Article published in:
Translation Spaces
Vol. 8:2 (2019) ► pp. 257–279

Non-literary translation in Switzerland

Silence in print media

| University of Geneva
Up until now, the literature on sociological approaches to translation has mainly focused on the self-perceptions of translators. This article analyses the coverage devoted to non-literary translation and translators in the print media in Switzerland. What perceptions of translation are newspapers circulating? Are these hetero-images positively or negatively connoted? A qualitative thematic analysis is conducted on four daily newspapers in Switzerland – Tages-Anzeiger, St. Galler Tagblatt, Le Temps and 24 Heures (two important newspapers for each of the two major official languages) – over a period of one year (spring 2013 – spring 2014). The analysis shows the scarcity and negativism of discourse about non-literary translation in Switzerland: it is depicted as a risky, costly, lonely and peripheral business – results that would need to be compared across media and countries. Understanding the construction of external ‘translation talk’ may help social actors such as translators or professional societies fight against existing prejudices about translation.
Keywords: non-literary translation, perceptions, status, hetero-image, news, qualitative analysis, discourse analysis, translator agency
Published online: 05 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.18010.dav
References

References

Association REMP
2014 “Recherches et études des médias publicitaires [Research and studies about advertising media].” Accessed July 9, 2014. http://​www​.remp​.ch/
Chancellerie fédérale suisse
2018 “Traduire pour les services de la Confédération [Translating for the services of the Swiss Confederation].” Accessed October 22, 2018. https://​www​.bk​.admin​.ch​/dam​/bk​/fr​/dokumente​/sprachdienste​/publikationen​/La%20traduction,%20mode%20d'emploi​.pdf​.download​.pdf​/La%20traduction,%20mode%20d'emploi​.pdf
Chesterman, Andrew
2009 “The Name and Nature of Translator Studies.” Hermes: Journal of Language and Communication Studies 42: 13–22.Google Scholar
2011 “Reflections on the Literal Translation Hypothesis.” In Methods and Strategies of Process Research, edited by Cecilia Alvstad, Adelina Hild, and Elisabeth Tiselius, 23–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Andrew Kay-Fan
2015 “Scapegoating the Interpreter for Listeners’ Dissatisfaction with Their Level of Understanding: An Experimental Study.” Interpreting 17 (1): 46–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chew, William L. III
2001 “Literature, History, and the Social Sciences? An Historical-Imagological Approach to Franco-American Stereotypes.” In National Stereotypes in Perspective: Americans in France, Frenchmen in America, edited by William L. III Chew, 1–53. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss
2008 Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Michael
2009 “Minority.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, edited by Mona Baker, and Gabriela Saldanha, 170–172. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
[ p. 275 ]
Dam, Helle V., and Karen Korning Zethsen
2008 “Translator Status: A Study of Danish Company Translators.” The Translator 14 (1): 71–96, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “The Status of Professional Business Translators on the Danish Market: A Comparative Study of Company, Agency and Freelance Translators.” Meta: Translators’ Journal 56 (4): 976–997, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davier, Lucile
2014 “The Paradoxical Invisibility of Translation in the Highly Multilingual Context of News Agencies.” Global Media and Communication 10 (1): 53–72, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demazière, Didier, and Charles Gadéa
(eds) 2009 Sociologie des groupes professionnels [Sociology of occupational groups]. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Duden
2016 In Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache [German Dictionary]. Mannheim: Duden.Google Scholar
Edwards, Rosalind, Bogusia Temple, and Claire Alexander
2005 “Users’ Experiences of Interpreters: The Critical Role of Trust.” Interpreting 7 (1): 77–95, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Peter
2005 A Linguistic Ethnography of Literary Translation: Irish Poems and Dutch-Speaking Translators. PhD thesis, University of Ghent.Google Scholar
Folaron, Deborah
2016 [2010] “Networking and Volunteer Translators.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer, 231–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fraser, Janet
2004 “The Debate: True and False Opposites.” In Translation Research and Interpreting Research: Traditions, Gaps and Synergies, edited by Christina Schäffner, 35–48. Clevedon, etc.: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gagnon, Chantal, Pier-Pascale Boulanger, and Esmaeil Kalantari
2018 “How to Approach Translation in a Financial News Corpus?” Across Languages and Cultures 19 (2), 221–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gambier, Yves
2006 “Pour une socio-traduction [For a sociology of translation].” In Translation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines, edited by João Ferreira Duarte, Alexandra Assis Rosa, and Teresa Seruya, 29–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hadziabdic, E., K. Heikkila, B. Albin, and K. Hjelm
2009 “Migrants’ Perceptions of Using Interpreters in Health Care.” International Nursing Review 56 (4): 461–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanssen, Ingrid, and Lise-Merete Alpers
2010 “Interpreters in Intercultural Health Care Settings: Health Professionals’ and Professional Interpreters’ Cultural Knowledge, and Their Reciprocal Perception and Collaboration.” Journal of Intercultural Communication 23. Accessed October 22, 2018. http://​www​.immi​.se​/intercultural​/nr23​/hanssen​.htm
Hermans, Johan, and José Lambert
1998 “From Translation Markets to Language Management: The Implications of Translation Services.” Target: International Journal on Translation Studies 10 (1): 113–132, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inghilleri, Moira
