Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Reference
Edited by Ludovica Serratrice and Shanley E.M. Allen
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 15] 2015
► pp. 181–211

From early to late mastery of reference

Multifunctionality and linguistic diversity

Developmental studies report either early or late mastery of reference during first language acquisition. This overview focuses on two dimensions that may account for this gap: the multifunctional nature of referring expressions that simultaneously contribute to linguistic organization at sentence and discourse levels, and the language-specific properties that present children with different problems to solve. Illustrations from available research indicate that children are highly sensitive to many discourse-pragmatic features of reference from early on. However, they gradually learn to mark the full range of discourse-internal relations that are necessary to communicate in extended discourse, and variable linguistic factors influence this process throughout development. The discussion highlights multiple determinants of how children come to master multifunctionality during the acquisition of reference across languages.

Keywords: agency, definite/indefinite, discourse genre, multifunctionality, narrative, nominal determiners, null argument/subject, pronoun, reference maintenance, referent introduction, subject/subjecthood, topic shift/continuity
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.15.08hic
References
Allen, S.E.M
(2000) A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38, 483–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, S.E.M., & Schröder, H
(2003) Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In J. Du Bois, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 301–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, J., Blume, M., Parkinson, D., Núnez del Prado, Z., & Lust, B
(1996) Interactions between pragmatic and syntactic knowledge in the first language acquisition of Spanish null and overt pronominals. In J. Lema & E. Trevino (Eds.), Theoretical analyses on Romance languages (pp. 35–47). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, N.D., & Greenfield, P.M
(1988) The development of new and old information in young children’s early language. Language Sciences, 10, 3–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M.G.W
(1986) A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships. Linguistics, 24, 227–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987) The acquisition of narratives: Learning to use language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Maillochon, I., Korecky-Kröll, K., van Dijk, M., Laaha, S., Dressler, W.U., & van Geert, P
(2011) A comparative and dynamic approach to the development of determiner use in three children acquiring different languages. First Language, 31(3), 253–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Korecky-Kröll, K., Maillochon, I., & Dressler, W.U
(2013) The acquisition of nominal determiners in French and German: A crosslinguistic perspective on the grammaticalization of nouns. In D. Bassano & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Grammaticalization and first language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives (pp. 37–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Korecky-Kröll, K., Maillochon, I., van Dijk, M., Laaha, S. van Geert, P., & Dressler, W.U
(2013) Prosody and animacy in the development of noun determiner use: A cross-linguistic approach. First Language, 33(5), 476–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R
(2015) Language development beyond the sentence. In E. Bavin & L. Naigles (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.I
(Eds.) (1994) Different ways of relating events in narrative: A cross-linguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bloom, P
(1990) Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 491–504.Google Scholar
Budwig, N
(1995) A developmental–functionalist approach to child language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Brooks, P., & Tomasello, M
(2000) Factors affecting young children’s use of pronouns as referring expressions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearning Research, 43, 1337–1349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., & Lei, J
(2013) The production of referring expressions in oral narratives of Chinese-English bilingual speakers and monolingual peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29 , 41–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, P
(1992) Referential strategies in the narratives of Japanese children. Discourse Processes, 15, 441–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) The lexicon in interaction: Developmental origins of preferred argument structure in Korean. In J. Du Bois, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 81–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cat, C
(2004) A fresh look at how young children encode new referents. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 111–127.Google Scholar
(2011) Information tracking and early encoding in early L1: Linguistic competence vs. cognitive constraints. Journal of Child Language, 38, 828–860. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A
(2008) Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., Patrolia, M., Song, J.Y., & Masapollo, M
(2012) The development of articles in children’s early Spanish: Prosodic interactions between lexical and grammatical form. First Language, 32, 17–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Weck, G
(1991) La cohésion dans les narrations d’enfants [Cohesion in infant narratives]. Neuchätel: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J.W
(1987) The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63, 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emslie, H., & Stevenson, R
(1981) Pre-school children’s use of the articles in definite and indefinite referring expressions. Journal of Child Language, 8 , 313–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fries, N
(1988) Über das Nulltopik im Deutschen [On null topics in German]. Sprache und Pragmatik, 3, 19–49.Google Scholar
Gerken, L.A., & McIntosh, B.J
(1993) The interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology, 29, 448–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grinstead, J
