Cover not available
Part of
Current Perspectives on Child Language Acquisition: How children use their environment to learn
Edited by Caroline F. Rowland, Anna L. Theakston, Ben Ambridge and Katherine E. Twomey
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 27] 2020
► pp. 1–7

Introduction

Published online: 17 September 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.27.int
References
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. V. M.
(2011) Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2010) Development of word order in German complement-clause constructions: Effects of input frequencies, lexical items, and discourse function. Language, 86(3), 583–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, W. B.
(1957) The elements of statistical confusion: Or: What does the mean mean? AAUP Bulletin, 43(1), 33–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Theakston, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2015) The relationship between infant hold out and gives, and pointing. Infancy, 20, 576–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2011) Children aged 2; 1 use transitive syntax to make a semantic-role interpretation in a pointing task. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 1109–1123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, F., Granlund, S., Kolak, J., Szreder, M., Ambridge, B., Pine, J., … & Lieven, E.
(2019) How the input shapes the acquisition of verb morphology: Elicited production and computational modelling in two highly inflected languages. Cognitive Psychology, 110, 30–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granlund, S., Kolak, J., Vihman, V., Engelmann, F., Lieven, E. V., Pine, J. M., … & Ambridge, B.
(2019) Language-general and language-specific phenomena in the acquisition of inflectional noun morphology: A cross-linguistic elicited-production study of Polish, Finnish and Estonian. Journal of Memory and Language, 107, 169–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A.
(2010) Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jorschick, L., Quick, A. E., Glässer, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2011) German–English-speaking children’s mixed NPs with ‘correct’agreement. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 173–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. V.
(2014) First language development: A usage-based perspective on past and current research. Journal of Child Language, 41(S1), 48–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Usage-based approaches to language development: Where do we go from here? Language and Cognition, 8, 346–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Crosslinguistic and crosscultural aspects of language addressed to children. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (Eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 56–73). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Developing language from usage: Explaining errors. In M. Hundt, S. Mollin, & S. E. Pfenniger (Eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp.321–331). Cambridge: Cambridge Univerity Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1978) Conversations between mothers and young children: Individual differences and their possible implications for the study of language learning. In N. Waterson & C. Snow (Eds.), The development of communication: Social and pragmatic factors in language acquisition (pp. 173–187). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. V., Pine, J. M., & Baldwin, G.
(1997) Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24(1), 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. V., & Stoll, S.
(2013) Early communicative development in two cultures: A comparison of the communicative environments of children from two cultures. Human Development, 56(3), 178–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. V., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M.
(2003) Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child language, 30(2), 333–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E. V., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2006) The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children’s use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(3), 403–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V.
(1993) Reanalysing rote-learned phrases: Individual differences in the transition to multi-word speech. Journal of Child Language, 20(3), 551–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V., & Rowland, C. F.
(1998) Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category. Linguistics, 36(4), 807–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Lieven, E. V., & Theakston, A. L.
(2005) Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model: Why the data on children’s use of non-nominative 3psg subjects count against the ATOM. Journal of Child Language, 32(2), 269–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoll, S., & Lieven, E.
(2014) Studying language acquisition cross-linguistically. In H. Winskel & Prakash Padakannaya (Eds.), South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics (pp.19–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stoll, S., Bickel, B., Lieven, E. V., Paudyal, N. P., Banjade, G., Bhatta, T. N., … & Rai, N. K.
(2012) Nouns and verbs in Chintang: Children’s usage and surrounding adult speech. Journal of Child Language, 39(2), 284–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F.
(2002) Going, going, gone: The acquisition of the verb ‘go’. Journal of Child Language, 29(4), 783–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax. Journal of Child Language, 31(1), 61–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Maslen, R., Lieven, E. V., & Tomasello, M.
(2012) The acquisition of the active transitive construction in English: A detailed case study. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar