Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation and Interpreting in Non-Governmental Organisations
Edited by Wine Tesseur
[Translation Spaces 7:1] 2018
► pp. 119–142

Translation spaces

Parallel shifts in translation and intercultural communication studies and their significance for the international development field

ORCID logo | University of Sheffield, School of Languages and Cultures
ORCID logo | Independent Social Development and Governance Consultant
ORCID logo | University of Sheffield, School of Languages and Cultures

This article addresses the relationship between translation, intercultural communication and international development practice as encountered in the field. Through tracing parallel developments in the academic fields of translation studies and intercultural communication studies, it highlights the move from static concepts of language, nation, and culture to the fluid exchange spaces of multilingual and intercultural encounters. In-the-field examples of international development challenges are examined and discussed in the light of these theoretical shifts. We propose (a) that both fields of study can learn from each other, (b) that translation training should account for the messy intercultural spaces of contact zones, and (c) that guidance on intercultural practice be further developed to benefit those working in the field.

Keywords: informal translation, intercultural communication, practice, interpreting, international development, NGOs
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The development of translation theory from linguistic approaches to translation as social practice in the context of International Development
  • Shifts in intercultural communication studies: From cross-national comparison to critical contexts of meaning-making in the context of international development
  • International Development: Practitioner examples
    • Example 1
    • Example 2
    • Example 3
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
    • What can insights into translation in NGOs add to the ongoing discussions in other research disciplines such as sociolinguistics, development studies and international relations?
    • What can we learn from these disciplines in order to better comprehend the phenomenon of translation in NGOs?
    • What insights and tools can translation studies offer to NGOs?
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.00007.ham
References
Agar, Michael
1994 Language Shock: Understanding the Culture of Conversation. New York William Morrow and Company.Google Scholar
Angelelli, Claudia
(ed.) 2014 The Sociological Turn in Translation and Interpreting Studies. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baker, Mona, and Carol Maier
(eds) 2011 “Ethics in Interpreter & Translator Training.” Special Issue of Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5 (1). Manchester: St Jerome Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byram, Michael
1997 Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Combeaud, Patricia Bonallack
2018 “Amnesty International Language Resource Centre: Overview of Current Context and Vision for the Future.” Translation Spaces 7(1).Google Scholar
Cornwall, Andrea
2007 Buzzwords and fuzzwords: deconstructing development discourse, Development in Practice, 171:4–5, 471–484, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2008 White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue “Living Together as Equals in Dignity.” Accessed March 29, 2018. [URL].
Cronin, Michael
2003 Translation and Globalisation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dervin, Fred, Anahy Gajardo, and Anne Lavanchy
(eds) 2011 Politics of Interculturality. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Fantini, Alvino E.
2006 Exploring and Assessing Intercultural Competence. Brattleboro, Vermont: Federation of the Experiment in International Living.Google Scholar
Footitt, Hilary
2017 International Aid and Development: Hearing Multilingualism, Learning from Intercultural Encounters in the History of Oxfam GB. Language and Intercultural Communication 17(4): 518–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Alan
1991 Building partnerships between Northern and Southern development NGOs: Issues for the 1990s. Development in Practice, Vol.1(1): 5–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Duncan
2008 From Poverty to Power: How Active Citizens and Effective States Can Change the World. Rugby: Oxfam GB, Practical Action.Google Scholar
Guilherme, Manuela, Clara Keating, and Daniel Hoppe
2010 “Intercultural Responsibility: Power and Ethics in Intercultural Dialogue and Interaction.” In The Intercultural Dynamics of Multicultural Working, edited by Manuela Guilherme, Evelyne Glaser, and María del Carmen Méndez-García, 77–94. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert
1991 Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Holliday, Adrian
1999 “Small Cultures.” Applied linguistics 20(2): 237–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane
2017 Translation; the Basics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
IATIS
2014 “About us”. Accessed February 27, 2018. [URL].
Institute of Translation and Interpreting
2016 ITI Code of Professionnal Conduct. Accessed March 10, 2018. [URL].
Kim, Young Yun
2001 Becoming Intercultural: An Integrative Theory of Communication and Cross-cultural Adaptation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Koehn, Peter, and James Roseneau
2002 “Transnational Competence in an Emergent Epoch.” International studies perspectives 3(2): 105–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kothari, Uma, and Martin Minogue
2002 Development Theory and Practice: Critical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillan Publishers Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kröger, Oliver
2005 Report on a Survey of Coastal Makua Dialects. SIL Electronic Survey Reports. Accessed April 16, 2018. [URL].
Lewis, David, and David Mosse
(eds) 2006 Development Brokers and Translators: The Ethnography of Aid and Agencies. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony
2016 “Translation as Intercultural Mediation: Setting the Scene.” Perspectives 24(3): 347–353 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marais, Kobus
2014 Translation Theory and Development Studies: A Complexity Theory Approach London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinotti, João Pedro
2016 Final Report on the Symposium on Language and Sustainable Development Goals. Accessed March 5, 2018. [URL].
Mawdsley, Emma, Janet Townsend, Gina Porter, and Peter Oakley
2002 Knowledge, Power and Development Agendas: NGOs North and South. Oxford: INTRAC PublicationsGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Julie
2011 “Moral Ambiguity: Some Shortcomings of Professional Codes of Ethics for Translators.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 151: 28–47.Google Scholar
Moon, Dreama
1996 “Concepts of “culture”. Implications for Intercultural Communication Research. Communication Quarterly 44 (1): 70–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nijhuis, Chantal J. Gervedink, Joke M. Voogt, and Jules M. Pieters
2012 “The Cultural Complexity of International Collaboration: Conditions for Sustainable Curriculum Development in Ghana.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 36(5): 647–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta, and Adrian Blackledge
(eds) 2004 Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risager, Karen
2006 Language and Culture: Global Flows and Local Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rist, Gilbert
2007 “Development as a Buzzword.” Development in Practice 17 (4–5): 485–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Benedetta
2006 “Aid Policies and Recipient Strategies in Niger: Why Donors and Recipients should not be Compartmentalised into Different ‘Worlds of Knowledge.” In Development Brokers and Translators: The Ethnography of Aid and Agencies, edited by David Lewis and David Mosse, 27–50. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Sanz Martins, Alberto
2018 “Development In So Many Words: the Oxfam GB Experience.” Translation Spaces 7(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäffner, Christina
2003 “Translation and Intercultural Communication: Similarities and Differences.” Studies in communication sciences 3(2): 79–107.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Wong Scollon
2001 “Discourse and Intercultural Communication.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 538–547. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Study Group on Language and the UN
2016 “Symposium Calls For Greater Attention To Language Differences In Formulating And Implementing The Sustainable Development Goals.” Press release. May 21, 2016. [URL].
Study group on Language and the UN
N.d. Website. Accessed March 13, 2018. [URL].
Tesseur, Wine
2014 Institutional Multilingualism in NGOs: Amnesty International’s Strategic Understanding of Multilingualism. Meta: Translators’ Journal 59(3): 557–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella
1999 Communicating across Cultures. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO
2013 Intercultural Competences: A Conceptual and Operational Framework. Accessed April 16, 2018. [URL]
United Nations Statistics Division
N.d. Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016, Leaving No One Behind. Accessed March 16, 2018. [URL].
Venuti, Lawrence
1995 The Translator’s Invisibility. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Tina
2004 NGO dilemmas: Trojan Horses for Global Neoliberalism? Accessed March 13, 2018. [URL].
Williams, Glyn
1992 Sociolinguistics: A Sociological Critique. London: Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Michaela
2011 “Mapping the Field: Sociological Perspectives on Translation” in International Journal Society of language 2071: 1–28.Google Scholar
2013 “The Sociology of Translation and its Activist Turn.” In The Sociological Turn in Translation and Interpreting Studies, edited by Claudia Angelelli, 7–21. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Ciribuco, Andrea
2021. Okra in translation. Language, Culture and Society 3:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Woodin, Jane
2020. Refugees, interculturalism and education. Language and Intercultural Communication 20:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Zheng, Puyu, Guojun Chai & Hamurabi Gamboa Rosales
2022. Innovative Research by Using IoT Applications on Cross-National English Cultural Communication Based on Crowdsourcing Translation Model. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.