues: A study of the functions of humor among the staff of a mental hospital. Psychiatry, 23, 81–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, Elise
(2015) Humoring the audience: Performance strategies and persuasion in Midwestern American stand-up comedy. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 28(3), 449–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
(1987) Pofaced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25, 219–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul & Heritage, John
(1992) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Double, Oliver
(2014) Getting the joke: The inner workings of stand-up comedy. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna & Paolino, Danae
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
(2008) No aggression, only teasing: The pragmatics of teasing and banter. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(2), 241–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) “You talking to me?” The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1628–1644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everts, Elisa
(2003) Identifying a particular family humor style: A sociolinguistic discourse analysis. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 16, 369–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan
(1977) Humor in situ: The role of humor in small group culture. In Antony J. Chapman & Hugh C. Foot (Eds.), It’s a funny thing, humor (pp. 315–318). Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel & Attardo, Salvatore
(2014) Irony. In Salvatore Attardo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of humor studies (pp. 398–402). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip
(2003) Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David & Clark, Timothy
(2002) Laughing with the gurus. Business Strategy Review, 13(3), 10–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
(2011) Humor, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In Bethan L. Davies, Michael Haugh & Andrew John. Merrison (Eds.), Situated politeness (pp. 165–184). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2014) Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 76–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John
(1996) Projections, transpositions and relativity. In John Gumperz & Stephen Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 271–323). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
(2001) The pragmatics of humor support. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(1), 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John & Greatbatch, David
(1986) Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 110–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, Keiko & Bysouth, Don
(2013) Laughter and turn-taking: Warranting next speakership in multiparty interactions. In Phillip Glenn & Elizabeth Holt (Eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction (pp. 39–62). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In George Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–95). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Sacks, Harvey & Schegloff, Emanuel
(1987) Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 152–205). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., Young, R. C., Heerey, E. A., Oemig, C. & Monarch, N. D.
(1998) Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1231–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., Capps, L., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C. & Heerey, E. A.
(2001) Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 229–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
(1996) Impoliteness and conversational joking: On relational politics. Folia Linguistica, 30(3–4), 299–326.Google Scholar
Limon, John K.
(2001) Spritzing, skirting: Standup talk strategies. In S. I. Salamensky (Ed.), Talk, talk, talk: The cultural life of everyday conversation (pp. 105–118). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lockyer, Sharon
(2015) Performance, expectation, interaction, and intimacy: On the opportunities and limitations of arena stand-up comedy for comedians and audiences. Journal of Popular Culture, 48(3), 586–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lockyer, Sharon & Myers, Lynn
(2011) “It’s about expecting the unexpected”: Live stand-up comedy from the audiences’ perspective. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 8, 165–188.Google Scholar
Loudon, John B.
(1970) Teasing and socialization on Tristan da Cunha. In Phillip Mayer (Ed.), Socialization: The approach from social anthropology (pp. 293–331). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A.
(2007) The psychology of humor: An integrated approach. Burlington, Mass.: Elsevier.Google Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul, Mettovaara, Sari & Tapio, Ritva
(1993) I really wanna make you laugh: Stand-up comedy and audience response. In Matti K. Suojanen & Auli Kulkki-Nieminen (Eds.), Folia, fennistica and linguistica: Proceedings of the annual Finnish Linguistic Symposium (pp. 225–247). Tampere: Tampere University.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal
(1993) Conversational joking. Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Oring, Elliott
(1984) Dyadic traditions. Journal of Folklore Research, 21, 19–28.Google Scholar
Pérez, Raúl
(2003) Learning to make racism funny in the “color-blind” era: Stand-up comedy students, performance strategies, and the (re)production of racist jokes in public. Discourse & Society, 24(4), 478–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pizzini, Franca
(1991) Communication hierarchies in humor: Gender differences in the obstetrical/gynaecological setting. Discourse & Society, 2(4), 477–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Hepburn, Alexa
(2010) Putting aspiration into words: “Laugh particles,” managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1543–1555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Sophie
(2011) Containing the audience: The ‘room’ in stand-up comedy. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 8(2), 219–238.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A.
(1952 [1940]) Structure and function in primitive society. London: Cohen.Google Scholar
Redfern, Walter
(2014) Aphorism. In Salvatore Attardo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of humor studies (pp. 51–52). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Rutter, Jason
(1997) Stand-up as interaction: Performance and audience in comedy venues. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Salford. [URL]
(2000) The stand-up introduction sequence: Comparing comedy compères. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 463–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Rhetoric in stand-up comedy: Exploring performer-audience interaction. Stylistyka, 10, 307–325.Google Scholar
Scarpetta, Fabiola & Spagnolli, Anna
(2009) The interactional context of humor in stand-up comedy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 210–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnurr, Stephanie
(2009) Constructing leader identities through teasing at work. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1125–1138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
(2013) Decoding encoded (im) politeness: “Cause on my teasing you can depend.” In Marta Dynel (Ed.) Developments in linguistic humor theory (pp. 263–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
(1990) You just don’t understand. New York: Ballatine.Google Scholar
Wells, Pam & Bull Peter
(2007) From politics to comedy: A comparative analysis of affiliate audience responses. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(4), 321–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Castillo Ortiz, Pedro Jesús
2022. Chapter 7. Humour and self-interpreting in the media. In Humour in Self-Translation [Topics in Humor Research, 11], ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Dore, Margherita
2022. Chapter 6. Humour, language variation and self-translation in stand-up comedy. In Humour in Self-Translation [Topics in Humor Research, 11], ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.