Article in:
Translation Spaces
Vol. 10:2 (2021) ► pp. 260277
References

References

Aberdeen Press & Journal
1921 “Mr G. Jamieson, C. M. G4 January 1921.Google Scholar
Barnard, Alan
2000History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cams, Mario
2014 “Restituting Church Buildings and Negotiating Church Factions: Missionary Mapmakers and the Making of Local Networks (1712–1716).” Frontiers of History in China 9 (4): 489–505. Accessed December 6, 2020. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daqing lüli huiji bianlan
大清律例彙輯便覽 [A Collection of the Great Qing Code] 1877 Vol. 10. Beijing: Shan Cheng Tang.Google Scholar
Entenmann, Robert
2015 “The Problem of Chinese Rites in Eighteenth-Century Sichuan.” In China and Christianity: Burdened Past, Hopeful Future, edited by Stephen Uhalley, Jr., and Xiaoxin Wu, 127–136. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland, and Finn Sivert Nielsen
2001A History of Anthropology. London & Sterling: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Rosaline Judith
1985Matteo Ricci, S. J. in China, 1583–1610: A Case Study of a Precursor in Educational Anthropology. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Connecticut.
Hsia, Ronnie Po-chia
2018 “Chinese Voices in the Rites Controversy: From China to Rome.” In The Rites Controversies in the Early Modern World, edited by Ines G. Županov, and Pierre Antoine Fabre, 29–49. Leiden and Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, George
1881 “Translations from the General Code of Laws of the Chinese Empire: VII Marriage Laws.” The China Review 10 (2): 77–99.Google Scholar
Jin, Mei 金眉
2007 “Lun qingdai hunyin jiating falü de tezhi” 論清代婚姻家庭法律的特質 [The Characteristics of Qing Marriage and Family Laws]. Faxue 法學 [Legal Science] (10): 67–78.Google Scholar
Kubuya, Paulin Batairwa
2018Meaning and Controversy within Chinese Ancestor Religion. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuklick, Henrika
2011 “Personal Equations: Reflections on the History of Fieldwork, with Special Reference to Sociocultural Anthropology.” Isis 102 (1): 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Yu
2020 “Behind the Façade of the Rites Controversy: The Intriguing Contrast of Chinese and European Theism.” Journal of Religious History 44 (1): 3–26. Accessed December 6, 2020. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lubbock, John
(1870) 2014The Origin of Civilization and the Primitive Condition of Men. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Luttio, Mark D.
1994 “The Chinese Rites Controversy (1603–1742): A Diachronic and Synchronic Approach.” Worship 68 (4): 290–313.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry
1883Dissertations on Early Law and Custom. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Malagrinò, Dylan Oliver
2014 “Change: A Constant Variably Defined – Law and Anthropology Perspectives on Historical Changes to the Rule of Law.” Northern Kentucky Law Review 41 (1): 93–118.Google Scholar
McLennan, John Ferguson
(1865) 1998Primitive Marriage: An Inquiry into the Origin of the Form of Capture in Marriage Ceremonies. Reprint, New York: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
1869a “Tree and Serpent Worship.” Cornhill Magazine 19: 626–640.Google Scholar
1869b “The Worship of Animals and Plants, Part I.” The Fortnightly Review 6 (October): 407–427.Google Scholar
1869c “The Worship of Animals and Plants, Part II.” The Fortnightly Review 6 (November): 562–582.Google Scholar
1870 “The Worship of Animals and Plants, Part III.” The Fortnightly Review 7 (February): 194–216.Google Scholar
Mungello, D. E.
2018The Chinese Rites Controversy: Its History and Meaning. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Qiu, Tang 邱唐
2016 “Qi min buhun? Qingdai zuqun tonghun de falü guifan shijian yu yishi” 旗民不婚?- 清代族群通婚的法律規範、實踐與意識 [No Marriage Between the Manchus and the Hans – The Legal Rules, Practice and Consciousness of Qing Intertribal Marriage]. Qinghua faxue 清華法學 [Tsinghua University Law Journal] (1): 190–207.Google Scholar
Sera-Shriar, Efram
2014 “What is Armchair Anthropology? Observational Practices in 19th- Century British Human Sciences.” History of the Human Sciences 27 (2): 26–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Herbert
(1876) 1885Principles of Sociology. Vol. 1. Reprint, London & Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
St. André, James
2004 “ ‘But Do They Have a Notion of Justice?’ Staunton’s 1810 Translation of the Great Qing Code.” The Translator 10 (1): 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Standaert, Nicolas
2018 “Chinese Voices in the Rites Controversy: The Role of Christian Communities.” In The Rites Controversies in the Early Modern World, edited by Ines G. Županov, and Pierre Antoine Fabre, 50–67. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Tedlock, Barbara
1991 “From Participant Observation to Observation of Participation: The Emergence of Narrative Ethnography.” Journal of Anthropological Research 47 (1): 69–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The London and China Telegraph
1921 “Obituary – Mr. Geo. Jamieson (1843–1920)3 January 1921.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward Burnett
1871 (1970)Religion in Primitive Culture. Vol 2. Reprint, Gloucester: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Voget, Fred W.
1975A History of Ethnology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Xiang, Lanxin
2020The Quest for Legitimacy in Chinese Politics. A New Interpretation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yeh, Alice
2019 “The Hermeneutics of Silk: China and the Fabric of Christendom according to Martino Martini and the Early Modern Jesuit ‘Accommodationists.’” Comparative Studies in Society and History 61(2): 419–446. Accessed December 6, 2020. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Guanzi 張冠梓
2003 “Fa renleixue de lilun fangfa jiqi liubian” 法人類學的理論、方法及其流變 [Theory, Methods and Mutations of Legal Anthropology]. Guowai shehui kexue 國外社會科學 [Social Sciences Abroad] (5): 23–32.Google Scholar