Chapter published in:
The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking
Edited by Alexandru Mardale and Silvina Montrul
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 26] 2020
► pp. 51–75

Chapter 2
Differential Object Marking in the speech of children learning Basque and Spanish

| Rutgers University - Newark

Basque speakers use dative case and agreement with animate, specific direct objects, a pattern that has been argued to be an instance of contact-induced Differential Object Marking (DOM) stemming from contact with the leísta dialect of Spanish spoken in the Basque Autonomous Community. This study compares the oral production of DOM in Basque and in Spanish by bilingual and monolingual children and by adults. While the bilingual children produced few tokens of DOM in Spanish, both bilingual and monolingual children used DOM in Basque more frequently than adults. In addition, bilingual children produced DOM at the same age in both Basque and Spanish, but at an earlier age in Basque than monolingual children do, suggesting that bilingualism in Spanish may accelerate the use of DOM in Basque. The implications of these findings for grammatical innovations driven by language contact are discussed.

Keywords: Basque, dative case, school age bilingual children, Spanish leísmo, Differential Object Marking, oral production
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Differential Object Marking and leísmo in Spanish
  • 3.Differential Object Marking (DOM) in Basque
  • 4.The acquisition of DOM in Spanish and Basque
  • 5.Research questions
  • 6.Experimental design
    • 6.1Adult participants
    • 6.2Child participants
    • 6.3Procedures
  • 7.Results
  • 8.Discussion
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.26.02aus
References
Albizu, P.
(1997) Generalized Person-Case Constraint: A case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology. In M. Uribe-Etxebarria & A. Mednikoetxea (Eds.), Theoretical issues on the morphology-syntax nterface (Supplements of Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo” 15 , pp. 1–33). Donostia: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldunida/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.Google Scholar
Austin, J.
(2001) Language differentiation and the acquisition of morphosyntax in bilingual Basque/Spanish children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
(2006) Dative overmarking in Basque: Evidence of Spanish-Basque convergence. Euskalingua, 9, 136–145.Google Scholar
(2014) Transfer and contact-induced variation in child Basque. In C. O’Shannessy (Ed.), Acquisition in contact. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 1576 Crossref
Barreña, A.
(1995) Gramatikaren jabekuntzagarapena eta haur euskaldunak. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
Bonet, E.
(1991) Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Bossong, G.
(1983/1984) Animacy and markedness in Universal Grammar. Glossologia, 2(3), 7–20.Google Scholar
(1991) Differential Object Marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ezeizabarrena, M.
(1996) Adquisición de la morfología verbal en euskera y castellano por niños bilingües. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
Ezeizabarrena, M. J., & Larrañaga, M. P.
(1996) Ergativity in Basque: a problem for language acquisition?. Linguistics, 34(5), 955-992.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ordóñez, I.
(1999) Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp.1317–1393). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Fernández, B.
(2001) Absolutibo komunztaduradun ergatiboak, absolutibo komunztaduradun datiboak: Ergatiboaren Lekualdatzetik Datiboaren Lekualdatzera. In B. Fernández & P. Albizu Garitano (Eds.), Kasu eta komunztaduraren gainean [On Case and Agreement]. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Fernández, B., & Rezac, M.
(2010) Datibo osagarri bitxiak eta Datiboaren lekualdatzea: Ari nai diyot eta kanta egin nauzu bidegurutzean. In B. Fernández, P. Albizu, & R. Etxepare (Eds.), Euskara eta euskarak: Aldakortasun sintaktikoa aztergai (pp. 113–150). Vitoria-Gasteiz: EHU.Google Scholar
(2016) Differential Object Marking in Basque varieties. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (pp. 93–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
(2005) Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franco, J.
(1993) Conditions on clitic doubling: the agreement hypothesis. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca" Julio de Urquijo", 27(1), 285-298.Google Scholar
Heusinger, K. von, & Kaiser, G.
(2011) Affectedness and Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Morphology, 21, 593–617. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M., & Parra, M.
(2012) Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 39(1), 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J., Elordieta, I., & Elordieta, A.
(1994) The Basque dialect of Lekeitio. Bilbao and Donostia: University of the Basque Country and Diputación de Gipuzkoa.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T.
(2007) Determiners in bilingual German–Italian children: What they tell us about the relation between language influence and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 57–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lafon, R.
(1944) Le système du verbe basque au XVIè siècle. Bayonne: Elkar.Google Scholar
Landa, A.
(1995) Conditions on null objects in Basque Spanish and y their relation to leísmo and clitic doubling (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Laka, I.
(1993) The structure of inflection: A case study in Xo. In J. Hualde and J. Ortiz de Urbina, Generative Studies in Basque Linguistics, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 21-70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, M.
(2004) Specificity and Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 75–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liceras, J., Fernández Fuertes, R., & Alba de la Fuente, A.
(2011) Overt subjects and copula omission in the Spanish and the English grammar of English-Spanish bilinguals: On the locus and directionality of interlinguistic influence. First Language, 32(1–2), 88–115.Google Scholar
López, L.
(2012) Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions and Differential Marking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2011) Multiple interfaces and incomplete acquisition. Lingua, 121(4), 591–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Sánchez-Walker, N.
(2013) Differential Object Marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 109–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odria, A.
(2014) Differential Object Marking and the nature of dative case in Basque varieties. Linguistic Variation 14(2), 289–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Differential Object Marking and datives in Basque syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J.
(2007) The object agreement constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25(2), 315–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics, 25(2), 301–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española
(1983) Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M.
(2008) The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Probus, 20(1), 111–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I.
(2013) Contact-induced phenomena in Gernika Basque: The case of dative over-marking. In C. Howe, S. Blackwell, & M. Lubbers Quesada (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 236–251). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2016) Differential Object Marking in Basque: Grammaticalization, attitudes and ideological representations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
(2017) Reexamining Differential Object Marking as a linguistic contact-phenomenon in Gernika Basque. Journal of Language Contact, 10(2), 318–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, L.
(2003) Quechua-Spanish bilingualism: Interference and convergence in functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality and aspectual systems of Quecha Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 147–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shain, C., & Tonhauser, J.
(2010) The synchrony and diachrony of Differential Object Marking in Paraguayan Guaraní. Language Variation and Change, 22(3), 321–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(1994). Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2014) Bilingual language acquisition: Spanish and English in the first six years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ticio, E.
(2015) Differential Object Marking in Spanish-English early bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(1), 62–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ticio, E., & Avram, L.
(2015) The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish and Romanian: Semantic scales or semantic features? Revue Roumaine de Linguistique-Romanian Review of Linguistics, 60(4), 383–401.Google Scholar
Torrego, E.
(1998). The Dependencies of Objects (Vol. 34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Callen, M. Cole & Karen Miller
2022. Linguistic Variation in the Acquisition of Morphosyntax: Variable Object Marking in the Speech of Mexican Children and Their Caregivers. Language Learning and Development 18:3 ► pp. 310 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.