Article published In:
The Development of Professional CompetenceEdited by Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Birgitta Englund Dimitrova and Séverine Hubscher-Davidson
[Translation and Interpreting Studies 9:1] 2014
► pp. 5–24
Edited by Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Birgitta Englund Dimitrova and Séverine Hubscher-Davidson
[Translation and Interpreting Studies 9:1] 2014
► pp. 5–24
The impact of cultural background knowledge in the processing of metaphorical expressions
An empirical study of English-Chinese sight translation
This study aims to explore the role and possible impact of cultural background knowledge (CBK) on performance in sight translation, specifically the translation of metaphorical expressions (MEs). A between-subjects experiment was designed for 68 interpreting students who were assigned to a control group (CG) and an experimental group (EG). They were asked to sight translate a speech containing ten MEs, with only the EG members given relevant CBK beforehand. The study triangulates data from the recordings of sight translation outputs, the transcriptions of the recordings, and the subjects’ guided interviews. The paper concludes with two main findings: (1) CBK markedly alleviates the cognitive load imposed by MEs and thus facilitates the process of translation by shortening the processing time and improving the translation quality; (2) although CBK does not exert a significant influence on the choice of translation strategies as a whole, it discernibly reduces the use of omission as a coping strategy to deal with inadequacies in the understanding of metaphorical meanings.
References
Agrifoglio, Marjorie
2004 “Sight Translation and Interpreting: A Comparative Analysis of Constraints and Failures.” Interpreting 6 (1): 43–67. 
Al-Qinai, Jamal
2000 “Translation Quality Assessment: Strategies, Parameters and Procedures.” Meta 45 (3): 497–519.
Anderson, Richard C
1984 “Role of Reader’s Schema in Comprehension, Learning and Memory.” In Learning to Read in American Schools: Basal Readers and Content Texts, ed. by Richard C. Anderson, Jean Osbourne, and Robert J. Tierney, 243–257. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Boers, Frank
2004 “Cross-cultural Variation as a Variable in Comprehending and Remembering Figurative Idioms.” European Journal of English Studies 8 (3): 375–388.
Camayd-Freixas, Erik
2011 “Cognitive Theory of Simultaneous Interpreting and Training.” In
Proceedings of the 52nd Conference of the American Translators Association
. New York: ATA. Accessed October 27, 2013. [URL].
Cook, Guy
1994 Discourse and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dobrzyńska, Teresa
1995 “Translating Metaphor: Problems of Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 24 (6): 595–604.
Dragsted, Barbara, and Inge G. Hansen
2007 “Speaking Your Translation: Exploiting Synergies between Translation and Interpreting.” In Interpreting Studies and Beyond, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, and Inger M. Mees, 251–274. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
Gibbs, Raymond W., Josephine M. Bogdanovich, Jeffrey R. Sykes, and Dale J. Barr
1997 “Metaphor in Idiom Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 371: 141–154.
Gile, Daniel
Hornby, Albert Sydney
(ed) 1997 Oxford Advanced Learner’s English-Chinese Dictionary (extended 4th edition). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Huang, Zidong
1998 “The Effects of Topic Familiarity, Proficiency Level, and Question Type on EFL Listening Comprehension.” [话题熟悉程度、语言水平和问题类型对EFL听力理解的影响]. 《现代外语》[Modern Foreign Languages] 41: 18–43.
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke, Kristian T.H. Jensen, and Inger M. Mees
2007 “Comparing Modalities: Idioms as a Case in Point.” In Interpreting Studies and Beyond, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, and Inger M. Mees, 217–249. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
Jensen, Astrid
2005 “Coping with Metaphor: A Cognitive Approach to Translating Metaphor.” Hermes - Journal of Linguistics 351: 183–209.
Kintsch, Walter, and Marita Franzke
1995 “The Role of Background Knowledge in the Recall of a News Story.” In Sources of Coherence in Reading, ed. by Robert F. Lorch, and Edward J. O’Brien, 321–333. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2002 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
2005 Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George
1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambert, Sylvie, Valeria Darò, and Franco Fabbro
1995 “Focalized Attention on Input vs. Output during Simultaneous Interpretation: Possibly a Waste of Effort!” Meta 40 (1): 39–46.
Littlemore, Jeannette
2003 “The Effect of Cultural Background on Metaphor Interpreting.” Metaphor and Symbol 18 (4): 273–288.
Macizo, Pedro, and Maria Teresa Bajo
2009 “Schema Activation in Translation and Reading: A Paradoxical Effect.” Psicológica 301: 59–89.
Mandelblit, Nili
1996 “The Cognitive View of Metaphor and Its Implication for Translation Theory.” In Translation and Meaning, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, and Marcel Thelen, 483–495. Maastricht: Hogeschool Maastricht.