(2000) Case, inflection and subject licensing in child Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Child Language, 27, 119–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M.T., De Lange, J., Gavarro, A., & Caprin, C
(2008) Article omission across child languages. Language Acquisition, 15, 89–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerriero, A.M.S., Oshima-Takane, Y., & Kuriyama, Y
(2006) The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33, 823–857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M
(1998) On null subjects and other pronouns: Syntactic and pragmatic approaches. In N. Dittmar & Z. Penner (Eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition: Essays in honor of Jürgen Weissenborn (pp. 143–175). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2003a) Coherence, cohesion, and context in narrative development: Some comparative perspectives. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 281–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2003b) Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H
(1999) Cohesion and anaphora in children´s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 26, 419–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., Roland, F., & Liang, J
(1996) The marking of new information in children’s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 23, 591–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Kail, M., & Roland, F
(1995) Cohesive anaphoric relations in French children´s narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 15, 277–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Schneider, P
(1993) Children’s ability to restore the referential cohesion of stories. First Language, 13, 169–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Cohesion and coherence anomalies and their effects on children’s referent introduction in narrative retell. In M. Perkins & S. Howard (Eds.), New directions in language development and disorders (pp. 251– 260). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M.E., & Allen, S.E.M
(2013) The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 15–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jisa, H
(2000) Increasing cohesion in narratives: A developmental study of maintaining and reintroducing subjects in French. Linguistics, 38 , 591–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jisa, H., Chenu, F., Fekete, G., & Omar, H
(2012) Promoting patients in narrative discourse: A developmental perspective. In M. Kail & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Language acquisition across linguistic and cognitive systems (pp. 161–177). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kail, M., & Hickmann, M
(1992) French children’s ability to introduce referents in discourse as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 12, 73–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kail, M., & Sanchez y Lopez, I
(1997) Referent introductions in Spanish narratives as a function of contextual constraints: A crosslinguistic perspective. First Language, 17, 103–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A
(1979) A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1981) The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production. In W. Deutsch (Ed.), The child’s construction of language (pp. 121–147). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1986) From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children’s metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23, 95–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T
(2004) On the relation between input frequency and acquisition patterns from a cross-linguistic perspective. In J. van Kempen & S. Baauw (Eds.), Proceedings of GALA (pp. 281–292). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
(2007) Testing the effects of frequency on the rate of learning: Determiner use in early French, German and Italian. In I. Gülzow & N. Gagarina (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Input Frequencies in Acquisition (pp. 83–113). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2008) Determinative, Individual- und Massennomen im Spracherwerb des Deutschen: Diskussion des Nominal Mapping Parameters [Determiners, count nouns, and mass nouns in German language development: Discussion of the Nominal Mapping Parameter]. Linguistische Berichte, 214, 129–160.Google Scholar
Lleó, C
(2001) The interface of phonology and syntax: The emergence of the article in the early acquisition of Spanish and German. In J. Weissenborn & B. Höhle (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping (Vol. 2, pp. 23–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M., & Lenart, E
(2004) Incidence des langues sur le développement de la cohésion en L1 et en L2 : Étude de la gestion du statut des entités dans une tâche de récit [The effect of language on the development of cohesion in L1 and L2 : A study of the management of referent status in narratives]. Langages, 155, 14–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, P., & Lenart, E
(2013) Discourse cohesion and accessibility of referents in oral narratives: A comparison of L1 and L2 acquisition of French and English. Discours, 12, 3–31.Google Scholar
Lenart, E
(2012a) The grammaticalisation of nominals in French L1 and L2: A comparative study of child and adult acquisition. In M. Watorek, S. Benazzo, & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Comparative perspectives to language acquisition: A tribute to Clive Perdue (pp. 420–440). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2012b) ‘Discourse errors’ in children’s narratives in L1 English, French and Polish: A case of ellipsis. Paper presented at the conference on Discourse Cohesive Means in Acquisition (DICMA), Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Li, C.N., & Thompson, S.A
(1976) Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 458–489). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D
(1992) Comments on Hyams and Weissenborn: On licensing and identification. In J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck, & T. Rooeper (Eds.), Theoretical issues in language acquisition (pp. 301–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(2011) A tale of two paradigms. In M. Kail & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Language acquisition across linguistic and cognitive systems (pp. 17–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney B., & Bates, E
