Cover not available
Part of
Language Impairment in Multilingual Settings: LITMUS in action across Europe
Edited by Sharon Armon-Lotem and Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 29] 2021
► pp. 169–196

Identification of bilingual children with Specific Language Impairment in France

 | Université François-Rabelais de Tours
 | Université François-Rabelais de Tours
 | Université François-Rabelais de Tours
 | Université François-Rabelais de Tours
 | Université François-Rabelais de Tours
 | Université François-Rabelais de Tours
 | Université François-Rabelais de Tours
 | CHRU de Tours, France
We report on the usefulness of three LITMUS tools in distinguishing bilingual children with SLI (Bi-SLI) from bilingual children with typical development (Bi-TD), in France: LITMUS-QU-NWR-FR (non-word repetition), LITMUS-SR-FR (sentence repetition), and LITMUS-PABIQ (parental questionnaire). 82 bilingual children, aged 5–8, who had all been exposed to both French and either Arabic, Portuguese or Turkish, recruited both in ordinary schools and in SLP practices, were divided into Bi-TD (n = 61) and Bi-SLI (n = 21) groups based on parental questionnaire (LITMUS-PABIQ) information and standardized language scores in each language. Monolingual controls included 17 children with SLI and 37 TD children. NWR and SR significantly distinguished between the Bi-TD and the Bi-SLI children, and there was minimal impact of different factors related to bilingual development on children’s performance.
Keywords: bilingualism, Specific Language Impairment, acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods and participants
    • 2.1Participants: Recruitment and assignment into groups
    • 2.2The experimental protocol
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Do NWR and SR identify SLI in bilingual children?
    • 3.2Are age and French exposure/use linked to performance on NWR and SR?
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1The accuracy of LITMUS-SR-FR and LITMUS-QU-NWR-FR
    • 4.2The LITMUS tools and the impact of bilingualism factors
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.29.06alm
References (45)
References
Armon-Lotem, S. (2012). Introduction: Bilingual children with SLI – the nature of the problem. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S, de Jong, J., & Meir, N. (Eds.) (2015). Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S., Walters, J., & Gargarina, N. (2011). The impact of internal and external factors on linguistic performance in the home language and in L2 among Russian- Hebrew and Russian-German preschool children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 291–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandeker, M. & Thordadottir, E. (2015). Language exposure in bilingual toddlers: Performance on nonword repetition and lexical tasks. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, 126–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castro, S. L., Caló, S., Gomes, I., Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (2007). PALPA-P Provas de Avaliação da Linguagem e da Afasia em Português. Lisboa: CEGOC.Google Scholar
Chevrie-Muller, C. & Plaza, M. (2001). N-EEL Nouvelles épreuves pour l’examen du langage. Paris: ECPA.Google Scholar
Chiat, S. (2015). Nonword repetition. In S. Armon-Lotem, J. de Jong, & N. Meir (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 123–148). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Chiat, S., Armon-Lotem, S., Marinis, T., Polišenská, K., Roy, P. & Seeff-Gabriel, B. (2013). The potential of sentence imitation tasks for assessment of language abilities in sequential bilingual children. In V. Mueller-Gathercole (Ed.), Issues in the assessment of bilinguals (pp. 56–89). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condon, S. & Régnard, C. (2010). Héritage et pratiques linguistiques des descendants d’immigrés en France. Hommes et migrations, 1288, 44–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N., & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 741–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
dos Santos, C. & Ferré, S. (2016). A nonword repetition task to assess bilingual children phonology. Language Acquisition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferré, S. & dos Santos, C. (2015). Un test de répétition de non-mots pour évaluer la phonologie des enfants bilingues. LiDiL, 51, 11–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferré, S., dos Santos, C. & de Almeida, L. (2015). Potential Phonological Markers for SLI in bilingual children. In E. Grillo & K. Jepson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 152–164). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ferré, S., Tuller, L., Sizaret, E., & Barthez, M.-A. (2012). Acquiring and avoiding phonological complexity in SLI vs. typical development of French: The case of consonant clusters. In P. Hoole, L. Bombien, M. Pouplier, C. Mooshammer, & B. Kühnert (Eds.), Consonant clusters and structural complexity (pp. 285–308). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleckstein, A., Prévost, P., Tuller, L., Sizaret, E., & Zebib, R. (2016). How to identify SLI in bilingual children? A study on sentence repetition in French. Language Acquisition. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2004). Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Gibson, T., Summers, C., Peña, E., Bedore, L., Gillam, R., & Bohman, T. (2015). The role of phonological structure and experience in bilingual children’s nonword repetition performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 551–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Girbau, D. & Schwartz, R. G. (2008). Phonological working memory in Spanish-English bilingual children with and without Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 124–145 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guttiérez-Clellen, V. F. & Simon-Cereijido, G. (2010). Using nonword repetition tasks for the identification of language impairment in Spanish-English speaking children: Does the language of assessment matter? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(1), 48–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C. (2012). Bilingual development and language assessment. In A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 1–28). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Journal officiel (2013). Décret n° 2013–682 du 24-7-2013 du Ministère de l’éducation nationale, J.O. du 28-7-2013. Retrieved from [URL].
Khomsi, A., Khomsi, J., Pasquet, F., & Parbeau-Gueno, A. (2007). Bilan Informatisé de langage Oral au cycle III et au Collège (BILO3C). Paris: ECPA.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I., Flavier, S., Marsico, E. & Pellegrino, F. (2011). LAPSyD: Lyon-Albuquerque Phonological Systems Databases, Version 1.0. [URL].Google Scholar
Marinis, T. & Armon-Lotem, S. (2015). Sentence repetition. In S. Armon-Lotem, J. de Jong, & N. Meir (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children. Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 95–122). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2004). The relevance of SLI in understanding the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. & Crago, M. (2000). Tense and temporality: a comparison between children learning a second language and children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing research, 43, 834–847. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plante, E. & Vance, R. (1994). Diagnostic accuracy of two tests of preschool language. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 70–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., Tuller, L., Scheidnes, M., Ferré, S. & Haiden, M. (2010). Computational complexity effects in the acquisition of wh-questions in child L2 French. In L. Dominguez & P. Guijarres-Fuentes (Eds.), New directions in language acquisition: Romance languages in the generative perspective (pp. 415–444). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Prévost, Philippe, Tuller, Laurice and Rasha Zebib. 2012. LITMUS-SR-French. ms, Université François-Rabelais de Tours.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Court, J. & Raven, J. (1986). Raven’s coloured matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Scheidnes, M. & Tuller L. (2013). L2 children embed normally, but children with SLI do not. In M. Lobo & A. L. Santos (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the Romance Turn V (pp. 261–284). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Sharp, K. & Gathercole, V. (2013). Can a novel word repetition task be a language-neutral assessment tool? Evidence from Welsh-English bilingual children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29, 77–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sua-Kay E. & Santos, M. E. (2014). Grelha de Avaliação da Linguagem – nível escolar (GOL-E). Alcoitão: Escola Superior de Saúde do Alcoitão. 2ª edição revista.Google Scholar
Thordardottir, E. (2015). Proposed Diagnostic procedures for use in bilingual and cross-linguistic contexts. In S. Armon-Lotem, J. de Jong, & N. Meir (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 331–358). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E. & Brandeker, M. (2013). The effect of bilingual exposure versus language impairment on nonword repetition and sentence imitation scores. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E. & Juliusdottir, A. G. (2013). Icelandic as a second language: A longitudinal study of language knowledge and processing by school-age children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 411–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Topbaş, S. & Güven, S. (2008). Turkce Erken Dil Gelisim Testi (Test of Early Language Development-TELD3. Turkish adaptation).Google Scholar
Topbaş, S., Kaçar-Kütükçü, D., & Kopkallı-Yavuz, H. (2014). Performance of children on the Turkish nonword repetition test: Effect of word similarity, word length, and scoring. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28, 602–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuller, L. (2015). Clinical use of parental questionnaires in multilingual contexts. In S. Armon-Lotem, J. de Jong, & N. Meir (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 299–328). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuller, L., Abboud, L., Ferré, S., Fleckstein, A., Prévost, P., dos Santos, C., Scheidnes, M. & Zebib, R. (2015). Specific language impairment and bilingualism: Assembling the pieces. In C. Hamann & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2013. (pp. 533–567). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Lornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I. (2014). The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 765–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu Rattanasone, N. & Demuth, K. (2014). The acquisition of coda consonants by Mandarin early child L2 learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 646–659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zebib, R., Hamann, C., Prévost, P., Aid Ibrahim, L. & Tuller, L. (2016). Syntactic complexity, verbal working memory, and executive function in bilingual children with and without SLI: a sentence repetition study in France and in Germany. Paper presented at the 38th annual conference of the German Linguistic Society (DGfS), University of Konstanz, Germany.Google Scholar