Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Reference
Edited by Ludovica Serratrice and Shanley E.M. Allen
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 15] 2015
► pp. 263–283

The cognitive underpinnings of referential abilities

ORCID logo

The aim of the chapter is to take stock and bring together fields of enquiry relevant to the investigation of preschool children’s referential abilities. After an appraisal of the evidence as to what adults’ referential abilities really are, the key cognitive prerequisites for unhindered performance in experimental tasks assessing referential abilities are identified. An estimation of when these cognitive prerequisites are in place in young children is then provided, on the basis of a review of the relevant developmental psychology literature. This leads to concrete predictions as to the emergence of referential abilities in preschool children, upon which one can define a programme of research to progress our understanding of children’s referential abilities.

Keywords: common ground, discourse, egocentricity, executive function, perspective, salience, theory of mind, visual context, working memory
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.15.11dec
References
Aichhorn, M., Perner, J., Kronbichler, M., Staffen, W., & Ladurner, G
(2006) Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind? Neuroimage, 30, 1059–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Almor, A., & Nair, V.A
(2007) The form of referential expressions in discourse. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1, 84–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M
(1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnold, J
(2001) The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation. Discourse Processes, 31, 137–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistic Compass, 4, 187–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J., & Griffin, Z
(2007) The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 521–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J., & Tanenhaus, M
(2011) Disfluency effects in comprehension: How new information can become accessible. In N. Perlmutter & E. Gibson (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (pp. 197–217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E
(2001) The autism-spectrum quotient: Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists, and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E
(1986) Factors in the growth of linguistic awareness. Child Development, 57, 498–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, Volume 70, 636–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Martin, M
(2004) Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the developmental change card sort task. Developmental Science, 7, 325–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blades, M., & Cooke, Z
(1994) Young children’s ability to understand a model as a spatial representation. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 115, 201–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S
(2009) The role of executive function in perspective-taking during on-line language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 893–900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S., Claxton, L., & Moses, L
(2015) The relation between executive function and theory of mind is more than skin deep. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 186–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S., & Meltzoff, A
(2008) Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11, 282–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S., & Moses, L.J
(2001) Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind. Child Development, 72, 1032–1053. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cattanach, A
(2008) Narrative approaches in play with children. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Marshall, C
(1981) Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A.K. Joshi, B. Webber, & I. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
De Cat, C
(2009) Experimental evidence for preschoolers’ mastery of “topic”. Language Acquisition, 16, 224–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Information tracking and encoding in early L1: Linguistic competence vs. cognitive limitations. Journal of Child Language, 38, 828–860. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Egocentric definiteness errors and perspective evaluation in preschool children. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 58–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLoache, J., & Burns, N
(1994) Early understanding of the representational function of pictures. Cognition, 52, 83–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doherty, M.J
(2009) Theory of mind. How children understand others’ thoughts and feelings. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Doherty, M.J., & Wimmer, M.C
(2005) Children’s understanding of ambiguous figures: Which cognitive developments are necessary to experience reversal? Cognitive Development, 20, 407–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epley, N., Morewedge, C., & Keysar, B
(2004) Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760–768. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flavell, J., Botkin, P., Fry, C., Wright, J., & Jarvis, D
(1968) The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Freeman, N.H., Lewis, C., & Doherty, M.J
(1991) Preschoolers’ grasp of a desire for knowledge in false-belief prediction: Practical intelligence and verbal report. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, N., Miyake, A., Corley, R., Young, S., DeFries, J., & Hewitt, J
(2006) Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17, 172–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukumura, K
(2010) Choosing referring expressions (PhD). University of Dundee. Google Scholar
Fukumura, K., & Van Gompel, R
(2011) The effects of animacy in the choice of referring expressions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1472–1504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Producing pronouns and definite noun phrases: Do speakers use the addressee’s discourse model? Cognitive Science, 36, 1289–1311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganea, P.A., Allen, M.L., Butler, L., Carey, S., & DeLoache, J.S
(2009) Toddlers’ referential understanding of pictures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 283–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garon, N., Bryson, S., & Smith, I
(2008) Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S
(2011) Referential processing in monologue and dialogue with and without access to real-world referents. In N. Perlmutter & E. Gibson (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (pp. 273–293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S
(1998) The development of memory. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 3–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grodner, D., Dalini, M., Pearlstein-Levy, S., & Ward, A
(2012) Factors that contribute to the use of perspective in referent identification (Paper presented at the City University of New York conference on human sentence processing).Google Scholar
Grosse, G., Moll, H., & Tomasello, M
(2010) 21-month-olds understand the cooperative logic of requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3377–3383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J
(2009) Children’s use of referring expressions: What can it tell us about theory of mind? Cognitive Critique, 1, 73–100.Google Scholar
(2011) Child language, theory of mind, and the role of procedural markers in identifying referents of nominal expressions. In V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti, & A. Ahern (Eds.), Procedural meaning: Problems and perspectives (pp. 205–231). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R
(1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, D., Grodner, D., & Tanenhaus, M.K
(2009) The real-time use of information about common ground in restricting domains of reference. In U. Sauerland & K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics. From experiment to theory (pp. 228–248).Google Scholar
Hendriks, P
( in press). Optimal acquisition: Why children’s language production can exceed their comprehension. Proceedings of GALA 2013 .Google Scholar
Hendriks, P., de Hoop, H., Krämer, I., de Swart, H., & Zwarts, J
(2010) Conflicts in interpretation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Henning, A., Spinath, F., & Aschersleben, G
(2010) The link between preschoolers’ executive function and theory of mind and the role of epistemic states. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 513–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M
(2000) Le développement de l’organisation discursive. In M. Kail & M. Fayol (Eds.), Acquisition du langage volume 2: Le langage en développement (Vol. 2, pp. 83–115). Paris: PUF. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogrefe, G., Wimmer, H., & Perner, J
(1986) Ignorance versus false belief: A developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states. Child Development, 57, 567–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hongwanishkul, D., Happaney, K.R., Lee, W., & Zelazo, P.D
(2005) Hot and cool executive function: Age-related changes and individual differences. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 617–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C., & Ensor, R
(2007) Executive function and theory of mind: Predictive relations from ages 2 to 4. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1447–1459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A
(1979) A functional approach to child language. A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(1985) Language and cognitive process from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 65–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Barr, D., Balin, J., & Bruauner, J
(2000) Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D
(2003) Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89, 25–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E., Stewart, A., & Serratrice, L
(2011) Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: The role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery. Journal of Child Language, 38, 222–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lempers, J., Flavell, E., & Flavell, J
(1977) The development in very young children of tacit knowledge concerning visual perception. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 95, 3–53.Google Scholar
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M
(2008) Twelve-month-olds communicate helpfully and appropriately for knowledgeable and ignorant partners. Cognition, 108, 732–739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin-Rhee, M., & Bialystok, E
(2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 81–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marvin, R., Greenberg, M., & Mossler, D
(1976) The early development of conceptual perspective taking: Distinguishing among multiple perspectives. Child Development, 47, 511–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M
(2006) The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children’s use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 403–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W
(1999) A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Emerson, M., Witzki, A., Howerter, A., & Wager, T
(2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moll, H., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M
(2014) Two- and 3-year-olds know what others have and have not heard. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 12–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moll, H., & Kadipasaoglu, D
(2013) The primacy of social over visual perspective-taking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, article 588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moll, H., & Meltzoff, A.N
(2011) How does it look? Level 2 perspective-taking at 36 months of age. Child Development, 82, 661–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moses, L., & Tahiroglu, D
(2010) Clarifying the relation between executive function and children’s theories of mind. In J. Carpendale, G. Iarocci, U. Mueller, B. Sokol, & A. Young (Eds.), Self- and social-regulation: Exploring the relations between social interaction, social cognition, and the development of executive functions (pp. 218–233). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mundy, P., Block, J., Delgado, C., Pomares, Y., Hecke, A.V.V., & Parlade, M.V
(2007) Individual differences and the development of joint attention in infancy. Child Development, 78, 938–954. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nadig, A., & Sedivy, J.C
(2002) Evidence of perspective-taking constratins in children’s on-ine reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, N., & Huttenlocher, J
(2000) Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nilsen, E., & Graham, S
(2009) The relations between children’s communicative perspective-taking and executive function. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 220-249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perner, J
(2000) Theory of mind. In M. Bennett (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B
(1948) The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pickering, M.J., & Garrod, S
(2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T
(1981) Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53–94.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M., & Posner, M
(2001) Mechanism and variation in the development of attentional networks. In C. Nelson & M. Luciana (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 353–363). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rueda, M.R., Posner, M.I., & Rothbart, M.K
(2005) The development of executive attention: Contributions to the emergence of self-regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 573–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salomo, D., Graf, E., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M
(2011) The role of perceptual availability and discourse context in young children’s question answering. Journal of Child Language, 38, 918–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J., & Matthewson, L
(2005) Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 53–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schafer, R., & de Villiers, J
(2000) Imagining articles: What a and the can tell us about the emergence of DP. In S.C. Howell, S. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD 24 (pp. 609–620). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R
(1974) Pragmatic presuppositions. In M.K. Munitz & P.K. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 197–213). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
(1978) Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Pragmatics: Syntax and semantics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J.C., Papafragou, A., & Choi, Y
(2011) Referential and syntactic processes: What develops? In N. Perlmutter & E. Gibson (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (pp. 65–108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rij, J
(2012) Pronoun processing: Computational, behavioral, and psychophysiological studies in children and adults (Vol. 108). Groningen: Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Vogels, J., Krahmer, E., & Maes, A
(2013a) Cognitive load does not decrease pronoun use when speaker’s and addressee’s perspectives are dissociated. In Proceedings of COGSCI 2013 (pp. 3681–3868).