(1978) Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural developmental study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 539–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGann, W., & Schwartz, A
(1988) Main character in children’s narratives. Linguistics, 26, 215–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J.M
(1978) A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrieval. Discourse Processes, 1, 14–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M.P
(1976) The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E.V.M., Theakston, A.L., & Tomasello, M
(2006) The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children’s use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 403–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.M
(1991) Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language use: On some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 231–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mishina-Mori, S
(2012) A discourse-pragmatic analysis of referential choice in English and Japanese monolingual children: A longitudinal study. Language, Culture, and Communication: Journal of the College of Intercultural Communication, 4, 35–49.Google Scholar
Moll, H., & Tomasello, M
(2006) Level 1 perspective taking at 24 months of age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 603–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, B., & Dimroth, C
(2008) Word order and information status in child language. Cognition, 107, 317–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, D.K
(1996) Two-year-old children’s sensitivity to a parent’s knowledge state when making requests. Child Development, 67, 659–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orsolini, M., Rossi, F., & Pontecorvo, C
(1996) Re-introduction of referents in Italian children’s narratives. Journal of Child Language, 23, 465–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Power, R., & Dal Martello, F
(1986) The use of the definite and indefinite articles by Italian preschool children. Journal of Child Language, 13, 145–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricard, M., Girouard, P., & Gouin Décarie, T
(1999) Personal pronouns and perspective taking in toddlers. Journal of Child Language, 26, 681–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozendaal, M., & Baker, A
(2008) A cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of the pragmatics of indefinite and definite reference in two-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 35, 773–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J., & Parès, J
(2010a) Dialogical beginnings of anaphora: The use of third person pronouns before the age of 3. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1842–1865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b) Dialogical factors in toddlers’s use of clitic pronouns. First Language, 30, 374–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J., & Matthewson, L
(2005) Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 53–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schimke, S., Colonna, S., & Hickmann, M
(2011) Agentivity and pronoun use: Evidence from a controlled production experiment. Paper presented at the 33. Jahrestagung der deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft , Göttingen, Germany.
(2013) Learning to maintain and to shift topics in French and German: General and language-specific determinants. Paper presented at the conference Linguistic Diversity and Cognition: Implications for First and Second Language Acquisition , ANR-DFG, Lille, France.
to appear). Reference in French and German: A developmental perspective. In Gagarina, N. Kühn, N., & Musan, R (Eds.) Referential and relational discourse coherence in adults and children Dordrecht Springer
Serratrice, L
(2005) The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 437–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Referential cohesion in the narratives of bilingual English-Italian children and monolingual peers. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1058–1087. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) The role of discourse and perceptual cues in the choice of referential expressions in English preschoolers, school-age children, and adults. Language Learning and Development, 4, 309–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S
(2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax–pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English–Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skarabela, B., Allen, S.E.M., & Scott-Phillips, T.C
(2013) Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 5–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.I
(1985) Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 1157–1257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smoczyńska, M
(1992) Developing narrative skills: Learning to introduce referents in Polish. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 23, 103–120.Google Scholar
Song, H., & Fisher, C
(2007) Discourse prominence effects on 2.5-year-old children’s interpretation of pronouns. Lingua, 117, 1959–1987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, N.L., & Albro, E.R
(1997) Building complexity and coherence: Children’s use of goal-structured knowledge in telling stories. In M.G.W. Bamberg (Ed.), Narrative development: Six approaches (pp. 5–44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stein, N.L., & Glenn, C.G
(1979) An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing Vol. 2: Advances in discourse processing (pp. 53–121). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Theakston, A.L
(2012) ‘The spotty cow tickled the cow with the curly tail’: How do sentence position, preferred argument structure, and referential complexity affect children’s and adults’ choice of referring expressions? Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 691–724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A.L., Maslen, R., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M
(2012) The acquisition of the active transitive construction in English: A detailed case study. Cognitive Linguistics, 23 , 91–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Haberl, K
