Chapter 7
Not all subjects are agents
Transitivity and meaning in early language comprehension
Children use syntax to guide sentence comprehension and verb learning. We explored the nature of the meanings children infer from syntactic evidence by examining the types of event-roles they can link with the subjects and objects of transitive verbs. In two experiments, 23-month-olds heard a novel verb in a transitive sentence while viewing pairs of events in which one participant acted on another without producing a clear effect (Experiment 1) or one participant moved relative to another without contacting it (Experiment 2). In both cases, children looked longer at the event in which the subject referent played a more prominent role. These findings suggest that children map a highly abstract conceptual-semantic asymmetry onto the syntactic difference between subjects and objects.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Abstract vs. concrete representations of language experience
- 1.2The semantics of subjects and objects
- 1.2.1Proto-agents and proto-patients
- 1.2.2Beyond transitives: The asymmetry of syntax
- 1.2.3The semantic prominence of subjects: Prior evidence from adults and children
- 1.3The present research
- 2.Experiment 1
- 2.1Method
- 2.1.1Participants
- 2.1.2Apparatus
-
2.1.3Materials and procedure
- 2.1.4Coding
-
2.2Results and discussion
- 3.Experiment 2
-
3.1Method
- 3.1.1Participants
- 3.1.2Apparatus
- 3.1.3Materials and procedure
- 3.1.4Coding
- 3.2Results and discussion
- 4.General discussion
-
Acknowledgments
-
Notes
-
References
References (51)
Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M.
(
2008)
Graded representations in the acquisition of English and German transitive constructions.
Cognitive Development, 23, 48–66.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E.
(
2015)
A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In
B. MacWhinney &
W. O’Grady (Eds.),
The handbook of language emergence (pp. 478–510). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arunachalam, S.
(
2013)
Two-year-olds can begin to acquire verb meanings in social impoverished contexts.
Cognition, 129, 569–573.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arunachalam, S., Escovar, E., Hansen, M. A., & Waxman, S.
(
2013)
Out of sight, but not out of mind: 21-month-olds use syntactic information to learn verbs even in the absence of a corresponding event.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 417–425.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arunachalam, S. & Waxman, S. R.
(
2010)
Meaning from syntax: Evidence from 2-year-olds.
Cognition, 114, 442–446.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & Bian, L.
(
2016)
Psychological reasoning in infancy.
Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 159–186.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K.
(
1972)
Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K.
(
2006)
Becoming syntactic.
Psychological Review, 113, 234–272.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chestnut, E. K., & Markman, E. M.
(
2016)
Are horses like zebras, or vice versa? Children’s sensitivity to the asymmetries of directional comparisons.
Child Development, 87, 568–582.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L.
(
1996)
Lexical development norms for young children.
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 125–127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(
2008)
Young German children’s early syntactic competence: A preferential looking study.
Developmental Science, 11, 575–582.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, D.
(
1991)
Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.
Language, 67, 547–619.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fenson, L., Pethick, S., Renda, C., Cox, J. L., Dale, P. S., & Reznick, J. S.
(
2000)
Short-form versions of the MacArthur communicative development inventories.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 95–115.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernandes, K. J., Marcus, G. F., Di Nubila, J. A., & Vouloumanos, A.
(
2006)
From semantics to syntax and back again: Argument structure in the third year of life.
Cognition, 100, B10–B20.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisher, C.
(
2002)
Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of abstract structure in 2.5-year-olds’ interpretations of novel verbs.
Developmental Science, 5, 56–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisher, C., Gertner, Y., Scott, R. M., Yuan, S.
(
2010)
Syntactic bootstrapping.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 143–149.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisher, C., Hall, D. G., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L. R.
(
1994)
When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth.
Lingua, 92, 333–375.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisher, C. & Song, H.
(
2006)
Who’s the subject? Sentence structure and verb meaning. In
K. Hirsh-Pasek &
R. Golinkoff (Eds.),
Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 392–426). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C.
(
2012)
Predicted errors in children’s early sentence comprehension.
Cognition, 125, 85–94.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J.
(
2006)
Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension.
Psychological Science, 17, 684–691.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C.
(
2005)
Hard words.
Language Learning and Development, 1, 23–64.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H., Miller, C., & Ostrin, R.
(
1996)
Similar, and similar concepts.
Cognition, 58, 321–376.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, J.
