Cover not available
Part of
Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences
Edited by Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten and Ana Vilacy Galucio
[Typological Studies in Language 105] 2014
► pp. 373–396

Argument marking and reference tracking in Mekens

| Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi-MCTI
This paper discusses argument marking and reference tracking in Mekens complex clauses and their correlation to information structure. The distribution of pronominal arguments in Mekens simple clauses follows an absolutive pattern with main verbs. Complex clauses maintain the morphological absolutive argument marking, but show a nominative pattern with respect to argument reference tracking, since transitive and intransitive subjects function as syntactic pivots. The language extends the use of argument-marking verb morphology to control the reference of discourse participants across clauses. This system of reference tracking also interacts with the encoding of sentence topics, expressed in the periphery of the clause in Mekens. However it will be demonstrated that subject is the important notion for the Mekens system of reference tracking. Keywords: Mekens; Tupian languages; argument marking; reference tracking
Published online: 5 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.105.13gal
References (18)
References
Bontkes, Carolyn. 1985. Subordinate clauses in Suruí. In Porto Velho Workpapers, David L. Fortune (ed.), 189-207. Brasília: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Clements, George. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10(2): 141-77.Google Scholar
Crevels, Mily & Van der Voort, Hein. 2008. The Guaporé-Mamoré region as a linguistic area. In From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 90], Pieter Muysken (ed.), 151-179. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
Gabas Jr., Nilson. 1999. A Grammar of Karo. PhD dissertation. Santa Barbara CA: University of California at Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Galucio, Ana Vilacy. 2001. The Morphosyntax of Mekens (Tupi). PhD dissertation, University of Chicago IL.Google Scholar
2002. Word order and constituent structure in Mekens. Revista da ABRALIN 1(2): 51-74.Google Scholar
2011. Subordinate adverbial constructions in Mekens. In Subordination in Native South American Languages [Typological Studies in Language 97], Rik van Gijn, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds), 25-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John & Pamela Munro. 1983. Switch Reference and Universal Grammar: Proceedings of a Symposium on Switch Reference and Universal Grammar , Winnipeg , May 1981 [Typological Studies in Language 2], Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry & Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3(1):19-37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Cheryl. 1998. Comparative Tupi-Guarani morphosyntax. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 4, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 491-618. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Haspelmath, Martin & Bickel, Balthasar (eds). 2008.The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for Interlinear Morpheme-by-Morpheme Glosses. Leipzig: Department of Linguistics of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and of the University of Leipzig. [URL] (July 2012).Google Scholar
McCready, Eric. 2007. The dynamics of a Japanese reflexive pronoun. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3609], Akito Sakurai, Kôiti Hasida & Katsumi Nitta (eds), 405-415. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Denny. 1984. Syntax of the Gavião Indians of Rondônia, Brazil. PhD dissertation, The City University of New York NY.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. 1984/85. Relações internas na família linguística Tupí-Guaraní. Revista de Antropologia 27/28: 33-53.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley. 1993. Switch-Reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony. 1983. Switch-reference, syntactic organization, and rhetorical structure in central Yup’ik Eskimo. In Switch Reference and Universal Grammar [Typological Studies in Language 2], John Haiman & Pamela Munro (eds), 291-315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Singerman, Adam Roth
2021. The clausal organization of Tuparí, an indigenous Brazilian language. Acta Linguistica Academica 67:4 ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Haig, Geoffrey & Diana Forker
2018. Agreement in grammar and discourse: A research overview. Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 715 ff. DOI logo
van Gijn, Rik
2016. Switch reference in Western South America. In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.