Chapter published in:
The Development of Prosody in First Language Acquisition
Edited by Pilar Prieto and Núria Esteve-Gibert
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 23] 2018
► pp. 185–206

The development of prosodic structure

A usage-based approach

| University of York
Scholarly views are divided as to the source of children’s knowledge of prosodic structure. Within the framework of a usage-based approach, this chapter compares prosodic structures in children learning four languages at the end of the single-word period in order to identify sources of both similarities and differences between children, within and across language groups. The similarities can generally be traced back to common constraints on the neurophysiology of infant vocal production, while the differences between language groups reflect ambient language accentual patterning and dominant word shapes. Individual differences within and across groups additionally relate to differing child mappings of input forms to familiar production patterns.
Published online: 24 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.23.10vih
References

References

Boysson-Bardies, B.de, & Vihman, M. M.
(1991) Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language, 67, 297–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M.
(2001) The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81, B33–B44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M.
(1987) The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. L., & MacNeilage, P. F.
(2000) An embodiment perspective on the acquisition of speech perception. Phonetica, 57, 229–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DePaolis, R. A., Keren-Portnoy, T., & Vihman, M. M.
(2016) Making sense of infant familiarity and novelty responses to words at lexical onset. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 715. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DePaolis, R., Vihman, M. M., & Keren-Portnoy, T.
(2011) Do production patterns influence the processing of speech in prelinguistic infants? Infant Behavior and Development, 34, 590–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M., & Nakai, S.
(2013) The influence of babbling patterns on the processing of speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 642–649. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A., & Farwell, C. B.
(1975) Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language, 51, 419–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A.
(1991) Prosody in speech to children: Prelinguistic and linguistic functions. Annals of Child Development, 8, 43–80.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P.
(1994) On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Amsterdam: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D.
(1989) Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 200–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. A.
(1990) Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grabe, E., & Low, E. L.
(2002) Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In C. Gussenhoven, & N. Warner (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VII (pp.515–546). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, K. C., Hume, E., Jaeger, T. F., & Wedel, A.
(2016) The message shapes phonology.Paper presented at the symposium on The role of predictability in shaping human language sound patterns, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Icht, M., & Mama, Y.
(2015) The production effect in memory: A prominent mnemonic in children. Journal of Child Language, 42, 1102–1124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W.
(1993) From general to language-specific capacities: The WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 3–28.Google Scholar
(1997) The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M.
(2013) The development of prosody and prosodic structure. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M., & Stoel-Gammon, C.
(2001) Development of syllable structure in English-speaking children with particular reference to rhymes. Journal of Child Language, 28, 393–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, M., & Lleó, C.
(2003) The acquisition of nuclei: A longitudinal analysis of phonological vowel length in three German-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 30, 527–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keren-Portnoy, T., Majorano, M., & Vihman, M. M.
(2009) From phonetics to phonology: The emergence of first words in Italian. Journal of Child Language, 36, 235–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keren-Portnoy, T., & Segal, O.
(2016) Phonological development in Israeli-Hebrew-learning infants and toddlers: Perception and perception. In R. A. Berman (Ed.), Acquisition and development of Hebrew (pp.69–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keren-Portnoy, T., Vihman, M. M., DePaolis, R., Whitaker, C., & Williams, N. A.
(2010) The role of vocal practice in constructing phonological working memory. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1280–1293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khattab, G., & Al-Tamimi, J.
(2013) Early phonological patterns in Lebanese Arabic. In M. M. Vihman, & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence (pp.374–414). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K.
(1987) Perception of speech and sound in early infancy. In P. Salapatek, & L. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of infant perception (Vol. 2, pp.275–381). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kunnari, S.
(2000) Characteristics of early lexical and phonological development in children acquiring Finnish. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Oulu.Google Scholar
Macken, M. A.
(1979) Developmental reorganization of phonology: A hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua, 49, 11–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, C., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K. L., Neary, K. R., & Ozubko, K. D.
(2010) The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 671–685.Google Scholar
Majorano, M., Vihman, M. M., & DePaolis, R. A.
(2014) The relationship between infants’ production experience and their processing of speech. Language Learning and Development, 10, 179–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., Nazzi, T., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G.
(1996) Coping with linguistic diversity: The infant’s viewpoint. In J. Morgan, & K. Demuth (Eds.), From signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.101–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P. Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C.
(1988) A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L., & Vihman, M. M.
(2011) Features in child phonology: Inherent, emergent, or artefacts of analysis? In N. Clements, & R. Ridouane (Eds.), Where do phonological features come from? (pp.261–301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munson, B., Edwards, J., & Beckman, M. E.
(2012) Phonological representation in language acquisition: Climbing the ladder of abstraction. In A. C. Cohn, C. Fougeron, & M. K. Huffman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology (pp.288–309). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I.
(1986) Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K.
(1980) The emergence of the sounds of speech in infancy. In G. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology, Vol. I: Production (pp.93–112). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E.
(1988) The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Development, 59, 441–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, E., Post, B., Astruc, L., Prieto, P., & Vanrell, M. M.
(2012) Measuring child rhythm. Language and Speech, 55, 203–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J.
(2003) Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46, 115–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S.
(1977) One idiosyncratic strategy in the aquisition of phonology. Journal of Child Language, 4, 45–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J.
(1999) Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savinainen-Makkonen, T.
(2000a) Learning long words: A typological perspective. Language and Speech, 43, 205–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) Word initial consonant omissions: A developmental process in children learning Finnish. First Language, 20, 161–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E.
(1978) On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In T. Fretheim (Ed.), Nordic prosody II (pp.111–140). Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
(1980) The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 563–605.Google Scholar
(1996) The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Morgan, & K. Demuth (Eds.), From signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.187–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C., & Cooper, J. A.
(1984) Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E., & Sinclair, H.
(2000) The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 27, 461–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M.
(1993) Variable paths to early word production. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 61–82.Google Scholar
(1996) Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2010) Phonological templates in early words: A cross-linguistic study. In C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. D’Imperio, & N. Vallée (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 10 (pp.261–284). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2014) Phonological development: The first two years (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016) Prosodic structures and templates in bilingual phonological development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 69–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
in press). First word learning. In S-A. Rueschmeyer, & G. Gaskell Eds. Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics Oxford Oxford University Press
Vihman, M. M., & Croft, W.
(2007) Phonological development: Toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45, 683–725. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Kay, E., Boysson-Bardies, B., de, Durand, C., & Sundberg, U.
(1994) External sources of individual differences? A cross-linguistic analysis of the phonetics of mothers’ speech to one-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 30, 652–663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., & Keren-Portnoy, T.
(Eds.) (2013) The emergence of phonology: Whole word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Keren-Portnoy, T., Khattab, G., & Wauquier, S.
(2011, July). Psychological significance and typology of templates in early word production. Paper presented at International Association for the Study of Child Language, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., & Kunnari, S.
(2006) The sources of phonological knowledge: A cross-linguistic perspective. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 35, 133–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Macken, M. A., Miller, R., Simmons, H., & Miller, J.
(1985) From babbling to speech: A reassessment of the continuity issue. Language, 61, 397–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., & Majorano, M.
(2017) The role of geminates in infants’ early words and word-form recognition. Journal of Child Language, 44, 158–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S., & DePaolis, R. A.
(2006) Getting the rhythm right: A cross-linguistic study of segmental duration in babbling and first words. In L. Goldstein, D. Whalen, & C. Best (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 8 (pp.341–366). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S., DePaolis, R. A., & Hallé, P.
(2004) The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 336–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., & Velleman, S.
(1989) Phonological reorganization: A case study. Language and Speech, 32, 149–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., & Velleman, S. L.
(2000) Phonetics and the origins of phonology. In N. Burton-Roberts, P. Carr & G. Docherty (Eds.), Phonological knowledge: Its nature and status (pp.305–339). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Velleman, S. L. & McCune, L.
(1994) How abstract is child phonology? Towards an integration of linguistic and psychological approaches. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp.9–44). San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Wauquier, S., & Yamaguchi, N.
(2013) Templates in French. In M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence (pp.317–342). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zamuner, T. S., Morin-Lessard, E., Strahm, S., & Page, M. P. A.
(2016) Spoken word recognition of novel words, either produced or only heard during learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 55–67.doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Schölderle, Theresa, Elisabet Haas & Wolfram Ziegler
2020. Age Norms for Auditory-Perceptual Neurophonetic Parameters: A Prerequisite for the Assessment of Childhood Dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63:4 ► pp. 1071 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.