(2003) Understanding attention: 12- and 18-month-olds know what’s new for other persons. Developmental Psychology, 39, 906–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Rodkin, P
(1994) Knowledge of goal/plans: A conceptual basis for narrating. In R.A. Berman & D.I. Slobin (Eds.), Different ways of relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 85–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Valian, V
(2009) Innateness and learnability. In E.L. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 15–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Velde, M
(2004) L’acquisition des articles définis en L1: Une étude comparative entre le français et le néerlandais [The acquisition of definite articles in L1: A comparative study of French and Dutch]. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangères (AILE), 21, 9–46.Google Scholar
Vygostky, L.S
(1962) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Warden, D
(1981) Learning to identify referents. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 93–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, G
(1990) Children’s narrative acquisition: A study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First Language, 10, 105–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittek, A., & Tomasello, M
(2005) Young children’s sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 541–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, A.M.Y., & Johnston, J.R
(2004) The development of discourse referencing in Cantonese speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 31, 633–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 24 other publications

Argus, Reili & Andra Kütt
2022. Acquisition of referentiality in elicited narratives of Estonian-speaking children. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Bitetti, Dana & Carol Scheffner Hammer
2021. English Narrative Macrostructure Development of Spanish–English Bilingual Children From Preschool to First Grade. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 30:3 ► pp. 1100 ff. DOI logo
Cekaite, Asta
2023. Child Pragmatic Development. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
de Weck, Geneviève, Anne Salazar Orvig, Stefano Rezzonico, Élise Vinel & Mélanie Bernasconi
2019. The impact of the interactional setting on the choice of referring expressions in narratives. First Language 39:3 ► pp. 298 ff. DOI logo
Dimroth, Christine, Sarah Schimke & Giuseppina Turco
2018. Focusing Functional Elements: Affirmative Particles and Verum Focus in First Language Acquisition of German. Language Acquisition 25:3 ► pp. 268 ff. DOI logo
Eilers, Sarah, Simon P. Tiffin-Richards & Sascha Schroeder
2019. Gender Cue Effects in Children’s Pronoun Processing: A Longitudinal Eye Tracking Study. Scientific Studies of Reading 23:6 ► pp. 509 ff. DOI logo
Elbro, Carsten, Jane Oakhill, Hakima Megherbi & Alix Seigneuric
2017. Aspects of pronominal resolution as markers of reading comprehension: the role of antecedent variability. Reading and Writing 30:4 ► pp. 813 ff. DOI logo
Fichman, Sveta & Carmit Altman
2019. Referential Cohesion in the Narratives of Bilingual and Monolingual Children With Typically Developing Language and With Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Fichman, Sveta, Joel Walters, Ravit Melamed & Carmit Altman
2022. Reference to characters in narratives of Russian-Hebrew bilingual and Russian and Hebrew monolingual children with Developmental Language Disorder and typical language development. First Language 42:2 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Gagarina, Natalia & Ute Bohnacker
2022. A new perspective on referentiality in elicited narratives: Introduction to the Special Issue. First Language 42:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Hassan, Rouba, Geneviève de Weck, Stefano Rezzonico, Anne Salazar-Orvig & Elise Vinel
2021. Chapter 8. Variations in adult use of referring expressions during storytelling in different interactional settings. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Le Mené, Marine, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Christine da Silva-Genest & Haydée Marcos
2023. The choice of referring expressions in adult-child dialogues. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Lindgren, Josefin, Valerie Reichardt & Ute Bohnacker
2022. Character introductions in oral narratives of Swedish–German bilingual preschoolers. First Language 42:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Lucero, Audrey, Kevin Donley & Bobbie Bermúdez
2021. The English referencing behaviors of first- and second-grade Spanish–English emergent bilinguals in oral narrative retells. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:5 ► pp. 1243 ff. DOI logo
Marcos, Haydée, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Christine da Silva-Genest & Julien Heurdier
2021. Chapter 7. The influence of dialogue in young children’s uses of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
2021. A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:2 ► pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula
2021. Pragmatic markers: the missing link between language and Theory of Mind. Synthese 199:1-2 ► pp. 1125 ff. DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne & Geneviève de Weck
2021. Chapter 11. The acquisition of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021. Chapter 1. A dialogical approach to the acquisition and usage of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021. Chapter 1. A dialogical approach to the acquisition and usage of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Vinel, Elise, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Geneviève de Weck, Salma Nashawati & Somayeh Rahmati
2021. Chapter 10. The impact of speech genres on the use of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 288 ff. DOI logo
Vogels, Jorrig & Josefin Lindgren
2022. The Development of Referring Expression Use from Age 4 to 7 in Swedish-Speaking Children. Discourse Processes 59:9 ► pp. 722 ff. DOI logo
Watorek, Marzena
2018. Chapter 12. Development of discourse competence. In Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 22], ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Chapter 11. The acquisition of referring expressions: From formal factors to communicative experience. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.