Article published in:
Toward Comparative Translation and Interpreting Studies
Edited by Sergey Tyulenev and Binghan Zheng
[Translation and Interpreting Studies 12:2] 2017
► pp. 231–252

Corpus-based methods for Comparative Translation and Interpreting Studies

Mapping differences and similarities with traditional and innovative tools

| Universitat Jaume I
Comparative Translation and Interpreting Studies (CTIS1) encompasses all research processes resulting from the comparison of theories, products, and practices associated with the tasks performed by translators and interpreters during their work. A specific set of comparative methods and tools are derived from Corpus-based Translation and Interpreting Studies (CTIS2). In an attempt to conduct CTIS1 from a CTIS2 perspective, this article applies (modern diachronic) corpus-based ideas, such as priming theory and corpus tools, to build a comparative methodology and analysis with the European Comparable and Parallel Corpus (ECPC) archive. The article focuses on the notions of difference and similarity to better understand the field.
Keywords: Comparative Translation and Interpreting Studies (CTIS1), Corpus-based Translation and Interpreting Studies (CTIS2), Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS), ECPC, methodology
Article outline
  • 1.CTIS1 and CTIS2
  • 2.Lexical priming: A corpus-based theory
  • 3.Corpus-based research tools
  • 4.The study
    • 4.1Aims and specific tools chosen for the analysis
    • 4.2The ECPC Archive
    • 4.3Outline of the methodology
    • 4.4Descriptive statistics
    • 4.5Lock keyword analysis
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.12.2.03cal
References

References

Bachmann, Ingo
2011 “Civil Partnership – ‘Gay Marriage in All but Name’: A Corpus-Driven Analysis of Discourses of Same-Sex Relationships in the UK Parliament.” Corpora 6(1): 77–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mona
1993 “Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies – Implications and Applications.” In Text and Technology, ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis, and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 233–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “A Corpus-Based View of Similarity and Difference in Translation.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(2): 167–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul
2010 Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2011 “Times May Change, But We Will Always Have Money: Diachronic Variation in Recent British English.” Journal of English Linguistics 39(1): 65–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, and Reppen, Randi
1998 Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Conrad, Susan, and Edward Finegan
1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. New York: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Bosseaux, Charlotte
2006 “Who’s Afraid of Virginia’s you: A Corpus-based Study of the French Translations of The Waves.” Meta 51(3): 599–610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calzada Pérez, María
2015 “Peeping into Europe’s Liquidity Through Cads and Md-Cads.” (Paper presented at 5th International Association for Translators and Intercultural Studies Conference , Belo Horizonte, Brazil, July 6–10, 2015).
2016 “Corpus-assisted discourse studies at the European Parliament.” (Paper presented at Languaging Diversity. 3rd International Conference. Language(s) and Power , Macerata, Italy, 3–5 March 2016).
Chesterman, Andrew
2004 “Beyond the Particular.” In Translation Universals Do They Exist?, ed. by Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David
1993 “The Comparative Method.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. by Ada W. Finifter, 105–19. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas, and Paul Baker
2008 “Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding. A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press, 1996–2005.” Journal of English Linguistics 36(1): 5–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas, and Anna Marchi
2012 “Keyness. Appropriate Metrics and Practical Issues.” (Paper presented at CADS International Conference. Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies: More than the sum of Discourse Analysis and computing? , Università di Bologna, Italy, 13–14 September 2012). Accessed June 7, 2017. https://​repository​.edgehill​.ac​.uk​/4196/
Hoey, Michael
2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Lexical Priming and Translation.” In Corpus-Based Translation Studies: Research and Applications, ed. by Alet Kruger, Kim Wallmach, and Jeremy Munday, 153–68. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hu, Kaibao
2016 Introducing Corpus-Based Translation Studies. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Stig
2003 “Reflections on corpora and their uses in cross-linguistic research.” In Corpora in Translator Education, ed. by Federico Zanettin, Silvia Bernardini, and Dominic Stewart, 135-144. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Kenny, Dorothy
1998 “Corpora.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, ed. by Mona Baker, 50–53. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001 Lexis and Creativity in Translation: A Corpus-Based Study. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
2012 “Applications of the Lexical Bundles Method in Historical Corpus Research.” In Corpus Data across Languages and Disciplines, ed. by Piotr Cap, 83–95. Lodz Studies in Language 28. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Laviosa, Sara
2002 Corpus-Based Translation Studies: Theory, Findings, Applications. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2010 “ Corpus-Based Translation Studies 15 Years on: Theory, Findings, Applications .” SYNAPS 241: 3–12.Google Scholar
2011 “Corpus-Based Translation Studies: Where Does It Come From? Where Is It Going?” In Corpus-Based Translation Studies: Research and Applications, ed. by Alet Kruger, Kim Wallmach, and Jeremy Munday, 13–32. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2012 “Divergent and Convergent Similarity in Corpus Translation Studies.” In Translations-Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium II, ed. by Barbara Ahrens, Silvia Hansen-Schirra, Monika Krein-Kühle, Michael Schreiber, Ursula Wienen, 295–305. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2014 “Towards the Study of Drifts in the Priming of Anglicisms in Business Communication.” In Identity in and across Cultures, ed. by Paola Evangelisti Allori, 185–208. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna, and Pekka Kujamäki
eds. 2004 Translation Universals. Do they exist? Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie
2012 Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, Timothy P. and Holbrook, Jon B.
2003 “Semantic memory and priming”. In Handbook of Psychology. Volume 41: Experimental Psychology, ed. by Alice F. Healy and Robert W. Proctor, 447–474. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moropa, Koliswa
2011 “A Link Between Simplification and Explicitation in English-Xhosa Parallel Texts: Do the Morphological Complexities of Xhosa Have and Influence?” In Corpus-Based Translation Studies: Research and Applications, ed. by Alet Kruger, Kim Wallmach, and Jeremy Munday, 259–81. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2012 Evaluation in Translation: Critical Points of Translator Decision-Making. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neely, James H.
1991 “Semantic Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition: A Selective Review of Current Findings and Theories.” In Basic Process in Reading: Visual Word Recognition, ed. by Derek Besner and Glyn W. Humphreys, 264–336. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Olohan, Maeve
2004 Introducing Corpora in Translation Studies. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor
eds. 2013 Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike
1997 “PC Analysis of Key Words – and Key Key Words.” System 25(2): 233–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 WordSmith Tools version 6, Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
2009 “In Search of a Bad Reference Corpus.” In What’s in a Word-List?: Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction, ed. by Dawn Archer. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Swan, Michael
2010 Practical English Usage: [easier, Faster Reference]. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte
2013 “Searching for Similarity Using Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies.” Corpora 8(1): 81–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Geoffrey
2006 “Michael Hoey. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. 2005. Xiii + 202 Pages. ISBN 0-415-32863-2.” International Journal of Lexicography 19(3): 327–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
WordSmith Tools
2015 “Word Smith Tools Manual. Software for Finding Word Patterns.” Accessed June 7, 2017. http://​www​.lexically​.net​/downloads​/version6​/HTML​/index​.html​?getting​_started​.htm.
Xiao, Richard, and Ming Yue
2009 “Using Corpora in Translation Studies: The State of the Art.” In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Paul Baker, 237–61. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Zanettin, Federico
2012 Translation-Driven Corpora Corpus Resources for Descriptive and Applied Translation Studies. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Calvo, Elisa & Marián Morón
2020. Investigación con corpus cualitativos en los estudios de traducción: el problema de los constructos traductológicos complejos. Meta: Journal des traducteurs 65:1 ► pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
Calzada Pérez, María
2018. What is kept and what is lost without translation? A corpus-assisted discourse study of the European Parliament’s original and translated English. Perspectives 26:2 ► pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Calzada-Pérez, María
2017. Researching the European Parliament with Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 465 ff. Crossref logo
Sayaheen, Bilal & Mona Nabeel Malkawi
2019. Understanding the Nature of Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Corpus-based Study of Semantic Prosody in Arabic Political Discourse. Lebende Sprachen 64:2 ► pp. 309 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.