2003 “Habitus, Field and Discourse: Interpreting as a Socially Situated Activity.” Target: International Journal on Translation Studies 15 (2): 243–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katan, David
2011a “Occupation or Profession: A Survey of the Translator’s World.” In Identity and Status in the Translational Professions, edited by Rakefet Sela-Sheffy, and Miriam Shlesinger, 65–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 276 ]
2011b “Status of Translators.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer, 146–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1980 L’énonciation : De la subjectivité dans le langage [Utterance production: On subjectivity in language]. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Le Petit Robert
2017 In Le Petit Robert de la langue française [Petit Robert French Dictionary]. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Leanza, Yvan
2005 “Roles of Community Interpreters in Pediatrics as Seen by Interpreters, Physicians and Researchers.” Interpreting 7 (2): 167–192, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lejeune, Christophe
2010 “Montrer, calculer, explorer, analyser : Ce que l’informatique fait (faire) à l’analyse qualitative [Showing, calculating, exploring, analysing: What informatics can do for qualitative data analysis].” Recherches qualitatives [Qualitative Research] (9): 15–32.Google Scholar
Monzó, Esther
2011 “Legal and Translation Occupations in Spain: Regulations and Specialization in Jurisdictional Struggles.” In Identity and Status in the Translational Professions, edited by Rakefet Sela-Sheffy, and Miriam Shlesinger, 11–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neather, Robert
2012 “ ‘Non-Expert’ Translators in a Professional Community.” The Translator 18 (2): 245–268, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OFS
2000 “Le paysage linguistique en Suisse [The Swiss linguistic landscape].” Accessed July 9, 2016. www​.bfs​.admin​.ch​/bfs​/portal​/fr​/index​/infothek​/publ​.Document​.52217​.pdf
Paillé, Pierre, and Alex Mucchielli
2012 L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales [Qualitative data analysis in the humanities and social sciences]. Paris: Armand Colin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-González, Luis, and Şebnem Susam-Saraeva
2012 “Non-Professionals Translating and Interpreting.” The Translator 18 (2): 149–165, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pitteloud, Anne
2016 “Lost in Translation.” Accessed October 22, 2018. http://​annepitteloud​.dosi​.ch​/index​.php​/enjeux​/traduction​/294​-lost​-in​-translation
Pöchhacker, Franz
2000 “The Community Interpreter’s Task: Self-Perception and Provider Views.” In The Critical Link 2: Interpreters in the Community, edited by Roda P. Roberts, Silvana E. Carr, Diana Abraham, and Aideen Dufour, 49–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Provalis Research, QDA Miner
2016 “Qualitative Data Analysis Software for Mixed Methods Research: QDA Miner.” Accessed October 22, 2018. http://​provalisresearch​.com​/products​/qualitative​-data​-analysis​-software/
Pym, Anthony
1996 “Venuti’s Visibility.” Target: International Journal on Translation Studies 8 (1): 165–177, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Ellen, Yvan Leanza, and Robbyn Seller
2007 “Doctor-Patient Communication in Primary Care with an Interpreter: Physician Perceptions of Professional and Family Interpreters.” Patient Education and Counseling 67 (3): 286–292, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruokonen, Minna
2016 “Realistic but Not Pessimistic: Finnish Translation Students’ Perceptions of Translator Status.” JosTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation 25: 188–212.Google Scholar
Saldaña, Johnny
2011 Fundamentals of Qualitative Research, Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 277 ]
Schouten, Barbara, Jonathan Ross, Rena Zendedel, and Ludwien Meeuwesen
2012 “Informal Interpreters in Medical Settings.” The Translator 18 (2): 311–338, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet
2005 “How to Be a (Recognized) Translator: Rethinking Habitus, Norms, and the Field of Translation.” Target: International Journal on Translation Studies 17 (1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “ ‘Stars’ or ‘Professionals’: The Imagined Vocation and Exclusive Knowledge of Translators in Israel.” MonTI: Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación 2: 131–152, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Introduction.” In Identity and Status in the Translational Professions, edited by Rakefet Sela-Sheffy, and Miriam Shlesinger, 1–9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet, and Miriam Shlesinger
2008 “Strategies of Image-Making and Status Advancement of Translators and Interpreters as a Marginal Occupational Group: A Research Project in Progress.” In Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies: Investigations in Homage to Gideon Toury, edited by Anthony Pym, Miriam Shlesinger, and Daniel Simeoni, 79–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2011 Identity and Status in the Translational Professions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, David
2011 Interpreting Qualitative Data. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Sturge, Kate
2007 Representing Others: Translation, Ethnography and the Museum. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Tesseur, Wine
2014 Transformation through Translation: Translation Policies at Amnesty International. PhD thesis, Aston University.Google Scholar
Valero-Garcés, Carmen
2015 “Insights from the Field: Perception of the Interpreter’s Role(s) in Cases of Gender-Based Violence.” Cultus: The Journal of Intercultural Mediation and Communication 8: 76–95.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence
1995 The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Michaela, and Alexandra Fukari
2007 Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar