Chapter published in:
Current Perspectives on Child Language Acquisition: How children use their environment to learn
Edited by Caroline F. Rowland, Anna L. Theakston, Ben Ambridge and Katherine E. Twomey
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 27] 2020
► pp. 155170


Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M.
(1999) A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311–1320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2009) Modeling children’s early grammatical knowledge. PNAS, 106, 17284–17289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeg Thomsen, D., Theakston, A., Kandemirci, B., & Brandt, S.
in prep.). Complements and false belief: A longitudinal study with 2- to 3-year-olds.
Brandt, S., & Buttelmann, D.
(2015, September). Theory of Mind and complex syntax. Paper presented at the Developmental Section and Social Section Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, Manchester, UK.
Brandt, S., Buttelmann, D., Lieven, E. V., & Tomasello, M.
(2016) Children’s understanding of first and third person perspectives in complement clauses and false belief tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 151, 131–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, S., Lieven, E. V., & Tomasello, M.
(2010) Development of word order in German complement-clause constructions: Effects of input frequencies, lexical items, and discourse function. Language, 86, 583–610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, S., Li, H., & Chan, A.
under revision) What makes a complement false? Looking at the effects of verbal semantics and perspective in Mandarin children’s interpretation of complement clauses and their false-belief understanding. Applied Psycholinguistics.
Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Breton, C.
(2002) How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11, 73–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, H., Husan-Chih, C., Creed, N., Ng, L., Wang, S., & Mo, L.
(2004) Relative roles of general and complementation language in theory of mind development: Evidence from Cantonese and English. Child Development, 75, 1155–1170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, H., Chen, H., & Yeung, W.
(2009) Relations between mental verb and false belief understanding in Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 141–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H. L., & Pratt, C.
(1995) The development of children’s Theory of Mind: The working memory explanation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 25–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
(2004) The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrar, M. J., Benigno, J. P., Tompkins, V., & Gage, N. A.
(2017) Are there different pathways to explicit false belief understanding? General language and complementation in typical and atypical children. Cognitive Development, 43, 49–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrar, M. J., & Maag, L.
(2002) Early language development and the emergence of a theory of mind. First Language, 22, 197–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. L., de Rosnay, M., & Pons, F.
(2005) Language and children’s understanding of mental states. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 69–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howard Gola, A. A.
(2012) Mental verb input for promoting children’s theory of mind: A training study. Cognitive Development, 27, 64–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S., Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J.
(2017) “Think” pragmatically: Children’s interpretation of belief reports. Language Learning and Development, 13(4), 395–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M.
(2003) The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74, 1130–1144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, H., Su, Y., & Wang, Q.
(2008) Talking about others facilitates theory of mind in Chinese preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1726–1736. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A.
(2007) Language and Theory of Mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622–646. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., Bryant, D., & Furrow, D.
(1989) Mental terms and the development of certainty. Child Development, 60, 167–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perner, J., Sprung, M., Zauner, P., & Haider, H.
(2003) Want that is understood well before say that, think that, and false belief: A test of de Villiers’ linguistic determinism on German-speaking children. Child Development, 74, 179–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perner, J., Stummer, S., Sprung, M., & Doherty, M.
(2002) Theory of Mind finds its Piagetian perspective: Why alternative naming comes with understanding belief. Cognitive Development, 17, 1451–1472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pyers, J. E., & Senghas, A.
(2009) Language promotes false-belief understanding: evidence from learners of a new sign language. Psychological Science, 20(7), 805–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruffman, T., Slade, L., & Crowe, E.
(2002) The relation between children’s and mothers’ mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 734–751. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schick, B., De Villiers, P., De Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R.
(2007) Language and Theory of Mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78(2), 376–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, A., & Coppola, M.
(2001) Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12, 323–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tardif, T., So, C., & Kaciroti, N.
(2007) Language and false belief: Evidence for general, not specific effects in Cantonese-speaking preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 43, 318–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tardif, T., & Wellman, H. M.
(2000) Acquisition of mental state language in Mandarin- and Cantonese-speaking children. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 25–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A., & Lieven, E. V.
(2017) Multiunit sequences in first language acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 588–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
(2002 “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26, 125–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A.
(2005) Constructions of intersubjectivity. Discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Villiers, J. de
(2007) The interface of language and Theory of Mind. Lingua, 117, 1858–1878. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villiers, J. G. de, & Pyers, J. E.
(2002) Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognitive Development, 17(1), 1037–1060. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J.
(2001) Meta-analysis of Theory of Mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J.
(1983) Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ferretti, Francesco & Ines Adornetti
2021.  Persuasive conversation as a new form of communication in Homo sapiens . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.