Chapter published in:
The Development of Prosody in First Language Acquisition
Edited by Pilar Prieto and Núria Esteve-Gibert
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 23] 2018
► pp. 37–57

Early sensitivity and acquisition of prosodic patterns at the lexical level

| Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité & CNRS (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, UMR 8158)
| University of Potsdam
| University of Potsdam
| Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité CNRS (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, UMR 8158)
This chapter reviews sensitivity to prosodic information at the lexical level during the first year of life, considering crosslinguistic data that bear on both monolingual and bilingual acquisition. First, we discuss infants’ early ability to discriminate lexical stress, and how this sensitivity changes across development depending on the native language, reflecting the acquisition of native prosodic properties. Second, we present data establishing the emergence of language-specific lexical stress preferences during that same period, also attesting language-specific acquisition. We then discuss data on the less well studied perception of lexical pitch accent and tone. Finally, we consider the role of lexical stress in early word segmentation abilities, and discuss the representations and processes underlying early prosodic perception at the lexical level.
Published online: 24 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.23.03bha
References

References

Abboub, N., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Serres, J., & Nazzi, T.
(2015) On the importance of being bilingual: Word stress processing in a context of segmental variability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 111–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abboub, N., Boll-Avetisyan, N., Bhatara, A., Höhle, B., & Nazzi, T.
(2016) An exploration of rhythmic grouping of speech sequences by French- and German-learning infants. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Albareda-Castellot, B., Pons, F., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
(2010) The acquisition of phonetic categories in bilingual infants: New data from an anticipatory eye movement paradigm. Developmental Science, 14(2), 395–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatara, A., Boll-Avetisyan, N., Unger, A., Nazzi, T., & Höhle, B.
(2013) Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(5), 3828–3843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatara, A., Yeung, H. H., & Nazzi, T.
(2015) Foreign language learning is related to better rhythm perception in French speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 277–282.Google Scholar
Bijeljac-Babic, R., Serres, J., Höhle, B., & Nazzi, T.
(2012) Effect of bilingualism on lexical stress pattern discrimination in French-learning infants. PloS One, 7(2), e30843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bijeljac-Babic, R., Höhle, B., & Nazzi, T.
(2016) Early prosodic acquisition in bilingual infants: the case of the perceptual trochaic bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bion, R. A., Benavides-Varela, S., & Nespor, M.
(2011) Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants’ and adults’ segmentation of speech sequences. Language and Speech, 54(1), 123–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boll-Avetisyan, N., Bhatara, A., Unger, A., Nazzi, T., & Höhle, B.
(2016) Effects of experience with L2 and music on rhythmic grouping by French listeners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 971–986.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
(1997) Native-language recognition abilities in 4-month-old infants from monolingual and bilingual environments. Cognition, 65(1), 33–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003a) Language experience and the perception of a voicing contrast in fricatives: Infant and adult data. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences – Barcelona, 1987–1990.
(2003b) Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Language and Speech, 46(2–3), 217–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M.
(2001) The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81, B33–B44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J., Floccia, C., Goslin, J., & Panneton, R.
(2011) Infants’ discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar accents in speech. Infancy, 16(4), 392–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, K., Burns, T. C., & Werker, J. F.
(2010) The roots of bilingualism in newborns. Psychological Science, 21(3), 343–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, L., Tsao, F.-M., Liu, H.-M., Li, L.-Y., Hu, Y.-H., Lorenzi, C., & Bertoncini, J.
(2015) The perception of speech modulation cues in lexical tones is guided by early language-specific experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, A., & Kager, R.
(2016) Discrimination of lexical tones in the first year of life. Infant and Child Development, 25(5), 426–439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christophe, A., Guasti, M. T., Nespor, M., Dupoux, E., & Van Ooyen, B.
(1997) Reflections on phonological bootstrapping: Its role for lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes, I2(5–6), 585–612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, S., Mintz, T. H., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2005) Stress changes the representational landscape: Evidence from word segmentation. Cognition, 96(3), 233–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, P.
(1938) L’accent final en français: Accent d’intensité, accent de hauteur, accent de durée. French Review, 12(2), 141–145.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A.
(1998) Intonation in French. In D. Hirst, & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages (pp.195–218). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mehler, J.
(1997) A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
(2001) A robust method to study stress “deafness.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dutoit, T., Pagel, V., Pierret, N., Bataille, F., & van der Vrecken, O.
(1996) The MBROLA project: Towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing – Philadelphia, ICSLP ‘96, Vol. 3, 1393–1396.Crossref
Echols, C. H., Crowhurst, M. J., & Childers, J. B.
(1997) The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(2), 202–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Floccia, C., Keren-Portnoy, T., DePaolis, R., Duffy, H., Luche, C. D., Durrant, S., White, L., Goslin, J, & Vihman, M. M.
