Cover not available
Part of
Language in Interaction: Studies in honor of Eve V. Clark
Edited by Inbal Arnon, Marisa Casillas, Chigusa Kurumada and Bruno Estigarribia
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 12] 2014
► pp. 251–280

The discourse basis of the Korean copula construction in acquisition

| University of California, Santa Barbara

This chapter examines the discourse foundations of the Korean copula construction as it is acquired by two young children in interaction with their mothers. The findings suggest that the construction develops through gradual generalization of an initially limited set of context-specific structural schemas, and that it is profoundly sensitive to discourse factors throughout the course of development. From the outset, the realization and form of the construction’s components are shaped by the functions it serves (e.g., labeling vs. describing), the discourse-pragmatic properties of referents (e.g., given vs. new information), the interactional roles of participants (e.g., questioner vs. respondent), and the ideologies (e.g., child as conversational partner, mother as tutor and playmate) that motivate particular types of caregiver-child activities and talk.

Published online: 17 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.12.19cla
References
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B
(1979) A functionalist approach to the acquisition of grammar. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 167–209). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York, NY:Academic Press.Google Scholar
Choi, S
(1998) Verbs in early lexical and syntactic development in Korean. Linguistics , 36(4), 755–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & Gopnik, A
(1995) Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language , 22, 497–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouinard, M.M., & Clark, E.V
(2003) Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language , 30, 637–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, P
(1989) A case study in language socialization: Korean wh-questions. Discourse Processes , 12, 169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In H. Sohn & J. Haig (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics VI (pp. 639–659). Stanford, CA: CSLI. Google Scholar
(2004) The discourse basis of constructions: Some evidence from Korean. In E. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the 32nd Stanford Child Language Research Forum (pp. 20–29). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Clark, E.V
(1997) Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition , 64, 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Color, reference, and expertise in language acquisition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 94, 339–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Young children’s uptake of new words in conversation. Language in Society , 36, 157–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Adult offer, word-class, and child uptake in early lexical acquisition. First Language , 30, 250–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V., & Bernicot, J
(2008) Repetition as ratification: How parents and children place information in common ground. Journal of Child Language 35, 349–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V., & Estigarribia, B
(2011) Using speech and gesture to introduce new words to young children. Gesture , 11, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V., & Grossman, J
(1998) Pragmatic directions and children’s word learning. Journal of Child Language , 25, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V., & Wong, A
(2002) Pragmatic directions about language use: Offers of words and relations. Language in Society , 31, 181–212.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S
(2012) Pragmatics as a facilitator in child syntax development. In M. Meeuwis & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Pragmaticizing understanding: Studies for Jef Verschueren . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Estigarribia, B., & Clark, E.V
(2007) Getting and maintaining attention in talk to young children. Journal of Child Language , 34, 799–814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A
(1995)  Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure . Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, S
(1983)  Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Sells, P., & Wescoat, M
(2008) Korean copular constructions: A lexical sharing approach. In M. Endo Hudson, P. Sells, S.-A. Jun, P. Clancy, S. Iwasaki, & S.-O. Sohn (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics , Vol. 13 (pp. 179–192). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kim, Y
(1987)  The acquisition of relative clauses in English and Korean: Development in spontaneous production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.
(1997) The acquisition of Korean. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition , Vol. 4 (pp. 335–443). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lee, C
(2003) Contrastive topic or contrastive focus. In W. McClure (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, Vol. 12 (pp. 1–13). Stanford, CA: CSLI/University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, H.S
(1991)  Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective . Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California,Los Angeles. Google Scholar
Lieven, E., Pine, J. & Baldwin, G
(1997) Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language , 24, 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B
(1984) Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In R. Schweder & R. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 276–313). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin. B
(1995) The impact of language socialization on grammatical development. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp. 73–94). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oh, M
(1991) The Korean copula and palatalization. Language Research , 27, 701–724.Google Scholar
Peters, A., & Boggs, S
(1986) Interactional routines as cultural influences upon language acquisition. In B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 80–95). Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar
Pine, J., Conti-Ramsden, G., Joseph, K., Lieven, E., & Serratrice, L
(2008) Tense over time: Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model as an account of the pattern of tense-marking provision in early child English. Journal of Child Language , 35, 55–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D
(1985) Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition , Vol. 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sokolov, J., & Snow, C
(1994) The changing role of negative evidence in theories of language acquisition. In C. Galloway & B. Richards (Eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 38–55). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M
(2000) The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 4, 156–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S
(2003) Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English. Journal of Child Language 30, 75–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar