Article published in:
The Acquisition of Reference
Edited by Ludovica Serratrice and Shanley E.M. Allen
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 15] 2015
► pp. 123153
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 320 ff. Crossref logo
DAVIES, Catherine & Helene KREYSA
2018. Look before you speak: children's integration of visual information into informative referring expressions. Journal of Child Language 45:5  pp. 1116 ff. Crossref logo
Fichman, Sveta & Carmit Altman
2019. Referential Cohesion in the Narratives of Bilingual and Monolingual Children With Typically Developing Language and With Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62:1  pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
Fichman, Sveta, Joel Walters, Ravit Melamed & Carmit Altman
2020. Reference to characters in narratives of Russian-Hebrew bilingual and Russian and Hebrew monolingual children with Developmental Language Disorder and typical language development. First Language  pp. 014272372096293 ff. Crossref logo
Forsythe, Hannah, Daniel Greeson & Cristina Schmitt
2021. After the Null Subject Parameter: Acquisition of the Null-Overt Contrast in Spanish. Language Learning and Development  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Grigoroglou, Myrto & Anna Papafragou
2019. Children's (and Adults') Production Adjustments to Generic and Particular Listener Needs. Cognitive Science 43:10 Crossref logo
HAENDLER, Yair & Flavia ADANI
2018. Testing the effect of an arbitrary subject pronoun on relative clause comprehension: a study with Hebrew-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 45:4  pp. 959 ff. Crossref logo
Hassan, Rouba, Geneviève de Weck, Stefano Rezzonico, Anne Salazar-Orvig & Elise Vinel
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
Klein, Janina, Stéphane Jullien & Gwendoline Fox
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo
Marcos, Haydée, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Christine da Silva-Genest & Julien Heurdier
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 204 ff. Crossref logo
Rezzonico, Stefano, Mélanie Bernasconi, Geneviève de Weck, Christine da Silva-Genest & Stéphane Jullien
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 142 ff. Crossref logo
Rezzonico, Stefano, Elise Vinel, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Nathalie Salagnac
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 116 ff. Crossref logo
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula
2020. Pragmatic markers: the missing link between language and Theory of Mind. Synthese Crossref logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne & Geneviève de Weck
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], Crossref logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], Crossref logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Serratrice, Ludovica & Cécile De Cat
2020. Individual differences in the production of referential expressions: The effect of language proficiency, language exposure and executive function in bilingual and monolingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:2  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Shin, Naomi & Karen Miller
2021. Children’s Acquisition of Morphosyntactic Variation. Language Learning and Development  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
SKARABELA, BARBORA & MITSUHIKO OTA
2017. Two-year-olds but not younger children comprehend it in ambiguous contexts: Evidence from preferential looking. Journal of Child Language 44:1  pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo
Stegenwallner-Schütz, Maja & Flavia Adani
2020. Production of referring expressions by children with ASD: Effects of referent accessibility and working memory capacity. Language Acquisition 27:3  pp. 276 ff. Crossref logo
Vinel, Elise, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Geneviève de Weck, Salma Nashawati & Somayeh Rahmati
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 288 ff. Crossref logo
Yamaguchi, Naomi, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Marine Le Mené, Stéphanie Caët & Annie Rialland
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Allen, S.E.M.
(2000) A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38, 483–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Formalism and functionalism working together? Exploring roles for complementary contributions in the domain of child null arguments. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White (pp. 233–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Interacting pragmatic influences on children’s argument realization. In M. Bowerman & P. Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 191–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Allen, S.E.M., & Schröder, H.
(2003) Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In J.W. Du Bois, L.E. Kumpf, & W.J. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 301–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S.E.M., Skarabela, B., & Hughes, M.E.
(2008) Using corpora to examine discourse effects in syntax. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives (pp. 99–137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M.
(1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1994) Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics, 30, 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J.E.
(2010) How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistic Compass, 4, 187–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J.E., & Griffin, Z.
(2007) The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone competes. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 521–536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bahtiyar, S., & Küntay, A.C.
(2009) Integration of communicative partner’s visual perspective in patterns of referential requests. Journal of Child Language, 36, 529–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K., & Warren, R.K.
(1985) Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A., Brooks, P., & Tomasello, M.