(2013b) Who is where referred to how, and why? The influence of visual saliency on referent accessibility in spoken language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1323–1349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weighall, A.R
(2008) The kindergarten path effect revisited: Children’s use of context in processing structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, & Perner, J
(1983) Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P.D., Qu, L., & Müller, U
(2005) Hot and cool aspects of executive function: Relations in early development. In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Eds.), Young children’s cognitive development: Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind (pp. 71–93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Argus, Reili & Andra Kütt
2022. Acquisition of referentiality in elicited narratives of Estonian-speaking children. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Daskalaki, Evangelia, Vasiliki Chondrogianni & Elma Blom
2023. Path and rate of development in child heritage speakers: Evidence from Greek subject/object form and placement. International Journal of Bilingualism 27:5 ► pp. 634 ff. DOI logo
DAVIES, Catherine & Helene KREYSA
2018. Look before you speak: children's integration of visual information into informative referring expressions. Journal of Child Language 45:5 ► pp. 1116 ff. DOI logo
Fichman, Sveta & Carmit Altman
2019. Referential Cohesion in the Narratives of Bilingual and Monolingual Children With Typically Developing Language and With Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Gagarina, Natalia & Ute Bohnacker
2022. A new perspective on referentiality in elicited narratives: Introduction to the Special Issue. First Language 42:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Lindgren, Josefin, Valerie Reichardt & Ute Bohnacker
2022. Character introductions in oral narratives of Swedish–German bilingual preschoolers. First Language 42:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Marcos, Haydée, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Christine da Silva-Genest & Julien Heurdier
2021. Chapter 7. The influence of dialogue in young children’s uses of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
MEGHERBI, Hakima, Alix SEIGNEURIC, Jane OAKHILL & Steve BUENO
2019. Children's understanding of pronouns that differ in scope of reference. Journal of Child Language 46:5 ► pp. 1012 ff. DOI logo
Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
2021. A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:2 ► pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Salazar Orvig, Anne, Haydée Marcos, Julien Heurdier & Christine da Silva
2018. Chapter 11. Referential features, speech genres and activity types. In Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 22], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne & Geneviève de Weck
2021. Chapter 11. The acquisition of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021. Chapter 1. A dialogical approach to the acquisition and usage of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021. Chapter 1. A dialogical approach to the acquisition and usage of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Serratrice, Ludovica & Cécile De Cat
2020. Individual differences in the production of referential expressions: The effect of language proficiency, language exposure and executive function in bilingual and monolingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:2 ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Sopata, Aldona, Kamil Długosz, Bernhard Brehmer & Raina Gielge
2021. Cross-linguistic influence in simultaneous and early sequential acquisition: Null subjects and null objects in Polish-German bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:3 ► pp. 687 ff. DOI logo
Sopata, Aldona, Esther Rinke & Cristina Flores
2024. Null objects in Polish heritage language acquisition in contact with German. International Journal of Bilingualism 28:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Torregrossa, Jacopo, Maria Andreou, Christiane Bongartz & Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
2021. Bilingual acquisition of reference: The role of language experience, executive functions and cross-linguistic effects. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24:4 ► pp. 694 ff. DOI logo
Vasil, Jared
2023. A New Look at Young Children’s Referential Informativeness. Perspectives on Psychological Science 18:3 ► pp. 624 ff. DOI logo
Vogels, Jorrig & Josefin Lindgren
2022. The Development of Referring Expression Use from Age 4 to 7 in Swedish-Speaking Children. Discourse Processes 59:9 ► pp. 722 ff. DOI logo
Wilson, Elspeth, Rebecca Lawrence & Napoleon Katsos
2023. The Role of Perspective-Taking in Children’s Quantity Implicatures. Language Learning and Development 19:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Zufferey, Sandrine
2016. Pragmatic acquisition. In Handbook of Pragmatics, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Chapter 11. The acquisition of referring expressions: From formal factors to communicative experience. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.