Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Turkish in Childhood
Edited by Belma Haznedar and F. Nihan Ketrez
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 20] 2016
► pp. 177–191

Learning to think, talk, and gesture about motion in language-specific ways

Insights from Turkish

| Georgia State University
| Georgia State University, USA
Languages differ systematically in the way they express spatial motion, rendering it as a highly relevant domain to examine effects of language on nonverbal representation of events. In this chapter, we focus on Turkish and English, the two languages that differ strongly in their expression of motion events. Our review of existing work – spanning across adult and child native speakers of the two languages (as well as several others) – suggests early emergence of language-specific patterns in speech, and possibly in gesture. Our review also highlights some key areas of further research that could shed new light on the effect of language on nonverbal representation of motion, particularly at the early ages.
Keywords: motion events, language acquisition, cross-linguistic variation, gesture, language and thought, spatial cognition, Turkish, English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Talking about motion
  • 3.Gesturing about motion
  • 4.Thinking about motion
  • 5.Summary and future directions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.20.08ozc
References (72)
References
Alibali, M.W., Bassok, M., Solomon, K., Syc, S.E. & Goldin-Meadow, S. 1999. Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psychological Science 10(4): 327–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alibali, M.W. & Goldin-Meadow, S. 1993. Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology 25(4): 468–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T. & Fujii, M. 2007. Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition 102: 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, F. & Essegbey, J. 2013. Serializing languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics 2(1): 19–38.Google Scholar
Cardini, F. 2010. Evidence against Whorfian effects in motion conceptualization. Journal of Pragmatics 42(5): 1442–1459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. & Bowerman, M. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41(1–3): 83–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. & Lantolf, J.P. 2008. Representation and embodiment of meaning in L2 communication: Motion events in the speech and gesture of advanced L2 Korean and L2 English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(2): 191–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chui, K. 2009. Linguistic and imagistic representations of motion events. Journal of Pragmatics 41(9): 1767–1777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. & Gentner, D. 2006. Naming motion events in Spanish and English. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4): 443–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emerson, S.N., Özçalışkan, Ş. & Frishkoff, G. 2016. Effects of motion type and modality on word learning in English. Applied Psycholinguistics 37(3): 643–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L. 2007. Talking about Motion: A Cross-linguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns [Studies in Language Companion Series 91]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furman, R., Küntay, A.C. & Özyürek, A. 2014. Early language-specificity of children’s event encoding in speech and gesture: Evidence from caused motion in Turkish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(5): 620–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S.P., Sloman, S.A., Malt, B.C. & Fitch, W. 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition 83(1): 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. 2003. Hearing Gesture: How our Hands Help Us Think. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. 1998. Gesture as a Communication Strategy in Second Language Discourse. A Study of Learners of French and Swedish. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M., Hendriks, H. & Hickmann, M. 2008. Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language 28(2): 200–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Taranne, P. & Bonnet, P. 2009. Motion in first language acquisition: Manner and path in French and English child language. Journal of Child Language 36(4): 705–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohenstein, J.M. 2005. Language-related motion event similarities in English- and Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Cognition and Development 6(3): 403–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohenstein, J. 2013. Parent – child talk about motion: Links to children’s development of motion event language. First Language 33(4): 411–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2004. Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3): 317–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. 1980. Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, M.R. Kay (ed.), 207–227. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. & Özyürek, A. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 16–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maguire, M.J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., Imai, M., Haryu, E., Vanegas, S. & Sanchez-Davis, B. 2010. A developmental shift from similar to language-specific strategies in verb acquisition: A comparison of English, Spanish, and Japanese. Cognition 114(3): 299–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J.M. 1971. Multiple stimulus discrimination learning, II: Effects of prior training. Psychonomic Science 23(3): 195–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J.M., Bauer, P.J. & McDonough, L. 1991. Separating the sheep from the goats: Differentiating global categories. Cognitive Psychology 23(2): 263–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J.M. 1992. How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99(4): 587–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (ed.) 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2000. Analogic/analytic representations and cross-linguistic differences in thinking for speaking. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1–2): 43–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L.R., Eisenberg, A.R. & Kako, E.T. 1992. Acquiring a language-specific lexicon: Motion verbs in English and Spanish. Paper presented at the International Conference on Pragmatics, Antwerp, Belgium.