(2000) Factors affecting young children’s use of pronouns as referring expressions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1337–1349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cho, S.W.
(2004) Argument ellipsis in Korean-speaking children’s early speech (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Clancy, P.M.
(1986) The acquisition of Japanese. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 373–515). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1993) Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In E.V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307–314). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
(1997) Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In H.-M. Sohn & J. Haig (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics VI (pp. 639–659). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
(2003) The lexicon in interaction: Developmental origins of Preferred Argument Structure in Korean. In J.W. Du Bois, L.E. Kumpf, & W.J. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 81–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V.
(2001) Grounding and attention in language acquisition. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, & S. Neuvel (Eds.), Proceedings from the Main Session of the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 95–116). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Davies, C., & Katsos, N.
(2010) Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? Lingua, 120, 1956–1972. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cat, C.
(2004) A fresh look at how young children encode new referents. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 111–127.Google Scholar
Demir, Ö., So, W.C., Özyürek, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2012) Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 844–867. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, W., & Pechmann, T.
(1982) Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions. Cognition, 11, 159–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.W.
(1987) The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63, 805–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graf, E., Theakston, A., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M.
(2015) Subject and object omission in children’s early transitive constructions: A discourse-pragmatic approach. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36 , 701–727. 10.1017/S0142716413000477 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, P., & Smith, J.H.
(1976) The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guerriero, S., Oshima-Takane, Y., & Kuriyama, Y.
(2006) The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33, 823–857. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J.K.
(2009) Children’s use of referring expressions: What can it tell us about theory of mind? Cognitive Critique, 1, 73–100.Google Scholar
Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R.
(1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J.K., & Johnson, K.
(2013) Children’s use of referring expressions in spontaneous discourse: Implications for theory of mind development. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 43–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J.K., Ntelitheos, D., & Kowalsky, M.
(2007) Children’s use of referring expressions: Some implications for theory of mind. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 48, 1–21.Google Scholar
Gürcanlı, Ö., Nakipoglu, M., & Özyürek, A.
(2007) Shared information and argument omission in Turkish. In H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake, & I.H. Woo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 262–273). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hacohen, A., & Schaeffer, J.
(2007) Subject realization in early Hebrew/English bilingual acquisition: The role of crosslinguistic influence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 , 333–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B.
(2010) Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish. Second Language Research, 26 , 355–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H.
(2000) The acquisition of topic marking in Chinese L1 and French L1 and L2. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 22, 369–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M.
(2003) Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C.
(2011) Referential choice in Mandarin child language: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2057–2080. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012a) Preferred argument structure in Mandarin child language. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 10 10, 119–168.Google Scholar
(2012b) Referential choice and informativeness in mother-child conversation: A focus on the mother. Language Sciences, 34, 319–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M.E., & Allen, S.E.M.
(2013) The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 15–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Competing motivations in children’s omission of subjects? The interaction between verb finiteness and referent accessibility. In B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov, & E. Moravcsik (Eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage (pp. 144–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The incremental effect of discourse-pragmatic sensitivity on referential choice in the acquisition of a first language. Lingua, 155, 43–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hurewitz, F., Brown-Schmidt, S., Thorpe, K., Gleitman, L.R., & Trueswell, J.C.
(2000) One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: Factors affecting children’s syntactic choices in production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 597–626. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N.
(2011) Missing subjects in early child language. In J. De Villiers & T. Roeper (Eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition (pp. 13–52). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayama, Y.
(2003) L1 acquisition of Japanese zero pronouns: The effect of discourse factors. In S. Burelle & S. Somesfalean (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Society (pp. 109–120). Montreal, QC: University of Quebec at Montreal.Google Scholar
Küntay, A.C., & Özyürek, A.
(2006) Learning to use demonstratives in conversation: What do language specific strategies in Turkish reveal? Journal of Child Language, 33, 303–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E.
(1978) Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural developmental study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 539–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M.
(1974) Preschool children’s use of definite and indefinite articles. Child Development, 45, 446–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E.V.M., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2006) The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children’s use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 403–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M.
(2007) How toddlers and preschoolers learn to uniquely identify referents for others: A training study. Child Development, 76, 1744–1759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Butcher, J., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M.
