The position of machine translation in translation studies
A definitional perspective
Attempts to define the concept of translation have historically both reflected and driven developments and
demarcations in the field. In light of the ubiquitous rise of machine translation (MT), the current article considers how
definitional approaches to translation that preceded the MT era, and were formulated with human translation in mind, correspond
with today’s MT. The article engages with two influential definitional strands in the discipline: a-priori prescriptive
definitions, and descriptive definitions focused on the reception of translations. The general compatibility of both definitional
approaches with MT, notwithstanding some empirical and moral criticisms pertaining to the first approach, encourages us to
conceive of MT as a full-fledged translational object of inquiry, fully at home in translation studies. Finally, the article
suggests that shifts in the professional status of human translators may lead to new definitions, aimed at differentiating human
from machine translation by focusing on the notion of (conscious) agency.
Article outline
- Definitions and disciplinary boundaries
- Definitions and their empirical focus
- A-priori prescriptive definitions, and how MT fits in
- Moral-ideological criticisms
- Descriptive definitional approaches, and how MT fits in
- What the future holds: The notion of (conscious) agency
-
References
References (45)
References
Aarseth, Espen J. 1997. Cybertext: Perspectives on Erdogic
Literature. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asscher, Omri. 2022. “The
Explanatory Power of Descriptive Translation Studies in the Machine Translation
Era.” Perspectives. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asscher, Omri and Ella Glikson. 2021. “Human
Evaluations of Machine Translation in an Ethically Charged Situation.” New Media &
Society. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bender, Emily M., Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. “On
the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too
Big?” In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness,
Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beteille, Andre. 2002. Sociology:
Essays on Approach and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blumczynski, Piotr. 2016. Ubiquitous
Translation. London and New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Catford, John C. 1965. A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An
Essay in Applied Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coyle, Martin, Peter Garside, Malcolm Kelsall, and John Peck. 1991. Encyclopedia
of Literature and
Criticism. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Delisle, Jean. 1988. Translation:
An Interpretive Approach. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eddebo, Johan. 2021. “The
Faustian Machine and the Chrome Lotus: On the Diversity of Perspectives on the Metaphysics of Artificial Intelligence with a
Particular Focus on the Contributions of Traditional non-Western Thought.” New Techno
Humanities 1(1–2): 100001. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gunkel, David J. 2020. An Introduction to Communication and
Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Polity Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halverson, Sandra L. 2013. “Translation.” In Handbook
of Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer, 378–384. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hermans, Theo. 2013. “What
is (not) Translation?” In The Routledge Companion to Translation
Studies, edited by Carmen Millán, and Francesca Bartrina, 75–87. London and New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jago, Arthur S. 2019. “Algorithms and
Authenticity.” Academy of Management
Discoveries 5(1): 38–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kenny, Dorothy. 2011. “The
Ethics of Machine Translation.” In Proceedings of the NZSTI Annual
Conference 2011, edited by Sybille Ferner, 121–131. Auckland: NZSTI. Accessed August 8, 2022. [URL]
Kenny, Dorothy, Félix do Carmo and Mary Nurminen. 2022. “Is
Machine Translation Translation?” EST Congress 2022 Abstract
Booklet, accessed August 8,
2022. [URL]
Koehn, Philipp. 2020. Neural
Machine Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koller, Werner. 1979. Einführung
in die Übersetzungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakew, Surafel, Matteo Negri, and Marco Turchi. 2020. “Low
Resource Neural Machine Translation: A Benchmark for Five African Languages,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:2003.14402. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Littau, Karin. 2016. “Translation
and the Materialities of Communication.” Translation
Studies 9(1): 82–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moorkens, Joss. 2017. “Under
Pressure: Translation in Times of
Austerity.” Perspectives 25(3): 464–477. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munday, Jeremy. 2009. “Issues
in Translation Studies.” In The Routledge Companion to Translation
Studies, edited by Jeremy Munday, 1–19. London and New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nida, Eugene A., and Charles R. Taber. 1969. The
Theory and Practice of
Translation. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nurminen, Mary, and Niko Papula. 2018. “Gist
MT Users: A Snapshot of the Use and Users of One Online MT
Tool.” In Proceedings of Journal of Business and Finance
Librarianship 411, 199–208. Alacant: Universitat d’Alacant. [URL]
Pym, Anthony. 2020. “Translator
Ethics: From Cooperation to Risk and Trust” (Translation Seminar
Series). Centre for Translation, Hong Kong Baptist University. [URL] (accessed 9 August 2022). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sebastián, Miguel Ángel and Fernando Rudy-Hiller. 2021. “First-person
Representations and Responsible Agency in
AI.” Synthese 199(3): 7061–7079. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spinzi, Cinzia, Alessandra Rizzo, and Marianna Lya Zummo (eds). 2019. Translation
or Transcreation? Discourses, Texts and
Visuals. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Susam-Sarajeva, Şebnem. 2014. “A
‘Multilingual’ and ‘International’ Translation
Studies?” In Cross-Cultural Transgressions: Research Models in
Translation Studies: Historical and Ideological Issues, edited by Theo Hermans, 193–207. Manchester: St. Jerome.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torres-Simón, Ester. 2019. “The
Concept of Translation in Wikipedia.” Translation
Studies 12(3): 273–287. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Toury, Gideon. 1985. “A
Rationale for Descriptive Translation Studies.” In The Manipulation
of Literature. Studies in Literary Translation, edited by Theo Hermans, 16–41. London and Sydney: Croom Helm.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tymoczko, Maria. 2010. Enlarging
Translation, Empowering Translators. London and New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Venuti, Lawrence. 1998. The
Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. London and New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vieira, Lucas Nunes, Carol O’Sullivan, Xiaochun Zhang, and Minako O’Hagan. 2022. “Machine
Translation in Society: Insights from UK Users.” Language Resources and
Evaluation: 1–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Binhua, and Yuan Ping. 2020. “Perceptions
of Machine Translation and Computer-Aided Translation by Professionals and the General Public: A Survey Study Based on
Articles in Professional Journals and in the Media.” International Journal of Translation,
Interpretation, and Applied Linguistics 2(2). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilss, Wolfram. 1982. The
Science of Translation: Problems and
Methods. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winfield, Alan F., Katina Michael, Jeremy Pitt, and Vanessa Evers. 2019. “Machine
Ethics: The Design and Governance of Ethical AI and Autonomous Systems.” Proceedings of the
IEEE 107(3): 509–517. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamada, Masaru. 2019. “The
Impact of Google Neural Machine Translation on Post-editing by Student Translators.” The
Journal of Specialised
Translation 311: 87–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rozmysłowicz, Tomasz
2024.
The politics of machine translation. Reprogramming translation studies.
Perspectives 32:3
► pp. 493 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.