(
1990)
Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartshorne, J. K., O’Donnell, T. J., Sudo, Y., Uruwashi, M., Lee, M., & Snedeker, J.
(
2016)
Psych verbs, the linking problem, and the acquisition of language.
Cognition, 157, 268–288.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartshorne, J. K., Pogue, A., & Snedeker, J.
(
2015)
Love is hard to understand: The relationship between transitivity and caused events in the acquisition of emotion verbs.
Journal of Child Language, 42, 467–504.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hohenstein, J. M., Naigles, L. R., & Eisenberg, A. R.
(
2004)
Keeping verb acquisition in motion: A comparison of English and Spanish. In
D. G. Hall &
S. R. Waxman (Eds.),
Weaving a lexicon (pp. 569–602). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
(
1980)
Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language, 56, 251–295.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jin, K. S.
(
2015)
The role of syntactic and discourse information in verb learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kako, E.
(
2006)
Thematic role properties of subjects and objects.
Cognition, 101, 1–42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kline, M., Snedeker, J., & Schulz, L.
(
2017)
Linking language and events: Spatiotemporal cues drive children’s expectations about the meanings of novel transitive verbs.
Language Learning and Development, 13, 1–23.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. R.
(
2015)
Height matters. In
I. Toivonen,
P. Csúri, &
E. van der Zee (Eds.),
Structures in the mind: Essays on language, music, and cognition in honor of Ray Jackendoff (pp. 187–210). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, B.
(
1993)
English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, B., & Rappaport-Hovav, M.
(
2005)
Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lidz, J., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L.
(
2003)
Understanding how input matters: Verb learning and the footprint of Universal Grammar.
Cognition, 87, 151–178.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naigles, L.
(
1990)
Children use syntax to learn verb meaning.
Journal of Child Language, 17, 357–374.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naigles, L. R.
(
1996)
The use of multiple frames in verb learning via syntactic bootstrapping.
Cognition, 58, 221–251.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naigles, L., Fowler, A., & Helm, A.
(
1992)
Developmental changes in the construction of verb meanings.
Cognitive Development, 7, 403–427.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naigles, L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L.
(
1993)
Children acquire word meaning components from syntactic evidence. In
E. Dromi (Ed.),
Language and cognition: A developmental perspective (pp. 104–140). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naigles, L. R., & Kako, E. T.
(
1993)
First contact in verb acquisition: Defining a role for syntax.
Child Development, 64, 1665–1687.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naigles, L. R., & Terrazas, P.
(
1998)
Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax.
Psychological Science, 9, 363–369.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nappa, R. L., January, D., Gleitman, L. R., & Trueswell, J.
(
2004)
Paying attention to attention: Perceptual priming effects on word order. In
Proceedings of the 17th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, New York.
Osgood, C. E., & Bock, J. K.
(
1977)
Salience and sentencing: Some production principles. In
S. Rosenberg (Ed.),
Sentence production: Developments in research and theory (pp. 89–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L.
(
2006)
When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events.
Cognition, 98, B75–B87.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S.
(
1989)
Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, R. M. & Fisher, C.
(
2009)
Two-year-olds use distributional cues to interpret transitivity-alternating verbs.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 777–803.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L.
(
1983)
How language structures space. In
H. L. Pick &
L. P. Acredolo (Eds.),
Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp. 225–282). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L.
(
1985)
Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In
T. Shopen (Ed.),
Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsunoda, T.
(
1985)
Remarks on transitivity.
Journal of Linguistics, 21, 385–396.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wagner, L.
(
2010)
Inferring meaning from syntactic structures in acquisition: The case of transitivity and telicity.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 1354–1379.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yuan, S., & Fisher, C.
(
2009)
“Really? She blicked the baby?”: Two-year-olds learn combinatorial facts about verbs by listening.
Psychological Science, 20, 619–626.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yuan, S., Fisher, C., & Snedeker, J.
(
2012)
Counting the nouns: Simple structural cues to verb meaning.
Child Development, 83, 1382–1399.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Donnelly, Seamus & Evan Kidd
2021.
On the Structure and Source of Individual Differences in Toddlers' Comprehension of Transitive Sentences.
Frontiers in Psychology 12
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Fisher, Cynthia, Kyong‐sun Jin & Rose M. Scott
2020.
The Developmental Origins of Syntactic Bootstrapping.
Topics in Cognitive Science 12:1
► pp. 48 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Horvath, Sabrina, Leslie Rescorla & Sudha Arunachalam
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.