Chapter 3
Beyond the English passive
What we can learn from syntactic priming about L1 acquisition by exploring other structures and languages
Research on syntactic priming in typically-developing monolingual children has focused on when abstract
syntactic representations first emerge and on which mechanisms can explain syntactic priming effects in acquisition. Much of
this work has focused on the English passive (but also dative structures). In this chapter, I explore how syntactic priming
data can provide more fine-grained information about children’s syntactic representations, what we can learn about the role
and representation of interfaces, and how syntactic priming can be used to systematically explore frequency effects in L1
acquisition. In each case, I emphasize how research with different structures and languages can make important contributions
in these areas.
Article outline
- Introduction
- The nature of abstract syntactic representations
- Interfaces
- Input frequency effects in first language acquisition
- Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
References (125)
References
Abbot-Smith, K., & Behrens, H. (2006). How
known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The German passive and future
constructions. Cognitive
Science 30(6), 995–1026. 

Alcock, K. J., Rimba, K., & Newton, C. R. (2012). Early
production of the passive in two Eastern Bantu languages. First
Language, 32(4), 459–478. 

Allen, S. E., & Crago, M. B. (1996). Early
passive acquisition in Inuktitut. Journal of Child
Language, 23(1), 129–155. 

Ambridge, B. (2019). Against
stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First
Language. 

Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L. (2015). The
ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child
Language, 42(2), 239–273. 

Anderson, S. C. (1983). Tone
and morpheme rules in Bamileke-Ngyemboon (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Southern California.
Arai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2014). The
development of Japanese passive syntax as indexed by structural priming in
comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 67(1), 60–78. 

Barnes, S., Gutfreund, M., Satterly, D., & Wells, G. (1983). Characteristics
of adult speech which predict children’s language development. Journal of Child
Language, 10(1), 65–84. 

Bencini, G. M., & Valian, V. V. (2008). Abstract
sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and
comprehension. Journal of Memory and
Language, 59(1), 97–113. 

Bernolet, S., Colleman, T., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2014). The
“sense boost” to dative priming: Evidence for sense-specific verb-structure
links. Journal of Memory and
Language, 76, 113–126. 

Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared
syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order
repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 33(5), 931–949.
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). From
language-specific to shared syntactic representations: The influence of second language proficiency on syntactic
sharing in
bilinguals. Cognition, 127(3), 287–306. 

Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic
persistence in language production. Cognitive
Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. 

Bock, J. K. (1989). Closed-class
immanence in sentence
production. Cognition, 31(2), 163–186. 

Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent
structural priming from language comprehension to language
production. Cognition, 104(3), 437–458. 

Bock, K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing
sentences. Cognition, 35(1), 1–39. 

Branigan, H. (2007). Syntactic
priming. Language and Linguistics
Compass, 1(1–2), 1–16. 

Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2016). What
children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult–child
dialogue. Journal of Memory and
Language, 91, 141–157. 

Branigan, H. P., & Messenger, K. (2016). Consistent
and cumulative effects of syntactic experience in children’s sentence production: Evidence for error-based implicit
learning. Cognition, 157, 250–256. 

Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2016). What
children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult-child
dialogue. Journal of Memory and
Language, 91, 141–157. 

Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2017). An
experimental approach to linguistic representation. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 40, Article e282. 

Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Liversedge, S. P., Stewart, A. J., & Urbach, T. P. (1995). Syntactic
priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of
Psycholinguistic
Research, 24, 489–506. 

Buckle, L., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A. L. (2017). The
effects of animacy and syntax on priming: A developmental study. Frontiers in
Psychology, 8, 02246. 

Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing
and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 26, 42–65. 

Chang, F., Baumann, M., Pappert, S., & Fitz, H. (2015). Do
lemmas speak German? A verb position effect in German structural priming. Cognitive
Science, 39(5), 1113–1130. 

Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming
syntactic. Psychological
Review, 113(2), 234–272. 

Chang, F., & Fitz, H. (2014). Computational
models of sentence production: A dual-path approach. In M. A. Goldrick, V. S. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of language
production (pp. 70–87). Oxford University Press.
Chang, F., Janciauskas, M., & Fitz, H. (2012). Language
adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and
Linguistics
Compass, 6(5), 259–278. 

Chen, B., Jia, Y., Wang, Z., Dunlap, S., & Shin, J. A. (2013). Is
word-order similarity necessary for cross-linguistic structural priming? Second
Language
Research, 29(4), 375–389. 

Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2003). The
use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase
structure. Journal of Memory and
Language, 49(2), 214–230. 

Crossley, S. A., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). A
linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. Modern Language
Journal, 91(1), 15–30. 

De Clercq, B., & Housen, A. (2017). A
cross-linguistic perspective on syntactic complexity in L2 development: Syntactic elaboration and
diversity. The Modern Language
Journal, 101(2), 315–334. 

DeGraff, M. (2003). Against
creole
exceptionalism. Language 79(2): 391–410. 

Dyakonova, M. (2004). Information
structure development: Evidence from the acquisition of word order in Russian and
English. Nordlyd, 32(1): 88–109.
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability
in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development, 59(5), 1–185. 

Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006). The
functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 21(7–8), 1011–1029. 

Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). The
role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 42(9), 1362–1376.
Fisher, C. (2002). The
role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: A reply to Tomasello
(2000). Cognition, 82, 259–278. 

Fleischer, Z., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2012). Shared
information structure: Evidence from cross-linguistic priming. Bilingualism: Language
and
Cognition, 15(3), 568–579. 

Foltz, A., Gaspers, J., Meyer, C., Thiele, K., Cimiano, P., & Stenneken, P. (2015). Temporal
effects of alignment in text-based, task-oriented discourse. Discourse
Processes, 52(8), 609–641. 

Foltz, A., Knopf, K., Jonas, K., Jaecks, P., & Stenneken, P. (2020). Evidence
for robust abstract syntactic representations in production before age three. First
Language. 

Foltz, A., Thiele, K., Kahsnitz, D., & Stenneken, P. (2015). Children’s
syntactic-priming magnitude: Lexical factors and participant characteristics. Journal
of Child
Language, 42(4), 932–945. 

Furrow, D., Nelson, K., & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers’
speech to children and syntactic development: Some simple relationships. Journal of
Child
Language, 6(3), 423–442. 

Gámez, P. B., & Shimpi, P. M. (2016). Structural
priming in Spanish as evidence of implicit learning. Journal of Child
Language, 43(1), 207–233. 

Gámez, P. B., Shimpi, P. M., Waterfall, H. R., & Huttenlocher, J. (2009). Priming
a perspective in Spanish monolingual children: The use of syntactic
alternatives. Journal of Child
Language, 36(2), 269–290. 

Gámez, P. B., & Vasilyeva, M. (2015). Increasing
second language learners’ production and comprehension of developmentally advanced syntactic
forms. Language Learning and
Development, 11(2), 128–151. 

Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning
words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence
comprehension. Psychological
Science, 17(8), 684–691. 

Gil, D. (2008). The
acquisition of voice morphology in Jakarta
Indonesian. In N. Gagarina & I. Gülzow (Eds.), The
acquisition of verbs and their grammar: The effect of particular
languages (pp. 201–227). Springer. 

Hall, M. L., Ferreira, V. S., & Mayberry, R. I. (2015). Syntactic
priming in American Sign Language. PLOS
ONE, 10(3), e0119611. 

Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic
priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken
dialogue. Journal of Memory and
Language, 58(2), 214–238. 

Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is
syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English
bilinguals. Psychological
Science, 15(6), 409–414. 

Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word
order priming in written and spoken sentence
production. Cognition, 75(2), B27–B39. 

Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1985). Some
contributions of mothers’ speech to their children’s syntactic growth. Journal of Child
Language, 12(2), 367–385. 

Holst, J. H. (2014). Advances
in Burushaski linguistics. BoD–Books on Demand.
Horgan, D. (1978). The
development of the full passive. Journal of Child
Language, 5, 65–80. 

Hsin, L., Legendre, G., & Omaki, A. (2013). Priming
cross-linguistic interference in Spanish–English bilingual
children. In S. Baiz, N. Goldman, & R. Hawks (Eds.), BUCLD
37: Proceedings of the 37th annual Boston University Conference on Language
Development (pp. 165–177). Cascadilla Press.
Hujanen, J. H. H. (1997). Effects
of case marking and word order on sentence parsing in Finnish: An eye fixation
analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section
A, 50(4), 841–858. 

Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language
input and child syntax. Cognitive
Psychology, 45(3), 337–374. 

Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic
priming in young children. Journal of Memory and
Language, 50(2), 182–195. 

Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment
as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both
prior and recent
experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. 

Jisa, H., Reilly, J., Verhoeven, L., Baruch, E., & Rosado, E. (2002). Passive
voice constructions in written texts: A cross-linguistic developmental study. Written
Language and
Literacy, 5(2), 163–181. 

Juola, P. (1998). Measuring
linguistic complexity: The morphological tier. Journal of Quantitative
Linguistics, 5(3), 206–213. 

Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term
structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory &
Cognition, 35(5), 925–937. 

Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Long-term
cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory &
Cognition, 39(3), 381–388. 

Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., & Borreggine, K. L. (2006). Recent
experience affects the strength of structural
priming. Cognition, 99(3), B73–B82. 

Kidd, E. (2012a). Implicit
statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of
syntax. Developmental
Psychology, 48(1), 171–184. 

Kidd, E. (2012b). Individual
differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 33, 393–418. 

Kline, M., & Demuth, K. (2010). Factors
facilitating implicit learning: The case of the Sesotho passive. Language
Acquisition, 17(4), 220–234. 

Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., Housen, A., & De Clercq, B. (2019). Variation
in syntactic complexity: Introduction. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 29(2), 161–170. 

Leonard, L. B., Miller, C. A., Grela, B., Holland, A. L., Gerber, E., & Petucci, M. (2000). Production
operations contribute to the grammatical morpheme limitations of children with specific language
impairment. Journal of Memory and
Language, 43(2), 362–378. 

Lin, J. W. (2006). Time
in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of
Semantics, 23(1), 1–53. 

Loban, W. (1976). Language
development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. National Council of Teachers of English.
McWhorter, J. H. (2001). The
worlds simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic
Typology, 5(2–3), 125–166. 

McWhorter, J. H. (2011). Linguistic
simplicity and complexity: Why do languages undress? Walter de Gruyter. 

Messenger, K. (2021). The
persistence of priming: Exploring long-lasting syntactic priming effects in children and
adults. Cognitive
Science, 45(6), e13005. 

Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2011). Evidence
for (shared) abstract structure underlying children’s short and full
passives. Cognition, 121, 268–274. 

Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Sorace, A. (2012). Is
young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic
priming. Journal of Memory and
Language, 66, 568–587. 

Meyer, A. S. (2017). Structural
priming is not a royal road to representations. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 40, e305. 

Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. S. (1981). The
relation between age and mean length of utterance. Journal of Speech and Hearing
Research, 24(2), 154–161. 

Muylle, M., Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2020). The
role of case marking and word order in cross-linguistic structural priming in late L2
acquisition. Language
Learning, 70(S2), 194–220. 

Naigles, L. R. (2002). Form
is easy, meaning is hard: Resolving a paradox in early child
language. Cognition, 86(2), 157–199. 

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards
an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of
complexity. Applied
Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. 

Pasch, H. (1997). Sango. In S. G. Thomason (Ed.), Contact
languages: A wider
perspective (pp. 209–270). John Benjamins. 

Perek, F. (2012). Alternation-based
generalizations are stored in the mental grammar: Evidence from a sorting task
experiment. Cognitive
Linguistics, 23(3), 601–635. 

Peter, M., Chang, F., Pine, J. M., Blything, R., & Rowland, C. F. (2015). When
and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural
priming task. Journal of Memory and
Language, 81, 1–15. 

Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The
representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language
production. Journal of Memory and
language, 39(4), 633–651. 

Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1999). Syntactic
priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 3(4), 136–141. 

Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability
and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. The MIT Press.
Pye, C., & Quixtan Poz, P. (1988). Precocious
passives (and antipassives) in Quiché Mayan. Papers and Reports on Child Language
Development, 27, 71–80.
Rissman, L., Legendre, G., & Landau, B. (2013). Abstract
morphosyntax in two-and three-year-old children: Evidence from priming. Language
Learning and
Development, 9(3), 278–292. 

Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. (2012). The
development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical
boost. Cognition, 125(1), 49–63. 

Sampson, G., Gil, D., & Trudgill, P. (Eds.). (2009). Language
complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford University Press.
Sarilar, A., Matthews, D., & Küntay, A. C. (2015). Hearing
relative clauses boosts relative clause usage (and referential clarity) in young Turkish language
learners. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 175–202. 

Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing
the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions
in young children. Developmental
Science, 6(5), 557–567. 

Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Structural
priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in
4-year-olds. Language Learning and
Development, 2(1), 27–49. 

Scarborough, H., & Wycoff, J. (1986). Mother,
I’d still rather do it myself: Some further non-effects of ‘motherese’. Journal of
Child
Language, 13(2), 431–437. 

Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The
representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic
priming. Journal of Memory and
Language, 56(2), 153–171. 

Scott, C. M. (1984). Adverbial
connectivity in conversations of children 6–12. Journal of Child
Language, 11(2), 423–452. 

Seabrooks, D. (2017). Child
acquisition of Spanish clitic impersonal constructions: An empirical study on the CHILDES
corpora (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Shimpi, P. M., Gámez, P. B., Huttenlocher, J., & Vasilyeva, M. (2007). Syntactic
priming in 3-and 4-year-old children: Evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative
forms. Developmental
Psychology, 43(6), 1334–1346. 

Shin, J. A., & Christianson, K. (2009). Syntactic
processing in Korean–English bilingual production: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural
priming. Cognition, 112(1), 175–180. 

Shosted, R. K. (2006). Correlating
complexity: A typological approach. Linguistic
Typology, 10(1), 1–40. 

Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal
and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural
overlap. International Journal of
Bilingualism, 13(2), 195–210. 

Szmrecsányi, B. (2004). On
operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Le poids des mots.
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis.
Louvain-la-Neuve (Vol. 2, pp. 1032–1039). Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Tamburelli, M., Sanoudaki, E., Jones, G., & Sowinska, M. (2015). Acceleration
in the bilingual acquisition of phonological structure: Evidence from Polish–English bilingual
children. Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition, 18(4), 713–725. 

Thornton, R. (2016, December 22). Children’s
acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Oxford Research encyclopedia of
linguistics. Oxford University Press. 

Tomasello, M. (1992). First
verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge University Press. 

Tomasello, M. (2000). Do
young children have adult syntactic
competence? Cognition, 74, 209–253. 

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing
a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2010). Syntactic
priming effects in comprehension: A critical review. Language and Linguistics
Compass, 4(10), 925–937. 

Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2018). Implicit
learning of structure occurs in parallel with lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in sentence
comprehension. Journal of Memory and
Language, 98, 59–76. 

Ullman, M. T. (2001). The
declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 30(1), 37–69. 

Valian, V. (1999). Input
and language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook
of child language
acquisition (pp. 497–530). Academic Press.
Vasilyeva, M., & Gámez, P. B. (2015). Exploring
interactions between semantic and syntactic processes: The role of animacy in syntactic
priming. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 138, 15–30. 

Vasilyeva, M., Huttenlocher, J., & Waterfall, H. (2006). Effects
of language intervention on syntactic skill levels in preschoolers. Developmental
Psychology, 42(1), 164–174. 

Vasilyeva, M., & Waterfall, H. (2012). Beyond
syntactic priming: Evidence for activation of alternative syntactic structures. Journal
of Child
Language, 39(2), 258–283. 

Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H., Gámez, P. B., Gómez, L. E., Bowers, E., & Shimpi, P. (2010). Cross-linguistic
syntactic priming in bilingual children. Journal of Child
Language, 37(5), 1047–1064. 

Wexler, K. (1998). Very
early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive
stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79. 

Whitehurst, G. J., Ironsmith, M., & Goldfein, M. (1974). Selective
imitation of the passive construction through modeling. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 17(2), 288–302. 

Ziegler, J., Snedeker, J., & Wittenberg, E. (2018). Event
structures drive semantic structural priming, not thematic roles: Evidence from idioms and light
verbs. Cognitive
Science, 42(8), 2918–2949. 

Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Tafuri, Michelle & Katherine Messenger
2024.
Syntactic priming as implicit learning in German child language.
Journal of Child Language ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.