Cover not available
Review article published In:
Literary translatorship in digital contexts
Edited by Wenqian Zhang, Motoko Akashi and Peter Jonathan Freeth
[Translation in Society 3:1] 2024
► pp. 1–16
Introductory article

Locating the digital in literary translatorship

ORCID logo | University of Exeter
ORCID logo | Trinity College Dublin
ORCID logo | London Metropolitan University
Thanks to the inclusion of sociological perspectives in the development of translator studies, the roles played by literary translators in the movement of texts between languages and cultures, and their positions within the fields of power that govern these processes, have become increasingly popular objects of study. However, despite the focus of sociological and translator studies on the agency and habitus of translators in literary translation processes, little has been done to connect this work to the ever-changing and proliferating digital contexts in which literary translation now takes place. This introductory article therefore seeks to position existing perspectives on literary translatorship within contemporary digital contexts whilst highlighting the increasing role of digital technology within literary translation processes, thereby emphasising the need to include digital technologies within all forms of research on contemporary literary translatorship going forwards.
Keywords: translatorship, literary translator, translator studies, sociological approaches, digital age, authorship, professional identity
Article outline
  • 1.Literary translatorship in digital contexts
    • 1.1Author–translator hierarchies
    • 1.2Social structures and literary translatorship
    • 1.3Literary translatorship as a professional identity
  • 2.Literary translatorship and the digital in this special issue
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 22 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tris.24008.zha
References (43)
References
Akashi, Motoko. 2018. “Contesting Invisibility: Japanese Celebrity Translators and the Impact of their Fame.” PhD diss. University of East Anglia.
Bantinaki, Katerina. 2020. “The Literary Translator as Author: A Philosophical Assessment of the Idea.” Translation Studies 13 (3): 306–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednárová-Gibová, Klaudia and Mária Majherová. 2021. “Academic Literary Translators: A Happy ‘Elite’ or Not?” The Translator 27 (2):167–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 2007. “Bridge Concepts in Translation Sociology.” In Constructing a Sociology of Translation, edited by Michaela Wolf, and Alexandra Fukari, 171–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “The Name and Nature of Translator Studies.” HERMES – Journal of Language and Communication in Business 22 (42): 13–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childress, Clayton. 2017. Under the Cover: The Creation, Production, and Reception of a Novel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, Michael. 2013. Translation in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dam, Helle V., and Minna Ruokonen. 2024. “Bringing in the Translators’ Views on their (In)Visibility: The Forms and Significance of Visibility in Research on Translator Status.” In Beyond the Translator’s Invisibility: Critical Reflections and New Perspectives, edited by Peter J. Freeth, and Rafael Treviño, 73–93. Leuven: Leuven University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desjardins, Renée, Claire Larsonneur, and Philippe Lacour, eds. 2021. When Translation Goes Digital: Case Studies and Critical Reflections. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmerich, Karen R. 2013. “Visibility (and Invisibility).” In Handbook of Translation Studies (Volume 4), edited by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer, 200–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Peter, and Yves Gambier. 2011. “Methodology in Translation Studies.” In Handbook of Translation Studies (Volume 2), edited by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer: 88–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. “What is an Author?” Translated by Donald F. Bouchard, and Sherry Simon. In Language, Counter- Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by Donald F. Bouchard, 113–138. NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Freeth, Peter J. 2022. “Beyond Invisibility: The Position and Role of the Literary Translator in the Digital Paratextual Space.” PhD diss. University of Leeds.