(2012) Two- and four-year-olds learn to adapt referring expressions to context: Effects of distracters and feedback on referential communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 184–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mishina-Mori, S.
(2007) Argument representation in Japanese/English simultaneous bilinguals: Is there a crosslinguistic influence? In H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake, & I.H. Woo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 441–450). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Nadig, A.S., & Sedivy, J.C.
(2002) Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children’s online-reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N., & Murty, L.
(2005) Argument realization in Hindi caregiver-child discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 461–495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, D.K.
(1996) Two-year-old children’s sensitivity to a parent’s knowledge state when making requests. Child Development, 67, 659–677. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, D.K., & Topolovec, J.C.
(2001) Two-year-old children’s sensitivity to the referential (in)efficacy of their own pointing gestures. Journal of Child Language, 28, 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Navarro, S.
(2003) Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the role of the input? Journal of Child Language, 30, 371–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pechmann, T., & Deutsch, W.
(1982) The development of verbal and nonverbal devices for references. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 330–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M.J., & Garrod, S.
(2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prat-Sala, M., & Hahn, U.
(2007) Catalan children’s sensitivity to the discourse constraints imposed by different kinds of question. Language Learning, 57, 443–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rozendaal, M.I., & Baker, A.E.
(2008) A cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of the pragmatics of indefinite and definite reference in two-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 35, 773–807. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) The acquisition of reference: Pragmatic aspects and the influence of language input. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1866–1879. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J., & Parès, J.
(2010a) Dialogical beginnings of anaphora: The use of third person pronouns before the age of 3. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1842–1865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010b) Dialogical factors in toddlers’ use of clitic pronouns. First Language, 30, 375–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salomo, D., Graf, E., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M.
(2011) The role of perceptual availability and discourse context in young children’s question answering. Journal of Child Language, 38, 918–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salomo, D., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M.
(2010) Young children’s sensitivity to new and given information when answering predicate-focus questions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 101–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, K.
(2007) L’interface syntaxe-pragmatique: Le sujet chez des enfants bilingues franco-allemands et italo-allemands [The syntax-pragmatics interface: Use of subjects by bilingual French-German and Italian-German children]. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère [Acquisition and Interaction in Foreign Languages], 25, 9–43.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L.
(2005) The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 437–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) The role of discourse and perceptual cues in the choice of referential expressions in English pre-schoolers, school-age children and adults. Language Learning and Development, 4, 309–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The role of number of referents and animacy in children’s use of pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 31–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S.
(2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in Italian-English bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 183–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(2014) Bilingual language acquisition: Spanish and English in the first six years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skarabela, B.
(2007a) The role of social cognition in early syntax: The case of joint attention in argument realization in child Inuktitut (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.Google Scholar
(2007b) Signs of early social cognition in children’s syntax: The case of joint attention in argument realization in child Inuktitut. Lingua, 117, 1837–1857. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skarabela, B., & Allen, S.E.M.
(2010) How newness and joint attention work together in child Inuktitut: Assessing discourse-pragmatic models of early argument realization. In K. Franich, K. Iserman, & L. Keil (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 385–396). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Skarabela, B., Allen, S.E.M., & Scott-Phillips, T.C.
(2013) Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 5–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C., & Ferguson, C.
(1977) Talking to children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
So, W.C., Demir, Ö. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2010) When speech is ambiguous, gesture steps in: Sensitivity to discourse-pragmatic principles in early childhood. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 209–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
So, W.C., & Lim, J.Y.
(2012) Point to a referent, and say, “what is this?” Gesture as a potential cue to identify referents in a discourse. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 329–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
So, W.C., Lim, J.Y., & Tam, S.H.
(2014) Sensitivity to information status in discourse: Gesture precedes speech in unbalanced bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 71–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, H., & Fisher, C.
(2005) Who’s “she”? Discourse structure influences preschoolers’ pronoun interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 29–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A.
(2012) “The spotty cow tickled the pig with a curly tail”: How do sentence position, preferred argument structure, and referential complexity affect children’s and adults’ choice of referring expression? Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 691–724. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J., Sekerina, I., Hill, N., & Logrip, M.
(1999) The kindergarten-path effect: Studying online sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittek, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2005) Young children’s sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 541–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar