List of Tables
2.1
Data used
48
2.2
Data groups for quantitative analyses
49
2.3
Distribution (in percentage) of forms in the prenominal position (total for all sessions, and maximum and minimum values), by MLU group
53
2.4
Distribution (in percentage) of forms in the preverbal position (total for all sessions, and maximum and minimum values), by MLU group
54
2.5
Percentages of unexpected realizations of /l/ in lexical words and in prenominal fillers, across all sessions
61
2.6
Percentage of unexpected realizations of /ʒ/ in lexical words and in preverbal fillers
62
2.7
Distribution (in percentage) of the noun and verb lemmas according to the types of occurrences in the prelexical position (total for all sessions, and maximum and minimum values)
66
2.8
Distribution (in percentage) of noun and verb lemmas associated (or not) to fillers, according to whether or not fluctuation was present in the prenominal and preverbal positions
67
2.9
Regression tables for clitic pronouns, fillers and no-form in pre-verbal position
71
3.1
Participants, by MLU group, age and number of sessions
86
3.2
Distribution (in percentage) of the referring expressions for each MLU group
88
3.3
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions for each syntactic function
90
3.4
Distribution of referring expressions (in percentage) for each type of referent
91
3.5
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions for each attentional and discursive status
93
3.6
Regression tables for strong referring expressions (nouns, strong demonstrative pronouns, strong personal pronouns)
95
3.7
Regression tables for weak referring expressions (clitic personal pronouns, fillers, and null forms)
100
4.1
Distribution of referring expressions (in percentage) by their position in the referential chain, their syntactic function, the referent’s characteristics, and the child’s age, for all participants pooled
123
4.2
Distribution (in percentage) of determiners preceding a noun according to their position in the referential chain and the referent’s characteristics
124
4.3
Regression tables for clitic and strong third-person pronouns and nouns
127
5.1
Type of referring expression, by population and position in the referential chain (group percentage)
148
5.2
Regression tables for clitic pronouns, nouns without a determiner, and null subjects
151
6.1
Distribution (in percentage) of the prosodic contours of the referring expressions used by the children and their mothers, by position in the referential chain
177
6.2
Distribution (in percentage) of left dislocations, right dislocations, and double dislocations for noun, demonstrative and strong personal pronouns dislocated forms used by the children and their mothers
178
6.3
Distribution (in percentage) of dislocations by position in the referential chain, used by the children and their mothers
180
6.4
Distribution (in percentage) of all referring expressions by position in the referential chain, used by the children and their mothers
180
6.5
Number of occurrences of prosodic contours in left dislocations and right dislocations, produced by the children and their mothers
181
6.6
Distribution (in percentage) of the referring expressions for all complements and for
Mettre+X,
Vouloir+X, and
C’est+X, used by the children and their mothers
184
6.7
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions according to their position in the referential chain, for all complements,
Mettre+X,
Vouloir+X, and
C’est+X, used by the children and their mothers
186
6.8
Distribution (in percentage) of common nouns, according to their position in the referential chain, for all complements,
Mettre+X,
Vouloir+X, and
C’est+X, used by the children and their mothers
188
6.9
Distribution (in percentage) of clitic pronouns used by the children and their mothers, according to their position in the referential chain for all complements of
Mettre+X, and
Vouloir+X
190
7.1
Distribution (in percentage) of the referring expressions for the children and their interlocutors
206
7.2
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions for each attentional and discursive status of the referents, for the children and their interlocutors
208
7.3
Regression tables for third-person clitic pronouns, nouns, and strong demonstrative pronouns for all referring expressions used by the children and their interlocutors
209
7.4
Distribution (in percentage) of children’s referring expressions for discourse-given referents, according to their correspondence with the form used by their interlocutors
215
7.5
Distribution (in percentage) of children’s referring expressions for discourse-given referents, according to their correspondence category of interlocutor’s antecedents
215
7.6
Regression tables for third-person clitic pronouns, nouns, and strong demonstrative pronouns for discourse-given referring expressions in the children’s discourse
216
7.7
Distribution (in percentages) of the children’s referring expressions for given referents, according to the type of dialogical relations
217
8.1
Distribution (in percentage) of the referring expression categories in the Adult-to-Experimenter and Mother-to-Child contexts, by position in the referential chain
244
8.2
Overall distribution (in percentage) of NPs (simple and dislocated) in first mentions, in the Adult-to-Experimenter and Mother-to-Child contexts
245
8.3
Distribution (in percentage) of the referring expressions categories in Home and School contexts, by position in the referential chain
249
8.4
Distribution (in percentage) of dislocations in Home and School contexts
250
8.5
Distribution (in percentage) of the referring expressions categories for mothers of typically developing children and mothers of children with DLD, by position in the referential chain
253
9.1
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions used by the toddlers, in each activity and for all activities pooled
269
9.2
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions used by the older group, for each activity and for all activities pooled
270
9.3
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions produced by the older children, for each social setting and for both settings taken together
272
9.4
Distribution (in percentage) of the referring expressions used by the toddler group at each position in the referential chain, for all activities pooled and for each activity taken separately
273
9.5
Distribution (in percentage) of the referring expressions used by the older children in the two acitvities, and at each position in the referential chain
275
9.6
Regression tables for nouns used by the older children
277
9.7
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions at each position in the referential chain, for the two social settings pooled and for each setting taken separately (home vs. school)
278
10.1
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions for the two corpora
297
10.2
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions in the discursive sequences of the toddler corpus
298
10.3
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions for each utterance genre among the toddlers (with H&N and Nar pooled)
298
10.4
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions for each position in the referential chain in the toddler corpus (with H&N and Nar pooled)
299
10.5
Regression tables for third-person pronouns, nouns, clitic demonstrative pronouns and strong demonstrative pronouns in the toddler corpus (Nar and H&N sequences)
301
10.6
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions for each utterance genre in the narrative sequences for the two corpora taken together
304
10.7
Distribution (in percentage) of referring expressions for each position in the referential chain, in narrative sequences (for the two corpora pooled)
305
10.8
Regression tables for third-person pronouns, nouns, clitic demonstrative pronouns and strong demonstrative pronouns in the narrative sequences of the toddlers and the older children
306