Article in:
Translation and Interpreting Studies: Online-First Articles

Lexical bundles in formulaic interpreting

A corpus-based descriptive exploration

| Northeastern University
| University of Agder
Inspired by Henriksen (2007), this article investigates some key characteristics of formulaic interpreting, understood as the recurrent use of linguistic formulae in interpreted texts. Using a Chinese-English corpus of consecutive interpreting in the political setting (CICPPC), the study quantitatively investigates some features of 4-gram lexical bundles in interpreted text, i.e., their discourse functions and relationships to the source text, and qualitatively studies characteristics of specific instances of lexical bundles. The patterns are described both in terms of equivalence, shifts, and additions, as well as ‘constraints on formulaicity,’ a generalization that captures the tension involved between frequency-driven selection and the need to establish a translational relationship. It is suggested that equivalence typical of form-based rendition and addition typical of meaning-based rendition are subject to lower constraints, while greater constraints pertain in the case of shifts.
Keywords: 4-gram lexical bundles, consecutive interpreting corpus, frequency patterns, formulaicity
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Characteristics of lexical bundles
  • Method
    • Corpus
    • 4-gram lexical bundles
    • Retrieval and screening
    • Analytic framework for translation relationships
  • Analysis and results
    • The distribution of discourse functions and correspondence patterns
    • Equivalence
    • Shift
    • Addition
  • Discussion
  • Concluding remarks
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 15 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.19037.li
References
Ädel, Annelie and Britt Erman
2012 “Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach.” English for Specific Purposes 31(2): 81–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2020 “ AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software].” Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from https://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net​/software
Arnon, Inbal and Neal Snider
2010 “More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases.” Journal of Memory and Language 62(1): 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aston, Guy
2016 “How the corporation can help the interpreter walk the tightrope.” In Corpus-based Approaches to Translation and Interpreting: From Theory to Applications, ed. by Gloria Corpas Pastor and Miriam Seghiri, 219–238. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2018 “Acquiring the language of interpreters: A Corpus-based Approach.” In Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies, ed. by Mariachiara Russo, Claudio Bendazzoli and Bart Defrancq, 83–96. Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avner, Ehud Alexander, Noam Ordan, and Shuly Wintner
2014 “Identifying translationese at the word and sub-word level.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31(1): 163–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Federica Barbieri
2007 “Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers.” English for Specific Purposes 26(3): 263–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Viviana Cortes
2004 “ If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks.” Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, Ruth
2013 “Lexical bundles across four legal genres.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2): 229–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corpas Pastor, Gloria and Miriam Seghiri
(ed) 2016 Corpus-based Approaches to Translation and Interpreting: From Theory to Applications. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cortes, Viviana
2013 “The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(1): 33–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csomay, Eniko
2013 “Lexical bundles in discourse structure: A corpus-based study of classroom discourse.” Applied Linguistics 34(3): 369–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dam, Helle V.
2001 “On the option between form-based and meaning-based interpreting: The effect of source text difficulty on lexical target text form in simultaneous interpreting.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 111: 27–55. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10077​/2445
De Cock, Sylvie
1998 “A recurrent word combination approach to the study of formulae in the speech of native and non-native speakers of English.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3(1): 59–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C.
1996 “Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18(1): 91–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 143–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Rita Simpson-Vlach, and Carson Maynard
2008 “Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL.” TESOL Quarterly 42(3): 375–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferraresi, Adriano and Maja Miličević
2017 “Phraseological patterns in translation and interpreting. Similar or different?” In Empirical Translation Studies: New Methodological and Theoretical Traditions, ed. by Gert De Sutter, Marie-Aude Lefer and Isabelle Delaere, 157–182. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forchini, Pierfranca and Amanda Murphy
2008 “N-grams in comparable specialized corpora: Perspectives on phraseology, translation, and pedagogy.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(3): 351–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Rongbo
2016 “Comparing modal patterns in Chinese-English interpreted and translated discourses in diplomatic setting.” Babel 62(1): 104–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gile, Daniel
(ed) 2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training ( 2nd edition ), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, Line
2007 “The song in the booth: Formulaic interpreting and oral textualisation.” Interpreting 9(1): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Kaibao and Tao Qing
2013 “The Chinese-English Conference Interpreting Corpus: Uses and Limitations.” Meta 58(3): 626–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2008 “As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation.” English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isham, William P.
1994 “Memory for sentence form after simultaneous interpretation: Evidence both for and against deverbalization.” In Bridging the Gap: Empirical research in Simultaneous Interpretation, ed. by Sylvie Lambert and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 191–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Roderick
(ed) 1998 Conference Interpreting Explained. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klaudy, Kinga and Krisztina Károly
2005 “Implicitation in translation: Empirical evidence for operational asymmetry in translation.” Across Languages and Cultures 6(1): 13–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lederer, Marianne
(ed) 1981 La Traduction Simultanée. Paris: Minard Lettres Modernes.Google Scholar
Li, Xin
2018 “Mediation through modality shifts in Chinese-English government press conference interpreting.” Babel 64(2): 269–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Yang
2016 “A corpus-based interpreting exploration into pragmatic functions of prefabricated chunks.” Modern Foreign Languages 39(2): 246–256.Google Scholar
2017 “A corpus-based exploration into the use of lexical bundles and students’ interpreting proficiency: A study based on PACCEL.” Foreign Languages and Their Teaching 296(5): 88–96.Google Scholar
Li, Yang and Sandra L. Halverson
2020 “A Corpus-based Exploration into Lexical Bundles in Interpreting.” Across Languages and Cultures 21(1): 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Yang and Wang Nan
2012 “The exploration into the alleviating effects of prefabricated chunks on simultaneous interpreting.” Foreign Language World 148(1): 61–67.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2013 “Speaking professionally in an L2: Issues of corpus methodology.” In Variation and Change in Spoken and Written Discourse, ed. by Julia Bamford, Silvia Cavalieri, and Giuliana Diani, 5–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paquot, Magali
2013 “Lexical bundles and L1 transfer effects.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3): 391–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plevoets, Koen and Bart Defrancq
2018 “The cognitive load of interpreters in the European Parliament: A corpus-based study of predictors for the disfluency uh(m) .” Interpreting 20(1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
2016 Introducing Interpreting Studies (2nd Edition). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russo, Mariachiara, Claudio Bendazzoli, and Bart Defrancq
(eds) 2018 Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seleskovich, Danica
(ed) 1975 Langage, langues et mémoire. Paris: Minard.Google Scholar
Setton, Robin
(ed) 1999 Simultaneous Interpretation: A Cognitive-pragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shlesinger, Miriam and Noam Ordan
2012 “More spoken or more translated?: Exploring a known unknown of simultaneous interpreting.” Target 24(1): 43–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shrefler, Nathan
2011 “Lexical bundles and German bibles.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(1): 89–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, Rita and Nick C. Ellis
2010 “An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research.” Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna and Ron Martinez
2014 “The idiom principle revisited.” Applied Linguistics 36(5): 549–569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael and Isabel Barth
2003 “Using recurrent phrases as text-type discriminators: A quantitative method and some findings.” Functions of Language 10(1): 61–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vuorikoski, Anna-Riitta
(ed) 2004 A Voice of its Citizens or a Modern Tower of Babel? Ph.D. dissertation University of Tampere, Finland.
Wang, Binhua
(ed) 2013 A descriptive study of norms in interpreting. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Wenyu and Yan Huang
2011 “Investigating the use of chunks in Chinese-English interpretation by college English Majors.” Foreign Languages and Their Teaching 260(5): 73–79.Google Scholar
2013 “The use of chunks and the quality of oral interpretation: An empirical study.” Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education 152(4): 28–35.Google Scholar
Wang, Ying
2017 “Lexical bundles in spoken academic ELF.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(2): 187–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1958 Philosophical Investigations, Trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe. USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison
2000 “Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice.” Applied linguistics 21(4): 463–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Weihe
(ed) 2006 A Coursebook of Interpreting between English and Chinese. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar