Chapter published in:
The Acquisition of Referring Expressions: A dialogical approach
Edited by Anne Salazar-Orvig, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan and Annie Rialland
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 28] 2021
► pp. 82–113

Chapter 3
Young children’s uses of referring expressions

| Université de Lorraine
| Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3
| Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3
| Université de Lille
| Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3
This chapter investigates the repertoire and the uses of referring expressions in natural dialogues of 28 French-speaking children, aged between 1;7 and 2;6 years old. We focus on three strong forms (nouns, strong demonstrative pronouns and strong personal pronouns) and three weak forms (clitic personal pronouns, null forms and fillers). Their uses are analyzed for the following factors: the linguistic development, the type of referent (participants vs. entities), the syntactic function, and the attentional and discursive status of the referent. The results reveal contrasted uses of referring expressions. Nouns are mainly used for new or reintroduced referents, generally in syntactic functions other than subject, whereas clitic personal pronouns (as well as the other weak forms) are mainly used for given referents and always as subjects. The type of referent (entities vs. participants) also influences the use of referring expressions. The discussion addresses the issue of the intertwining of morphological, syntactic and pragmatic development.
Keywords: referential choice, accessibility, strong forms, weak forms, syntactic function, attentional status, discursive status, entities, self, addressee
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Children’s first referring expressions
      • 1.1.1Factors affecting the use of expressions referring to entities
      • 1.1.2Factors affecting the uses of expressions referring to the discourse participants
    • 1.2The aim of this study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants and data collection
    • 2.2Coding system
      • 2.2.1Types of referring expressions
      • 2.2.2Intercoder agreement and statistics
  • 3.Factors affecting the use of referring expressions
    • 3.1Impact of linguistic development on the use of referring expressions
    • 3.2Impact of syntactic function on the use of referring expressions
    • 3.3Type of referent
    • 3.4Attentional and discursive status of the referent
    • 3.5Interactions between factors
      • 3.5.1Nouns
      • 3.5.2Strong demonstrative pronouns
      • 3.5.3Strong personal pronouns
      • 3.5.4Clitic personal pronouns
      • 3.5.5Fillers
      • 3.5.6Null forms
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 June 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.28.03das
References
Allen, S. E. M.
(2000) A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38(3), 483–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Formalism and functionalism working together? Exploring roles for complementary contributions in the domain of child null arguments. In R. Slabakova, S. A. Montrul, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White (pp. 233–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Interacting pragmatic influences on children’s argument realization. In M. F. Bowerman & P. Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 191–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ariel, M.
(1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2000) The development of person agreement markers: From pronouns to higher accessibility markers. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 197–260). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, E.
(1966) La nature des pronoms. In Problèmes de linguistique générale (Vol. 1, pp. 251–257). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bloom, P.
(1990) Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 491–504.Google Scholar
Budwig, N.
(1995) A developmental-functionalist approach to child language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Budwig, N., & Wiley, A.
(1995) What language reveals about children’s categories of personhood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1995(69), 21–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caët, S.
(2013) Référence à soi et à l’interlocuteur chez des enfants francophones et anglophones et leurs parents (PhD dissertation). Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 27–55). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M.
(1993) Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307–314). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cornish, F.
(1999) Anaphora, discourse and understanding. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culbertson, J., & Legendre, G.
(2008) Qu’en est-il des clitiques sujet en français oral contemporain? Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française-CMLF’08. http://​www​.linguistiquefrancaise​.org​/articles​/cmlf​/abs​/2008​/01​/cmlf08308​/cmlf08308​.html. doi:  Crossref
De Cat, C.
(2005) French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua, 115, 1195–1219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Weck, G., Hassan, R., Heurdier, J., Klein, J., & Salagnac, N.
(2021) Activities and institutional contexts: their role in the use of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 261–286). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K.
(2001) A prosodic approach to filler syllables. Journal of Child Language, 28(1), 246–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
(2006) Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 463–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., & Kilani-Schoch, M.
(2001) On the possible rise and inevitable fall of fillers. Journal of Child Language, 28(1), 250–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(2003) Discourse and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Vol. 2, pp. 47–87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Girouard, P. C., Ricard, M., & Gouin Decarie, T.
