In a longitudinal study we found that 6- and 10-month-old monolingual Turkish infants are already sensitive to backness vowel harmony in stem-suffix sequences. Using a head-turn paradigm, listening times between 2 vowel-harmonic and 2 vowel-disharmonic lists of words for backness and rounding harmony were compared. While only main effects of age and trial were found for rounding harmony, in backness harmony a significant interaction between harmony and age was found: 6-month-olds preferred listening to harmonic words whereas 10-month-olds preferred listening to disharmonic words. This finding is reminiscent of the “familiarity-to-novelty-shift” in cognitive development, indicating that younger infants first extract the regular, harmonic pattern in their ambient language, whereas older infants’ attention is drawn to irregular, disharmonic tokens, due to violation-of-expectation.
2007Developmental change and the nature of learning in children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(7): 274–279.
Roder, B.J., Bushnell, E.W. & Sasseville, A.M.
2000Infants’ preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy 1(4): 491–507.
Rose, S.A., Gottfried, A.W., Melloy-Carminar, P. & Bridger, W.H.
1982Familiarity and novely preferences in infant recognition memory: implications for information processing. Developmental Psychology 18(5): 704–713.
Shinskey, J.L. & Munakata, Y.
2010Something old, something new: A developmental transition from familiarity to novelty preferences with hidden objects. Developmental Science 13: 378–384.
Sirois, S. & Mareschal, D.
2004An interacting systems model of infant habituation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(8): 1352–1362.
Snyder, K.A., Blank, M.P. & Marsolek, C.J.
2008What form of memory underlies novelty preferences?Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15(2): 315–321.
Suomi, K., McQueen, J.M. & Cutler, A.
1997Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish. Journal of Memory and Language 36: 422–444.
2015The Phonology and Morphology of Turkish. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
1976The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Journal of Child Development 47: 466–472.
van Kampen, A., Parmaksız, G., van de Vijver, R. & Höhle, B.
2008Metrical and statistical cues for word segmentation: Vowel harmony and word stress as cues to word boundaries by 6- and 9-month-old Turkish learners. In Language Acquisition and Development, A. Gavarró & M.J. Freitas (eds.), 313–324. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Werker, J.F. & Lalonde, C.E.
1988Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology 24(5): 672–683.
Werker, J.F. & Tees, R.C.
1984Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7: 49–63.
1967A note on vowel harmony. International Journal of American Linguistics 33: 166–171.
Zimmer, K.E. & Küntay, A.C.
2003Turkish internal vowel harmony revisited. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics, A.S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan & A. Aksu-Koç (eds.), 27–33. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
Cited by 4 other publications
2022. Development of Speech Perception. In Speech Perception [Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, 74], ► pp. 201 ff.
Güven, Selçuk, Naama Friedmann & Claudio Mulatti
2021. Vowel dyslexia in Turkish: A window to the complex structure of the sublexical route. PLOS ONE 16:3 ► pp. e0249016 ff.
Güven, Selçuk & Laurence B. Leonard
2023. Verb morphology in Turkish-speaking children with and without DLD: the role of morphophonology. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 37:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.