Article published in:Perspectives on Semantic Roles
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Heiko Narrog
[Typological Studies in Language 106] 2014
► pp. 99–150
Plotting diachronic semantic maps
The role of metaphors
The paper discusses patterns of polysemy among semantic roles in cross-linguistic perspective, and the possible way in which such polysemies come into being through meaning extension of morphemes (cases and adposition) that encode semantic roles. Semantic extension is described based on commonly assumed metaphors, which are thought to account for frequent polysemies, such as the Companion Metaphor in the case of the Comitative-Instrument polysemy. Taking space as a basic domain, metaphors are shown to provide links among different cognitive domains, which account for the position of semantic roles relative to one another in the ensuing semantic map. Such map incorporates diachronic information, assuming that metaphorical extension reflects diachronic developments. Although the specific focus of the paper concerns the contribution of metaphors to semantic extension, it is also shown that other processes are involved, such as analogy and various kinds of metonymy, which can account for some specific patterns of polysemy among semantic roles. Keywords: Metaphor; semantic maps; polysemy; meaning extension
Published online: 19 August 2014
Cited by 9 other publications
Brucale, Luisa & Egle Mocciaro
Fedriani, Chiara & Michele Prandi
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Petros Karatsareas
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
Lewis, Diana M.
Stolz, Thomas, Nataliya Levkovych & Aina Urdze
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
2004 Experiencer datives in Kannada. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), 1–24.
Bennett, David C.
2004 The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), 77–112.
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata
Blake, Barry J.
Blansitt Jr., Edward L.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
Comrie, Bernard & van den Berg, Helma
Creissel, Denis & Mounole, Céline
2011 Animacy and spatial cases: Typological tendencies and the case of Basque. In Kittilä, Västi & Ylikoski (eds), 155–182.
Daniel, Michael A. & Ganenkov, Dmitri S.
Dik, Simon C.
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine, Thomason, Olga A. & de Swart, Peter
Erelt, Mati & Metslang, Helle
Ganenkov, Dmitry S.
Geeraerts, Dirk & Cuyckens, Hubert
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
Itkonen, Erkki, Joki, Aulis J. & Peltola, Reino
2010 Beneficiary coding in Finnish. In Kittilä & Zúñiga (eds), 245–270.
Kittilä, Seppo & Zúñiga, Fernando
2010 Introduction: Benefaction and malefaction form a cross-linguistic perspective. In Zúñiga & Kittilä (eds),1–28.
Kittilä, Seppo, Västi, Katja & Ylikoski, Jussi
1977 Linguistic Gestalts. In Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 236–287. Chicago IL: CLS.
Lakoff, George & Turner, Mark
Lakoff, George, Espenson, Jane & Schwartz, Alan
1991 The Master Metaphor List. http://araw.mede.uic.edu/~alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf
Langacker, Ronald W.
Lehmann, Christian & Yong-Min Shin
Leumann, Manu, Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Szantyr, Anton
2011 Human landmarks in spatial expressions: From Latin to Romance. In Kittilä, Västi & Ylikoski (eds), 207–234.
2013a The mapping of space onto the domain of benefaction: Beneficiaries that are not Recipients and their sources. Paper read at the 10th International Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology (Leipzig, 15–18 August 2013).
2013b The dative of agent in Indo-European languages. Paper read at the Workshop historisch-vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (Salzburg, 22–24 November 2013).
Forthcoming. External possessor constructions in Indo-European. In Reconstructing Syntax. Jóhanna Barðdal, Eugenio Lujan & Spike Gildea (eds) Leiden Brill
Luraghi, Silvia & Sausa, Eleonora
Forthcoming. Hate and anger, love and desire: The construal of emotions in Homeric Greek. In Historical Linguistics 2013, Dag T. Haug (ed) Amsterdam Benjamins
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
Matisoff, James A.
Nikitina, Tatiana & Spano, Marianna
Forthcoming. ‘Behind’ and ‘in front’ in Ancient Greek: A case study in orientation asymmetry. In Ort und Bewegung: Linguistischen Arbeiten zu Sprachen der Antike, Silvia Kutscher & Daniel Werning (eds) Berlin Mouton de Gruyter
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda L.
2007 Metonymy. In Geeraerts & Cuyckens (eds), 236–263.
Pompeo, Flavia & Carmela Benvenuto, Maria
Rice, Sally & Kabata, Kaori
Rodriguez Aristar, Anthony
Sands, Kristina & Lyle Campbell
2010 The role of benefactives and related notions in the typology of purpose clauses. In Zúñiga & Kittlä (eds), 121–146.
Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia & Urdze, Aina
2007 Schematicity. In Geeraerts & Cuyckens (eds), 82–116.
Tyler, Andrea & Evans, Vyvyan
2007 Spatial semantics. In Geeraerts & Cuyckens (eds), 318–350.