Chapter published in:
Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 81–102

Chapter 4
Retrieving meaning from noun and verb grammatical contexts

Interindividual variation among 2- to 4-year-old French-speaking children

| Laboratoire Modèles, Dynamique, Corpus & Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, Université Paris Descartes & CNRS
| Laboratoire Modèles, Dynamique, Corpus, INSERM, Université Paris Nanterre & CNRS
Ninety French-speaking children aged 2 to 4 years were presented with short utterances containing homophonous or nonce words whose object or action meaning was identifiable on the sole basis of the preceding grammatical morpheme. Items in noun and verb contexts were presented to the same children in order to assess their ability to provide appropriate contrastive interpretations. Results show that, at all ages, items were correctly identified beyond chance, with 4-year-olds outperforming the 2- and 3-year-olds. Individually, however, only part of the children, even in the older group, performed beyond chance level, suggesting substantial interindividual variability and difficulties, still present at these ages, to tackle situations offering minimal information. A case study of the developmental relation between production and comprehension is also presented.
Keywords: first language acquisition, French, grammatical morphemes, noun-verb distinction, production and comprehension
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • Participants
    • Procedure
    • Material
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Group results
      • 3.1.1Success rate: All items
      • 3.1.2Success rate: Meaningful and nonce words
      • 3.1.3Effect of age on success rate: All items
      • 3.1.4Effect of age on success rate: Meaningful and nonce words
    • 3.2Individual subjects’ results
      • 3.2.1All items
      • 3.2.2Meaningful homophonous and nonce words
    • 3.3A case study of the relation between production and comprehension
  • 4.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 February 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.05ven
References
Bassano, D.
2000 Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language 27: 512–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Eme, E. & Champaud, C.
2005 A naturalistic study of early lexical development: General processes and inter-individual variations in French children. First Language 25(1): 67–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, S., Lidz, J., Millotte, S. & Christophe, A.
2007 Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning. Language Learning and Development 3: 325–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clairis, C.
1984 Nom et verbe. Modèles Linguistiques VI(1): 23–28.Google Scholar
Cristia, A., Seidl, A., Junge, C., Soderstrom, M. & Hagoort, P.
2014 Predicting individual variation in language from infant speech perception measures. Child Development 85: 1330–1345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. & McIntosh, B.
1993 Interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology 29(3): 448–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L. & Lederer, A.
1999 Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition 73: 135–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, B., Weissenborn, J., Kiefer, D., Schulz, A. & Schmitz, M.
2004 Functional elements in infants’ speech processing: The role of determiners in the syntactic categorization of lexical elements. Infancy 5: 341–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M. & Lyons, T.
1991 Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology 27(2): 236–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, N., Baker, E. & Macnamara, J.
1974 What’s in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper names. Child Development 45: 469–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilani-Schoch M. & Dressler W. U.
2000 Are fillers as precursors of morphemes relevant for morphological theory? In Morphological Analysis in Comparison [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 201], W. U. Dressler, O. E. Pfeiffer, M. Pöchtrager & J. Rennison (eds), 89–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazard, G.
1984 La distinction entre nom et verbe en morphologie et en syntaxe. Modèles Linguistiques VI(1): 29–40.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. V., Pine, J. M. & Baldwin, G.
1997 Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language 24: 187–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lléo, C.
1997 Filler syllables, proto-articles and early prosodic constraints in Spanish and German. In Language Acquisition: Knowledge, Representation, and Processing. Proceedings of GALA 1997, A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillcock (eds), 251–256. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. & Chalkley, M. A.
1980 The internal language of children’s syntax: The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Children’s Language, Vol. 2, K. Nelson (ed.), 127–214. New York NY: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Ziv, T. & Sommerville, J. A.
2016 Variability and individual differences in early social perception and social cognition. Research Topic in Frontiers in Psychology. http://​journal​.frontiersin​.org​/researchtopic​/2848 doi: Crossref
Mintz, T. H.
2006 Finding the verbs: Distributional cues to categories available to young learners. In Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs, K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (eds), 31–63. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L. R.
1990 Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language 17: 357–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand L. & Matos, R.
2001 Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L’Année Psychologique 101: 447–462. http://​www​.lexique​.org
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M. & Ferrand, L.
2004 Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 36(3): 516–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, T., Demuth, K. & Roark, B.
2001 The status of ‘filler syllables’ in children’s early speech. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A.H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez & A. Johansen (ed.) 575–586. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. & Menn L.
1993 False starts and filler-syllables: Ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language 69: 742–777. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petretic, P. A. & Tweney, R. D.
1977 Does comprehension precede production? The development of children’s responses to telegraphic sentences of varying grammatical adequacy. Journal of Child Language 4: 201–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. K.
1999 Linguistic categories. In Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories, K. Brown & J. Miller (eds), 6670. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Shi, R.
2014 Functional morphemes and early language acquisition. Child Development Perspectives 8(1): 6–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, R. & Lepage, M.
2008 The effect of functional morphemes on word segmentation in pre-verbal infants. Developmental Science 11(3): 407–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, R., Werker, J. & Cutler, A.
2006 Recognition and representation of function words in English-learning infants. Infancy 10: 187–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, R., Werker, J. F. & Morgan, J. L.
1999 Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition 72(2): B11–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, E., Smith, C. & Gleitman, L.
1969 A study in the acquisition of language. Language 45: 322–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. L.
1988 The emergent lexicon from a phonetic perspective. In The Emergent Lexicon, M. Smith & J. Locke (eds), 75–109. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taelman, H., Durieux, G. & Gillis, S.
2009 Fillers as signs of distributional learning. Journal of Child Language 36: 323–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tersis-Surugue, N.
1984 L’opposition verbo-nominale dans diverses langues du monde: Présentation. Modèles Linguistiques VI(1): 5–10.Google Scholar
Thelen, E.
1991 Motor aspects of emergent speech: A dynamic approach. In Biological and Behavioral Determinants of Language Development, N. A. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, R. L. Schiefelbusch & M. Studdert-Kennedy (eds), 339–362. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
1992 First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Abbot-Smith, K.
2002 A tale of two theories: Response to Fisher. Cognition 83: 207–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E.
2003 The emergence of noun and verb categories in the acquisition of French. Psychology of Language and Communication 7(1): 23–36.Google Scholar
2017. Noun and Verb categories in acquisition: Evidence from fillers and inflectional morphology in French-acquiring children. In Polycategoriality and Lexical Categories: Cross-Linguistic, Cross-Theoretical and Language Acquisition Approaches [Studies in Language Companion Series 182], V. Vapnarsky & E. Veneziano eds 381 411 Amsterdam John Benjamins Crossref
Veneziano, E. & Parisse, C.
2010 The acquisition of early verbs in French: Assessing the role of conversation and of child-directed speech. First Language 30(3–4): 287–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veneziano E. & Sinclair H.
2000 The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27: 461–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, S. R., Lidz, J. L., Braun, I. E. & Lavin, T.
2009 Twenty four-month-old infants' interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes. Cognitive Psychology 59(1): 67–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Dickinson, David K., Kerry G. Hofer & Bretta L. Rivera
2019.  In Narrative, Literacy and Other Skills [Studies in Narrative, 25], ► pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo
Parisse, Christophe & Caroline Rossi
2017.  In Lexical Polycategoriality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 182], ► pp. 413 ff. Crossref logo
Vapnarsky, Valentina & Edy Veneziano
2017.  In Lexical Polycategoriality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 182], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.