(1997) The acquisition of personal pronouns in French-speaking and English-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 24, 311–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(Ed.) (1983) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guerriero, A. M. S., Oshima-Takane, Y., & Kuriyama, Y.
(2006) The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: a discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33(4), 823–857. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R.
(1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. K., & Johnson, K.
(2013) Children’s use of referring expressions in spontaneous discourse: Implications for theory of mind development. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 43–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., Rizzi, L., & Frauenfelder, U. H.
(1996) On the acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 309–334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, R., de Weck, G., Rezzonico, S., Salazar Orvig, A., & Vinel, E.
(2021) Variations in adult use of referring expressions during storytelling in different interactional settings. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 233–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T., & Zeileis, A.
(2015) Partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 16, 3905–3909.Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X.
(2013) Assessing the Fit of the Model. In D. W. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow & R. X. Sturdivant (Eds.), Applied logistic regression (pp. 153–226). New York, NY: John Wiley & Son. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.
(2011) Referential choice in Mandarin child language: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 2057–2080. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M. E., & Allen, S. E. M.
(2006) A discourse-pragmatic analysis of subject omission in child English. In D. Bamman, D. T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 293–304). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2015) The incremental effect of discourse-pragmatic sensitivity on referential choice in the acquisition of a first language. Lingua, 155, 43–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. M.
(1986) Language acquisition and the theory of parameters: Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imbens-Bailey, A., & Pan, B. A.
(1998) Pragmatics of self-and other-reference in young children. Social Development, 7(2), 219–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., & Rigaut, C.
(1997) L’acquisition des clitiques nominatifs en français. In A. Zribi-Hertz (Ed.), Les pronoms. Morphologie, syntaxe et typologie (pp. 57–99). Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Klein, J., Jullien, S., & Fox, G.
(2021) Explorations in the relations between reference, syntactic constructions and prosody. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogic approach (pp. 163–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
(1977) Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcos, H., Salazar Orvig, A., da Silva-Genest, C., & Heurdier, J.
(2021) The influence of dialogue in young children’s uses of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 203–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, A.
(2006) Un je en construction. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N., & Murty, L.
(2005) Argument realization in Hindi caregiver-child discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(4), 461–495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K.
(1989) Monologue as the linguistic construction of self in time. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Narratives from the crib (pp. 284–308). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1993/1994) Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language acquisition, 3(4), 371–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rozendaal, M., & Baker, A.
(2010) The acquisition of reference: Pragmatic aspects and the influence of language input. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1866–1879. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., & da Silva, C.
(2014) Demonstratives and personal pronouns in French: Concurrent factors for early contrasts. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Amsterdam.
Salazar Orvig, A., Fayolle, V., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J., Marcos, H., & Morgenstern, A.
(2004) Emergence des marqueurs anaphoriques avant 3 ans: Le cas des pronoms de troisième personne. Calap. La Cohésion Chez l’Enfant, 24, 57–82.Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J., & Parès, J.
(2010a) Dialogical beginnings of anaphora: The use of third person pronouns before the age of 3. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1842–1865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010b) Dialogical factors in toddler’s use of clitic pronouns. First Language, 30(3–4), 374–402.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., & Morgenstern, A.
(2015) Acquisition and uses of pronouns in a dialogic perspective. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 155–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L., & Allen, S. E. M.
(Eds.) (2015) The acquisition of reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skarabela, B., Allen, S. E. M., & Scott-Phillips, T. C.
(2013) Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 5–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F.
(2001) The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: An alternative account. Journal of Child Language, 28(1), 127–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E.
(2017) Noun and verb categories in acquisition: Evidence from fillers and inflectional morphology in French-acquiring children. In V. Vapnarsky & E. Veneziano (Eds.), Lexical polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches (pp. 381–411). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E., & Clark, E. V.
(2016) Early verb constructions in French: adjacency on the left edge. Journal of Child Language, 43(6), 1193–1230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E., & Sinclair, H.
(2000) The changing status of ‘filler syllabes’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 27, 461–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinel, E., Salazar Orvig, A., de Weck, G., Nashawati, S., & Rahmati, S.
(2021) The impact of speech genres on the use of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 287–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, N., Salazar Orvig, A., Le Mené, M., Caët, S., & Rialland, A.
(2021) Filler syllables as precursors of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 41–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar