Article published in:
Translation and Interpreting Studies
Vol. 13:2 (2018) ► pp. 271–292
Thematic cluster: Understanding Chinese culture through key concepts

The “ideograph” and the 漢字 hànzì

A cross-cultural concept with two mutually invisible faces

In the Anglophone sphere, according to popular and most academic understandings, the term “ideograph” is regarded as an unproblematic synonym of 漢字 hànzì ‘Chinese character.’ On graphological grounds, i.e. as applied to writing systems, it can easily be shown that the concept of “ideograph” is both theoretically incoherent and practically unfeasible (McDonald 2016); while historically it is clear that the notion was founded on an imperfect understanding of Chinese characters as a writing system, and grew out of a European obsession with the notion of a “universal character” at a particular historical moment (Mungello 1985; Saussy 2001). Nevertheless the concept has become deeply embedded in European understandings of Chinese language and culture, to the extent that it is, in effect, a valuable conceptual possession of Western modernity (Bush 2010), and promoted alike by those with a detailed knowledge of Chinese writing, such as H. G. Creel (1936), as by those in blissful ignorance of it, like Jacques Derrida (1967/1976). In the Sinophone sphere, while for most practical purposes, as well as in a large proportion of scholarly work, more grounded understandings of Chinese characters as a writing system operate either implicitly or explicitly, the traditional emphasis on characters as a link between civilization and the cosmos (O’Neill 2013), as well as a long tradition of pedagogical “just so stories” about the construction of individual characters (e.g., Zuo 2005), provide a key point of contact with Western notions of the “ideograph” as symbolizing not a word, but an idea or an object. The situation may thus be described involving a type of inversion of the phenomenon of faux amis or “false friends,” where two different words are understood as being more or less synonymous; or alternatively as an example of Lydia Liu’s (2004) notion of a cross-lingual “supersign” where two comparable terms exercise an influence on each other across linguistic and cultural boundaries. This article will attempt to trace the genealogy of these complex and overlapping notions, and see what differing understandings of Chinese characters have to tell us about notions of cultural specificity, cultural production, and cross-cultural (mis-)communication in the contemporary globalized world.
Keywords: Chinese characters, ideograph, writing systems, nativised orientalism, cultural nationalism
Article outline
  • Argument: What exactly is the problem?
  • The archeology of the “ideograph”
  • The ideograph and the hanzi: Translingual scholarly interaction
  • The ideograph as nativised orientalism: Claiming cultural uniqueness
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00016.mcd
References
Ames, Roger T. and Henry Rosemont, Jr.
1999 The Analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis
1605 The Advancement of Learning. Renascence Editions: An Online Repository of Works Printed in English Between the Years 1477 and 1799. http://​www​.luminarium​.org​/renascence​-editions​/adv1​.htm
1625 De dignitate & augmentis scientiarum IX libri. Editio nova, cum indice rerum ac verborum locupletissimo 1645 Lugd. Batav. (Leiden): F. Moyardum & A. Wijngaerde.Google Scholar
Boodberg, Peter A.
1937 “Some Proleptical Remarks on the Evolution of Archaic Chinese.” Harvard Journal of Asian Studies 21: 329–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Christopher
2010 Ideographic Modernism: China, Writing, Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Champollion, Jean-François
1822 Lettre à M. Dacier relative à l’alphabet des hiéroglyphes phonétiques employés par les Égyptiens pour inscrire sur leurs monuments les titres, les noms et les surnoms de souverains grecs et romains. Paris: Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Chang, Han-Liang
1988 “Hallucinating the Other: Derridean Fantasies of Chinese Script.” Representations of Otherness: Cultural Hermeneutics, East and West. Center for Twentieth Century Studies UWM, April 1988.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren 趙元任
1975 Rhythm and Structure in Chinese Word Conceptions. 漢語詞的概念及其結構和節奏.’ 王洪君譯。見 “中國現代語言學的開闊和發展 – 趙元任語言學論文選”。清華大學出版社 1992.Google Scholar
Creel, Herrlee Glessner
1936 “On the Nature of Chinese Ideography.” T’oung Pao xxxii1: 85–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bono, Edward
2000 The De Bono Code Book. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1967 De la grammatologie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit 1976 Of Grammatology. Trans. by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Du Ponceau, Peter S.
1828  A Dissertation on the Nature and Character of the Chinese System of Writing. Published as 1838. Transactions of the Historical and Literary Committee of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 21Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
1995 The Search for the Perfect Language. Tr. James Fentress. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fenollosa, Ernest
1919 The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry. Ed. by Ezra Pound. reprinted 1936 San Francisco: City Lights Books. Fenollosa, Ernest & Ezra Pound 2008 New edition. Ed. by Haun Saussy, Jonathan Stalling, and Lucas Klein. The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry: A Critical Edition. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Ming Dong
2005 Chinese Theories of Reading and Writing: A Route to Hermeneutics and Open Poetics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2006 Chinese Theories of Fiction: A Non-Western Narrative System. Albany, NY: University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Linguistic Sinologism.” Chapter 8 in Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism, 187–215. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
2014 “Sinologism in Language Philosophy: A Critique of the Controversy over Chinese Language.” Philosophy East and West 64(3): 692–717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Sharron
2012 A Cultural History of the Chinese Language. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Hall, David L. and Roger T. Ames
1987 Thinking Through Confucius. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Chad
1983 Language and Logic in Ancient China, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
1993 “Chinese Ideographs and Western Ideas.” Journal of Asian Studies 52(2): 373–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Roy
2000 What’s the code for ‘We’ve heard this one before’? Times Higher Education, August 20, 2000. Available at: www​.timeshighereducation​.co​.uk​/books​/whats​-the​-code​-for​-weve​-heard​-this​-one​-before​/155936​.article. Last accessed 18 May 2018.
Hodge, Bob & Kam Louie
1998 The Politics of Chinese Language and Culture: The Art of Reading Dragons. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kern, Robert
1996 Orientalism, Modernism, and the American Poem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lydia H.
2004 The Clash of Empires: The Invention of China in Modern World Making. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang
1986 Hanyu jufa de linghuoxing. [The flexibility of Chinese syntax] Zhongguo Yuwen 1986(1), 1–9. 呂叔湘著漢語句法的靈活性《中國語文》1986年 第11期，第1–9頁。Google Scholar
Lurie, David B.
2006 “Language, writing and disciplinarity in the Critique of the ‘Ideographic Myth’: Some proleptical remarks.” Language and Communication 261: 250–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Edward
2000 “Review of Hodge, Bob & Kam Louie. 1998. The Politics of Chinese Language and Culture: The Art of Reading Dragons .” Modern Chinese Literature and Culture 12(1)(Spring): 209–217.Google Scholar
2002 “ ‘Humanistic Spirit or Scientism?’: conflicting ideologies in Chinese language reform.” Histoire, Epistémologie, Langage 24(2): 51–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Getting over the Walls of Discourse: ‘Character Fetishization’ in Chinese Studies.” Journal of Asian Studies 68(4): 1189–1213.Google Scholar
2011 “Ideolatry vs Phonolatry?: Chinese Characters as Disciplinary Identifier.” Chapter 5 in Learning Chinese, Turning Chinese: challenges to becoming sinophone in a globalised world. London: Routledge, 109–131.Google Scholar
2016 “The Chinese Script in the Chinese Scriptworld: Chinese Characters in Native and Borrowed Traditions.” Journal of World Literature 1(2): 195–211. Crossref.Google Scholar
Mungello, David
1985 Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Timothy
2013 “Xu Shen’s Scholarly Agenda: A New Interpretation of the Postface of the Shuowen jiezi .” Journal of the American Oriental Society 133(3): 413–440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
www​.oed​.com.
Porter, David
2001 Ideographia: The Chinese Cipher in Early Modern Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pound, Ezra
1915 Cathay: Translations by Ezra Pound for the most part from the Chinese of Rihaku, from the notes of the late Ernest Fenollosa, and the decipherings of the Professors Mori and Ariga. London: Elkin Matthews.Google Scholar
Rosemont, Henry Jr.
1974 “On Representing Abstractions in Archaic Chinese.” Philosophy East and West 24(1): 71–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward
1978 Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient, New York: Pantheon; revised edition 1995 London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916 Cours de linguistique générale 1957 Tr. by Wade Baskin. Course in General Linguistics, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Saussy, Haun
2001 Great Walls of Discourse and Other Adventures in Cultural China Harvard East Asian Monographs 212, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Asia Center. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Xiaolong
1989 Renwen jingshen haishi kexuezhuyi?: 20 shiji Zhongguo yuyanxye de sibianlu. [Humanism or Scientism?: A Critique of 20th Century Chinese Linguistics]. Shanghai: Shulin. 申小龍著《人文精神還是科學主義？：20世紀中國語言學的思辨录 》 書林出版社，上海。Google Scholar
Watters, T.
1889 Essays on the Chinese Language, Shanghai: Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, John
1668 An Essay Towards a Real Character And a Philosophical Language, London: Sa. Gellibrand.Google Scholar
Xu, Tongqiang
2001 Jichu yuyanxue jiaocheng/Foundations of Linguistics: A Course Book. Beijing: Peking University Press. 許通鏘著《基礎語言學教程》 北京大學出版社，北京。Google Scholar
Zhang, Gongjin
1998 Wenhua yuyanxue fafan [Overview of Cultural Linguistics]. Kunming: Yunnan University Press. 張公瑾著《文化語言學發凡》 云南大學出版社，昆明。Google Scholar
Zhou, Gang
2015 “Review of Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism by Ming Dong Gu.” Modern Chinese Literature and Culture. http://​u​.osu​.edu​/mclc​/book​-reviews​/gangzhou/
Zhou, Xian
2015 “Between Knowledge and Politics: Reflections on Reading Ming Dong Gu’s Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism .” Philosophy East and West 65(4): 1273–1279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zuo, Min’an
2005 Xishuo Hanzi: 1,000 ge hanzi de qiyuan yu yanbian [Chinese Characters in Detail: The origins and evolution of 1,000 Chinese Characters.] Beijing: Citic. 左民安著《細說漢字:1000個漢字的起源與演變》 中信出版社，北京。Google Scholar