Chapter published in:
Current Perspectives on Child Language Acquisition: How children use their environment to learn
Edited by Caroline F. Rowland, Anna L. Theakston, Ben Ambridge and Katherine E. Twomey
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 27] 2020
► pp. 113130
References

References

Ambridge, B.
(in press). Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First Language. Preprint: https://​psyarxiv​.com​/gy3ah/> (27 January 2020).
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. V.
(2011) Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), Handbook of language emergence, (pp. 478–510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Barak, L., Wonnacott, E., Bannard, C., & Sala, G.
(2018) Effects of both preemption and entrenchment in the retreat from verb overgeneralization errors: Four reanalyses, an extended replication, and a meta-Analytic synthesis. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Jones, R. L., & Clark, V.
(2009) A semantics-based approach to the ‘no negative-evidence’ problem Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1301–1316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F.
(2012) Semantics versus statistics in the retreat from locative overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 123(2), 260–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Young, C. R.
(2008) The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 106(1), 87–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bidgood, A., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Sala, G., Freudenthal, D. T., & Ambridge, B.
(submitted). Verb argument structure overgeneralisations for the English intransitive and transitive constructions: Grammaticality judgments, production priming and a meta-analytic synthesis. Preprint: https://​osf​.io​/4ns9d/> (27 January 2020).
Bowerman, M.
(1982) Evaluating competing linguistic models with language acquisition data: Implications of developmental errors with causative verbs. Quaderni di Semantica, 3, 5–66.Google Scholar
(1988) The “no negative evidence” problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 73–101). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Croft, W.
(2007) The acquisition of the English causative alternation. In M. Bowerman & P. Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 279–307). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S., & Brooks, P. J.
(1995) Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In M. Tomasello & W. E. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs (pp. 352–376). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., & Nikitina, T.
(2008) The gradience of the dative alternation. In L. Uyechi & L. Wee (Eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, L. Wee & L-H. Wee (Eds.). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Chandler, S.
(2010) The English past tense: Analogy redux. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(3), 371–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chouinard, M. M., & Clark, E. V.
(2003) Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 637–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harmon, Z., & Kapatsinski, V.
(2017) Putting old tools to novel uses: The role of form accessibility in semantic extension. Cognitive Psychology, 98, 22–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2011) Preface: Argument structure – Valency and/or constructions? Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 59(4), 315–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lord, C.
(1979) Don’t you fall me down: Children’s generalizations regarding cause and transitivity. In Papers and reports on child language development (PRCLD) 17. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2004) A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 883–914. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maslen, R. J., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V., & Tomasello, M.
(2004) A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D.
(2007) Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31(6), 927–960. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, M., & Parsdeshi, P.
(2002) The causative continuum. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation (pp. 85–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Ambridge, Ben, Laura Doherty, Ramya Maitreyee, Tomoko Tatsumi, Shira Zicherman, Pedro Mateo Pedro, Ayuno Kawakami, Amy Bidgood, Clifton Pye, Bhuvana Narasimhan, Inbal Arnon, Dani Bekman, Amir Efrati, Sindy Fabiola Can Pixabaj, Mario Marroquín Pelíz, Margarita Julajuj Mendoza, Soumitra Samanta, Seth Campbell, Stewart McCauley, Ruth Berman, Dipti Misra Sharma, Rukmini Bhaya Nair & Kumiko Fukumura
2021. Testing a computational model of causative overgeneralizations: Child judgment and production data from English, Hebrew, Hindi, Japanese and K’iche’. Open Research Europe 1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Aryawibawa, I Nyoman, Yana Qomariana, Ketut Artawa & Ben Ambridge
2021. Direct Versus Indirect Causation as a Semantic Linguistic Universal: Using a Computational Model of English, Hebrew, Hindi, Japanese, and K'iche’ Mayan to Predict Grammaticality Judgments in Balinese. Cognitive Science 45:4 Crossref logo
Quick, Antje Endesfelder, Ad Backus & Elena Lieven
2021. Entrenchment effects in code-mixing: individual differences in German-English bilingual children. Cognitive Linguistics 32:2  pp. 319 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.