(2016) British English infants segment words only with exaggerated infant-directed speech stimuli. Cognition, 148(C), 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A., Friedrich, M., & Christophe, A.
(2007) Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specific. Current Biology, 17(14), 1208–1211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L.
(1990) The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1(1), 3–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F.
(2010) Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goyet, L., de Schonen, S., & Nazzi, T.
(2010) Words and syllables in fluent speech segmentation by French-learning infants: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1332, 75–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goyet, L., Millotte, S., Christophe, A., & Nazzi, T.
(2016) Processing continuous speech in infancy: From major prosodic units to isolated word forms. In J. Lidz, J. Pater, & W. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (pp.133–153). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Goyet, L., Nishibayashi, L.-L., & Nazzi, T.
(2013) Early syllabic segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e79646. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Nespor, M., Christophe, A., & Van Ooyen, B.
(2001) Pre-lexical setting of the head-complement parameter through prosody. In J. Weissenborn, & B. Höhle (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp.231–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, J. S. F., & Saffran, J. R.
(2012) Rhythmic grouping biases constrain infant statistical learning. Infancy, 17(6), 610–641. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B.
(1995) Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Cassidy, K. W., Druss, B., & Kennedy, L.
(1987) Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26(3), 269–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, B., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Herold, B., Weissenborn, J., & Nazzi, T.
(2009) Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: Evidence from German and French infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 32(3), 262–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, B., Pauen, S., Hesse, V. & Weissenborn, J.
(2014) Discrimination of rhythmic pattern at 4 months and language performance at 5 years: A longitudinal analysis of data from German-learning children. Language Learning, 64, 141–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Houston, D. M., Jusczyk, P. W., Kuijpers, C., Coolen, R., & Cutler, A.
(2000) Cross-language word segmentation by 9-month-olds. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 504–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, J. R., Patel, A. D., & Ohgushi, K.
(2008) Perception of rhythmic grouping depends on auditory experience. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 2263–2271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. K., Seidl, A., & Tyler, M. D.
(2014) The edge factor in early word segmentation: Utterance-level prosody enables word form extraction by 6-month-olds. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e83546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jun, S. A.
(1996): The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody: Intonational phonology and the prosodic hierarchy. New York, NY: GarlandGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J.
(1993) Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Nelson, D. G. K., Kennedy, L. J., Woodward, A., & Piwoz, J.
(1992) Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 252–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M.
(1999) The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3–4), 159–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., & Thompson, E.
(1978) Perception of a phonetic contrast in multisyllabic utterances by 2-month-old infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 23(2), 105–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kooijman, V., Hagoort, P., & Cutler, A.
(2005) Electrophysiological evidence for prelinguistic infants’ word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 109–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Prosodic structure in early word segmentation: ERP evidence from Dutch ten-month-olds. Infancy, 14(6), 591–612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L., & Kager, R.
(2014) Perception of tones by infants learning a non-tone language. Cognition, 133(2), 385–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Bilingual exposure influences infant VOT perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 38, 27–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Männel, C., Schipke, C. S., & Friederici, A. D.
(2013) The role of pause as a prosodic boundary marker: Language ERP studies in German 3- and 6-year-olds. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 86–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattock, K., & Burnham, D.
(2006) Chinese and English infants’ tone perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization. Infancy, 10(3), 241–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattock, K., Molnar, M., Polka, L., & Burnham, D.
(2008) The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106(3), 1367–1381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C.
(1988) A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, M., Carreiras, M., & Gervain, J.
(2016) Language dominance shapes non-linguistic rhythmic grouping in bilinguals. Cognition, 152(C), 150–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, M., Gervain, J., & Carreiras, M.
(2013) Within-rhythm class native language discrimination abilities of Basque-Spanish monolingual and bilingual infants at 3.5 months of age. Infancy, 19(3), 326–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, M., Lallier, M., & Carreiras, M.
(2014) The amount of language exposure determines nonlinguistic tone grouping biases in infants from a bilingual environment. Language Learning, 64(s2), 45–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moon, C., Panneton Cooper, R., & Fifer, W. P.
(1993) Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behavior & Development, 16, 495–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J., & Demuth, K.
(1996) Signal to syntax: An overview. In J. Morgan, & K. Demuth (Eds.). Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.1–24.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J.
(1998) Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 756–766. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Floccia, C., & Bertoncini, J.
(1998) Discrimination of pitch contours by neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(4), 779–784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Iakimova, G., Bertoncini, J., Frédonie, S., & Alcantara, C.
(2006) Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: Emerging evidence for crosslinguistic differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), 283–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Jusczyk, P. W., & Johnson, E. K.
(2000) Language discrimination by English-learning 5-month-olds: Effects of rhythm and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., & Jusczyk, A. M.
