Cross-linguistic variation in children’s multimodal utterances
Asli Özyürek | Radboud University Nijmegen & Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Our ability to use language is multimodal and requires tight coordination between what is expressed in speech and in gesture, such as pointing or iconic gestures that convey semantic, syntactic and pragmatic information related to speakers’ messages. Interestingly, what is expressed in gesture and how it is coordinated with speech differs in speakers of different languages. This paper discusses recent findings on the development of children’s multimodal expressions taking cross-linguistic variation into account. Although some aspects of speech-gesture development show language-specificity from an early age, it might still take children until nine years of age to exhibit fully adult patterns of cross-linguistic variation. These findings reveal insights about how children coordinate different levels of representations given that their development is constrained by patterns that are specific to their languages.
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T. & Fujii, M.2007. Language-specific and universal influences in children’s packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition 102(1): 16–48.
Bates, E.1976. Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York NY: Academic Press.
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V.1979. The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition-Communication in Infancy. New York NY: Academic Press.
Brown, P.2008. Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language. In Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure, M. Bowerman & P. Brown, 167–189. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cardini, F.2010. Evidence against Whorfian effects in motion conceptualization. Journal of Pragmatics 42(5): 1442–1459.
Cartmill, E. A., Demir, Ö.E. & Goldin-Meadow, S.2012. Studying gesture. In Research Methods in Child Language: A Practical Guide, E. Hoff (ed.), 208–225. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Choi, S. & Bowerman, M.1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41(1–3): 83–121.
Colletta, J., Guidetti, M., Capirci, O., Cristilli, C., Demir, O., Kunene-Nicolas, R. & Levine, S.2014. Effects of age and language on co-speech gesture production: an investigation of French, American, and Italian children’s narratives. Journal of Child Language 42(1): 122–145.
Demir, Ö. E., So, W. -C., Özyürek, A. & Goldin-Meadow, S.2012. Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(6): 844–867.
Furman, R.2012. Caused Motion Events in Turkish: Verbal and Gestural Representation in Adults and Children. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Furman, R., Kuntay, A. & Özyürek, A.2014. Early language-specificity of children’s event encoding in speech and gesture: Evidence from caused motion in Turkish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29: 620–634.
Gentner, D.1982. Why are nouns learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Language Development: Language, Thought and Culture, Vol. 2, S. A. Kuczaj (ed.), 301–334. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Alibali, M. W.2013. Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology 123: 448–453. .
Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M.2010. How do preschoolers express cause in gesture and speech?Cognitive Development 25(1): 56–68.
Greenfield, P. & Smith, J.1976. The Structure of Communication in Early Language Development. New York NY: Academic Press.
Gu, Y., Mol, L., Hoetjes, M. & Swerts, M.2014. Does language shape the production and perception of gestures? A study on late Chinese-English bilinguals’ conceptions about time. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane & B. Scassellati (eds). <[URL]> (19 December 2016).
Gullberg, M.2011. Language-specific encoding of placement events in gestures. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (eds), 166–188. Cambridge: CUP.
Gullberg, M., Hendricks, H. & Hickmann, M.2008. Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language 28(2): 200–36.
Gullberg, M. & Narasimhan, B.2010. What gestures reveal about how semantic distinctions develop in Dutch children’s placement verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 21(2): 239–262.
Hickmann, M., Taranne, P. & Bonnet, P.2009. Motion in first language acquisition: Manner and path in French and English child language. Journal of Child Language 36(4): 705–741.
Hostetter, A. B. & Alibali, M. W.2008. Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15: 495–514.
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O. & Caselli, M. C.1994. From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive Development 9(1): 23–43.
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Volterra, V. & Goldin-Meadow, S.2008. Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication in Italian vs. American children. First Language 28(2): 164–181.
Iverson, J. M. & Goldin-Meadow, S.2005. Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science 16(5): 367–371.
Kendon, A.2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: CUP.
Ketrez, N. & Aksu-Koc, A.2002. Acquisition of noun and verb categories in Turkish. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics: Proceedings of the Xth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, A. S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan & A. Koc (eds), 239–246. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press
Kita, S.2009. Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2): 145–167.
Kita, S. & Özyürek, A.2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48 (1): 16–32.
Kita, S., Özyürek, A., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R. & Ishizuka, T.2007. Relations between syntactic encoding and co-speech gestures: Implications for a model of speech and gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(8): 1212–1236.
Küntay, A. & Slobin, D. I.1996. Listening to a Turkish mother: Some puzzles for acquisition. In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language, D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (eds), 265–286. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liszkowski, U., Brown, P., Callaghan, T., Takada, A. & De Vos, C.2012. A prelinguistic gestural universal of human communication. Cognitive Science 36(4): 698–713.
McNeill, D.1992. Hand and Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Namy, L. L., Campbell, A. L. & Tomasello, M.2004. The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development 5: 37–57. (Special issue).
Nicoladis, E.2002. Some gestures develop in conjunction with spoken language development and others don’t: Evidence from bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 26(4): 241–266.
Nicoladis, E., Mayberry, R. I. & Genesee, F.1999. Gesture and early bilingual development. Developmental Psychology 35(2): 514–526.
Oh, K.2003. Language, Cognition and Development: Motion Events in English and Korean. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
Özçalışkan, Ş.2007. Metaphors we move by: Children’s developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor & Symbol 22(2): 147–68.
Özçalışkan, Ş.2012. When gesture does and does not follow speech in describing motion. In Online supplement for the Proceedings of the 36th Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Biller, E. Chung & A. Kimball (eds). <[URL]> (19 December 2016).
Özçalışkan, Ş., Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S.2014. Do iconic gestures pave the way for children’s early verbs?Applied Psycholinguistics 35: 1143–1162.
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S.2005. Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition 96(3): B101–B113.
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S.2009. When gesture-speech combinations do and do not index linguistic change. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2): 190–217.
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S.2011. Is there an iconic gesture spurt at 26 months? In Integrating Gestures: The Interdisciplinary Nature of Gesture [Gesture Studies 4], G. Stam & M. Ishino (eds), 163–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Slobin, D. I.1999. Learning ‘how to search for the frog’: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish and Turkish. In Proceedings of the 23rd Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 541–552. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Özyürek, A., Furman, R. & Goldin-Meadow, S.2014. On the way to language: Event segmentation in homesign and gesture. Journal of Child Language 42: 64–94.
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., Brown, A. & Ishizuka, T.2008. Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology 44(4): 1040–1054.
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. & Gleitman, L.2002. Shake, rattle, 'n' roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84: 189–219.
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. & Gleitman, L.2006. When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition 98: B75–87.
Rowe, M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. G.2009. Differences in early gesture explain SES disparities in child vocabulary size at school entry. Science 323: 951–953.
Talmy, L.1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Semantic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 36–149. Cambridge: CUP.
Talmy, L.2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2024. Sign advantage: Both children and adults’ spatial expressions in sign are more informative than those in speech and gestures combined. Journal of Child Language 51:4 ► pp. 876 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene & Jennifer Hinnell
2024. Iconicity, Schematicity, and Representation in Gesture. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 56 ff.
Brown, Lucien, Hyunji Kim, Iris Hübscher & Bodo Winter
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.