Naigles, L.R., Eisenberg, A.R., Kako, E.T., Highter, M. & McGraw, N. 1998. Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes 13(5): 521–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L.R. & Terrazas, P. 1998. Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax. Psychological Science 9(5): 363–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, B. 2003. Motion events and the lexicon: A case study of Hindi. Lingua 113:123–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oh, K. 2003. Language, Cognition and Development: Motion Events in English and Korean. PhD dissertation in Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. 2003. Metaphorical motion in crosslinguistic perspective. A comparison of English and Turkish. Metaphor and Symbol 18(3): 189–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Encoding the manner, path and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2: 73–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005a. Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics 16(1): 207–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b. On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: Is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity? Journal of Child Language 32(2): 291–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Metaphors we ‘move by’: Children’s developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor and Symbol 22(2): 147–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Learning to talk about spatial motion in language-specific ways. In Cross-Linguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, K. Nakamura & Ş. Özçalışkan (eds), 263–276. New York NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2015. Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics 36: 485–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Do gestures follow speech in bilinguals’ description of motion? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(3): 644–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. 2014. Do iconic gestures pave the way for children’s early verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics 35: 1143–1162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S. 2005. Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition 96(3): B101–B113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Is there an iconic gesture spurt at 26 months? In Integrating Gestures: The Interdisciplinary Nature of Gesture [Gesture Studies 4], G. Stam & M. Ishino (eds), 163–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Goldin-Meadow, S., Gentner, D. & Mylander, C. 2009. Does language about similarity foster similarity comparisons in children? Cognition 112(2): 217–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Lucero, C. & Goldin-Meadow, S. 2016a. Does language shape silent gesture? Cognition 148: 10–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b. Is seeing gesture necessary to gesture like a native speaker? Psychological Science 27(5): 737–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Slobin, D.I. 1999. Learning how to search for the frog: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish. In BUCLD 23: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol. 2, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 163–174. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2000. ‘Climb up’ vs. ‘ascend climbing’: Lexicalization choices in expressing motion events with manner and path components. In BUCLD 24: Proceedings of the 24th Boston University Conference on Language Development, S. Catherine-Howell, S.A. Fish & K. Lucas (eds), 558–570. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in English and Turkish. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics, A.S. Özsoy, M. Nakipoglu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan & A. Aksu-Koç (eds), 259–270. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Özyürek, A. 2002. Speech-language relationship across languages and in second language learners: Implications for spatial thinking and speaking. In BUCLD 26: Proceedings of the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development. B. Skarabella (ed.). 500–509. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R. & Ishizuka, T. 2008. Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology 44(4): 1040–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J. & Trueswell, J. 2008. Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition 108(1): 155–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. & Gleitman, L. 2002. Shake, rattle, ’n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84(2): 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition 98(3): B75–B87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pruden, S.M., Göksun, T., Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R.M. 2012. Find your manners: How do infants detect the invariant manner of motion in dynamic events? Child Development 83(3): 977–991. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pruden, S.M., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R.M. 2008. Current events: How infants parse the world and events for language. In Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events, T.F. Shipley & J.M. Zacks (eds), 160–192. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pruden, S.M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Maguire, M.J. & Meyer, M.A. 2004. Foundations of verb learning: Infants form categories of path and manner in motion events. In BUCLD 28: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Brugos, L. Micciulla & C.E. Smith (eds), 461–472. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking". In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I., Bowerman, M., Brown, P., Eisenbeiβ, S. & Narasimhan, B. 2011. Putting things in places: Developmental consequences of linguistic typology. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (eds), 134–165. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stam, G. 2006. Thinking for speaking about motion: L1 and L2 speech and gesture. IRAL 44: 145–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Lexical Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wieselman Schulman, B. 2004. A Crosslinguistic Investigation of the Speech-Gesture Relationship in Motion Event Descriptions. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Wilson, N.L. 2005. Conceptualizing Motion Events and Metaphorical Motion: Evidence from Spanish/English Bilinguals. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Benjamin, L. Whorf. 1956. Languages and logic. In Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, J.B. Carroll (ed.), 233–245. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zheng, M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. 2002. Thought before language: How deaf and hearing children express motion events across cultures. Cognition 85(2): 145–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J. & Yangklang, P. 2004. A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion – event typology. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, Vol. 2, S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (eds), 159–190. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Tütüncü, Irmak Su, Jing Paul, Samantha N. Emerson, Murat Şengül, Melanie Knezevic & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2023. When Gestures Do or Do Not Follow Language‐Specific Patterns of Motion Expression in Speech: Evidence from Chinese, English and Turkish. Cognitive Science 47:4 DOI logo
Emerson, Samantha N., Christopher M. Conway & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2020. Semantic P600—but not N400—effects index crosslinguistic variability in speakers’ expectancies for expression of motion. Neuropsychologia 149 ► pp. 107638 ff. DOI logo
Valenzuela, Javier & Daniel Alcaraz Carrión
2020. Temporal Expressions in English and Spanish: Influence of Typology and Metaphorical Construal. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2018. How event perspective influences speech and co-speech gestures about motion. Journal of Pragmatics 128 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2021. How language type influences patterns of motion expression in bilingual speakers. Second Language Research 37:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2021. THE SPECIFICITY OF EVENT EXPRESSION IN FIRST LANGUAGE INFLUENCES EXPRESSION OF OBJECT PLACEMENT EVENTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:4 ► pp. 838 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.