2024a. “Introduction.” In Beyond the Translator’s Invisibility: Critical Reflections and New Perspectives, edited by Peter J. Freeth, and Rafael Treviño, 7–28. Leuven: Leuven University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2024b. “‘Yes: I translated it!’: Visibility and the Performance of Translatorship in the Digital Paratextual Space.” In Beyond the Translator’s Invisibility: Critical Reflections and New Perspectives, edited by Peter J. Freeth, and Rafael Treviño, 147–172. Leuven: Leuven University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heino, Anu. 2021. “Investigating Literary Translators’ Translatorship Through Narrative Identity.” In Literary Translator Studies, edited by Klaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager, 123–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Theo. 1999. “Translation and Normativity.” Translation and Norms, edited by Christina Schäffner, 50–71. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hu, Gengshen. 2004. “Translator-Centredness.” Perspectives 12 (2): 106–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ignatow, Gabe. 2020. Sociological Theory in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Hanne, and Anna Wegener. 2013. “Multiple Translatorship.” In Authorial and Editorial Voices in Translation 1 – Collaborative Relationships between Authors, Translators, and Performers, edited by Hanne Jansen, and Anna Wegener, 1–42. Montreal: Éditions québécoises de l’oeuvre.Google Scholar
Jansen, Hanne. 2019. “I’m a Translator and I’m Proud: How Literary Translators View Authors and Authorship.” Perspectives 27 (5): 675–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaindl, Klaus. 2021. “(Literary) Translator Studies: Shaping the Field.” In Literary Translator Studies, edited by Klaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager, 1–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longolius, Sonja. 2016. Performing Authorship: Strategies of “Becoming an Author” in the Works of Paul Auster, Candice Breitz, Sophie Calle and Jonathan Safran Foer. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
McMartin, Jack, and Paola Gentile. 2020. “The Transnational Production and Reception of ‘a Future Classic’: Stefan Hertmans’s War and Turpentine in Thirty Languages.” Translation Studies 13 (3): 271–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meylaerts, Reine. 2008. “Translators and (their) Norms: Towards a Sociological Construction of the Individual” In Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies: Investigations in Homage to Gideon Toury, edited by Anthony Pym, Miriam Shlesinger, and Daniel Simeoni, 91–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Simone. 2018. The Digital Literary Sphere: Reading, Writing, and Selling Books in the Internet Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paloposki, Outi. 2016. “Translating and Translators before the Professional Project.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 251: 15–32.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. 2011. “The Translator as Non-Author, and I am Sorry about That.” In The Translator as Author: Perspectives on Literary Translation, edited by Claudia Buffagni, Beatrice Garzelli, and Serenella Zanott, 31–43. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Refsum, Christian. 2017. “When Poets Translate Poetry: Authorship, Ownership, and Translatorship.” In Textual and Contextual Voices of Translation, edited by Cecilia Alvstad, Annjo K. Greenall, Hanne Jansen, and Kristiina Taivalkoski-Shilov, 101–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, Andrew, Andy Way, and Roy Youdale, eds. 2024. Computer-Assisted Literary Translation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet. 2008. “The Translators’ Personae: Marketing Translatorial Images as Pursuit of Capital.” Meta 53 (3): 609–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. “What Does It Take to Be a Professional Translator? Identity as a Resource.” In Professions and Proficiency, edited by Johanes Glückler, Christopher Winch, and Anna Mateja Punstein, 89–111. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Summers, Caroline. 2012. “Translating the Author-Function: The (Re)Narration of Christa Wolf.” New Voices in Translation Studies 81: 170–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Examining Text and Authorship in Translation: What Remains of Christa Wolf? London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Authorship.” In Routledge Encyclopaedia of Translation Studies, 3rd edition, edited by Mona Baker, and Gabriela Saldanha, 35–39. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svahn, Elin. 2020. “The Dynamics of Extratextual Translatorship in Contemporary Sweden: A Mixed Methods Approach.” PhD diss. Stockholm University.
Thompson, John B. 2010. Merchants of Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2021. Book Wars: The Digital Revolution in Publishing. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Doorslaer, Luc. 2020. “Translation Studies: What’s in a Name?” Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies 7 (2): 139–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Youdale, Roy, and Andrew Rothwell. 2022. “Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) Tools, Translation Memory, and Literary Translation.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Memory, edited by Sharon Deane-Cox, and Anneleen Spiessens, 381–402. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Wenqian. 2023. “Constructing the Literary Translator as a Brand: Methodological Considerations.” Translation in Society 2 (2): 123–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar