Part of
The Acquisition of Turkish in Childhood
Edited by Belma Haznedar and F. Nihan Ketrez
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 20] 2016
► pp. 2956
References (41)
References
Aksu-Koç, A. & Slobin, D.I. 1985. The acquisition of Turkish. In Cross-linguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 839–878. Hillsdale NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Altan, A. 2009. Acquisition of vowel harmony in Turkish. In 35. yıl Yazıları, N. Büyükkantarcıoğlu & E. Yarar (eds), 9–26. Istanbul: Multilingual Yabancı Dil Yayınları.Google Scholar
Bozşahin, C. 2012. Combinatory Linguistics. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, G.N. & Sezer, E. 1982. Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish. In The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part II, H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (eds.), 213–255. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ekmekçi, Ö. 1979. Acquisition of Turkish: A Longitudinal Study on the Early Language Development of a Turkish Child. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Elman, J.L., Bates, E.A., Johnson, M.H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. & Plunkett, K. 1997. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fisher-Thompson, D. & Peterson, J.A. 2004. Infant side biases and familiarity-novelty preferences during a serial paired-comparison task. Infancy 5(3): 309–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Göz, İ. 2003. Yazılı Türkçenin Kelime Sıklığı Sözlüğü (Dictionary of Word Frequency in Written Turkish). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar
Hacıoğlu, M. 1994. Vowel harmony in Turkish: Problems with generative and auto-segmental approaches. Dilbilim Araştırmaları, 288–305. Ankara: Hitit Yayınevi.Google Scholar
Heck, R.H., Thomas, S.L. & Tabata, L.N. 2014. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling with IBM SPSS, 2nd edn.. [Quantitative Methodology Series]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Houston-Price, C. & Nakai, S. 2004. Distinguishing novelty and familiarity effects in infant preference procedures. Infant and Child Development 13: 341–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kabak, B., Maniwa, K. & Kazanina, N. 2010. Listeners use vowel harmony and word-final stress to spot nonsense words: A study of Turkish and French. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 1: 207–224.Google Scholar
Kabak, B. 2011. Turkish vowel harmony. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, B. Hume & K. Rice (eds), 2831–2954. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kabak, B. & Weber, S. 2013. Markedness, context, and directionality in Turkish harmony: A corpus study on vowel co-occurrence patterns. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 1: 53–85.Google Scholar
Kemler Nelson, D.G., Jusczyk, P.W., Mandel, D.R., Myers, J., Turk, A. & Gerken, L. 1995. The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception. Infant Behavior and Development 18: 111–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ketrez, F.N. 2014. Harmonic cues and speech segmentation: A crosslinguistic study on child-directed speech. Journal of Child Language 41(2): 439–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimper, W.A. 2011. Competing Triggers: Transparency and Opacity in Vowel Harmony. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P.K. 2000. A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 97: 11850–11857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5: 831–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron 67(5): 713–727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lees, R. (1961). The Phonology of Modern Standard Turkish [Indiana University publications: Uralic and Altaic Series 6]. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar
Miller, J.L. & Eimas, P.D. 1983. Studies on the categorization of speech by infants. Cognition 13: 135–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mintz, T. & Walker, R. 2006. Infants’ sensitivity to vowel harmony and its role in word segmentation. Paper presented at the LSA, January 7, Albuquerque NM.
Munakata, Y. 2000. Challenges to the violation-of-expectation paradıgm: Throwing the conceptual baby out with the perceptual bathwater? Infancy 1(4): 471–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascalis, O. & de Haan, M. 2003. Recognition memory and novelty preference: What model? In Progress in Infancy Research, H. Hayne & J. Fagen (eds.), 95–120. Hillsdale NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1976. The Grasp of Consciousness: Action and Concept in the Young Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, M. 2010. Does Turkish diss harmony? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(4): 458–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramscar, M. & Gitcho, N. 2007. Developmental change and the nature of learning in children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(7): 274–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roder, B.J., Bushnell, E.W. & Sasseville, A.M. 2000. Infants’ preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy 1(4): 491–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, S.A., Gottfried, A.W., Melloy-Carminar, P. & Bridger, W.H. 1982. Familiarity and novely preferences in infant recognition memory: implications for information processing. Developmental Psychology 18(5): 704–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shinskey, J.L. & Munakata, Y. 2010. Something old, something new: A developmental transition from familiarity to novelty preferences with hidden objects. Developmental Science 13: 378–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sirois, S. & Mareschal, D. 2004. An interacting systems model of infant habituation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(8): 1352–1362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, K.A., Blank, M.P. & Marsolek, C.J. 2008. What form of memory underlies novelty preferences? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15(2): 315–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suomi, K., McQueen, J.M. & Cutler, A. 1997. Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish. Journal of Memory and Language 36: 422–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylan, E.E. 2015. The Phonology and Morphology of Turkish. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Trehub, S.E. 1976. The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Journal of Child Development 47: 466–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kampen, A., Parmaksız, G., van de Vijver, R. & Höhle, B. 2008. Metrical and statistical cues for word segmentation: Vowel harmony and word stress as cues to word boundaries by 6- and 9-month-old Turkish learners. In Language Acquisition and Development, A. Gavarró & M.J. Freitas (eds.), 313–324. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Werker, J.F. & Lalonde, C.E. 1988. Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology 24(5): 672–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F. & Tees, R.C. 1984. Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7: 49–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, K.E. 1967. A note on vowel harmony. International Journal of American Linguistics 33: 166–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, K.E. & Küntay, A.C. 2003. Turkish internal vowel harmony revisited. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics, A.S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan & A. Aksu-Koç (eds.), 27–33. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Harry van der Hulst & Nancy A. Ritter
2024. The Oxford Handbook of Vowel Harmony, DOI logo
Özkan, Zeynep G., Berceste Özdemir, Pablo Gómez & Manuel Perea
2024. The distinctive role of vowel harmony in visual word recognition: The case of Turkish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology DOI logo
Güven, Selçuk & Laurence B. Leonard
2023. Verb morphology in Turkish-speaking children with and without DLD: the role of morphophonology. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 37:1  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Gervain, Judit
2022. Development of Speech Perception. In Speech Perception [Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, 74],  pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Güven, Selçuk, Naama Friedmann & Claudio Mulatti
2021. Vowel dyslexia in Turkish: A window to the complex structure of the sublexical route. PLOS ONE 16:3  pp. e0249016 ff. DOI logo
Kappa, Ioanna & Marina Tzakosta
2019. Chapter 8. Vowel harmony patterns in Greek dialectal child speech. In Language Variation - European Perspectives VII [Studies in Language Variation, 22],  pp. 134 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.