Steering ethics toward social justice
A model for a meta-ethics of interpreting
Julie Boéri | Hamad Bin Khalifa University
The interpreting field has not been impervious to the call for dismantling patterns of injustice that extend down to the communication encounter. However, its engagement with socio-political commitment and change remains largely constrained by a deontological and liberal tradition. To decenter interpreting from this tradition and to steer its ethics toward social justice, this paper proposes a meta-ethical approach to and a model of interpreting. It explores activist interpreting in the global justice movement from three complementary standpoints: interpreting in the encounter (micro), politics of organization (macro) and enquiry (meso). The case study shows that social justice does not only concern the leverage of citizens’ benefits in the welfare state, but also consists of a communicational and social performance. The model can equip researchers to harness the liberatory potential of praxes, discourses and epistemologies found in the social movement milieu to refashion ethical language and thought in the field.
Keywords: activism, meta-ethics, interpreting, tridimensional model, social justice
Article outline
- Introduction
- The deontology of professional associations: Who benefit and how?
- Ethics in training and research: A professional heritage
- Toward a renewed prescriptivism: Teleological ethics
- Meta-ethics of interpreting
- A tridimensional model of interpreting: Meta-ethics in context
- Explorations in the global justice movement
- Macro: The politics of organization of interpreting
- Micro: Interpreting in the encounter
- Meso: Steering ethics toward social justice
- Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 21 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.20070.boe
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.20070.boe
References
AIIC
1999 “Practical Guide for Professional Conference Interpreters.” https://aiic.org/document/547/AIICWebzine_Apr2004_2_Practical_guide_for_professional_conference_interpreters_EN.pdf
Angelelli, Claudia
Baer, Brian, and Christina Schäffner
Bahadır, Şebnem
2017 “The interpreter as observer, participant and agent of change: The irresistible entanglement between interpreting ethics, politics and pedagogy.” In The Changing Role of the Interpreter: Contextualizing Norms, Ethics and Quality Standards, ed. by Marta Biagini, Michael Boyd, and Claudia Monacelli, 122–45. London: Routledge. 

Baker, Mona, and Carol Maier
Beauchamp, Tom L. Childress, James, F.
Boéri, Julie
2013 “Le défi de la traduction dans les forums sociaux : Plusieurs langues pour un autre monde.” Le Monde Diplomatique 7151 (October): 9. www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2013/10/BOERI/49730
Boéri, Julie, and Carmen Delgado Luchner
Boéri, Julie, and Jesús De Manuel Jerez
Boéri, Julie, and Carol Maier
Böhm, Steffen, Sian Sullivan, and Oscar Reyes
2005 “The organization and politics of social forums.” Ephemera 5(2). www.ephemerajournal.org/issue/organisation-and-politics-social-forums
Camayd-Freixas, Erik
2008 “Interpreting after the largest ICE raid in US history: A personal account.” http://dll.fiu.edu/people/faculty/erik-camayd-freixas/interpreting_the_largest_ice.pdf
Clifford, Andrew
Cokely, Dennis
2005 “Shifting positionality: A critical examination of the turning point of the relationship between interpreters and the Deaf community.” In Sign Language Interpreting and Interpreter Education: Directions for Research and Practice, ed. by Marc Marschark, Rico Peterson, and Elizabeth A. Winston, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Dean, Robyn
2015 Sign Language Interpreters’ Ethical Discourse and Moral Reasoning Patterns. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Heriot-Watt University.
Dean, Robyn, and Robert Pollard
Delgado Luchner, Carmen, and Leïla Kherbiche
Doerr, Nicole
Donovan, Clare
Downie, Jonathan
Drugan, Joanna, and Rebecca Tipton
Fant, Lou
Fraser, Nancy, and Axel Honneth
García-Beyaert, Sofía
2016 “Cross-linguistic communication and public policy: The institutionalization of community interpreting.” Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/383765
García-Beyaert, Sofía, et al.
Hyunhye Cho, Eunice, et al.
Johnson, Alice
Juris, Jeffrey
Keiser, Walter
Koskinen, Kaisa
Koskinen, Kaisa, and Nike Pokorn
Maeckelbergh, Marianne
Manuel Jerez, Jesús De
Mellinger, Christopher D., and Brian Baer
Mikkelson, Holly
Morris, Ruth
Naumann, Peter
2005 “Babels and Nomad – Observations on the barbarising of communication at the 2005 World Social Forum.” Communicate! http://aiic.net/page/1800/babels-and-nomad-observations-on-the-barbarising-of-communication-at-the-2005-world-social-forum/lang/1
Pöchhacker, Franz, and Cornelia Zwischenberger
2010 “Survey on quality and role: Conference interpreters’ expectations and self-Perceptions.” Communicate! https://aiic.net/page/3405/survey-on-quality-and-role-conference-interpreters-expectations-and-self-perceptions/lang/1
Roy, Cynthia
Saldanha, Gabriela, and Sharon O’Brien
Schäffner, Christina
Seleskovitch, Danièle, and Marianne Lederer
Stoljar, Natalie
2013 “Feminist perspectives on autonomy.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta, (Winter 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/feminism-autonomy
Swabey, Laurie, and Paula Gajewski Mickelson
Tijerina, Roberto
Wood, Linda, and Rolf Kroger