Cover not available
Part of
Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 139–160

Chapter 7
Gesture and speech in adults’ and children’s narratives

A cross-linguistic investigation of Zulu and French

| Laboratoire Linguistique et Didactique des Langues Etrangères et Maternelles, Université Grenoble Alpes
| Department of Linguistics, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
| Laboratoire Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie, Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès & CNRS
This chapter reports on a cross-linguistic developmental study comparing speech and gesture produced in narratives by adults and children speaking either French (a non-pro-drop Romance language) or Zulu (a pro-drop Bantu language). We asked 72 participants (French: 12 adults and 24 children; Zulu: 12 adults and 24 children) to narrate a short silent cartoon. Zulu narratives were more detailed and contained fewer comments than the French. Zulu-speaking participants produced more representational and fewer pragmatic gestures than their French-speaking counterparts. Language differences do not explain this result. Rather, the findings support the gesture-speech co-expressivity framework and suggest an impact of literacy practice norms on multimodal narrative performance during later language acquisition.
Keywords: multimodality, development, narratives, Zulu, French, gesture-speech co-expressivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The role of gesture in the development of multimodal communication
    • 1.2The role of language-specific factors in the development of multimodal communication
    • 1.3Aims of the present investigation
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Procedure
    • 2.3Coding
      • 2.3.1Speech coding
      • 2.3.2Discourse cohesive clues
      • 2.3.3Gesture coding
      • 2.3.4Rates per clause
      • 2.3.5Reliability
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Effects of language and age on linguistic measures
    • 3.2Effects of language and age on gestural measures
    • 3.3The role of gesture in tracking referents in Zulu narratives
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Effects of language on narratives
    • 4.2Effects of language on gestures
    • 4.3Effects of age on narratives
    • 4.4Effects of age on gesture
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.08col
References (30)
References
Bresnan, J. & Mchombo, S. 1986. Grammatical and anaphoric agreement. Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago Linguistic Society 22(2): 278–297.Google Scholar
Capirci, O., Cristilli, C., De Angelis, V. & Graziano, M. 2011. Learning to use gesture in narratives: Developmental trends in formal and semantic gesture competence. In Integrating Gestures: The Interdisciplinary Nature of Gesture [ Gesture studies 4], G. Stam & M. Ishino (eds), 189–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colletta, J. -M. 2004. Le développement de la parole chez l'enfant agé de 6 à 11 ans. Corps, langage et cognition. Sprimont: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Colletta, J. -M., Guidetti, M., Capirci, O., Cristilli, C., Demir, O. E., Kunene-Nicolas, R. K. & Levine, S. 2015. Effects of age and language on co-speech gesture production: An investigation of French, American, and Italian children’s narratives. Journal of Child Language 42(1): 122–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colletta, J. -M., Pellenq, C. & Guidetti, M. 2010. Age-related changes in co-speech gesture and narrative: Evidence from French children and adults. Speech Communication 52: 565–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristilli, C., Capirci, O. & Graziano, M. 2010. Le funzioni anaforiche della gestualità nel racconto dei bambini [The anaphoric function of gestures in children’s narratives]. In La Comunicazione Parlata 3, Atti del Terzo Congresso Internazionale del Gruppo di Studi Sulla Comunicazione Parlata. Vol I [In Oral Communication, Proceedings from the Third International Congress of the Research Group on Oral Commnication], M. Pettorino, A. Giannini & F. M. Dovetto (eds), 307–339. Naples: Università degli Studi di Napoli “l’Orientale”.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. 2000. Bantu noun class systems: Loan word and acquisition evidence of semantic productivity. In Classification Systems, G. Senft (ed.), 270–292. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fayol, M. 1997. Des idées au texte. Psychologie cognitive de la production verbale, orale et ecrite. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interactions between Speakers and Hearers. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Groenewald, H. 2004. Zulu oral art. Oral Tradition 18(1): 87–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, F. 1996. Enfances de la lecture. Manières de faire, manières de dire à l’école maternelle. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. 2006. Handling discourse: Gestures reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning 56(1): 155–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jisa, H. 2000. Increasing cohesion in narratives: A developmental study of maintaining and reintroducing subjects. French Linguistics 38(3): 591–620.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. 2003. Children’s Discourse: Person, Space and Time across Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. & Hendriks, H. 1999. Cohesion and anaphora in children's narratives: A comparison of English, French, German, and Chinese. Journal of Child Language 26: 419–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H. & Gullberg, M. 2011. Developmental perspectives on the expression of motion in speech and gesture: A comparison of French and English. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 2(1): 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture. Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunene, R. 2010. A Comparative Study of the Development of Multimodal Narratives in French and Zulu Children and Adults. PhD dissertation, Stendhal University, Grenoble.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. 1967. Narrative analysis. In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, J. Helm (ed.), 12–44. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Marten, L., Kempson, R. & Bouzouita, M. 2008. Structural underspecification in Romance and Bantu: A procedural perspective. In The Bantu-Romance Connection: A Comparative Investigation of Verbal Agreement, DPs, and Information Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 131], C. de Cat & K. Demuth (eds), 3–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind. What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2014. Gesture-speech unity: Phylogenesis, ontogenesis and microgenesis. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 5(2): 137–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. & Levy, E. T. 1993. Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes 16(4): 363–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R. & Ishizuka, T. 2008. Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology 44: 1040–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramaila, Z. M. 2005. An Investigation of the Potential Role that Folklore can Play in Environmental Education: A Case Study of Mphoko. Magister Artium thesis, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Reig Alamillo, A., Colletta, J. -M. & Kunene, R. N. 2010. Reference tracking in gesture and speech. A developmental study on French narratives. Rivista di Psicholinguistica Applicata X(3): 75–95.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, K. 2009. Gesture and information structure in first and second language. Gesture 8: 236–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeller, J. 2008. The subject marker in Bantu as an antifocus marker. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 38: 221–254.Google Scholar