(2000) Six-month-olds’ detection of clauses embedded in continuous speech: Effects of prosodic well-formedness. Infancy, 1(1), 123–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Mersad, K., Sundara, M., Iakimova, G., & Polka, L.
(2014) Early word segmentation in infants acquiring Parisian French: Task-dependent and dialect-specific aspects. Journal of Child Language, 41(3), 600–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishibayashi, L. L., Goyet, L., & Nazzi, T.
(2015) Early speech segmentation in French-learning infants: Monosyllabic words versus embedded syllables. Language and Speech, 58(3), 334–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., Guasti, M. T., & Christophe, A.
(1996) Selecting word order: The rhythmic activation principle. In U. Kleinhenz (Ed.), Interfaces in phonology (pp.1–26). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. S. F., & Saffran, J. R.
(2009) Learning in reverse: Eight-month-old infants track backward transitional probabilities. Cognition, 113(2), 244–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I., & Dupoux, E.
(2010) Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 422–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polka, L., & Sundara, M.
(2012) Word segmentation in monolingual infants acquiring Canadian English and Canadian French: Native language, cross-dialect, and cross-language comparisons. Infancy, 17, 198–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pons, F., & Bosch, L.
(2010) Stress pattern preference in Spanish-learning infants: The role of syllable weight. Infancy, 15(3), 223–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B.
(2009) Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12(2), 339–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sansavini, A., Bertoncini, J., & Giovanelli G.
(1994) Newborns discriminate stress patterns in phonetically complex Italian words. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 924–924.Google Scholar
Sansavini, A., Bertoncini, J., & Giovanelli, G.
(1997) Newborns discriminate the rhythm of multisyllabic stressed words. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 3–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R.
(2010) Development of hemispheric specialization for lexical pitch-accent in Japanese infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(11), 2503–2513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Y., Utsugi, A., Yamane, N., Koizumi, M., & Mazuka, R.
(2013) Dialectal differences in hemispheric specialization for Japanese lexical pitch accent. Brain and Language, 127(3), 475–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, A.
(2007) Infants’ use and weighting of prosodic cues in clause segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1), 24–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, A. & Cristià, A.
(2008) Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues. Developmental Science, 11(4), 596–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segal, O. & Kishon-Rabin, L.
(2012) Evidence for language-specific influence on the preference of stress patterns in infants learning an Iambic language (Hebrew). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1329–1341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singh, L., & Foong, J.
(2012) Influences of lexical tone and pitch on word recognition in bilingual infants. Cognition, 124(2), 128–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skoruppa, K., Cristià, A., Peperkamp, S., & Seidl, A.
(2011) English-learning infants’ perception of word stress patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), EL50–EL55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skoruppa, K., Pons, F., Bosch, L., Christophe, A., Cabrol, D., & Peperkamp, S.
(2013) The development of word stress processing in French and Spanish infants. Language Learning and Development, 9(1), 88–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skoruppa, K., Pons, F., Christophe, A., Bosch, L., Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Peperkamp, S.
(2009) Language-specific stress perception by 9-month-old French and Spanish infants. Developmental Science, 12(6), 914–919. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soderstrom, M., Seidl, A., Kemler Nelson, D. G., & Jusczyk, P. W.
(2003) The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: Evidence from prelinguistic infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 249–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Molnar, M.
(2008) Development of coronal stop perception: Bilingual infants keep pace with their monolingual peers. Cognition, 108(1), 232–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Hulst, H.
(1999) Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Weikum, W. M., Vouloumanos, A., Navarra, J., Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastian-Gallés, N., Werker, J. F.
(2007) Visual language discrimination in infancy. Science, 316(5828), 1159–1159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weissenborn, J., & Höhle, B.
(2001) Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wellmann, C., Holzgrefe, J., Truckenbrodt, H., Wartenburger, I. & Höhle, B.
(2012) How each prosodic boundary cue matters: Evidence from German infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 580, 1–13.Google Scholar
Yeung, H. H., Chen, K. H., & Werker, J. F.
(2013) When does native language input affect phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 123–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, K. A., Iversen, J. R., Patel, A. D., Mazuka, R., Nito, H., Gervain, J., & Werker, J. F.
(2010) The development of perceptual grouping biases in infancy: A Japanese-English cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 115(2), 356–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Cruz, Marisa, Joseph Butler, Cátia Severino, Marisa Filipe & Sónia Frota
2020. Eyes or mouth? Exploring eye gaze patterns and their relation with early stress perception in European Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Frota, Sónia, Joseph Butler, Ertugrul Uysal, Cátia Severino & Marina Vigário
2020. European Portuguese-Learning Infants Look Longer at Iambic Stress: New Data on Language Specificity in Early Stress Perception. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.