Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Referring Expressions: A dialogical approach
Edited by Anne Salazar-Orvig, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan and Annie Rialland
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 28] 2021
► pp. 81–113

Chapter 3
Young children’s uses of referring expressions

ORCID logo | Université de Lorraine
ORCID logo | Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3
ORCID logo | Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3
ORCID logo | Université de Lille
 | Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3
This chapter investigates the repertoire and the uses of referring expressions in natural dialogues of 28 French-speaking children, aged between 1;7 and 2;6 years old. We focus on three strong forms (nouns, strong demonstrative pronouns and strong personal pronouns) and three weak forms (clitic personal pronouns, null forms and fillers). Their uses are analyzed for the following factors: the linguistic development, the type of referent (participants vs. entities), the syntactic function, and the attentional and discursive status of the referent. The results reveal contrasted uses of referring expressions. Nouns are mainly used for new or reintroduced referents, generally in syntactic functions other than subject, whereas clitic personal pronouns (as well as the other weak forms) are mainly used for given referents and always as subjects. The type of referent (entities vs. participants) also influences the use of referring expressions. The discussion addresses the issue of the intertwining of morphological, syntactic and pragmatic development.
Keywords: referential choice, accessibility, strong forms, weak forms, syntactic function, attentional status, discursive status, entities, self, addressee
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Children’s first referring expressions
      • 1.1.1Factors affecting the use of expressions referring to entities
      • 1.1.2Factors affecting the uses of expressions referring to the discourse participants
    • 1.2The aim of this study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants and data collection
    • 2.2Coding system
      • 2.2.1Types of referring expressions
      • 2.2.2Intercoder agreement and statistics
  • 3.Factors affecting the use of referring expressions
    • 3.1Impact of linguistic development on the use of referring expressions
    • 3.2Impact of syntactic function on the use of referring expressions
    • 3.3Type of referent
    • 3.4Attentional and discursive status of the referent
    • 3.5Interactions between factors
      • 3.5.1Nouns
      • 3.5.2Strong demonstrative pronouns
      • 3.5.3Strong personal pronouns
      • 3.5.4Clitic personal pronouns
      • 3.5.5Fillers
      • 3.5.6Null forms
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.28.03das
References (58)
References
Allen, S. E. M. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38(3), 483–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Formalism and functionalism working together? Exploring roles for complementary contributions in the domain of child null arguments. In R. Slabakova, S. A. Montrul, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White (pp. 233–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Interacting pragmatic influences on children’s argument realization. In M. F. Bowerman & P. Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 191–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2000). The development of person agreement markers: From pronouns to higher accessibility markers. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 197–260). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1966). La nature des pronoms. In Problèmes de linguistique générale (Vol. 1, pp. 251–257). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 491–504.Google Scholar
Budwig, N. (1995). A developmental-functionalist approach to child language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Budwig, N., & Wiley, A. (1995). What language reveals about children’s categories of personhood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1995(69), 21–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caët, S. (2013). Référence à soi et à l’interlocuteur chez des enfants francophones et anglophones et leurs parents (PhD dissertation). Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 27–55). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M. (1993). Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307–314). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cornish, F. (1999). Anaphora, discourse and understanding. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culbertson, J., & Legendre, G. (2008). Qu’en est-il des clitiques sujet en français oral contemporain? Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française-CMLF’08. [URL]. DOI logo
De Cat, C. (2005). French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua, 115, 1195–1219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Weck, G., Hassan, R., Heurdier, J., Klein, J., & Salagnac, N. (2021). Activities and institutional contexts: their role in the use of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 261–286). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K. (2001). A prosodic approach to filler syllables. Journal of Child Language, 28(1), 246–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H. (2006). Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 463–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., & Kilani-Schoch, M. (2001). On the possible rise and inevitable fall of fillers. Journal of Child Language, 28(1), 250–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (2003). Discourse and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Vol. 2, pp. 47–87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Girouard, P. C., Ricard, M., & Gouin Decarie, T. (1997). The acquisition of personal pronouns in French-speaking and English-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 24, 311–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (Ed.) (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerriero, A. M. S., Oshima-Takane, Y., & Kuriyama, Y. (2006). The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: a discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33(4), 823–857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. K., & Johnson, K. (2013). Children’s use of referring expressions in spontaneous discourse: Implications for theory of mind development. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 43–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., Rizzi, L., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (1996). On the acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 309–334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hassan, R., de Weck, G., Rezzonico, S., Salazar Orvig, A., & Vinel, E. (2021). Variations in adult use of referring expressions during storytelling in different interactional settings. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 233–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T., & Zeileis, A. (2015). Partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 16, 3905–3909.Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Assessing the Fit of the Model. In D. W. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow & R. X. Sturdivant (Eds.), Applied logistic regression (pp. 153–226). New York, NY: John Wiley & Son. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. (2011). Referential choice in Mandarin child language: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 2057–2080. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M. E., & Allen, S. E. M. (2006). A discourse-pragmatic analysis of subject omission in child English. In D. Bamman, D. T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 293–304). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2015). The incremental effect of discourse-pragmatic sensitivity on referential choice in the acquisition of a first language. Lingua, 155, 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. M. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters: Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imbens-Bailey, A., & Pan, B. A. (1998). Pragmatics of self-and other-reference in young children. Social Development, 7(2), 219–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., & Rigaut, C. (1997). L’acquisition des clitiques nominatifs en français. In A. Zribi-Hertz (Ed.), Les pronoms. Morphologie, syntaxe et typologie (pp. 57–99). Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Klein, J., Jullien, S., & Fox, G. (2021). Explorations in the relations between reference, syntactic constructions and prosody. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogic approach (pp. 163–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcos, H., Salazar Orvig, A., da Silva-Genest, C., & Heurdier, J. (2021). The influence of dialogue in young children’s uses of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 203–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, A. (2006). Un je en construction. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N., & Murty, L. (2005). Argument realization in Hindi caregiver-child discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(4), 461–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1989). Monologue as the linguistic construction of self in time. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Narratives from the crib (pp. 284–308). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1993/1994). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language acquisition, 3(4), 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozendaal, M., & Baker, A. (2010). The acquisition of reference: Pragmatic aspects and the influence of language input. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1866–1879. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., & da Silva, C. (2014). Demonstratives and personal pronouns in French: Concurrent factors for early contrasts. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Amsterdam.
Salazar Orvig, A., Fayolle, V., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J., Marcos, H., & Morgenstern, A. (2004). Emergence des marqueurs anaphoriques avant 3 ans: Le cas des pronoms de troisième personne. Calap. La Cohésion Chez l’Enfant, 24, 57–82.Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J., & Parès, J. (2010a). Dialogical beginnings of anaphora: The use of third person pronouns before the age of 3. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1842–1865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b). Dialogical factors in toddler’s use of clitic pronouns. First Language, 30(3–4), 374–402.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., & Morgenstern, A. (2015). Acquisition and uses of pronouns in a dialogic perspective. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 155–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L., & Allen, S. E. M. (Eds.). (2015). The acquisition of reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skarabela, B., Allen, S. E. M., & Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2013). Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 5–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F. (2001). The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: An alternative account. Journal of Child Language, 28(1), 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E. (2017). Noun and verb categories in acquisition: Evidence from fillers and inflectional morphology in French-acquiring children. In V. Vapnarsky & E. Veneziano (Eds.), Lexical polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches (pp. 381–411). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E., & Clark, E. V. (2016). Early verb constructions in French: adjacency on the left edge. Journal of Child Language, 43(6), 1193–1230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E., & Sinclair, H. (2000). The changing status of ‘filler syllabes’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 27, 461–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinel, E., Salazar Orvig, A., de Weck, G., Nashawati, S., & Rahmati, S. (2021). The impact of speech genres on the use of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 287–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, N., Salazar Orvig, A., Le Mené, M., Caët, S., & Rialland, A. (2021). Filler syllables as precursors of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 41–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Le Mené, Marine, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Christine da Silva-Genest & Haydée Marcos
2023. The choice of referring expressions in adult-child dialogues. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Caët, Stéphanie, Aliyah Morgenstern, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
2022. « Veux une tartine au chocolat pour goûter » : absence de sujet en référence à soi chez une enfant francophone. SHS Web of Conferences 138 ► pp. 09010 ff. DOI logo
Klein, Janina, Stéphane Jullien & Gwendoline Fox
2021. Chapter 6. Explorations in the relations between reference, syntactic constructions and prosody. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Marcos, Haydée, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Christine da Silva-Genest & Julien Heurdier
2021. Chapter 7. The influence of dialogue in young children’s uses of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Rezzonico, Stefano, Mélanie Bernasconi, Geneviève de Weck, Christine da Silva-Genest & Stéphane Jullien
2021. Chapter 5. Referring expressions and developmental language disorders. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Rezzonico, Stefano, Elise Vinel, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Nathalie Salagnac
2021. Chapter 4. Referring in dialogical narratives. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne & Geneviève de Weck
2021. Chapter 11. The acquisition of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021. Chapter 1. A dialogical approach to the acquisition and usage of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021. Chapter 1. A dialogical approach to the acquisition and usage of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], DOI logo
Vinel, Elise, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Geneviève de Weck, Salma Nashawati & Somayeh Rahmati
2021. Chapter 10. The impact of speech genres on the use of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 288 ff. DOI logo
Yamaguchi, Naomi, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Marine Le Mené, Stéphanie Caët & Annie Rialland
2021. Chapter 2. Filler syllables as precursors of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Chapter 11. The acquisition of referring expressions: From formal factors to communicative experience. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.