Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition
Edited by Danielle Matthews
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 10] 2014
► pp. 121–138

Learning conventions and conventionality through conversation

Despite assumptions that children learn linguistic and behavioral conventions through socialization, a systematic account of this developmental process is lacking. We ask how well existing evidence supports a sociocultural account explaining how children learn what is conventional, and that meanings are conventional. Specifically, we consider empirical support for two hypotheses: that parents provide systematic cues regarding conventions and conventionality to children, and that children learn from these cues. Considering research involving conventional word meanings, object uses, and social behaviors, we find impressive support for both hypotheses. Parent-child conversations may support children’s expectation that people within a community tend to know and use the same words, and have similar knowledge and expectations. Finally we discuss ongoing controversies and future research ideas.

Published online: 26 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.08cal
References
Akhtar, N., & Menjivar, J
(2012) Cognitive and linguistic correlates of early exposure to more than one language. In J.B. Benson (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior , Vol.42. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F.I.M., & Luk, G
(2012) Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 16, 240–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, S.E., & Clark, H.H
(1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 22, 1482–1493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buresh, J. & Woodward, A
(2007) Infants track action goals within and across agents. Cognition , 104, 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callanan, M
(2000) Les noms d’objet dans les conversations entre parents et jeune enfants (Names for objects in conversations between young children and their parents). Psychologie Française , 45, 187–192.Google Scholar
Callanan, M., Akhtar, N., & Sussman, L
(2012)  Children Learning Words from Ostensive and Directive Speech . Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Callanan, M., & Jipson, J.L
(2001) Explanatory conversations and young children’s developing scientific literacy. In K. Crowley, C.D. Schuun, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings (pp. 21–49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Callanan, M., Rigney, J., Nolan-Reyes, C., & Solis, G
(2012) Beyond pedagogy: How children’s knowledge develops in the context of everyday parent-child conversations. In A. Pinkham, T. Kaefer, & S. Neuman. (Eds.), Knowledge Development in Early Childhood: How Young Children Build Knowledge and Why it Matters . New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Callanan, M., & Sabbagh, M
(2004) Multiple labels for objects in conversations with young children: Parents’ language and children’s developing expectations about word meanings. Developmental Psychology, 40, 746–763. DOI logo
Callanan, M.A., Siegel, D., & Luce, M.R
(2007) Conventionality in family conversations about everyday objects. In M. Sabbagh & C. Kalish (Eds.), New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development (pp. 83–97). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cimpian, A., & Scott, R
(2012) Children expect generic knowledge to be widely shared. Cognition , 123, 419–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V
(1992) Conventionality and contrast: Pragmatic principles with lexical consequences. In A. Lehrer & E.F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts (pp. 171–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1993)  The Lexicon in Acquisition . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Conventionality and contrast in language and language acquisition. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development , 115, 11–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G
(2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Science , 13(4), 148–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesendruck, G
(2005) The principles of conventionality and contrast in word learning: An empirical examination. Developmental Psychology , 41, 451–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesendruck, G., & Markson, L
(2001) Children’s avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology , 37, 630–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Children’s assumption of the conventionality of culture. Child Development Perspectives , 5, 189–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gauvain, M
(2001)  The Social Context of Cognitive Development . New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Gelman, S
(2003)  The Essentialist Child . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Learning from others: Children’s construction of concepts. Annual Review of Psychology , 60, 115–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S., Coley, J., Rosengren, K., Hartman, E., & Pappas, A
(1998) Beyond labeling: The role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development , 63 (Serial No. 253). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
German, T.P., & Johnson, S.C
(2002) Function and the origins of the design. Journal of Cognition and Development , 3, 279–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grusec, J.E., & Davidov, M
(2010) Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development , 81, 687–709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, P.L., & Koenig, M.A
(2006) Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development , 77, 505–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T
(1995)  Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children . Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Henderson, A., & Graham, S.A
(2005) Two-year-olds’ appreciation of the shared nature of novel object labels. Journal of Cognition and Development , 6, 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A., & Sabbagh, M
(2010) Parents’ use of conventional and unconventional labels in conversations with their preschoolers. Journal of Child Language , 37, 793–816. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horner, V., & Whiten, A
(2005) Causal knowledge and emulation/imitation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition , 8, 164–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T
(1991) Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology , 27, 236–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaswal, V.K
(2004) Don’t believe everything you hear: Preschoolers’ sensitivity to speaker intent in category induction. Child Development , 75, 1871–1885. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaswal, V.K., & Neely, L
(2006) Adults don’t always know best: Preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychological Science , 9, 757–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalish, C.W., & Cornelius, R
(2007) What is to be done: Children’s ascriptions of conventional obligations. Child Development, 78 , 859–878. DOI logo
Kalish, C.W., & Lawson, C.A
(2008) Development of social category representations: Early appreciation of roles and deontic relations. Child Development , 79, 577–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalish, C.W., & Sabbagh, M.A
(2007) Conventionality and cognitive development: Learning to think the right way. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development , 115, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, D
(1999) The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition , 70, 241–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellman, P.J., Massey, C.M., & Son, J.Y
(2010) Perceptual learning modules in mathematics: Enhancing students’ pattern recognition, structure extraction, and fluency. Topics in Cognitive Science , 2, 285–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, C., White, K.S., & Aslin, R.N
(2011) Toddlers use speech disfluencies to predict speakers’ referential intentions. Developmental Science , 14, 925–934. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinzler, K., Corriveau, K., & Harris, P
(2011) Children’s selective trust in native-accented speakers. Developmental Science , 14, 106–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenig, M.A., & Harris, P.L
(2005) Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development , 76, 1261–1277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenig, M.A., & Woodward, A.L
(2010) 24-month-olds’ sensitivity to the prior inaccuracy of the source: Possible mechanisms. Developmental Psychology , 46, 815–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D.K
(1969)  Convention: A Philosophical Study . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lieven, E.V.M
(1994) Crosslinguistic and crosscultural aspects of language addressed to children. In C. Gallaway & B.J. Richards ( Eds .), Input and Interaction in Language Acquisition (pp. 56–73). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luce, M., & Callanan, M
(2010) Parents’ object labeling: Possible links to conventionality of word meaning? First Language , 30, 270–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M
(2010) What’s in a manner of speaking? Children’s sensitivity to partner-specific referential precedents. Developmental Psychology , 46, 749–760. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A
(1995) Understanding the intention of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology , 31, 838–850. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nucci, L. & Weber, E.K
(1995) Social interactions in the home and the development of young children’s conceptions of the personal. Child Development , 66, 1438–1452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perez-Granados, D.R
(2002) Normative scripts for object labeling during a play activity: Mother-child and sibling conversations in Mexican-descent families. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences , 24, 164–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakoczy, H., Tomasello, M., & Striano, T
(2005) On tools and toys: How children learn to act on and pretend with ‘virgin’ objects. Developmental Science , 8(1), 57–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B
(2003)  The Cultural Nature of Human Development . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Mejía Arauz, R., Correa-Chávez, M., & Angelillo, C
(2003) Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology , 54, 175–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabbagh, M., & Baldwin, D
(2001) Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers’ theory of mind and semantic development. Child Development , 72, 1054–1070. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabbagh, M., & Henderson, A
(2007) How an appreciation of conventionality shapes early word learning. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development , 115, 28–38.Google Scholar
Sabbagh, M.A., & Shafman, D
(2009) How children block learning from ignorant speakers. Cognition , 112, 415–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J.R., Aslin, R.N., & Newport, E.L
(1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science , 274, 1926–1928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. & Ochs, E
(1986)  Language Socialization across Cultures . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Siegel, D.R
(2010)  Parent-Child Interactions with Artifacts in Everyday Activities . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Siegel, D.R., & Callanan, M.A
(2007) Artifacts as conventional objects. Journal of Cognition and Development , 8, 182–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, K
(2011)  Teaching Children through “Little Dramas”: Opinions about Instructional Ribbing from Mexican-heritage and European-American Mothers . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Tennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M
(2006) Push or pull: Imitation vs. emulation in great apes and human children. Ethology , 112, 1159–1169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M
(1999)  The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turiel, E
(1983)  The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar