Cited by

Cited by 44 other publications

Antonova Ünlü, Elena & Wei Li
2018. The acquisition of the weaker language. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:5  pp. 637 ff. DOI logo
Ariel, Mira
2014. Orconstructions: Monosemy vs. polysemy. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
ASHKENAZI, Orit, Steven GILLIS & Dorit RAVID
2020. Input–output relations in Hebrew verb acquisition at the morpho-lexical interface. Journal of Child Language 47:3  pp. 509 ff. DOI logo
Ashkenazi, Orit, Dorit Ravid & Steven Gillis
2016. Breaking into the Hebrew verb system: A learning problem. First Language 36:5  pp. 505 ff. DOI logo
Behrens, Heike
2020. From grammatical categories to processes of categorization. In Current Perspectives on Child Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 27],  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2014. Competition in argument interpretation: Evidence from the neurobiology of language. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Cristofaro, Sonia
2014. Competing motivation models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Dattner, Elitzur, Ronit Levie, Dorit Ravid & Orit Ashkenazi
2021. Patterns of Adaptation in Child-Directed and Child Speech in the Emergence of Hebrew Verbs. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Dixon, Sally
2018. Alyawarr Children’s Use of Two Closely Related Languages. In Language Practices of Indigenous Children and Youth,  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gary Libben & Katharina Korecky‐Kröll
2014. Conflicting vs. convergent vs. interdependent motivations in morphology. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Du Bois, John W.
2014. Motivating competitions. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Espinosa-Ochoa, Mary Rosa
2019. The Spanish Verbs Estar (To Be) and Ser (To Be) in Child-Directed Speech. Psychology of Language and Communication 23:1  pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Francis, Elaine J. & Laura A. Michaelis
2014. Why move? How weight and discourse factors combine to predict relative clause extraposition in English. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Guo, Ling-Yu, Amanda J. Owen & J. Bruce Tomblin
2010. Effect of Subject Types on the Production of AuxiliaryIsin Young English-Speaking Children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53:6  pp. 1720 ff. DOI logo
Haiman, John
2014. Six competing motives for repetition. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2014. On system pressure competing with economic motivation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Hawkins, John A.
2014. Patterns in competing motivations and the interaction of principles. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Helmbrecht, Johannes
2014. Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns: A case study on competing motivations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Hughes, Mary E. & Shanley E. M. Allen
2014. Competing motivations in children's omission of subjects? The interaction between verb finiteness and referent accessibility. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Bernd Heine
2014. Sentence grammar vs. thetical grammar: Two competing domains?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 348 ff. DOI logo
Krajewski, Grzegorz & Elena Lieven
2014. Competing cues in early syntactic development. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Lamers, Monique J. A. & Helen de Hoop
2014. Animate object fronting in Dutch: A production study. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Lieven, Elena
2010. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120:11  pp. 2546 ff. DOI logo
Lieven, Elena & Silke Brandt
2011. The constructivist approach: Reply to commentaries. Infancia y Aprendizaje 34:3  pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Lieven, Elena & Silke Brandt
2011. The constructivist approach. Infancia y Aprendizaje 34:3  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Lustigman, Lyle
2015. Optional opacity: A syntactically-based analysis of early Hebrew verb morphology. First Language 35:6  pp. 466 ff. DOI logo
MacWhinney, Brian
2014. Conclusions: Competition across time. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik
2014. Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, DOI logo
Malchukov, Andrej
2014. Resolving alignment conflicts: A competing motivations approach. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Mondorf, Britta
2014. Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Moravcsik, Edith
2014. Introduction. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014. Where do motivations compete?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Pfeiffer, Martin
2014. Formal vs. functional motivations for the structure of self‐repair in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Ravid, Dorit & Anael Zimmerman
2017. Chapter 3. Maternal input at 1;6. In Social Environment and Cognition in Language Development [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 21],  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Rowland, Caroline F., Claire Noble & Angel Chan
2014. Competition all the way down: How children learn word order cues to sentence meaning. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Strunk, Jan
2014. A statistical model of competing motivations affecting relative clause extraposition in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Theakston, Anna & Elena Lieven
2017. Multiunit Sequences in First Language Acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3  pp. 588 ff. DOI logo
Türker, Ebru
2016. The role of L1 conceptual and linguistic knowledge and frequency in the acquisition of L2 metaphorical expressions. Second Language Research 32:1  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. List of abbreviations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. xviii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Preface. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. List of figures and tables. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. xiv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Copyright Page. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Notes on contributors. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. viii ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.