McDonald, Janet L., and Patricia A. Carpenter
1981 “Simultaneous Translation: Idiom Interpretation and Parsing Heuristics.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 201: 231–247.
McNamara, Danielle S., and Walter Kintsch
1996 “Learning from Texts: Effects of Prior Knowledge and Text Coherence.” Discourse Processes 221: 247–288.
Moser-Mercer, Barbara
1995 “Sight Translation and Human Information Processing.” In Basic Issues in Translation Studies, ed. by Albrecht Neubert, Gregory Shreve, and Klaus Gommlich, 159–166. Kent, OH: Institute for Applied Linguistics.
Nida, Eugene A., and Charles R. Taber
1969.The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
O’Brien, Sharon
2006 “Pauses as Indicators of Cognitive Effort in Post-editing Machine Translation.” Across Languages and Cultures 7 (1): 1–21.
Ortony, Andrew, Diane L. Schallert, Ralph E
Reynolds, and Stephen J. Antus. 1978. “Interpreting Metaphors and Idioms--Some Effects of Context on Comprehension.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 171: 465–477.
Pöchhacker, Franz
2004 Introducing Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge.
Rumelhart, David E
1980 “Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition.” In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, ed. by Rand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce, and William F. Brewer, 33–58. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rundell, Michael
(ed) 2007 Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners (2nd edition). Oxford: Macmillan Publishers.
Schäffner, Christina
2004a “Metaphor and Translation: Some Implications of a Cognitive Approach.” Journal of Pragmatics 361: 1253–1269.
2004b “Researching Translation and Interpreting.” In Translation Research and Interpreting Research: Traditions, Gaps and Synergies, ed. by Christina Schäffner, 1–9. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Schilperoord, Joost
1996 It’s About Time: Temporal Aspects of Cognitive Processes in Text Production. Utrecht: Rodopi.
Snell-Hornby, Mary
1995 Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
2002 “Metaphoric Expressions in Translation Processes.” Across Languages and Cultures 3 (1): 101–116.
Wang, Lidi
2001 “Schema Theory in Translation.” [翻译中的知识图式].《中国翻译》[Chinese Translators Journal] 21: 19–24.
Yu, Ning
2008 “Metaphor from Body and Culture.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, 247–261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zheng, Binghan, and Xia Xiang
2013 “Processing Metaphorical Expressions in Sight Translation: An Empirical-experimental Research.” Babel 59 (2): 160–183.
Cited by
Cited by 13 other publications
Chen, Jinjin
2021. Translating Chinese Neologisms Without Knowledge of Context: An Exploratory Analysis of an Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging Experiment. In Explorations in Empirical Translation Process Research [Machine Translation: Technologies and Applications, 3], ► pp. 315 ff. 
Cui, Yixiao & Binghan Zheng
2022. Extralinguistic Consultation in English–Chinese Translation: A Study Drawing on Eye-Tracking and Screen-Recording Data. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Fang, Jing, Xiaomin Zhang & Haidee Kotze
2023. The effects of training on reading behaviour and performance in sight translation: a longitudinal study using eye-tracking. Perspectives 31:4 ► pp. 655 ff.
Han, Chao
2018. Using rating scales to assess interpretation. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 20:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Jin, Shengxi, Zhengjun Lin & Todd Oakley
2021. Translating Metaphtonymy: Exploring Trainee Translators' Translation Approaches and Underlying Factors. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Ren, Haimeng
2022. Translation of allusive literary text in both directions. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 5:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Su, Wenchao
2020. Translation Style in Sight Translation. In Eye-Tracking Processes and Styles in Sight Translation [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 19 ff.
Sun, Sanjun & Kairong Xiao
2019. Chinese scholarship in Cognitive Translation Studies. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 2:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Wang, Yifang
2021. The Impact of Directionality on Cognitive Patterns in the Translation of Metaphors. In Advances in Cognitive Translation Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 201 ff.
Xu, Nairui
2021. Digital media and investigative journalism in China. Media Asia 48:3 ► pp. 158 ff.
Zhang, Junchen
2021. Re-dissecting Ang Lee’s Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon from the Perspectives of Cognition, Translation and Reconfiguration of Culture. Comparative Literature: East & West 5:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Zheng, Binghan & Mingqing Xie
2018. The effect of explanatory captions on the reception of foreign audiovisual products. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Zhou, Hao, Yu Weng & Binghan Zheng
2021. Temporal Eye-Voice Span as a Dynamic Indicator for Cognitive Effort During Speech Processing: A Comparative Study of Reading Aloud and Sight Translation. In Advances in Cognitive Translation Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 161 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.