Insights from studying statistical learning
Acquiring language is notoriously complex, yet for the majority of children this feat is accomplished with remarkable ease. Usage-based accounts of language acquisition suggest that this success can be largely attributed to the wealth of experience with language that children accumulate over the course of language acquisition. One field of research that is heavily underpinned by this principle of experience is statistical learning, which posits that learners can perform powerful computations over the distribution of information in a given input, which can help them to discern precisely how that input is structured, and how it operates. A growing body of work brings this notion to bear in the field of language acquisition, due to a developing understanding of the richness of the statistical information contained in speech. In this chapter we discuss the role that statistical learning plays in language acquisition, emphasising the importance of both the distribution of information within language, and the situation in which language is being learnt. First, we address the types of statistical learning that apply to a range of language learning tasks, asking whether the statistical processes purported to support language learning are the same or distinct across different tasks in language acquisition. Second, we expand the perspective on what counts as environmental input, by determining how statistical learning operates over the situated learning environment, and not just sequences of sounds in utterances. Finally, we address the role of variability in children’s input, and examine how statistical learning can accommodate (and perhaps even exploit) this during language acquisition.
Article outline
- Preface
- Introduction
- Statistical processes for different language learning tasks
- General statistical principles of language acquisition: Grouping and dividing
- The role of the broader environment on learning
- A note on cue variability
- Conclusions
-
References
References (108)
Aristotle
(350BCE
1932)
Posterior analytics. Translated by
G. R. G. Mure,
Works of Aristotle, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ay, N., Flack, J., & Krakauer, D.
(
2007)
Robustness and complexity co-constructed in multimodal signalling networks.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1479), 441–447.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R.
(
2004)
Intersensory redundancy guides the development of selective attention, perception, and cognition in infancy.
Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 99–102.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baldwin, D. A.
(
1991)
Infants’ contribution to the achievement of joint reference.
Child Development, 62, 875–890.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Black, A., & Bergmann, C.
(
2017)
Quantifying infants’ statistical word segmentation: A meta-analysis. In
G. Gunzelmann,
A. Howes,
T. Tenbrink, &
E. J. Davelaar (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 124–129). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A. N.
(
2008)
Infant gaze following and pointing predict accelerated vocabulary growth through two years of age: A longitudinal, growth curve modeling study.
Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 207–220.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E. V., & Tomasello, M.
(
2003)
A construction based analysis of child directed speech.
Cognitive Science, 27(6), 843–873.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cartwright, T. A., & Brent, M. R.
(
1997)
Syntactic categorization in early language acquisition: Formalizing the role of distributional analysis.
Cognition, 63(2), 121–170.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1981)
Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
2005)
Three factors in language design.
Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clerkin, E. M., Hart, E., Rehg, J. M., Yu, C., Smith, L. B.
(
2017)
Real-world visual statistics and infants’ first-learned object names.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372 (1711), 1–10.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, S., & Nakayama, M.
(
1987)
Structure dependence in grammar formation.
Language, 63(3), 522–543.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conwell, E.
(
2017)
Prosodic disambiguation of noun/verb homophones in child-directed speech.
Journal of Chid Language, 44(3), 734–751.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culter, A., & Norris, D.
(
1988)
The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 113–121.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cunillera, T., Toro, J. M., Sebastian-Galles, N., & Rodruiguez-Fornells, A.
(
2006)
The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: An event-related brain potential study.
Brain Research, 1123(1), 168–178.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Diego-Balaguer, R., Rodriguez-Fornells, A. & Bachoud-Lévi, A. C.
(
2015)
Prosodic cues enhance rule learning by changing speech segmentation mechanisms.
Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1478.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Diego-Balauger, R., Toro, J. M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Bachoud-Levi, A.-C.
(
2007)
Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.
PLoS One, 2, 01175.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deutsch, D.
(
2013)
Grouping mechanisms in music. In
D. Deutsch (Ed.),
The psychology of music (pp. 184–238). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dupoux, E.
(
2018)
Cognitive science in the era of artificial intelligence: A roadmap for reverse-engineering the infant language-learner.
Cognition, 173, 43–59.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elman, J. L.
(
1993)
Learning and developmentin neural networks: The importance of starting small.
Cognition, 48, 71–99.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Endress, A. D., Scholl, B. J., & Mehler, J.
(
2005)
The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules.
Journal of Psychology: General, 134(3), 406–419.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernald, A.
(
1985)
Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese.
Infant Behavior & Development, 8(2), 181–195.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. K.
(
1987)
Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech.
Infant Behavior & Development, 10(3), 279–293.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fery, C. & Schubö, F.
(
2010)
Hierarchical prosodic structures in the intonation of center embedded relative clauses.
The Linguistic Review, 27(3), 293–317.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
French, R. M., Addyman, C., & Mareschal, D.
(
2011)
TRACX: A recognition-based connectionist framework for sequence segmentation and chunk extraction.
Psychological Review, 118(4), 614–636.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M., & Gobet, F.
(
2006)
Modeling the development of children’s use of optional infinitives in Dutch and English using MOSAIC.
Cognitive Science, 30, 277–310.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, C. C.
(
1952)
The structure of English. London: Longmans.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frost, R. L. A., Isbilen, E. S., Christiansen, M. H. & Monaghan, P.
(
2019)
Testing the limits of non-adjacent dependency learning: Statistical segmentation and generalization across domains. In
A. K. Goel,
C. M. Seifert, &
C. Freksa (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Montreal, QB: Cognitive Science Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frost, R. L. A., Jessop, A., Durrant, S., Peter, M. S., Bidgood, A., C., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Monaghan, P.
(
2020)
Non-adjacent dependency learning in infancy, and its link to language development.
Cognitive Psychology, 120: 101291.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frost, R. L. A., & Monaghan, P.
(
2016)
Simultaneous segmentation and generalisation of non-adjacent dependencies from continuous speech.
Cognition, 147, 70–74.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frost, R. L. A., Monaghan, P., & Tatsumi, T.
(
2017)
Domain-general mechanisms for speech segmentation: The role of duration information in language learning.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 466–476.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gogate, L. J., Maganti, M., & Laing, K.
(
2013)
Maternal naming of object wholes versus parts for preverbal infants: A fine-grained analysis of scaffolding at 6 to 8 months.
Infant Behavior & Development, 36(3), 470–479.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gomez, R. L.
(
2002)
Variability and detection of invariant structure.
Psychological Science, 13(5), 431–436.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graf Estes, K., & Hurley, K.
(
2013)
Infant-directed prosody helps infants map sounds to meanings.
Infancy, 18(5), 797–824.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Z. S.
(
1954)
Distributional structure.
Word, 10, 140–162.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Z. S.
(
1955)
From phoneme to morpheme.
Language, 31, 190–222.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawthorne, K., & Gerken, L.
(
2014)
From pauses to clauses: Prosody facilitates learning of syntactic constituency.
Cognition, 133, 420 – 428.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hendrickson, A. T., & Perfors, A.
(
2019)
Cross-situational learning in a Zipfian environment.
Cognition, 189, 11–22.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockema, S. A.
(
2006)
Finding words in speech: An investigation of American English.
Language Learning and Development, 2, 119–146.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollich, G., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M.
(
2000)
Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning.
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(
3, Serial No. 262).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Houston-Price, C., Plunkett, K., & Duffy, H.
(
2006)
The use of social and salience cues in early word learning.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 27–55.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R.
(
2002)
Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, E. K., & Jusczyk, P. W.
(
2001)
Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics.
Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 548–567.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, E. K., & Seidl, A. H.
(
2009)
At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics.
Developmental Science, 12(1), 131–141.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, E. K., & Tyler, M. D.
(
2010)
Testing the limits of statistical learning for word segmentation.
Developmental Science, 13(2), 339–345.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., Redanz, N. J.
(
1993)
Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words.
Child Development, 64(3), 675–687.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamper, H., Jansen, A., & Goldwater, S.
(
2016)
Unsupervised word segmentation and lexicon discovery using acoustic word embeddings. In
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing (TASLP), 24, 669–679.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelly, M. H.
(
1992)
Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments.
Psychological Review, 99, 349–364.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kurumada, C., Meylan, S. C., & Frank, M. C.
(
2013)
Zipfian frequency distributions facilitate word segmentation in context.
Cognition, 127(3), 439–453.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lany, J.
(
2014)
Judging words by their covers and the company they keep: Probabilistic cues support word learning.
Child Development, 85(4), 1727–1739.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieven, E. V., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M.
(
2003)
Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach.
Journal of Child Language, 30(2), 333–370.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieven, E. V., & Brandt, S.
(
2011)
The constructivist approach.
Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34(3), 281–296.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieven, E. V., Salomo, D., & Tomasello, M.
(
2009)
Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis.
Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 481–508.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ma, W., Golinkoff, R. M., Houston, D. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
(
2011)
Word learning in infant- and adult-directed speech.
Language Learning and Development,7(3), 185–201.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B. J.
(
2000)
The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R.
(
1984)
Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 23, 127–150.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchetto, E., & Bonatti, L. L.
(
2013)
Words and possible words in early language acquisition.
Cognitive Psychology 67(3), 130–150.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchetto, E., & Bonatti, L. L.
(
2015)
Finding words and word structure in artificial speech: The development of infants’ sensitivity to morphosyntactic regularities.
Journal of Child Language, 42(4), 873–902.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mattys, S. L., White, L., & Melhorn, J. F.
(
2005)
Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 477–500.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L.
(
1986)
The TRACE model of speech perception.
Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K.
(
2012)
Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning.
Psychological Review, 119(4), 831–877.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, M., & Baldwin, D. A.
(
2013)
Pointing as a socio-pragmatic cue to particular vs. generic reference.
Language Learning and Development, 9(3), 245–265.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mintz, T.
(
2003)
Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech.
Cognition, 90, 91–117.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Modrak, D. K. W.
(
2001)
Aristotle’s theory of language and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monaghan, P.
(
2017)
Canalization of language structure from environmental constraints: A computational model of word learning from multiple cues.
Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 21–34..
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monaghan, P., Brand, J., Frost, R. L. A., & Taylor, G.
(
2017)
Multiple variable cues in the environment promote accurate and robust word learning. In
G. Gunzelmann,
A. Howes,
T. Tenbrink, &
E. J. Davelaar (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 817–822). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monaghan, P., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H.
(
2005)
The differential contribution of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation.
Cognition, 96, 143–182.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H.
(
2010)
Words in puddles of sound: Modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation.
Journal of Child Language, 37, 545–564.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N.
(
2007)
The Phonological Distributional Coherence Hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition.
Cognitive Psychology, 55, 259–305.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monaghan, P. & Mattock, K.
(
2012)
Integrating constraints for learning word referent mappings.
Cognition, 123, 133–143.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monaghan, P., Mattock, K., Davies, R., & Smith, A. C.
(
2015)
Gavagai is as gavagai does: Learning nouns and verbs from cross-situational statistics.
Cognitive Science, 39, 1099–1112.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monaghan, P., Kalashnikova, M., & Mattock, K.
(
2017)
Intrinsic and extrinsic cues to word learning. In
G. Westermann &
N. Mani (Eds.),
Early word learning. Hove: Psychology Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moore, C., Angelopolous, M., & Bennett, P.
(
1999)
Word learning in the context of referential and salience cues.
Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 60–68.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mueller, J. L., Bahlmann, J., & Friederici, A. D.
(
2010)
Learnability of embedded syntactic structures depends on prosodic cues.
Cognitive Science, 34(2), 338–349.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I.
(
1986)
Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, F. J.
(
2017)
Form and function in the evolution of grammar.
Cognitive Science, 41, 259–276.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R.
(
2004)
Learning at a distance: Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies.
Cognitive Psychology, 48(2), 127–162.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nixon, J. S.
submitted).
Of mice and men: Is speech sound acquisition statistical or error- driven?
O’Brien, M. G., Jackson, C. N., Gardner, C. E.
(
2014)
Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 27–70.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. F., Saffran, J. R.
(
2009)
Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants.
Child Development, 80(3), 674–685.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perruchet, P., Tyler, M. D., Galland, N., & Peereman, R.
(
2004)
Learning non- adjacent dependencies: No need for algebraic-like computations.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133(4), 573–583).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A.
(
1998)
PARSER: A model for word segmentation.
Journal of Memory and Language, 39(2), 246–263.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peña, M., Bonatti, L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J.
(
2002)
Signal-driven computations in speech processing.
Science, 298, 604–607.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S.
(
1984)
Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pullum, G. K., & Scholz, B.
(
2002)
Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments.
The Linguistic Review, 19, 9–50.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quine, W. V. O.
(
1960)
Word and object. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Redington, M., Chater, N. & Finch, S.
(
1998)
Distributional information: A powerful cue for acquiring syntactic structures.
Cognitive Science, 22, 425–469.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Cunillera, T., Mestres-Misse, A., & De Diego-Balauger, R.
(
2009)
Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in language learning in adults.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3711–3734.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saffran, J., Aslin, R., & Newport, E.
(
1996)
Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.
Science, 274, 1926–1928.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N.
(
1996b)
Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues.
Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 606–621.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A., & Barrueco, S.
(
1997)
Incidental language learning: Listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear.
Psychological Science, 8 (2), 101–105.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saksida, A., Langus, A., & Nespor, M.
(
2017)
Co-occurrence statistics as a language-dependent cue for speech segmentation.
Developmental Science, 20(3), e12390.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J. M.
(
2003)
The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension.
Cognition, 90, 51–89.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, R. M., & Fisher, C.
(
2012)
2.5-Year-olds use cross-situational consistency to learn verbs under referential uncertainty.
Cognition, 122, 163–180.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shukla, M., White, K. S., & Aslin, R.
(
2011)
Prosody guides the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants.
PNAS, 108(15), 6038–6043.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, L., & Yu, C.
(
2008)
Infants rapidly learn word–referent mappings via cross-situational statistics.
Cognition, 106, 1558–1568.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, L. B., Jayaraman, S., Clerkin, E., & Yu, C.
(
2018)
The developing infant creates a curriculum for statistical learning.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 325–336.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
St Clair, M. C., Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H.
(
2010)
Learning grammatical categories from distributional cues: Flexible frames for language acquisition.
Cognition, 116, 341–360.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stumper, B., Bannard, C., Lieven, E. V., & Tomasello, M.
(
2011)
“Frequent frames” in German child-directed speech: A limited cue to grammatical categories.
Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1190–1205.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swingley, D.
(
2005)
Statistical clustering and the contents of infant vocabulary.
Cognitive Psychology, 50(1), 86–132.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thiessen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R.
(
2003)
When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants.
Developmental Psychology, 39, 706–716.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trotter, A. S., Frost, R. L. A., & Monaghan, P.
(
2019)
Chained melody: Low-level acoustic cues as a guide to phrase structure in comprehension (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whitacre, J.
(
2010)
Degeneracy: A link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems.
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 7, 6.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L., & Turk, A. E.
(
2010)
English words on a Procrustean bed: Polysyllabic shortening reconsidered.
Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 459–471.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B.
(
2012)
Modeling cross situational word referent learning: Prior questions.
Psychological Review, 119(1), 21–39.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yurovsky, D., Smith, L. B., & Yu, C.
(
2013)
Statistical word learning at scale: The baby’s view is better.
Developmental Science, 16, 959–966.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yurovsky, D., Boyer, T. W., Smith, L. B., & Yu, C.
(
2013)
Probabilistic cue combination: Less is more.
Developmental Science, 16(2), 149–158.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zipf, G. K.
(
1935)
Psycho-biology of languages. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Mirzaei, Azizullah, Mahshid Azizi Farsani & Heesun Chang
2023.
Statistical learning of L2 lexical bundles through unimodal, bimodal, and multimodal stimuli.
Language Teaching Research ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Munro, Natalie, Elise Baker, Sarah Masso, Lynn Carson, Taiying Lee, Anita M.-Y. Wong & Stephanie F. Stokes
2021.
Vocabulary Acquisition and Usage for Late Talkers Treatment: Effect on Expressive Vocabulary and Phonology.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 64:7
► pp. 2682 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.